Although extensively investigated in inflammatory conditions, the role of pro-inflammatory microRNAs (miRNAs), miR-155 and miR-146a, has not been well-studied in retinal degenerative diseases. We therefore aimed to explore the role and regulation of these miRNA in the degenerating retina, with a focus on miR-155. C57BL/6J mice were subjected to photo-oxidative damage for up to 5 days to induce focal retinal degeneration. MiR-155 expression was quantified by qRT-PCR in whole retina, serum, and small-medium extracellular vesicles (s-mEVs), and a PrimeFlow™ assay was used to identify localisation of miR-155 in retinal cells. Constitutive miR-155 knockout (KO) mice and miR-155 and miR-146a inhibitors were utilised to determine the role of these miRNA in the degenerating retina. Electroretinography was employed as a measure of retinal function, while histological quantification of TUNEL+ and IBA1+ positive cells was used to quantify photoreceptor cell death and infiltrating immune cells, respectively. Upregulation of miR-155 was detected in retinal tissue, serum and s-mEVs in response to photo-oxidative damage, localising to the nucleus of a subset of retinal ganglion cells and glial cells and in the cytoplasm of photoreceptors. Inhibition of miR-155 showed increased function from negative controls and a less pathological pattern of IBA1+ cell localisation and morphology at 5 days photo-oxidative damage. While neither dim-reared nor damaged miR-155 KO animals showed retinal histological difference from controls, following photo-oxidative damage, miR-155 KO mice showed increased a-wave relative to controls. We therefore consider miR-155 to be associated with the inflammatory response of the retina in response to photoreceptor-specific degeneration.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short (~ 21–25 base pair), non-coding RNA regulators that are central to all biological processes . In mammals, miRNAs are primarily transcribed into primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) within the nucleus where they are cleaved and exported into the cytoplasm to undergo further processing into the mature strand. Typically, regulation of mRNAs by a mature miRNA occurs through incorporation into Argonaute (AGO) proteins, most commonly AGO2, of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) [2,3,4]. Although the mechanism of miRNA regulation and their targets under different biological and pathological conditions are still being elucidated, miRNAs have the capacity to simultaneously repress multiple mRNA targets within a specific process, such as oxidative stress and cellular inflammation [5, 6]. They are therefore ideal therapeutic targets for controlling dysregulated or overactive biological pathways [7, 8], such as occurs in retinal degenerations including age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Consequently, there is a growing focus on miRNAs as both diagnostics and therapeutics in chronic inflammatory conditions such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [7, 9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
miR-155 and miR-146a are two well-characterised miRNAs known for their roles in angiogenesis, oxidative stress and inflammation [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. With approximately 45% sequence homology between them, miR-155 and miR-146a have been shown to act independently in and/or in tangent through the modulation of different processes involved in the innate immune response, including toll-like receptor (TLR), cytokine and complement signalling [21, 24,25,26]. As the Y402H mutation of the complement factor H (CFH) is the greatest genetic predictor of AMD development and severity , combinational suppression of miR-155 and miR-146a may be of particular interest due to their partially overlapping binging sites in the CFH mRNA 3′ untranslated region (UTR) [24, 28]. Unsurprisingly, both miR-155 and miR-146a have been shown to be upregulated in the blood and retinal tissue of AMD patients and animal models of retinal degeneration [29,30,31,32]. While the precise mechanism of miR-155 and miR-146a regulation and their influence on disease progression in the retina remains unclear, there is mounting evidence for a role in processes including mononuclear phagocyte (MP)–mediated inflammation [16, 18, 33, 34].
The activation and migration of MPs is a hallmark of many late-stage retinal degenerative diseases such as glaucoma , diabetic retinopathy , retinitis pigmentosa [37, 38] and AMD [39, 40]. Within the retina, the MP population is comprised of resident microglia, and in the degenerative state, further encompasses infiltrating blood-borne macrophages. MPs exhibit high plasticity, adopting a range of phenotypes along a functional and morphological spectrum. ‘Classical’ activation of MPs is amalgamated with the upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, complement components and a dysregulation of modulatory molecules such as miRNAs [34, 39, 41]. The upregulation of miR-155, together with miR-146a, is consistently associated with this ‘classically’ activated MP profile; however, the immunomodulatory role of miR-146a in the MP response has not been clearly defined [41,42,43,44,45,46]. Regardless, due to their typical expression profile in degenerations, miR-155 and miR-146a have been suggested as therapeutic targets in numerous inflammation-associated conditions, such as systemic lupus erythematosus , psoriasis , rheumatoid arthritis and neurodegenerative conditions including, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Alzheimer’s disease and AMD [24, 26, 31, 49,50,51].
In this study we investigated the role of miR-155 and miR-146a in both the homeostatic and degenerating retina using a rodent photo-oxidative damage model, a light-induced model causing central photoreceptor cell death and increased inflammation . We demonstrated that inhibition of miR-155 and miR-146a in combination results in loss of retinal function and increased inflammation. Subsequently, these miRNAs were investigated independently. While miR-146a did not alter the retinal response, inhibition of miR-155 resulted in functional protection, increased photoreceptor viability and reduced inflammation. We corroborated these findings through assessment of a miR-155 KO mouse, further demonstrating preservation of function and photoreceptor viability. MPs appeared to be the primary source of miR-155 in the degenerating retina degenerating retina but we also highlight the possibility of miR-155 being delivered to photoreceptors via small to medium extracellular vesicle (s-mEV). Consequently, we consider miR-155 to demonstrate a role in the inflammatory response of the degenerating retina, contributing to cell death and loss of function.
Animal Handling and Photo-oxidative Damage
All experiments were conducted in accordance with the ARVO Statement for Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The study was approved by the Australian National University (ANU) Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (Application ID: 2017/41). C57BL/6J (Stock No: 000664) and a miR-155 KO mouse line, C57BL/6-Mir155<tm1.1Ggard>/J (Stock No: 007745) from Jackson Laboratories (MA, USA) were utilised in this study. Mice were raised under dim (5 lx), 12-h cyclic light conditions, and were used as dim-reared controls in this study.
To induce photo-oxidative damage, adult (P60) C57BL/6J and miR-155 KO were exposed to 1, 3, or 5 days of 100 K lux natural LED with free access to food and water as previously described .
Intravitreal Injections of miR-155 Inhibitors
miR-155-5p and miR-146a-5p inhibitors and a negative, scrambled control miRNA mimics (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used for intravitreal injection. Prior to administration miRNAs were encapsulated into a cationic lipid-based transfection agent (Invivofectamine 3.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a total concentration of 1 μg/μl, as described in a previous publication . Intravitreal injections were performed according to previously described methodology . At day 2 of a 5-day photo-oxidative damage paradigm, 1 μl of miRNA inhibitor or negative control miRNA-invivofectamine formulation was injected into both eyes of C57BL/6J mice. Animals were recovered for approximately 4 h prior to continuing photo-oxidative damage.
Tissue Collection and Processing
Animals were euthanised by administration of CO2. Rodent eyes and retinas for histological processing and molecular analysis respectively were collected and processed as described in a previous publication . Whole-mount retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) was collected from the whole eyes under a dissection microscope. The cornea and lens were removed, exposing the retina; the retina was then gently separated from the RPE/choroid using forceps and the RPE/choroid was collected for analysis.
Whole blood was collected from the left eye via retro-orbital bleeds. Serum was separated by clotting samples at RT for 20 min followed by centrifugation at 1000×g for 10 min at 4 °C.
Rodent retinas of adult C57BL/6J mice were digested using the Neural Tissue Dissociation Kit - Postnatal Neurons (Miltenyi Biotec, NRW, Germany, 130-094-802) according to the manufacturer’s instructions for manual dissociation of retinas. Dissociated cells were re-suspended in a 1% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MS, USA, AM2616) in Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 10010023) solution and passed through a 4% BSA cushion by centrifugation at 100×g for 10 min at 4 °C.
Anti-mouse, fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies, FITC-Vimentin (1:5, Santa Cruz, TX, US, sc-32,322 FITC), PE-Rhodopsin (1:2500, Santa Cruz, sc-57,432 PE), PE/CY7-CD11b (1:500, Biolegend, CA, USA, 101215) and BV605-CD90.2 (1:250, Thy1.2, Biolegend, 140317) were stained at room temperature for 30 min to identify retinal cell populations, as per the PrimeFlow™ assay protocol. DAPI (stored at 1 mg/ml, used 1:10000, Sigma-Aldrich, D9542-1MG) and 7-AAD (1:1000, Biolegend, 420403) were added immediately prior to flow cytometry as nuclear stains for identification of viable cells.
To detect miR-155 in retinal cells against surface markers, PrimeFlow™ assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 88-18005-210) with microRNA pre-treatment (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 88-18006) protocol was performed according the manufacturer’s guidelines and using a type 1, Alexa Fluor 647-labelled miR-155-5p (Thermo Fisher Scientific, VM1-10229-PF), and miR-124-3p (Thermo Fisher Scientific, VMI-10271-PF) as a biological control.
Data was acquired by both standard flow cytometry (BD LSRFortessa™) using the BD FACSDiva Software (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA) and imaging flow cytometry (Amnis® ImagStream®) using the Amnis INSPIRE® Software (Luminex corporation, TX, USA). Data was analysed using the FlowJo (BD Biosciences) and Amnis IDEAS® (Luminex corporation) software respectively. Cytoplasmic spot counting was performed by creating a cytoplasmic mask of the intracellular, DAPI-negative area of rhodopsin positive cells. This mask was combined with the spot counting feature to obtain counts of miR-155 expression within the cytoplasm.
Small–Medium Extracellular Vesicle Isolation
S-mEVs were isolated from papain-digested retinas by sequential ultracentrifugation following the MISEV2018 guidelines for studies of extracellular vesicles  and adapted for retina . Briefly, retinas were mechanically and enzymatically dissociated in a digestion solution of 2.5 mg/ml papain (Worthington Biochemicals), 200 U DNAse I (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) 5 μg/ml catalase (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 μg/ml gentamycin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 5 μg/ml superoxide dismutase (Worthington Biochemicals) in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Enzymatic digestion was performed at 37 °C for 8 min, followed by 20 min at 8 °C, to allow for s-mEV release. Following digestion, tissue suspensions were neutralised by dilution in 11.5 ml of HBSS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and centrifuged at 1000×g for 10 min at 4 °C to allow for the removal of cells and debris. The supernatant was transferred to 14 × 89 mm Beckman Ultra-Clear ultracentrifuge tubes and spun down at 10,000×g for 30 min in a Beckman Coulter Optima XE-100 fitted with a SW41Ti Rotor. This step allowed for the precipitation of large EVs (lEV) and remaining cell debris.
The s-mEV-containing supernatant was transferred to new ultracentrifuge tubes and centrifuged for a further 1.5 h at 150,000×g. The supernatant was carefully decanted, and the s-mEV pellet was resuspended via tituration for 1 min. For s-mEV RNA analysis, the s-mEV pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of RNase A at 10 μg/ml (EN0531, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C to remove external RNA contamination. Following RNase treatment, s-mEV RNA was extracted using a mirVana miRNA isolation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Retinal function was assessed using full-field scotopic electroretinography (ERG) as described previously . Briefly, mice were dark-adapted overnight, anesthetised by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazil (10 mg/kg), and pupils dilated with a single drop of 1% atropine sulphate. A single- or twin-flash paradigm was used to elicit mixed (rod and cone) responses, respectively. Flash stimuli for mixed responses were provided by an LED-based system (FS-250A Enhanced Ganzfeld; Photometric Solutions International, Huntingdale VIC, Australia), across a stimulus intensity range of 6.3 log cd s m−2 (range, − 4.4 to 1.9 log cd s m−2).
Haematoxylin and Eosin Staining
Thawed retinal cryosections were moved through an ethanol gradient of 95% for 2 min and 70% for 3 min. Slides were rinsed in milli-Q water and covered with Harris Haematoxylin solution (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 min. Sections were rinsed in Scott’s tap water (2 g/l sodium bicarbonate and 20 g/l magnesium sulphate in milli-Q water), and Eosin Y counterstain (Sigma-Aldrich) was applied for 2.5 min. Slides were dehydrated through an ethanol gradient starting at 70% for 3 min, 95% for 1 min and 100% for 1 min. Slides were coverslipped using DPX (Sigma-Aldrich).
Retinal cryosections were labelled for cell death using a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) kit (Roche Applied Science), as described previously . For quantification of photoreceptor cell death, TUNEL+ cells in the outer nuclear layer (ONL) were counted along the full length of the retinal section, cut in the parasagittal plane. Cumulative cell death was determined by ONL thickness measurements at 600-μm increments from the optic nerve head along the full length of the retinal cryosection. For each animal, counts/measures were performed in technical duplicate, averaging for each experimental group.
Immunohistochemical analysis of retinal cryosections was performed as described previously . Microglia/macrophages were immunolabelled with primary mouse anti-rabbit ionised calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (IBA1; 1:500, cat. 019-19741, Wako, Osaka, Japan) and secondary goat anti-rabbit Alexa 488 (1:500, cat. A11034, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Quantification of IBA1+ cells (marker of retinal MPs) was performed across the superior and inferior retina of cryosections. The number of IBA1+ cells in the outer retina was quantified as the total counts in the ONL and subretinal space. Nuclear layers were visualised by staining cryosections with the DNA-specific dye, Hoechst 33342 solution (20 mM, 1:10000, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The ONL thickness was measured at increments of 600 μm across the length of the retinal cryosection, including the optic nerve head.
RPE integrity was determined by staining RPE/choroid whole mounts with an Alexa Fluor™ 594 conjugated phalloidin probe (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A12381) for 2 h at room temperature (RT).
Fluorescence was visualised and captured by using a ZEISS LSM800 with Airyscan Super-resolution confocal microscope (ZEISS Microscopy, BW, Germany). Excitation wavelengths of 488 nm (green), 561 nm (red) and 358 nm (Hoechst) were used for image acquisition. Images were obtained using uniform gain settings and processed using the ZEISS Zen (blue edition) software and ImageJ (NIH, MA, US). H&E staining was captured using the brightfield setting of a laser-scanning A1 confocal microscope (Nikon Instruments, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). High-magnification images of retinal histology were taken as representative images from the superior retina at 500 μm from the optic nerve head as reported previously .
Measures of miRNA and mRNA Expression
Extraction and purification of mRNA was performed on isolated retinas using a combination of TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., MA, USA) and the RNAqueous Total RNA isolation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to previously published methodology . Extraction and purification of miRNA was performed using the miRVana miRNA isolation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
From a mRNA template, cDNA synthesis was performed using the Tetro cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline Reagents, London, UK) as described previously . From a miRNA template, cDNA was synthesised using the TaqMan MicroRNA RT kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the appropriate RT Single TaqMan® Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Table 1). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using TaqMan hydrolysis probes (Table 1). Reactions were run on a QuantStudio Flex 12 K instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and with each sample in technical duplicate. The average cycle threshold (Ct) values were used to determine expression. Percent expression change was calculated using the comparative Ct (ΔΔCt) method, where targets were normalised to the expression of a reference of Gapdh and Sdha for mRNA and small nuclear RNA U6 and small nucleolar RNA 234 for miRNA as per previous analyses [59, 60]. The average Ct for each probe in different tissues is included in Supplementary Table 1).
Identification of AGO Bound Targets
Potential miR-155-5p mRNA targets were elucidated based on previously published Argonaute immunoprecipitation (Ago IP) data . Potential targets were selected based on demonstration of a significant negative log-fold change in response to photo-oxidative damage determined using a linear model fit and Bayes adjustment of p values. The mRNA database is available from BioProject (accession ID: PRJNA606092).
Murine photoreceptor–derived 661W cells (kindly gifted by Dr. Muayyad R. Al-Ubaidi, Dept. of Cell Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Centre, Oklahoma City, OK, USA) , murine brain–derived microglia C8B4 (American Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC), Virginia, USA) , immortalised human Müller-like MIO-M1 (Moorfield’s Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK)  and immortalised human RPE-like aRPE19 (ATCC)  were validated for species authenticity (CellBank, Sydney, Australia), and were all used for experimental purposes within 10 passages. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), l-glutamine (3 mM), sodium pyruvate (1 mM) and glucose (25 mM) and grown in flasks in a humidified incubator set to 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Cell Culture Stimulation
A total of 661W photoreceptor-like cells were seeded in 24-well plates (Nunc, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) at 2.5 × 105 cells/well, 36 h prior to photo-oxidative damage exposure. Twenty-four hours following seeding, culture medium was replaced with a reduced (1%) serum medium of 1% FBS. A total of 661W cells were exposed to 15,000 lx light (2.2 mW/cm2; irradiance measured with PM100D optical power metre, THORLABS, NJ, USA) from two white fluorescent lamps (2 × 10 W T4 tri-phosphor 6500 K daylight fluorescent tubes; Crompton, NSW, Australia), for 5 h with 5% CO2 at 37 °C to induce photo-oxidative damage. For dim control cells, one plate was completely wrapped in aluminium foil to avoid light exposure. For air/gas exchange, six small incisions were cut on the aluminium foil. Cells were then washed with 1× PBS and extracted using the mirVana™ miRNA extraction kit according to the manufacturers’ protocol.
C8-B4 cells and MIO-M1 cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 15 × 104 and 2 × 104 respectively. Twenty-four hours following seeding, the culture medium was replaced with a reduced (1%) serum medium. Thirty-six hours following seeding, cells were challenged with a cytokine cocktail of 10 ng/ml interleukin 1β (IL-1β; R&D Systems, MN, USA), 10 ng/ml tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α; R&D Systems) and 100 U/ml interferon γ (IFN-γ; R&D Systems), as reported previously , for 24 h to elicit an inflammatory response. Following cytokine stimulation, adherent cells were washed with 1× PBS and extracted using the mirVana™ miRNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
3′UTR CFH Luciferase Assay
A luciferase assay was performed on HeLa cells using a commercially available vector containing the luciferase gene fused to the human CFH 3′UTR (CFH LightSwitch 3′UTR Reporter GoClone; Switchgear Genomics, CA, USA) and a pLightSwitch-3′UTR Luciferase assay system (Switchgear Genomics), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Control cells were transfected with a scrambled-sequence miRNA.
HeLa cells were seeded in a 96-well plate (5000 cells per well), cultured for 24 h, following which the pLightSwitch Luciferase assay system was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Luciferase activity was measured using an Infinite 200 plate reader (TECAN, Grödig, Austria).
For experiments compared between two groups, data was assessed for normal distribution using a Shapiro-Wilk test, and statistical significance was determined by an unpaired Student’s t test. For group comparisons, a 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test was used to determine significance. For ERG and ONL thickness analysis, a 2-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons was applied. All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism V7 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical significance was determined by p < 0.05.
Targeted Inhibition of miR-155 Alleviated Degeneration in the Photo-oxidative Damage Retina
Previous findings have identified immune cell infiltration into the ONL to increase at 3 days photo-oxidative damage, reaching peak infiltration at 5 days . Therefore, to target the MP inflammatory response, a miR-155 inhibitor or a negative scrambled miRNA control was injected intravitreally into mouse retinas at day 2 of a 5-day photo-oxidative damage experimental paradigm. Retinas treated with miR-155 inhibitor had improved function resulting from negative miRNA inhibitor–injected controls, as indicated by a significantly lower amplitude across all flash intensities for both the a-wave and b-wave responses (Fig. 1a–b). The protective effect of miR-155 inhibitors was further investigated, which typically show a progressive increase in TUNEL and a decrease in ONL thickness over the period of retinal degeneration . There was no significant reduction in the number of TUNEL+ cells in the ONL (Fig. 1c–e). However, there was significantly less ONL thinning in miR-155 inhibitor–injected retinas compared with that in scrambled miRNA inhibitor controls (Fig. 1f), indicating a cumulative protection against photoreceptor cell death.
IBA1+ immunostaining displayed no decrease in the total number of MPs recruited to the outer retina between mice treated with miR-155 inhibitors and scrambled miRNA inhibitor controls (Fig. 1g–i). However, there were proportionately more IBA1+ cells in the outer retina of miR-155 inhibited retinas (average of 28% compared with 10%) that exhibited a ramified, homeostatic morphology (Fig. 1j). There was also a greater number of IBA1+ cells present in both the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and outer plexiform layer (OPL) in the miR-155 inhibitor–treated retinas (Fig. 1k).
As Cfh is a reported target of miR-155, complement targets were investigated by qRT-PCR demonstrating no significant difference in the expression of Cfh or the downstream molecule C3 (Fig. 1n). Therefore, we used AGO2 immunoprecipitation to identify AGO2-bound potential alternative targets of miR-155 (Supplementary Table 2). Three predicted targets, Bdnf, Antxr2 and Il-6st, were chosen for further investigation based on a significant expression change following photo-oxidative damage in addition to potential roles in neuroprotection , angiogenesis  and cytokine signalling  respectively. These targets were explored in conjunction with the pro-inflammatory cytokine Tnfa and the immunomodulatory Il-10 and Socs1. In the miR-155-inhibited retina, significantly lower levels of Tnfa and Il-10 were recorded by qRT-PCR, when compared with the negative inhibited control (Fig. 1n). However, there was no significant increase in the levels of Socs1 or the AGO2-bound potential targets Bdnf, Il-6st or Antxr2 (Fig. 1n).
As non-traditional immune cells, RPEs have been shown to express miR-155 under stress . Here, the relationship between miR-155 and the degenerating RPE was further explored by measuring RPE integrity in the photo-oxidative damage model following miR-155 inhibition. There was no significant decrease in the lesion size or the number of adherent subretinal MPs in the RPE following inhibition of miR-155 compared with negative inhibitor controls (Supplementary Fig. 1). Furthermore, there was no change in IBA1+ cells or gene expression for the measured targets. This suggests that although inhibition of miR-155 demonstrates functional protection in the retina, no protective effect appears to extend to the RPE.
MiR-155 KO Retinas Do Not Exhibit Functional or Obvious Histological Differences
A miR-155 KO mouse was used to further demonstrate the role of miR-155 in the retina, and retinal morphology including the thickness of retinal layers was assessed compared with aged-matched C57BL/6J WT controls (Fig. 2a–d). Results showed no significant difference in the thickness of retinal layers between WT and miR-155 KO mice (Fig. 2e). Additionally, no difference in the number of rows of photoreceptor nuclei in the ONL was observed (Fig. 2f). As miR-155 is known to influence the activation state of MPs [44, 69], the number of IBA1+ cells in the plexiform layers, ONL and subretinal space (SRS) was quantified. However, no significant difference was observed in the number of IBA1+ cells in these layers (Fig. 2g). Finally, the effect of miR-155 deficiency on retinal function was measured by ERG. Functionally, there was no difference in the a-wave or b-wave response in miR-155 KO mice when compared with that in the WT control (Fig. 2h–i). Overall, within the parameters investigated, no changes were observed between the normal and miR-155 KO adult mouse retina.
MiR-155 KO Results in Mild Protection in the Retina in Response to PD
To verify the observed effects of miR-155 inhibition and to further elucidate the role of miR-155 in the degenerating retina, miR-155 KO mice were subjected to 5 days of photo-oxidative damage, following which functional and histological measures were taken. ERG results showed a significantly larger a-wave response but no statistical difference in b-wave response across increasing flash intensities in miR-155 KO photo-oxidative damage mice compared with that in WT controls (Fig. 3a–b). To explain the functional preservation observed in miR-155 KO mice, photoreceptor cell death was compared between the miR-155 KOs and WT controls by TUNEL assay. However, no difference was found in TUNEL+ cell counts between groups (Fig. 3c–e). Cumulative photoreceptor cell death was determined by measuring ONL thickness across the entire retina, showing that the ONL was significantly thinner in the WT controls than in the miR-155 KO (Fig. 3f).
Quantification of IBA1+ MPs accumulating in the outer retina (ONL and SRS) and plexiform layers was used as a measure of inflammation. There was no decrease in the number of IBA1+ cells in the outer retina (Fig. 3g–i). Furthermore, there was no difference in the morphology of MPs in the outer retina (Fig. 3j). Similarly, MPs in the plexiform layers showed no difference between the controls and miR-155 KOs (Fig. 3k–m). To further investigate retinal inflammation in miR-155 KO retinas, the expression of inflammatory cytokines and potential targets of miR-155 (see Supplementary Table 2) was measured by qRT-PCR. The expression of Cfh did not increase in the miR-155 KO compared with that in the WT control following photo-oxidative damage; however, there was a significant, ~ 200% decrease in the expression of C3 in the KO retinas. While there was no difference in Tnfα, Il-10 or Socs1 expression, there was a significant increase in the expression of Bdnf, Il-6st and Antxr2 (Fig. 3n). In summary, there was some protection of function and photoreceptor survival in the miR-155 KO retinas in comparison with that in the WT controls; however, this did not translate into a no clear difference in counts or morphology of inflammatory cells.
MiR-155 Is Predominantly Localised to the Nucleus of Retinal Macroglia and Microglia in the Normal Retina
To determine the cell-specific localisation of miR-155 in the normal retina, retinal single-cell suspensions from dim-reared, WT, C57BL/6J mice were stained for miR-155 expression using PrimeFlow™. Cells were then double-labelled with lineage markers of four major retinal cell types: photoreceptors (rhodopsin); Müller glia and astrocytes (vimentin); ganglion cells (thy1.2); and MPs (CD11b). Single, DAPI+ cells were gated for by flow cytometry to remove cell aggregates from analysis (Fig. 4a–c). As the isolation of MPs has previously shown contamination with rod photoreceptor–specific transcripts [70, 71], rod photoreceptors were identified based on the expression of rhodopsin in combination with an inverted nuclear pattern of DAPI staining (Fig. 4d). Rhodopsin+ photoreceptors exhibited little to no miR-155 fluorescent staining, with only 6% of rhodopsin+ cells positively stained for miR-155. Furthermore, miR-155 fluorescence in these cells was rarely localised to the nucleus, but rather, was found to be predominantly localised in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4d). Expression of miR-155 was found in 62% of vimentin+ CD11b− cells (Fig. 4e), 70% of CD11b+ cells (Fig. 4f) and approximately 40% of thy1.2+ ganglion cells (Fig. 4g). Within these cell types, miR-155 expression appeared to largely localise within the nucleus, as indicated by colocalisation with the nuclear stain, DAPI. Overall, these results demonstrate the greatest abundance of miR-155 transcript to be within macroglia (vimentin+, CD11b−) and microglia (vimentin+, CD11b+) cells.
MiR-155 Expression Is Produced by Macroglia and MPs under Stress
To further elucidate the role of miR-155 in the WT degenerating retina, the expression of miR-155 was assessed in four major retinal cell types by flow cytometry using a PrimeFlow™ assay. We compared 5-day photo-oxidative damage retinas with dim-reared control retinas. There was no change observed in the expression of miR-155 in rhodopsin+, vimentin+ or thy1.2+ cells (Fig. 5a–c). However, there was a slight increase in the fluorescence intensity of miR-155 in the CD11b+ cells as a result of photo-oxidative damage (Fig. 5d–f). We aimed to corroborate these findings by exploring miR-155 expression in vitro.
Immortalised cell lines 661W (photoreceptor-like cells), MIOM1 (Müller glia-like cells) and C8B4s (brain-derived microglia) were stimulated with photo-oxidative damage or a cytokine cocktail and miR-155 expression measured by qRT-PCR. There was no change in miR-155 expression in 661W cells following 5-h photo-oxidative damage compared with dim controls (Fig. 5g). However, miR-155 was significantly increased in both MIO-M1 and C8-B4 cells following a 24-h cytokine cocktail challenge (Fig. 5h–i). Therefore, a cytoplasmic mask combined with a spot-counting feature was used for in-depth analysis of the miR-155 cytoplasmic content of rhodopsin+ cells in dim-reared and photo-oxidative damage retinas. We found a greater proportion of cells containing miR-155 in the photo-oxidative damage population than the dim-reared, together with photo-oxidative damage rhodopsin+ cells displaying a greater number of cytoplasmic spots (Fig. 5j–k). The absence of miR-155 in the nucleus, combined with the cell culture results, indicates that miR-155 is likely not produced by photoreceptors. In summation, this suggests that cytoplasmic miR-155 is translocated to photoreceptors at an increased frequency during photo-oxidative damage.
To assess the potential mechanism by which miR-155 may be communicated to photoreceptors, the level of miR-155 in retinal s-mEVs of WT mice before (dim-reared) and after photo-oxidative damage was assessed. There was a significant increase in miR-155 in s-mEV isolated from 5-day photo-oxidative damage retinas compared with photo-oxidative damage controls (Fig. 5l). Furthermore, we measured miR-155 in systemic serum to add validity to s-mEV loading, demonstrating an increase in miR-155 at 5 days photo-oxidative damage when compared with that in dim-reared controls (Fig. 5m). Taken together it appears that miR-155 is acting as a signalling molecule produced locally by macroglia and MPs, and possibly exported in s-mEV which are delivered to photoreceptors and systemic circulation under degenerative conditions.
Combinational Treatment with miR-155 and miR-146a Inhibitors Presents No Therapeutic Efficacy Against Retinal Degeneration
It is well-documented that miR-155 and miR-146a act on similar pathways in inflammation with overlapping binding sites on the 3′UTR of multiple mRNA targets, creating some redundancy in regulatory pathways [21, 24, 28]. We therefore wanted to determine the therapeutic potential of modulating two miRNAs in the retina, miR-155 and miR-146a to reduce inflammation and degeneration.
Firstly, the expression of both miR-155 and miR-146a was measured over a time course of 1, 3 and 5 days photo-oxidative damage by qRT-PCR to determine potential peaks in miRNA abundance, compared with a dim-reared control (Supplementary Fig. 2a–b). A significant increase in miR-155 and miR-146a was identified at all three time points. As a known target of both miRNAs, and a key molecule associated with retinal degeneration , the regulation of CFH was confirmed using a luciferase assay. A significant, ~ 2-fold reduction in the relative luciferase activity for CFH was observed with the addition of miR-155 or miR-146a (Supplementary Fig. 2c). Furthermore, the combination of miR-155 and mir-146a demonstrated a significantly larger decrease in relative luciferase activity then miR-155 alone, although not miR-146a. Given that the combination demonstrated a reduction in luciferase activity from a negative miRNA inhibitor control and early photo-oxidative damage time points demonstrated marked increase in miR-155 (1 and 3 days) and miR-146a (3 days), we chose to intravitreally administer inhibitors of both miRNAs at day 2 during a 5-day photo-oxidative damage period to assess their combinational therapeutic efficacy. At 5-day photo-oxidative damage, we assessed retinal function by ERG, comparing with retinas injected with a scrambled miRNA control. We observed no change in a-wave, but a significantly lower b-wave response when compared with the scrambled miRNA controls (Supplementary Fig. 2d–e). Neuronal cell death at 5 days photo-oxidative damage was assessed by TUNEL assay demonstrating no difference when treated with miRNA inhibitors (Supplementary Fig. 2f–h). Additionally, there was no change in the cumulative cell death of photoreceptors as indicated by ONL layer thickness between these groups (Supplementary Fig. 2i). However, there was a significant increase in the number of IBA1+ cells, specifically in the ONL when compared with scrambled controls (Supplementary Fig. 2j–l). Due to the combined CFH suppression by miR-155 and miR-146a in vitro, Cfh and the central complement molecule C3 were measured by qRT-PCR. There was no significant difference in the expression of Cfh or C3 between the scrambled miRNA inhibitor control and combined inhibition of miR-155 and miR-146a (Supplementary Fig. 2m).
Due to the combination therapy demonstrating no protective effect on the photo-oxidative damage rodent retinas, and to investigate individual roles, we focused our investigations on targeting miR-146a individually.
Treatment with miR-146a Inhibitor Alone Offered No Protective Effect
To determine the therapeutic potential of miR-146a inhibition, miR-146a inhibitors were intravitreally injected into the retina at 2 days during a 5-day photo-oxidative damage period. Retinal function was assessed by ERG, revealing that there was no difference in function for either a-wave or b-wave when compared with scrambled miRNA inhibitor controls (Supplementary Fig. 3a–b). Further histological analysis demonstrated no change in photoreceptor cell death at 5 days photo-oxidative damage, indicated by TUNEL+ cell counts, and cumulative cell death, assessed by ONL thickness (Supplementary Fig. 3c–f). Additionally, no difference was observed between miR-146a inhibitor and scrambled inhibitor control–treated retinas in IBA1+ counts of MP infiltration into the outer retina (Supplementary Fig. 3g–i). The expression of complement genes Cfh and C3, measured by qRT-PCR, remained unchanged in response to miR-146a inhibition (Supplementary Fig. 3j). Taken together, the inhibition of miR-146a did not appear to protect against degeneration in the photo-oxidative damage retina.
Although a role for miR-155 and miR-146a in degenerative diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) has been described [24, 31, 49, 51, 73], their role remains relatively underexplored in the retina. Furthermore, biological targets of miR-155 and miR-146a in retinal degenerations have yet to be fully explored. This study notably demonstrated that inhibition of miR-155 provides retinal protection, particularly in alleviating the typical immune response during retinal degenerations. We further show, for the first time in the retina, the localisation of miR-155 to the nucleus of macroglia and MPs and at low levels in the cytoplasm of photoreceptors. We believe that this facet may be due to the transport of mature miR-155 miRNA strands within the retina, potentially in an s-mEV-dependent manner. Assessment of a miR-155 KO to verify findings revealed no change in inflammation, suggesting retinal protection is occurring by the regulation of additional pathways. This study demonstrated that the inhibition of miR-155 in the retina offers functional protection; however, the specific retinal mRNA targets or molecular interactions remain elusive.
Inhibition of miR-155 Attenuates MP-Mediated Inflammation in Retinal Degenerations
The inhibition of miR-155 in the CNS has been shown previously to be beneficial against neuroinflammation by alleviating MP reactivity [42, 44,45,46, 49, 69, 74, 75]. A characteristic homeostatic, or ‘alternatively activated’ morphology has further been demonstrated in MPs as a consequence of miR-155 ablation in a superoxide dismutase (SOD) mouse model of ALS, reversing the abnormal gene expression profile . Similarly, it was demonstrated here that MPs in the ONL of photo-oxidative damage retinas exhibited a more ramified morphology when treated with a miR-155 inhibitor. This appearance is characteristic of ‘alternatively activated’ MPs associated with maintenance and repair of the retina . We therefore consider that although inhibition of miR-155 did not change the number of MPs in the outer retina, the observed retinal protection may be due to a modulation of processes such as chemokine signalling as demonstrated in previous studies in the retina [77,78,79,80].
miR-155 was identified to potentially act in a positive-feedback loop with pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, propagating MP-mediated inflammation and subsequent retinal degeneration [77,78,79]. Furthermore, in alignment with the work by Jablonski et al. (2016) demonstrating that inhibition of miR-155 reduces MP activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production , we demonstrated a decrease in Tnf-α in conjunction with a typically homeostatic MP morphology in response to miR-155 inhibition. We believe that this decrease in pro-inflammatory activation of MPs would also contribute to the reduction of aberrant functions such as phagocytosis.
While phagocytosis is part of the normal transient inflammatory response in the retina, the persistent presence of pro-inflammatory MPs in the outer retina is known to further hamper retinal function by increasing photoreceptor cell death via phagocytosis of stressed, but viable cells . This deleterious process occurs in part via the loss of ‘do not eat me’ signals on photoreceptors, for example CD47, a target of miR-155 [82, 83]. While the direct interaction of miR-155 with these targets has not yet been explored in the retina, we suggest that miR-155 could contribute to ONL thinning in two parts, firstly by increasing MP activation and phagocytic capacity and secondly via the regulation of ‘do not eat me’ photoreceptor signals. Subsequently, we hypothesise that inhibition of miR-155 attenuates this pro-inflammatory or ‘classical’ activation response of MPs in the photo-oxidative damage retina leading to increased photoreceptor survivability. However, although the phenotypic measure used here provides an indication of MP state, supplementary assessment using homeostatic and cell lineage markers of MP populations in the degenerating retina would provide essential validation to the MP response to miR-155 inhibition.
In addition to these phenotypic changes, we observed an increase in the number of MPs within the plexiform layers of miR-155 inhibitor–treated retinas at 5 days photo-oxidative damage. Where MPs in the outer retina are associated with the diseased state, Wang et al. (2016) have shown that steady state microglia located in the plexiform layers are required for the maintenance of synapse structure in the outer retina and synaptic transmission . Furthermore, the ablation of MPs alone has been shown to be sufficient in reducing ERG function over an extended time course of 30 days. We therefore postulate that protection of retinal function observed here in conjunction with significantly more MPs in the plexiform layers may be due to a similar mechanism of preserving the maintenance of synapses. However, further investigations into the mechanism underlying the increased MP population in the plexiform layers are required to fully understand this effect.
MiR-155 Is Expressed by Glial Cells of the Retina in Response to Stress
Due to low abundance of miR-155 within the retina, the localisation of miR-155 by traditional methods, e.g. in situ hybridisation, has proven to be ineffective . Here, we used a combination of PrimeFlow™ assay, measured by traditional flow cytometry and imaging flow cytometry, and cell culture to gain an understanding of how miR-155 is expressed within the retina. Analysis of miR-155 expression by flow cytometry in mouse isolated photoreceptors, macroglia (Müller cells and astrocytes), MPs and ganglion cells demonstrated an overall increase in miR-155 solely in the CD11b+ MP population following photo-oxidative damage. Transcript expression measures of miR-155 in response to stimulation confirmed this upregulation of miR-155 by MPs in addition to a demonstrated miR-155 production by Müller glia, these principal glia cells of the retina, functionally akin to astrocytes of the brain . This expression by macroglia in culture may not have been detected in retinal photo-oxidative damage samples due to miR-155 being released at an earlier time point, the use of a human cell line, or that the pathway required for miR-155 maturation and release is not active in macroglia in the photo-oxidative damage retina. Regardless, taken together, these findings align with previous investigations into miR-155 abundance in the hippocampus, showing miR-155 to increase in regions of both microglia and astrocyte activation following stress . Likewise, primary microglia derived from cortical tissue have shown increased mir-155 expression in response to stress . The upregulation of miR-155 has subsequently been linked to an impedance of astrocyte and microglia function in the brain [46, 49, 69]. Therefore, we believe miR-155 to be similarly involved in the stress response in retinal glia.
MiR-155 Potentially Translocates Between Glia and Neurons in an s-mEV Dependent Manner
While it was shown that miR-155 is expressed by MPs under stress and contributes to the MP inflammatory response in retinal degenerations, our data suggests that miR-155 is also taken up by rhodopsin+ photoreceptors, particularly during degeneration. This is considered due the absence of nuclear miRNA expression, as PrimeFlow is not specific to the mature miRNA strand, nuclear staining likely indicates presence of the pri- or pre-miRNA expressed by the host cell. Similar to the findings presented here, Koval et al. (2013) previously showed that administration of fluorescently tagged anti-miR-155 administration to the lateral ventricle of the brain induced cell specific uptake by neurons, microglia and astrocytes, leading to the regulation of miR-155-directed activity . Here, it is hypothesised that miR-155 can influence markers expressed by photoreceptors to encourage loss of function and survivability, such as ‘do not eat me’ signals; however, the mechanism by which this transport occurs is currently unknown.
Intercellular communication of miRNA is essential for normal tissue functioning, and interruptions of this process are shown to induce neuronal deficits . Previous studies have identified the inhibition of glia-neuron directional communication of miR-155 in a culture system to increase neuronal viability . Furthermore, the signalling of exosome-encapsulated pro-inflammatory miRNA from glia to neurons can be detrimental to neuronal synapses . Here, we identified increased miR-155 expression within isolated retinal s-mEVs, as a consequence of photo-oxidative damage. Additionally, miR-155 fluorescence was detected to increase in the cytoplasm of rhodopsin+ photoreceptors, which were virtually devoid of nuclear staining for miR-155, indicating an absence of pri-miRNA. Therefore, we consider the miR-155 detected in photoreceptors to be derived from miR-155 expressing cells, such as macroglia and MPs and subsequently transported to photoreceptors in an s-mEV-dependent manner. Moreover, we hypothesise that the increased detection of miR-155 in circulation, aligning to previous findings , is due to the activation of circulating monocytes and/or the capability of s-mEVs to cross blood-CNS-barriers . These features of s-mEV-directed communication of miR-155 have led to its investigation as both diagnostic and therapeutic .
Taken together, we speculate that the combination of retaining plexiform layer MPs and the reduction in miR-155 signalling protects against neuronal cell death and maintains synapse integrity. However, investigation into synapse structure and function as well as further exploration into cell-to-cell communication in the photo-oxidative damage retina is required for a more in-depth understanding of this process.
Depletion of miR-155 Demonstrates Potential Redundancy in Inflammatory Pathways Suggesting Other Mechanisms of Protection
It was relatively unexpected that the protective effect of miR-155 inhibition did not fully translate to miR-155 KO rodent retinas. Although previous studies have identified slight alterations to retinal vasculature in the miR-155 KO mouse , we identified no significant histological or functional deficiencies in the dim-reared retina. Additionally, although there was an observed protection of function and photoreceptor viability, in the photo-oxidative damage retina, we did not identify a change in inflammation. This is contrary to previous studies that have identified a greater occurrence of homeostatic microglia in miR-155 KO retinas following oxygen-induced retinopathy . Similarly, Woodbury et al. (2015) documented decreased microglia activation in the brains of miR-155 KO mice in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation . Escobar et al. (2013) also showed a reduction of inflammatory cells in the vitreous and retina of miR-155 KO mice with experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) . Granted, the discrepancy between findings could be due to subtleties in disease pathology, however, we postulate that compensatory mechanisms may also be influencing the inflammatory potential in the KOs. The knockdown of a single miRNA can result in the upregulation in other miRNA family members with overlapping binding sites on the target mRNA. Over a lifespan, these pathways have time to adjust creating redundancy within clusters . Although we see reduction in potential AGO2-mediated binding mRNA transcripts, there is no change in indicators of broader inflammatory pathways and the location and phenotype of immune cells in the KO retina. We therefore suggest a greater redundancy in inflammatory pathways with regard to miR-155 and indicate the regulation of an alternative protective mechanism for neuronal survival and functional protection.
Investigations by Harrison et al. (2017) in the rodent hippocampus in an acute model of cortical impact, identified localisation of miR-155, via in situ hybridisation, to be largely within neuronal nuclei . While the findings presented here do not show miR-155 expression in the nucleus of the predominant neuronal population, rhodopsin+ photoreceptors, nuclear miR-155 was detected in a proportion of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), neurons responsible for conveyance of visual information to the visual cortex . This study was limited by only investigating the two neuronal subtypes of the retina and this could be a point for further investigation. However, for the purpose of this study, the RGCs became a point of interest due the potential regulation of neurotrophic factors such as BDNF, essential to the survival of RGCs in the retina [97, 98]. While miRNA profiling of apoptosing RGCs has not previously shown differential regulation of miR-155 , other studies have identified BDNF as a binding partner of miR-155 [100, 101]. Similarly, we show here by AGO-HITS-CLIP that both miR-155 and Bdnf are incorporated into AGO2 in the degenerating retina. Furthermore, our previous findings have demonstrated an increase in AGO2 abundance to occur in the ganglion cell layer (GCL) as a consequence of photo-oxidative damage, suggestive that AGO2-mediated miRNA inhibition is also increasing in the GCL during degeneration . Additionally, a greater abundance of Bdnf was identified in the miR-155 KO photo-oxidative damage retina when compared with WT; however, this was not apparent in the miR-155 inhibitor retina. This difference warrants further investigation into the regulation of Bdnf across the time course of photo-oxidative damage and measures of neuronal integrity.
Combinational Inhibition of miR-155 and miR-146a Demonstrates Negative Therapeutic Prospect
Lastly, due to the redundancy of roles for miRNAs in biological systems, combinatorial miRNA therapies have been suggested as an effective strategy for alleviating disease progression [102,103,104]. Our previous research and findings presented here have shown both miR-155 and miR-146a to be significantly upregulated in response to photo-oxidative-induced damage . However, we found that the combinational inhibition of miR-155 and miR-146a amplifies disease severity, decreasing function and increasing MP recruitment to the outer retina. We suggest that this is due to a disparate role of miR-155 and miR-146a in the regulation of the MP activation state. While both have the capacity to negatively regulate CFH, miR-146a is thought to also act as a negative regulator of inflammation, through suppression of inflammatory activators, such as nuclear factor κB (NF-κB). This negative feedback can contribute to a decrease in the expression of downstream pro-inflammatory factors, including miR-155, and consequently MP activation and retinal degeneration [21, 105]. With this considered, it remains unclear as to why the miR-146a inhibitor retinas did not display a more severe pathology but highlights the complexity of combinational miRNA therapies without knowledge of all the mRNA targets.
Although the precise mechanisms underlying miRNA function in the retina remain to be disentangled for effective application of combinatorial therapies, we show here, for the first time, the potential for the use of miR-155 in slowing the progression of retinal degenerations. The potential s-mEV pathway of miR-155 from glial cells to photoreceptors identified here presents a platform for more targeted strategies in alleviating the MP-mediated inflammatory response propagated into later stages of disease. Subsequently, in alignment with previous studies, we propose a role for miR-155 in the inflammatory response in degenerative conditions of the CNS.
Availability of Data and Material
All data generated or analysed during this study is included in the published article, and the datasets found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the “Methods” section.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Age-related macular degeneration
Analysis of variance
Anthrax toxin receptor 2
Australian National University
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
Bovine Serum Albumin
Cluster of differentiation molecule 11b
Cluster of differentiation molecule 47
Complement factor H
Central nervous system
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Media
Experimental autoimmune uveitis
Fetal bovine serum
Ganglion cell layer
Hank’s balanced salt solution
High-throughput sequencing of RNA isolated by cross-linking immunoprecipitation
Haematoxylin and Eosin
Ionised calcium-binding adapter molecule 1
Interleukin 6 signal transducer
Inner plexiform layer
Large extracellular vesicles
Nuclear factor κB
Outer nuclear layer
Outer plexiform layer
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
Retinal ganglion cells
RNA-induced silencing complex
Retinal pigment epithelium
Succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit A
small to medium extracellular vesicles
small nucleolar RNA
small nuclear RNA
Suppressor of cytokine signalling
Tumour necrosis factor α
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling
Comparative cycle threshold
Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116(2):281–297
Sohel MH (2016) Extracellular/circulating MicroRNAs: release mechanisms, functions and challenges. Achiev Life Sci Sci 10(2):175–186
Andreeva K, Cooper NGF (2014) MicroRNAs in the neural retina. Int J Genomics 2014:165897–165897
Bandyra KJ et al (2012) The seed region of a small RNA drives the controlled destruction of the target mRNA by the endoribonuclease RNase E. Mol Cell 47(6):943–953
Rekatsina M, Paladini A, Piroli A, Zis P, Pergolizzi JV, Varrassi G (2020) Pathophysiology and therapeutic perspectives of oxidative stress and neurodegenerative diseases: a narrative review. Adv Ther 37(1):113–139
Ambati J, Atkinson JP, Gelfand BD (2013) Immunology of age-related macular degeneration. Nat Rev Immunol 13:438–451
Roy S, Sen CK (2011) MiRNA in innate immune responses: novel players in wound inflammation. Physiol Genomics 43(10):557–565
Essandoh K et al (2016) MiRNA-mediated macrophage polarization and its potential role in the regulation of inflammatory response. Shock (Augusta, Ga) 46(2):122–131
Krützfeldt J, Rajewsky N, Braich R, Rajeev KG, Tuschl T, Manoharan M, Stoffel M (2005) Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’. Nature 438(7068):685–689
Nahand JS, et al. (2019) microRNAs: new prognostic, diagnostic, and therapeutic biomarkers in cervical cancer. 234(10): p. 17064–17099.
Wang S, Koster KM, He Y, Zhou Q (2012) miRNAs as potential therapeutic targets for age-related macular degeneration. Future Med Chem 4(3):277–287
Chen X, Ba Y, Ma L, Cai X, Yin Y, Wang K, Guo J, Zhang Y et al (2008) Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res 18:997–1006
Weiland M, Gao XH, Zhou L, Mi QS (2012) Small RNAs have a large impact. RNA Biol 9(6):850–859
Gilad S, Meiri E, Yogev Y, Benjamin S, Lebanony D, Yerushalmi N, Benjamin H, Kushnir M et al (2008) Serum MicroRNAs are promising novel biomarkers. PLoS One 3(9):e3148
Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, Peterson A, Noteboom J et al (2008) Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(30):10513–10518
Taganov KD, Boldin MP, Chang KJ, Baltimore D (2006) NF-kappaB-dependent induction of microRNA miR-146, an inhibitor targeted to signaling proteins of innate immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(33):12481–12486
Pulkkinen KH, Ylä-Herttuala S, Levonen A-L (2011) Heme oxygenase 1 is induced by miR-155 via reduced BACH1 translation in endothelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med 51(11):2124–2131
Berber P, Grassmann F, Kiel C, Weber BHF (2017) An eye on age-related macular degeneration: the role of MicroRNAs in disease pathology. Mol Diagn Ther 21(1):31–43
Kutty RK, Nagineni CN, Samuel W, Vijayasarathy C, Hooks JJ, Redmond TM (2010) Inflammatory cytokines regulate microRNA-155 expression in human retinal pigment epithelial cells by activating JAK/STAT pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 402(2):390–395
Zhuang Z, Xiao-qin, Hu H, Tian SY, Lu ZJ, Zhang TZ, Bai YL (2015) Down-regulation of microRNA-155 attenuates retinal neovascularization via the PI3K/Akt pathway. Mol Vis 21:1173–1184
Testa U et al (2017) miR-146 and miR-155: two key modulators of immune response and tumor development. Non-coding RNA 3(3):22
Schulte LN, Westermann AJ, Vogel J (2013) Differential activation and functional specialization of miR-146 and miR-155 in innate immune sensing. Nucleic Acids Res 41(1):542–553
Atarod S, et al. (2016) miR-146a and miR-155 expression levels in acute graft-versus-host disease incidence. 7(56).
Lukiw WJ et al (2012) Common micro RNAs (miRNAs) target complement factor H (CFH) regulation in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Int J Biochem Mol Biol 3(1):105–116
Elton TS, Selemon H, Elton SM, Parinandi NL (2013) Regulation of the MIR155 host gene in physiological and pathological processes. Gene 532(1):1–12
Alivernini S, et al. (2018) MicroRNA-155—at the critical interface of innate and adaptive immunity in arthritis. Vol. 8.
Cao S, Wang JCC, Gao J, Wong M, To E, White VA, Cui JZ, Matsubara JA (2016) CFH Y402H polymorphism and the complement activation product C5a: effects on NF-κB activation and inflammasome gene regulation. Br J Ophthalmol 100(5):713–718
Lukiw WJ, Alexandrov PN (2012) Regulation of complement factor H (CFH) by multiple miRNAs in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain. Mol Neurobiol 46(1):11–19
Ménard C, Rezende FA, Miloudi K, Wilson A, Tétreault N, Hardy P, SanGiovanni JP, de Guire V et al (2016) MicroRNA signatures in vitreous humour and plasma of patients with exudative AMD. Oncotarget 7(15):19171–19184
Bhattacharjee S, Zhao Y, Dua P, Rogaev EI, Lukiw WJ (2016) microRNA-34a-mediated down-regulation of the microglial-enriched triggering receptor and phagocytosis-sensor TREM2 in age-related macular degeneration. PLoS One 11(3):e0150211–e0150211
Romano GL et al (2017) Retinal and circulating miRNAs in age-related macular degeneration: an in vivo animal and human study. Front Pharmacol 8:168–168
Saxena K et al (2015) Identification of miRNAs in a model of retinal degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci:56(3)
Wang X-H, Wang T-L (2018) MicroRNAs of microglia: wrestling with central nervous system disease. Neural Regen Res 13(12):2067–2072
Guo Y, et al. (2019) MicroRNAs in microglia: how do MicroRNAs affect activation, inflammation, polarization of microglia and mediate the interaction between microglia and glioma?. 12(125).
Bosco A, Steele MR, Vetter ML (2011) Early microglia activation in a mouse model of chronic glaucoma. 519(4):599–620
Zeng H-y, Green WR, Tso MOM (2008) Microglial activation in human diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 126(2):227–232
Noailles A, Fernández-Sánchez L, Lax P, Cuenca N (2014) Microglia activation in a model of retinal degeneration and TUDCA neuroprotective effects. J Neuroinflammation 11(1):186
Blank T, Goldmann T, Koch M, Amann L, Schön C, Bonin M, Pang S, Prinz M et al (2018) Early microglia activation precedes photoreceptor degeneration in a mouse model of CNGB1-linked retinitis pigmentosa. Front Immunol 8:1930–1930
Combadière C, Feumi C, Raoul W, Keller N, Rodéro M, Pézard A, Lavalette S, Houssier M et al (2007) CX3CR1-dependent subretinal microglia cell accumulation is associated with cardinal features of age-related macular degeneration. J Clin Invest 117(10):2920–2928
Gupta N, Brown KE, Milam AH (2003) Activated microglia in human retinitis pigmentosa, late-onset retinal degeneration, and age-related macular degeneration. Exp Eye Res 76(4):463–471
Ponomarev ED, Veremeyko T, Weiner HL (2013) MicroRNAs are universal regulators of differentiation, activation, and polarization of microglia and macrophages in normal and diseased CNS. Glia 61(1):91–103
Cardoso AL, Guedes JR, de Lima MCP (2016) Role of microRNAs in the regulation of innate immune cells under neuroinflammatory conditions. Curr Opin Pharmacol 26:1–9
Guedes J, Cardoso ALC, Lima MCPd (2013) Involvement of MicroRNA in microglia-mediated immune response. J Immunol Res:2013
Cardoso AL, Guedes JR, Pereira de Almeida L, Pedroso de Lima MC (2012) miR-155 modulates microglia-mediated immune response by down-regulating SOCS-1 and promoting cytokine and nitric oxide production. Immunology 135(1):73–88
O’Connell RM, Taganov KD, Boldin MP, Cheng G, Baltimore D (2007) MicroRNA-155 is induced during the macrophage inflammatory response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(5):1604–1609
Moore CS, Rao VTS, Durafourt BA, Bedell BJ, Ludwin SK, Bar-Or A, Antel JP (2013) miR-155 as a multiple sclerosis–relevant regulator of myeloid cell polarization. Ann Neurol 74(5):709–720
Honarpisheh M et al (2018) The involvement of MicroRNAs in modulation of innate and adaptive immunity in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. J Immunol Res 2018:4126106–4126106
Timis TL, Orasan RI (2018) Understanding psoriasis: role of miRNAs. Biomedical Reports 9(5):367–374
Cunha C, Santos C, Gomes C, Fernandes A, Correia AM, Sebastião AM, Vaz AR, Brites D (2018) Downregulated glia interplay and increased miRNA-155 as promising markers to track ALS at an early stage. Mol Neurobiol 55(5):4207–4224
Kurowska-Stolarska M, Alivernini S, Ballantine LE, Asquith DL, Millar NL, Gilchrist DS, Reilly J, Ierna M et al (2011) MicroRNA-155 as a proinflammatory regulator in clinical and experimental arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:11193–11198
Kanwal N, John P, Bhatti A (2012) MicroRNA-155 as a therapeutic target for inflammatory diseases. Rheumatol Int 33
Natoli R, Jiao H, Barnett NL, Fernando N, Valter K, Provis JM, Rutar M (2016) A model of progressive photo-oxidative degeneration and inflammation in the pigmented C57BL/6J mouse retina. Exp Eye Res 147(2016):114–127
Chu-Tan JA, Fernando N, Aggio-Bruce R, Cioanca AV, Valter K, Andronikou N, deMollerat du Jeu X, Rutar M et al (2020) A method for gene knockdown in the retina using a lipid-based carrier. Mol Vis 26:48–63
Rutar M, Natoli R, and Provis J.M.J.J.o.N. (2012) Small interfering RNA-mediated suppression of Ccl2 in Müller cells attenuates microglial recruitment and photoreceptor death following retinal degeneration. 9(1):221.
Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, Antoniou A, Arab T et al (2018) Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles 7(1):1535750
Wooff Y, et al. (2020) Extracellular vesicles and their miRNA cargo in retinal health and degeneration: mediators of homeostasis, and vehicles for targeted gene therapy. p. 2020.03.29.014910.
Natoli R, Zhu Y, Valter K, Bisti S, Eells J, Stone J (2010) Gene and noncoding RNA regulation underlying photoreceptor protection: microarray study of dietary antioxidant saffron and photobiomodulation in rat retina. Mol Vis 16:1801–1822
Rutar M et al (2015) Chemokine-mediated inflammation in the degenerating retina is coordinated by Müller cells, activated microglia, and retinal pigment epithelium. J Neuroinflammation:12(8)
Chu-Tan JA, Rutar M, Saxena K, Aggio-Bruce R, Essex RW, Valter K, Jiao H, Fernando N et al (2018) MicroRNA-124 Dysregulation is associated with retinal inflammation and photoreceptor death in the degenerating retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59(10):4094–4105
Rutar M et al (2014) Synthesis and propogation of complement C3 by microglia/monocytes in the aging retina. PLoS One:9(4)
Chi SW, Zang JB, Mele A, Darnell RB (2009) Argonaute HITS-CLIP decodes microRNA–mRNA interaction maps. Nature 460(7254):479–486
Al-Ubaidi MR et al (1992) Photoreceptor degeneration induced by the expression of simian virus 40 large tumor antigen in the retina of transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89(4):1194–1198
Alliot F, Pessac B (1984) Astrocytic cell clones derived from established cultures of 8-day postnatal mouse cerebella. Brain Res 306(1–2):283–291
Limb GA et al (2002) In vitro characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human Muller cell line (MIO-M1). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(3):864–869
Dunn K et al (1996) ARPE-19, a human retinal pigment epithelial cell line with differentiated properties. Exp Eye Res 62(2):155–170
Gupta V, You Y, Li J, Gupta V, Golzan M, Klistorner A, van den Buuse M, Graham S (2014) BDNF impairment is associated with age-related changes in the inner retina and exacerbates experimental glaucoma. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) - Mol Basis Dis 1842(9):1567–1578
Reeves C, Charles-Horvath P, Kitajewski J (2013) Studies in mice reveal a role for anthrax toxin receptors in matrix metalloproteinase function and extracellular matrix homeostasis. Toxins 5(2):315–326
Chen Y-H et al (2020) Absence of GP130 cytokine receptor signaling causes extended Stüve-Wiedemann syndrome. J Exp Med:217(3)
Butovsky O, Jedrychowski MP, Cialic R, Krasemann S, Murugaiyan G, Fanek Z, Greco DJ, Wu PM et al (2015) Targeting miR-155 restores abnormal microglia and attenuates disease in SOD1 mice. Ann Neurol 77(1):75–99
Ronning KE, Karlen SJ, Miller EB, Burns ME (2019) Molecular profiling of resident and infiltrating mononuclear phagocytes during rapid adult retinal degeneration using single-cell RNA sequencing. Sci Rep 9(1):4858
O’Koren EG et al (2019) Microglial function is distinct in different anatomical locations during retinal homeostasis and degeneration. Immunity 50(3):723–737.e7
Hageman GS, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, Hancox LS, Taiber AJ, Hardisty LI, Hageman JL, Stockman HA et al (2005) A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(20):7227–7232
Romano GL et al (2015) MicroRNA target prediction in glaucoma. Prog Brain Res 220:217–240
Yan L, Lee S, Lazzaro DR, Aranda J, Grant MB, Chaqour B (2015) Single and compound knock-outs of MicroRNA (miRNA)-155 and its angiogenic gene target CCN1 in mice alter vascular and neovascular growth in the retina via resident microglia. J Biol Chem 290(38):23264–23281
Henry RJ, et al. (2019) Inhibition of miR-155 limits neuroinflammation and improves functional recovery after experimental traumatic brain injury in mice. 16(1):216–230.
Langmann T (2007) Microglia activation in retinal degeneration. J Leukoc Biol 81(6)
Welser-Alves JV, Milner R (2013) Microglia are the major source of TNF-α and TGF-β1 in postnatal glial cultures; regulation by cytokines, lipopolysaccharide, and vitronectin. Neurochem Int 63(1):47–53
Tili E et al (2007) Modulation of miR-155 and miR-125b levels following lipopolysaccharide/TNF-α stimulation and their possible roles in regulating the response to endotoxin. Shock 179(8):5082–5089
Léveillard T, Philp NJ, Sennlaub F (2019) Is retinal metabolic dysfunction at the center of the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration? Int J Mol Sci 20(3):762
Jablonski KA, Gaudet AD, Amici SA, Popovich PG, Guerau-de-Arellano M (2016) Control of the inflammatory macrophage transcriptional signature by miR-155. PLoS One 11(7):e0159724
Zhao L, Zabel MK, Wang X, Ma W, Shah P, Fariss RN, Qian H, Parkhurst CN et al (2015) Microglial phagocytosis of living photoreceptors contributes to inherited retinal degeneration. EMBO Mol Med 7(9):1179–1197
Rastgoo N, Abdi J, Pourabdollah M, Chang H (2018) Targeting CD47 and TNFAIP8 by Mir-155 overcomes drug resistance and inhibits tumor growth through induction of phagocytosis and apoptosis in multiple myeloma. Blood 132:1923–1923
Junker A, Krumbholz M, Eisele S, Mohan H, Augstein F, Bittner R, Lassmann H, Wekerle H et al (2009) MicroRNA profiling of multiple sclerosis lesions identifies modulators of the regulatory protein CD47. Brain 132(12):3342–3352
Wang X, Zhao L, Zhang J, Fariss RN, Ma W, Kretschmer F, Wang M, Qian H et al (2016) Requirement for microglia for the maintenance of synaptic function and integrity in the mature retina. J Neurosci 36(9):2827–2842
Newman EA (2015) Glial cell regulation of neuronal activity and blood flow in the retina by release of gliotransmitters. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 370(1672):20140195
Guedes JR, Custódia CM, Silva RJ, de Almeida LP, Pedroso de Lima MC, Cardoso AL (2014) Early miR-155 upregulation contributes to neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease triple transgenic mouse model. Hum Mol Genet 23(23):6286–6301
Koval ED, Shaner C, Zhang P, du Maine X, Fischer K, Tay J, Chau BN, Wu GF et al (2013) Method for widespread microRNA-155 inhibition prolongs survival in ALS-model mice. Hum Mol Genet 22(20):4127–4135
Thomas KT, Gross C, and Bassell GJ (2018) microRNAs sculpt neuronal communication in a tight balance that is lost in neurological disease. 11(455).
Prada I, Gabrielli M, Turola E, Iorio A, D’Arrigo G, Parolisi R, de Luca M, Pacifici M et al (2018) Glia-to-neuron transfer of miRNAs via extracellular vesicles: a new mechanism underlying inflammation-induced synaptic alterations. Acta Neuropathol 135(4):529–550
Chen CC, Liu L, Ma F, Wong CW, Guo XE, Chacko JV, Farhoodi HP, Zhang SX et al (2016) Elucidation of exosome migration across the blood-brain barrier model in vitro. Cell Mol Bioeng 9(4):509–529
Batrakova EV, Kim MS (2015) Using exosomes, naturally-equipped nanocarriers, for drug delivery. J Control Release 219:396–405
Woodbury ME, Freilich RW, Cheng CJ, Asai H, Ikezu S, Boucher JD, Slack F, Ikezu T (2015) miR-155 is essential for inflammation-induced hippocampal neurogenic dysfunction. J Neurosci 35(26):9764–9781
Escobar T, Yu CR, Muljo SA, Egwuagu CE (2013) STAT3 activates miR-155 in Th17 cells and acts in concert to promote experimental autoimmune uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54(6):4017–4025
Bao J, Li D, Wang L, Wu J, Hu Y, Wang Z, Chen Y, Cao X et al (2012) MicroRNA-449 and MicroRNA-34b/c function redundantly in murine testes by targeting E2F transcription factor-retinoblastoma protein (E2F-pRb) pathway. J Biol Chem 287(26):21686–21698
Harrison EB et al (2017) Induction of miR-155 after brain injury promotes type 1 interferon and has a neuroprotective effect. Front Mol Neurosci:10(228)
Sanes JR, Masland RH (2015) The types of retinal ganglion cells: current status and implications for neuronal classification. 38(1):221–246
Mysona BA, Zhao J, Bollinger KE (2017) Role of BDNF/TrkB pathway in the visual system: Therapeutic implications for glaucoma. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 12(1):69–81
Feng, L., et al., Overexpression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor protects large retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve crush in mice. eNeuro, 2017. 4(1): p. ENEURO.0331-16.2016.
Wang J, Valiente-Soriano FJ, Nadal-Nicolás FM, Rovere G, Chen S, Huang W, Agudo-Barriuso M, Jonas JB et al (2017) MicroRNA regulation in an animal model of acute ocular hypertension. Acta Ophthalmol 95(1):e10–e21
Varendi K, Kumar A, Härma MA, Andressoo JO (2014) miR-1, miR-10b, miR-155, and miR-191 are novel regulators of BDNF. Cell Mol Life Sci 71(22):4443–4456
Cai Z, Li S, Li S, Song F, Zhang Z, Qi G, Li T, Qiu J et al (2016) Antagonist targeting microRNA-155 protects against lithium-pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus in C57BL/6 mice by activating brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Front Pharmacol 7
Kluiver J, Gibcus JH, Hettinga C, Adema A, Richter MKS, Halsema N, Slezak-Prochazka I, Ding Y et al (2012) Rapid generation of MicroRNA sponges for MicroRNA inhibition. PLoS One 7(1):e29275
van Beijnum JR, Giovannetti E, Poel D, Nowak-Sliwinska P, Griffioen AW (2017) miRNAs: micro-managers of anticancer combination therapies. Angiogenesis 20(2):269–285
Miroshnichenko S and Patutina O (2019) Enhanced inhibition of tumorigenesis using combinations of miRNA-targeted therapeutics. 10(488).
Ma X, Becker Buscaglia LE, Barker JR, Li Y (2011) MicroRNAs in NF-kappaB signaling. J Mol Cell Biol 3(3):159–166
We would like to acknowledge the contribution of the staff of the Australian National University (ANU) Imaging and Flow Cytometry Facility, Harpreet Vohra and Michael Devoy, for running the FACS samples and assisting in flow cytometry. We would also like to acknowledge the staff of the ANU Biomolecular Resource Facility (BRF) for library preparation and sequencing of MP RNA samples, as well as the ANU Bioinformatics Consultancy Unit (BCU) for bioinformatics support of sequencing data and re-analysis of publicly available data. We also acknowledge the staff of the ANU Centre for advanced microscopy (CAM) for assistance in confocal microscopy.
This work would not have been possible without the support of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC: 1127705), Retina Australia, The Gordon and Gretel Bootes Foundation and The ANU Translational Fellowship.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics Approval and Consent
All experiments were conducted in accordance with the ARVO Statement for Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The study was approved by the Australian National University (ANU) Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (Application ID: 2017/41).
Consent for Publication
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Aggio-Bruce, R., Chu-Tan, J.A., Wooff, Y. et al. Inhibition of microRNA-155 Protects Retinal Function Through Attenuation of Inflammation in Retinal Degeneration. Mol Neurobiol 58, 835–854 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-02158-z
- Photo-oxidative damage