Skip to main content
Log in

Chlorine retention in drinking water with UiO66 metal–organic framework

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, the chlorine retention performance of both UiO-66 and UiO-66@GO metal–organic frameworks has been highlighted. A 48 × 10−5 % solution of drinking water with sodium hypochlorite (H2O-NaClO) was filtered on one hand with UiO-66 and on the other with UiO-66@GO. Using OTO reagent, it was determined their respective performance in terms of chlorine retention. It is worth to note that UiO-66@GO composite is a good material option to retain chlorine from drinking water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Secretaría de Salud 2015 NOM-201-SSA1-2015 Agua y hielo para consumo humano 2015 1

  2. WHO 2022 Guidelines for drinking-water quality ISBN 978-92-4-004506-4

  3. Secretaria de Salud 2022 NOM-127-SSA1-2021 Agua para uso y consumo humano 2022 1

  4. S de Salud 2009 NOM-251-SSA1-2009 Prácticas de higiene 2009 1

  5. TU Delft 2014 Disinfection 2014 0

  6. Eltom A, Fournier M, Silva M and Rocha J 2012 J. Mater. Res. Tecnol. 1 80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Omokafe S, Adeniyi A, Igbafen E, Oke S and Olubambi P 2020 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 15 10854

  8. Hernández M, Otero A, Falcón J and Yperman Y 2017 Rev. Cubana Quím. 29 26

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sofyan N, Suhendar D, Zulfia A and Subhan A 2020 Adv. Mat. Res. 1000 41

    Google Scholar 

  10. Micro K 2020 Available: www.carbotecnia.info (accessed on 15 September 2020)

  11. Ahmadijokani F, Molavi H, Rezakazemi M, Tajahmadi S, Bahi A, Ko F et al 2021 Prog. Mat. Sci. 125 100904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yap M, Fow K and Chen G 2017 Green En. & Env. 2 218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bedia J, Muelas-Ramos V, Peñas-Garzón M, Gómez-Avilés A, Rodríguez J and Belver C 2019 Catalysts 9 1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng Y, Chen Q, Jiang M and Yao J 2019 I & EC Res. 58 17646

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu T, Tang L, Feng H, Zhang J, Li X, Zuo Y et al 2022 Coord. Chem. Rev. 451 1

  16. Hasan Z and Jhung S 2015 J. Haz. Mat. 283 329

  17. Burtch N, Jasuja H and Walton K 2014 Chem. Rev. 114 10575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sorribas S and Téllez C 2016 Bol. Grup. Esp. Car. 2016 19

  19. Bonelli B, Freyria F, Rossetti I and Sethi R 2020 In: Nanomatls. for the detect. and removal ISBN: 978-0-12-818489-9

  20. Abdullah N, Rahman M, Othman M and Jaafar J 2018 J. Mem. Sci. 563 162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Howarth A, Liu Y, Li P, Li Z, Wang T, Hupp J et al 2016 Nat. Rev. 1 1

  22. An H, Li M, Gao J, Zhang Z, Ma S and Chen Y 2019 Coord. Chem. Rev. 384 90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bian Y, Xiong N and Zhu G 2018 Processes 6 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taddei M 2016 UiO-66: a Case Study Metal-Organic Framework (Paul Scherrer Institut)

  25. Ruiz-Blázquez P 2018 M Thesis (Universitat de les Illes Balears)

  26. Yang F, Du M, Yin K, Qiu Z, Zhao J, Liu C et al 2021 Small 2105715 1

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bravo F, Daiana A, Crivello M and Heredia A 2019 XXI CAC X MercoCat on Síntesis y caract. de MOF UIO-66 con solvs. amig. p 6

  28. Li S, Chen Y, Pei X, Zhang S, Feng X, Zhou J et al 2016 Chin. J. Chem. 34 175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. DeCoste J, Peterson G, Jasuja H, Glover T, Huang Y and Walton K 2013 J. Mater. Chem. A 1 5642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bužek D, Demel J and Lang K 2018 Inorg. Chem. 57 14290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang C, Liu X, Demir N, Chen J and Li K 2016 Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016 1

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bůžek D, Adamec S, Lang K and Demel J 2021 Inorg. Chem. Front. 8 720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chaemchuen S, Wang J, Gilani A and Francis F 2018 Res. Eff. Tech. 1 1

    Google Scholar 

  34. Venturi D, Campana F, Marmottini F, Costantino F and Vaccaro L 2020 ACS Sust. Chem. Eng. 8 17154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liang W, Coghlan C, Ragon F, Rubio-Martinez M, D’Alessandro D and Babarao R 2016 Dalt. Trans. 45 4496

  36. Petit C and Bandosz T 2009 J. Mater. Chem. 19 6521

  37. Ma J, Guo X, Ying Y, Liu D and Zhong C 2017 Chem. Eng. J. 313 890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cao Y, Zhao Y, Lv Z, Song F and Zhong Q 2014 J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2356 1

    Google Scholar 

  39. Go for Life 2018 Man. de op. del centro de llen. 2018 20

  40. Katz M, Brown Z, Colón Y, Siu P, Scheidt K, Snurr R et al 2013 Chem. Commun. 49 9449

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Facultad de Química UAEMex, Dafne Larissa Ortega QFB and Edwin A. Giles Mazón QFB for technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio A Serrano-Palafox.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serrano-Palafox, S.A., Romero-Romero, F., Varela-Guerrero, V. et al. Chlorine retention in drinking water with UiO66 metal–organic framework. Bull Mater Sci 47, 29 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-023-03087-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-023-03087-y

Keywords

Navigation