Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dependence of various oxide interfacial layers on the performance of P3HT:PCBM-based inverted organic solar cells

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of organic solar cells (OSCs) during the past decade makes an excellent path for future photovoltaic technology, as it is accessible to all people owing to a simple and cost-effective fabrication process. Here we report the fabrication of inverted OSCs with various oxide interfacial layers (ZnO, SnO2). ZnO and SnO2 thin films were grown by spin-coating technique and it is used as an electron transport layer (ETL) in inverted OSCs. ZnO thin films with pure hexagonal wurtzite structure were obtained for the films annealed at 300°C. The bandgap of ZnO thin films calculated from the Tauc plot was found to be 3.27 eV. The optimum annealing temperature for the cubic-structured SnO2 thin films by spin-coating technique was 200°C. The inverted OSCs fabricated in ambient air conditions with ZnO as ETL showed a power conversion efficiency of 1.59%. The fabricated cell was then compared with inverted OSCs having SnO2 as the ETL and with conventional OSCs. The stability, efficiency and other performance parameters of the fabricated devices were calculated. The result indicates that inverted OSCs have significant improvement in stability compared to conventional OSCs. Also, inverted OSCs with ZnO exhibited higher efficiency and stability than OSCs fabricated with SnO2 as an ETL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yan H, Jo T and Okuzaki H 2009 Polym. J. 41 1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ionescu-Zanetti C, Mechler A, Carter S A and Lal R 2004 Adv. Mater. 16 385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cameron J and Skabara P J 2020 Mater. Horizons. 7 1759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mingorance A, Xie H, Kim H S, Wang Z, Balsells M, Morales-Melgares A et al 2018 Adv. Mater. Interfaces 5 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yin Z, Wei J and Zheng Q 2016 Adv. Sci. 3 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zafar M, Yun J Y and Kim D H 2019 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 96 66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Elumalai N K, Vijila C, Jose R, Uddin A and Ramakrishna S 2015 Mater. Renew. Sustain Energy 4 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jo H, Yang J H, Choi S W, Park J, Song E J, Shin M et al 2019 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 202 110131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong K, Son J H, Kim S, Koo B H and Lee J L 2012 Chem. Commun. 48 10606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cui Z and Korotcenkov G 2020 Solution processed metal oxide thin films for electronic applications (Netherlands: Elsevier) p 83

  11. Ferdaus M M, Rashid M M and Rahman M A 2014 Adv. Environ. Biol. 8 729

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozu S, Zhang Y, Yasuda H, Kitabatake Y, Toyoda T, Hirata M et al 2019 Front. Energy Res. 7 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Keis K, Bauer C, Boschloo G, Hagfeldt A, Westermark K, Rensmo H et al 2002 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 148 57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sandeep K M, Bhat S and Dharmaprakash S M 2017 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 104 36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim D C, Han W S, Kong B H, Cho H K and Hong C H 2007 Phys. B Condens. Matter 401–402 386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo X L, Choi J H, Tabata H and Kawai T 2001 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40 L177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Iwata K, Sakemi T, Yamada A, Fons P, Awai K, Yamamoto T et al 2005 Thin Solid Films 480–481 199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Faÿ S, Steinhauser J, Nicolay S and Ballif C 2010 Thin Solid Films 518 2961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Faÿ S, Steinhauser J, Oliveira N, Vallat-Sauvain E and Ballif C 2007 Thin Solid Films 515 8558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitra P, Chatterjee A P and Maiti H S 1998 Mater. Lett. 35 33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu J, Pan Q, Shun Y and Tian Z 2000 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 66 277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang M, Zhang S, Qu F, Gong S, Wang C, Qiu L et al 2019 J. Alloys Compd. 797 246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hsu C L, Chen K C, Tsai T Y and Hsueh T J 2013 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 182 190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou W, Liu Y, Yang Y and Wu P 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 6448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu S, Yang W, Li L and Zhang W 2016 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 144 652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaur J, Roy S C and Bhatnagar M C 2007 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 123 1090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jung K H, Seo J Y, Lee S, Shin H and Park N G 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 24790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fonstad C G and Rediker R H 1971 J. Appl. Phys. 42 2911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hussain B, Aslam A, Khan T M, Creighton M and Zohuri B 2019 Electron 8 1

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hatem D and Belkaid M S 2013 Adv. Mater. Res. 685 166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang P T, Chen Y H, Lin B Y and Chuang W P 2015 Int. J. Photoenergy 2015 1

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li S, Xue D, Xu W, Feng Y, Wang J, Zhang G et al 2014 J. Mater. Chem. C 2 1500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, for the financial support under the Early Career Research (ECR) Award (No. ECR/2015/000163). CHR acknowledges the University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India, for Research Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, 671320, India

    C H RAJ KISHOR, K M SHAFEEQ & P M ANEESH

Authors
  1. C H RAJ KISHOR
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K M SHAFEEQ
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P M ANEESH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P M ANEESH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

KISHOR, C.H.R., SHAFEEQ, K.M. & ANEESH, P.M. Dependence of various oxide interfacial layers on the performance of P3HT:PCBM-based inverted organic solar cells. Bull Mater Sci 45, 131 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-022-02724-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-022-02724-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation