Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of particle size, surface area and conductivity of nano-carbon additives on deep discharge lead-acid battery

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of carbon nano- and micro-particle additives on performance of lead-acid battery (LAB) was studied by considering two different carbon blacks, both having low electrical conductivity. Full-scale 150 Ah flooded-electrolyte stationary batteries were prepared in a battery manufacturing unit and subjected to deep discharge cyclic conditions at depth-of-discharge (DOD) ~65%. We report that carbon particle size played a significant role in LAB performance. In comparison to nano-size, micron-scale particles demonstrated better results and this was completely in accordance with Pavlov’s findings. Moreover, an improvement in LAB charging regime and its charge return percentage was observed by the inclusion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in negative active material (NAM). Intriguingly, upon testing with 100 Ah deep discharge traction battery by replacing 0.075 wt% of micron additive with MWCNTs, the battery back-up time was increased by half an hour roughly (during C5 discharge with 100% DOD), while its charging time was reduced by 15–25 min, which seems to be significant. Such enhancement in LAB’s charge–discharge efficacy can be attributed to high specific surface area and electrical conductivity of MWCNTs, which with its tubular morphology was helpful in establishing an effective conductive network within NAM. The microscopic analysis confirms the useful dispersion and structural stability of MWCNTs in NAM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

References

  1. Perrin M, Saint-Drenan Y M, Mattera F and Malbranche P 2005 J. Power Sources 144 402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Global energy storage battery inverter market size and forecast 2018–2025. Available: https://www.adroitmarketresearch.com/press-release/energy-storage-battery-inverter-market (accessed on 20/5/2019)

  3. IESA knowledge paper on India lead acid battery market 2016–2020. Available: http://www.indiaesa.info/images/pdf/IESAKnowledgepaperonIndianLeadAcidBatteryMarket_DebiPrasadDash_IESA.pdf (accessed on 02/12/2018)

  4. Ruetschi P 2004 J. Power Sources 127 33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper A and Moseley P T 2003 J. Power Sources 113 200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garche J, Moseley P T and Karden E 2015 in Advances in battery technologies for electric vehicles B Scrosati, J Garche and W Tillmetz (eds) (Cambridge: Elsevier Ltd) p 75

  7. The advanced lead acid battery consortium 2016–2018. Available: www.alabc.org/publications/overview-of-the-alabc-1618-program (accessed on 22/12/2016)

  8. Rand D A J and Moseley P T 2015 in Electrochemical energy storage for renewable sources and grid balancing P T Moseley and J Garche (eds) (Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd) p 201

  9. Saravanan M, Sennu P, Ganesan M and Ambalavanan S 2012 J. Electrochem. Soc. 160 A70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Logeshkumar S and Manoharan R 2014 Electrochim. Acta 144 147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yeung K K, Zhang X, Kwok S C T, Ciucci F and Yuen M M F 2015 RSC Adv. 5 71314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marom R, Ziv B, Banerjee A, Cahana B, Luski S and Aurbach D 2015 J. Power Sources 296 78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Banerjee A, Ziv B, Levi E, Shilina Y, Luski S and Aurbach D 2016 J. Electrochem. Soc. 163 A1518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Banerjee A, Ziv B, Shilina Y, Levi E, Luski S and Aurbach D 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 3634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu H-Y, Xie N, Wang C, Wang L-Y, Privette R M, Li H-F et al 2018 ACS Omega 3 7096

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo Y, Tang S, Meng G and Yang S 2009 J. Power Sources 191 127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Newnham R H and Baldsing W G A 1997 J. Power Sources 66 27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moseley P T, Garche J, Parker C D and Rand D A J (eds) 2004 Valve-regulated lead-acid batteries (Netherlands: Elsevier Science)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pavlov D, Rogachev T, Nikolov P and Petkova G 2009 J. Power Sources 191 58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pavlov D and Nikolov P 2013 J. Power Sources 242 380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahajan V, Bharj R S and Bharj J 2019 Bull. Mater. Sci. 42 21

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Dr Amlan Kanti Das, Mr Thayananth and Mr Subhajit Dasgupta from Luminous Power Technologies, Una (HP), India, for their technical support and useful discussions on the subject matter. Further, we also thank Dr B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar (NITJ), for the Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme (TEQIP) financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishal Mahajan.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1820 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahajan, V., Bharj, R.S. Effect of particle size, surface area and conductivity of nano-carbon additives on deep discharge lead-acid battery. Bull Mater Sci 44, 52 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-020-02331-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-020-02331-z

Keywords

Navigation