Abstract
\(\hbox {BiFeO}_{3}\) (BFO) is the only room temperature multiferroic material that has been extensively studied due to its multifunctional properties. BFO with a canted G-type antiferromagnetic (AFM) ordering exhibits strong exchange bias characteristics with NiFe which offers the potential to design and utilize devices working based on multiferroic features. In the past, it was known that the presence of \(180^{\circ }\) domain walls of BFO hinders a plausible exchange bias interaction. To understand the role of the strain-induced effects on such \(180^{\circ }\) domain walls and its effect on the exchange bias, NiFe, a soft ferromagnetic layer, was grown on the epitaxial BFO AFM layers. An approximately 80 nm BFO layer was grown epitaxially in both the tetragonal (001) phase on the \(\hbox {LaAlO}_{3}\) (001) substrate and the rhombohedral (111) phase on the \(\hbox {SrTiO}_{3}\) (111) substrate, with a thin (10 nm) layer of \(\hbox {Ni}_{80}\hbox {Fe}_{20}\) on top of it. An exchange bias of 510 Oe was observed in the tetragonal phase of BFO with a c / a ratio of 1.22, which is comparable with the exchange bias shown by the (111) oriented rhombohedral phase (360 Oe). Both the tetragonal (001) and rhombohedral (111) layers possess ferroelectric polarization normal to the sample surface and so the domain walls are mostly \(180^{\circ }\) oriented which is expected to have a minimum effect on the exchange bias. However, the weak strain-induced structural variants in the (111) oriented rhombohedral BFO and the monoclinic distortion present in the tetragonal BFO introduce non-\(180^{\circ }\) domain walls in the system. These variants arising due to the structural distortion are expected to play a key role in defining the ferroelectric domain wall nature, thereby exhibiting exchange bias characteristics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Reohr W, Honigschmid H, Robertazzi R, Gogl D, Pesavento F, Lammers S et al 2002 IEEE Circuits Devices Mag. 18 17
Binek C and Doudin B 2005 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17 39
Wang J, Neaton J B, Zheng H, Nagarajan V, Ogale S B, Liu B et al 2003 Science 299 1719
Bertinshaw J, Maran R, Callori S J, Ramesh V, Cheung J, Danilkin S A et al 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12664
Zhang J X, Xiang B, He Q, Seidel J, Zeches R J, Yu P et al 2009 Science 326 977
Ramesh R and Spaldin N A 2007 Nature Mater. 6 2
Sajmohan M M, Bandyopadhyay S, Jogi T, Bhattacharya S and Ramadurai R 2019 J. Appl. Phys. 125 012501
Sajmohan M M, Sreenath M V and Ranjith R MRS Adv. 3 2713
Sajmohan M M and Ranjith R 2018 AIP Conf. Proc. 1942 80040
Choi T, Lee S, Choi Y J, Kiryukhin V and Cheong S W 2009 Science 324 63
Chu S H, Singh D J, Wang J, Li E P and Ong K P 2012 Laser Photonics Rev. 6 684
Nogules J and Schuller I K 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 192 203
Dong S, Yamauchi K, Yunoki S, Yu R, Liang S, Moreo A et al 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 5
Bea H, Bibes M, Cherifi S, Nolting F, Warot-Fonrose B, Fusil S et al 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 242114
Martin L W, Chu Y H, Zhan Q, Ramesh R, Han S J, Wang S X et al 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 1
Bea H, Bibes M, Ott F, Dupe B, Zhu X H, Petit S et al 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 1
Dho J and Blamire M G 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 106 1
Heron J T, Schlom D G and Ramesh R 2014 Appl. Phys. Rev. 1 21303
Dho J and Blamire M G 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 106 73914
Zhao T, Scholl A, Zavaliche F, Lee K, Barry M, Doran A et al 2006 Nat. Mater. 5 823
Bai F, Yu G, Wang Y, Jin L, Zeng H, Tang X et al 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 092401
Xu Q, Yuan X, Xue X, Shi Z, Wen Z and Du J 2014 Phys. Status Solidi B 251 892
Venkataiah G, Anupama S, Katsuyoshi K, Mitsuru I and Tomoyasu T 2017 Phys. Status Solidi RRL 11 1700294
Bea H, Bibes M, Barthlmy A, Bouzehouane K, Jacquet E, Khodan A et al 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 1
Li J, Wang J, Wuttig M, Ramesh R, Wang N, Ruette B et al 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 5261
Saito K, Ulyanenkov A, Grossmann V, Ress H, Bruegemann L, Ohta H et al 2006 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45 7311
Zhang N, Yokota H, Glazer A M, Ren Z, Keen D A, Keeble D S et al 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 5231
Hatt A J, Spaldin N A and Ederer C 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 54109
Martin L W, Chu Y H, Holcomb M B, Huijben M, Yu P, Han S J et al 2008 Nano Lett. 8 2050
Dipanjan M, Vilas S, Milko I, Stephen J, Amit K, Kalinin S V et al 2010 Nano Lett. 10 2555
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by DAE-BRNS (project no: 34/20/05/2014-BRNS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sajmohan, M.M., Ranjith, R. & Chelvane, J.A. Effect of non-\(180^{\circ }\) polarization invariants on the exchange bias of tetragonal \(\langle 001\rangle \) and rhombohedral \(\langle 111\rangle \) orientations of bismuth ferrite epitaxial thin films. Bull Mater Sci 42, 208 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-019-1904-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-019-1904-3