Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of methionine and glucosamine conjugation on the anticancer activity of aromatic dinitrobenzamide mustards

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Certain nutrients viz., glucose and methionine are consumed more by cancer cells. Hence, an anticancer agent conjugated to them may render more toxicity in cancer cells due to higher uptake. To probe this effect, methionine and glucosamine were conjugated to a series of well-known aromatic dinitrobenzamide mustards. The in vitro cytotoxicity studies performed to probe the effect of such conjugation showed that the conjugation of methionine and glucosamine to one of the dinitrobenzamide mustard led to more toxicity selectively in human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cell lines. However, effect of functionalization cannot be generalized. Hypoxia based studies showed that IC50 value did not show much change from normoxic condition which is encouraging as many drugs deactivate in hypoxia. Among the glucosamine and methionine conjugated dinitrobenzamide mustards, the methionine conjugated aromatic dinitrobenzamide mustard of 2-chlorobenzoic acid is the most effective one. It acts by inducing apoptosis through G2/M phase arrest and encouragingly, is much less toxic to nontumorigenic human embryonic kidney (HEK-293T) and mouse embryonic fibroblast (NIH 3T3) cell lines in vitro.

In vitro studies show that conjugation of methionine and glucosamine to certain dinitrobenzamide mustards may enhance selectivity and increase toxicity against breast adenocarcinoma as compared to nontumorigenic HEK-293T and mouse fibroblast NIH 3T3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mittal S, Tsume Y, Landowski C P, Lee K D, Hilfinger J M and Amidon G L 2007 Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 67 752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gatenby Robert A and Gillies Robert J 2008 Nat. Rev. Cancer 8 56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vistica D T, Toal J N and Rabinovitz M 1978 Biochem. Pharmacol. 27 2865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Begleiter A, Lam H Y P, Grover J, Froese E and Goldenberg G J 1979 Cancer Res. 39 353

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldenberg G J, Lam H Y P and Begleiter A 1979 J. Biol. Chem. 254 1057

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Begleiter A, Froese E K and Goldenberg G J 1980 Cancer Lett. 10 243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vistica D T 1983 Pharmacol. Ther. 22 379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Epner D E 2001 J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 20 443S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fong Y, Marano M A, Moldawer L L, Wei H, Calvano S E, Kenney J S, Allison A C, Cerami A, Shires G T and Lowry S F 1990 J. Clin. Invest. 85 1896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenblatt S, Clowes G H A J., George B C, Hirsch E and Lindberg B 1983 Arch. Surg. 118 167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pauleit D, Floeth F, Hamacher K, Riemenschneider Markus J, Reifenberger G, Muller H W, Zilles K, Coenen Heinz H and Langen K 2005 J. Brain 128 678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pirotte B, Goldman S, Massager N, David P, Wikler D, Vandesteene A, Salmon I, Brotchi J and Levivier M 2004 J. Nucl. Med. 45 1293

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhattacharyya S, Sarkar A, Dey S K, Jose G P, Mukherjee A and Sengupta T K 2013 Dalton Trans. 42 11709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Patra A K, Dhar S, Nethaji M and Chakravarty A R 2005 Dalton Trans. 896

  15. Bhattacharyya S, Sarkar A, Dey S K and Mukherjee A 2014 J. Inorg. Biochem. 140 131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bui T and Thompson C B 2006 Cancer Cell 9 419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim J W and Dang C V 2006 Cancer Res. 66 8927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Warburg O 1956 Science 123 309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Calvaresi E C and Hergenrother P J 2013 Chem. Sci. 4 2319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Parry D M and Pedersen P L 1983 J. Biol. Chem. 258 10904

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Graham M M, Spence A M, Muzi M and Abbott G L 1989 J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 9 315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Isselbacher K J 1972 New Engl. J. Med. 286 929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pellei M, Papini G, Trasatti A, Giorgetti M, Tonelli D, Minicucci M, Marzano C, Gandin V, Aquilanti G, Dolmella A and Santini C 2011 Dalton Trans. 40 9877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Arbuckle M I, Kane S, Porter L M, Seatter M J and Gould G W 1996 Biochemistry 35 16519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Singhal T, Narayanan Tanjore K, Jain V, Mukherjee J and Mantil J 2008 Mol. Imaging Biol. 10 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mehravi B, Ardestani Mehdi S, Damercheli M, Soltanghoraee H, Ghanaldarlaki N, Alizadeh Ali M, Oghabian Mohammad A, Shirazi Maryam S, Mahernia S and Amanlou M 2014 Mol. Imaging Biol. 16 519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Palmer B D, Wilson W R, Anderson R F, Boyd M and Denny W A 1996 J. Med. Chem. 39 2518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Palmer B D, Wilson W R, Atwell G J, Schultz D, Xu X Z and Denny W A 1994 J. Med. Chem. 37 2175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brown J M and Wilson W R 2004 Nat. Rev. Cancer 4 437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Denny W A and Wilson W R 1986 J. Med. Chem. 29 879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Palmer B D, Wilson W R, Cliffe S and Denny W A 1992 J. Med. Chem. 35 3214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Palmer B D, Wilson W R, Pullen S M and Denny W A 1990 J. Med. Chem. 33 112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Siim B G, Denny W A and Wilson W R 1997 Oncol. Res. 9 357

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Helsby N A, Wheeler S J, Pruijn F B, Palmer B D, Yang S, Denny W A and Wilson W R 2003 Chem. Res. Toxicol. 16 469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Perrin D D and Armarego W L F 2003 In Purification of Laboratory Chemicals 5th ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann: Burlington, USA)

  36. Hosangadi B and Dave R H 1996 Tetrahedron Lett. 37 6375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cunha A C, Pereira L O R, De Souza M C B V and Ferreira V F 1999 J. Chem. Educ. 76 79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Vijayaraghavan S, Jing B, Vrablik T, Chou T C and Regen S L 2003 Bioconjugate Chem. 14 667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Scudiero D A, Shoemaker R H, Paull K D, Monks A, Tierney S, Nofziger T H, Currens M J, Seniff D and Boyd M R 1988 Cancer Res. 48 4827

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Connell M J, Walworth N C and Carr A M 2000 Trends Cell Biol. 10 296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Samuel T, Weber H O and Funk J O 2002 Cell Cycle 1 162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Dronkert M L G and Kanaar R 2001 Mutat. Res. DNA Repair 486 217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ben-Yehoyada M, Wang Lily C, Kozekov Ivan D, Rizzo Carmelo J, Gottesman Max E and Gautier 2009 J. Mol. Cell 35 704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Vermes I, Haanen C, Steffens-Nakken H and Reutelingsperger C 1995 J. Immunol. Methods 184 39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank DST-India for funding (vide Project Grant no. SR/S1/IC-36/2010). We are also thankful to IISER Kolkata for financial and infrastructural support. We also want to acknowledge Dr. Jayasri Das Sarma and Dr. Tapas K Sengupta for providing us the human cancer cell lines. SK wants to thank UGC-India for providing a fellowship. SB sincerely thanks CSIR-India for a research fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ARINDAM MUKHERJEE.

Additional information

Supplementary Information (SI)

The supplementary material includes synthetic schemes, NMR data of synthesized compounds, NMR and HRMS of stability studies and plots of MTT assay. The supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at www.ias.ac.in/chemsci.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOC 23.6 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

KARMAKAR, S., BHATTACHARYYA, S. & MUKHERJEE, A. Effect of methionine and glucosamine conjugation on the anticancer activity of aromatic dinitrobenzamide mustards. J Chem Sci 128, 401–413 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-015-1019-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-015-1019-3

Keywords

Navigation