Skip to main content
Log in

Synthesis of CeO2 nanostructures with its exceptional biological and chemocatalytic activities: a comparative study

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative study has been carried out on the synthesis of nanostructured CeO2 through chemical and biological methods. CeO2 nanoparticles have been synthesized chemically using oxalic acid. The as-synthesized nanoparticles have been stabilized using the capping agent, polyvinylpyrrolidone. The aqueous leaf extract of Annona reticulata has been utilized for the biofabrication of CeO2 nanoparticles. XRD, TEM and Raman analyses have been carried out to determine the structure and formation of the as-synthesized products. Optical studies have been carried out through UV–visible absorption, photoluminescence, Fourier transform infrared and Raman spectroscopic techniques. The biosynthesized CeO2 nanoparticles exhibit strong antioxidant activity as well as potent antidiabetic and wound healing activities in comparison to their chemically fabricated counterparts, extending the possibility for their application in pharmaceuticals. The biogenic nanoparticles also exhibit superior catalytic activity in the degradation of harmful dyes including methylene blue and eosin yellowish.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dhall A and Self W 2018 Antioxidants 7 97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang Z, Zhou K, Liu X, Tian Q, Lu D and Yang S 2007 Nanotechnology 18 185606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shirke B, Patil A A, Hankare P P and Garadkar K M 2011 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 22 200

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pinjari D V and Pandit A B 2011 Ultrason. Sonochem. 18 1118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Darroudi M, Sarani M, Oskuee R K, Zak A K, Hosseini H A and Gholami L 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 2041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Farahmandjou M, Zarinkamar M and Firoozabadi T P 2016 Rev. Mex. de Fis. 62 496

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu C, Lin Y, Wang J, Wu L, Wei W, Ren J et al 2013 Adv. Health. Mater. 2 1591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vassie J A, Whitelock J M and Lord M S 2018 Mol. Pharm. 15 994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thovhogi N, Diallo A, Gurib-Fakim A and Maaza M 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 647 392

  10. Maqbool Q, Nazar M, Naz S, Hussain T, Jabeen N, Kausar R et al 2016 Int. J. Nanomed. 11 5015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Arumugam A, Karthikeyan C, Haja Hameed A S, Gopinath K, Gowri S and Karthika V 2015 Mater. Sci. Eng. C 49 408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kannan S K and Sundrarajan M 2014 Int. J. Nanosci. 13 1450018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hegazy M A E, Maklad H M, Doaa A, Elmonsif A, Elnozhy F Y, Alqubiea M A et al 2017 J. Med. 53 351

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rajeshkumar S and Naik P 2018 Biotechnol. Rep. 17 1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiong J, Wu Q, Mei X, Liu J, Wei Y, Zhao Z et al 2018 ACS Catal. 8 7915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rajan A R, Rajan A, John A, Vilas V and Philip D 2019 Ceram. Int. 45 21947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chokshi K, Pancha I, Ghosh T, Paliwal C, Maurya R K, Ghosh A et al 2016 RSC Adv. 6 72269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumari M M, Jacob J and Philip D 2015 Spectrochim. Acta A 137 185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goharshadi E K, Samiee S and Nancarrow P 2011 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 356 473

  20. Tsunekawa S, Wang J T, Kawazoe Y and Kasuya A 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 94 3654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramjeyanthi N, Alagar M and Muthuraman D 2018 Int. J. Inter. Res. Inn. 6 389

    Google Scholar 

  22. Deus R C, Cortes J A, Ramirez M A, Ponce M A, Andres J, Rocha L S R et al 2015 Mater. Res. Bull. 70 416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gopinath K, Karthika V, Sundaravadivelan C, Gowri S and Arumugam A 2015 J. Nanostruct. Chem. 54 295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jayanthi S A, Sukanya D, Pragasam A J A and Sagayaraj P 2013 Der. Pharma Chem. 5 90

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sreeju N, Rufus A and Philip D 2016 J. Mol. Liq. 221 1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vilas V, Philip D and Mathew J 2016 J. Mol. Liq. 22 1179

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sherly E D, Vijaya J J and Kennedy L J 2015 J. Mol. Struct. 1099 114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar S, Srivastava M, Singh J, Layek S, Yashpal M, Materny A et al 2015 AIP Adv. 5 027109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gupta R N, Pareek A, Suthar M, Rathore G S, Basniwal P K and Jain D 2010 Int. J. Diabetes Dev. Ctries. 29 170

    Google Scholar 

  30. Javed R, Ahmed M, Haq I, Nisa S and Zia M 2017 Mater. Sci. Eng. C 79 108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Das M S and Devi G 2015 J. Appl. Pharma. Sci. 5 92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Reddy G R, Morais A B and Gandhi N N 2013 Asian J. Chem. 25 9249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Phull A R, Abbas Q, Ali A, Raza H, Kim S J, Zia M et al 2016 Future J. Pharma. Sci. 2 31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nagaich U, Gulati N and Chauhan S 2016 J. Pharma. (Cairo) 2016 7141523

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sudha A, Jeyakanthan J and Srinivasan P 2017 Res. Effic. Technol. 3 506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Esmaeili M A and Sonboli A 2010 Food Chem. Toxicol. 48 846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Xue Y, Luan Q, Yang D, Yao X and Zhou K 2011 J. Phys. Chem. 115 4433

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sandhir R, Yadav A, Sunkaria A and Singhal N 2015 Neurochem. Int. 89 209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Diaconeasa Z, Rugina D, Coman C, Socaciu C, Leopold L F, Vulpoi A et al 2017 Colloids Surf. A 5 132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rajendran N K, Dhilip K S S, Houreld N N and Abrahamse H 2018 J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 44 421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Pawar R S, Chaurasiya P K, Rajak H, Singour P K, Toppo F A and Jain A 2013 Indian J. Pharmacol. 45 474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rather H A, Thakore R, Singh R, Jhala D, Singh S and Vasita R 2018 Bioact. Mater. 3 201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chigurupati S, Mughal M R, Okun E, Das S, Kumar A, McCaffery M et al 2013 Biomaterials 34 2194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Rajan A, Vilas V and Philip D 2015 J. Mol. Liq. 207 231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Vasantharaj S, Sathiyavimal S, Saravanan M, Senthilkumar P, Kavitha G, Shanmugavel M et al 2019 J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 191 143

  46. Arasu M V, Arokiyaraj S, Viayaraghavan P, JebaKumar T S, Duraipandiyan V, Al-Dhabi N A et al 2019 J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 190 154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Abraham N, Rufus A, Unni C and Philip D 2019 Spectrochim. Acta A 200 116

  48. Princy K F and Gopinath A 2018 J. Nanostruct. Chem. 8 333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge STIC (Cochin), SAIF (Chennai), BIOGENIX research center (Thiruvananthapuram), for the technical help and Kerala University, Thiruvananthapuram, for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angel Rose Rajan.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajan, A.R., Vilas, V., Rajan, A. et al. Synthesis of CeO2 nanostructures with its exceptional biological and chemocatalytic activities: a comparative study. Bull Mater Sci 44, 16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-020-02315-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-020-02315-z

Keywords

Navigation