Amplicon-Based RNA Interference Targeting V2 Gene of Cotton Leaf Curl Kokhran Virus-Burewala Strain Can Provide Resistance in Transgenic Cotton Plants
The conserved coat or V2 gene of begomoviruses is responsible for viral movement in the plant cells. RNAi technology was used to silence V2 gene for resistance against these viruses in transgenic plants. The transformation of the RNAi-based gene construct targeting V2 gene of CLCuKoV-Bur, cloned under 35S promoter, was done in two elite cotton varieties MNH-786 and VH-289 using shoot apex cut method of gene transformation. The transformation efficiency was found to be 3.75 and 2.88 % in MNH-786 and VH-289, respectively. Confirmation of successful transformation was done through PCR in T0, T1, and T2 generations using gene-specific primers. Transgenic cotton plants were categorized on the basis of the virus disease index in T1 generation. Copy number and transgene location were observed using FISH and karyotyping in T2 generation which confirmed random integration of V2 RNAi amplicon at chromosome 6 and 16. Real-time quantitative PCR analyses of promising transgenic lines showed low virus titer compared to wild-type control plants upon challenging them with viruliferous whiteflies in a contained environment. From the results, it was concluded that amplicon V2 RNAi construct was able to limit virus replication and can be used to control CLCuV in the field.
KeywordsGene transformation siRNA CLCuD Begomovirus V2 ORF Knockdown
The agriculture sector is of utmost importance for Pakistan’s economy as it contributes 21.4 % of the overall GDP. Among major crops, only cotton shares 1.2 % of the country’s overall GDP and contributes more than 60 % of its foreign exchange. Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) is a major threat to the production of cotton in Pakistan [1, 2, 3]. CLCuD remained a sporadic nuisance before 1986, but in the subsequent years, it rapidly spread across the cotton growing areas of Pakistan and became an epidemic in 1991–2 causing heavy yield losses during those years. During the late 1990s, resistant cotton varieties were introduced and thus losses due to this disease reduced . However, in the year 2001–2, in the Burewala region of Punjab province, resistant cotton varieties began to show typical symptoms of CLCuD. This was an indication of a second epidemic and referred to as Cotton leaf curl Burewala virus which is now known as Cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus-Burewala strain (CLCuKoV-Bur). This virus has spread and infection is now found in most cotton growing areas in Pakistan [5, 6].
Typical symptoms of CLCuD include thickening, darkening and swelling of veins, upward or downward curling of leaves, and enations (cup-shaped laminar outgrowths on the undersides of leaves) [7, 8, 9]. The CLCuD is caused by a complex consisting of several monopartite begomoviruses (family Geminiviridae) that essentially require a satellite molecule known as cotton leaf curl Multan beta satellite (CLCuMB). CLCuMB is entirely dependent on the helper begomovirus for its replication and encapsulation, while it acts as a pathogenicity determinant and encodes protein βC1 that can overcome host defense responses . It has been shown that CLCuKoV-Bur is a recombinant molecule derived from two previously reported viruses i.e., Cotton leaf curl Multan virus and Cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus . Similarly, the beta satellite associated with CLCuKoV is a recombinant of CLCuMB and Tomato leaf curl beta satellite . Also associated with the disease is another self-replicating component referred to as an alpha satellite. The role of the alpha satellite is not fully known; however, the rep protein of an alpha satellite has been shown to be a suppressor of gene silencing . These viral components are transmitted to the plant by whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) .
To date, no natural resistance to immunity is available in cotton against CLCuD. Besides conventional methods, the use of biotechnological approaches can be a possible solution to this problem, based on RNA interference (RNAi) in varieties with an agronomical CLCuD-tolerant background [13, 14, 15]. RNAi (or gene silencing) is a homology based down-regulation/silencing of genes mechanism which is evolutionary conserved and works in a sequence-specific manner. Begomoviruses can be targeted by gene silencing both at the transcriptional level [transcriptional gene silencing (TGS)], which results in methylation of viral DNA, and the post-transcriptional level [post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS)], which results in degradation of viral transcripts. RNAi is always triggered by a dsRNA that is cleaved into short interfering siRNAs by an RNase referred to as DICER-like. The siRNAs then guide sequence-specific silencing. For PTGS, siRNAs are incorporated into an enzyme complex, the RNA-induced silencing complex which degrades homologous mRNAs [16, 17, 18, 19]. Resistance against viruses in plants can be obtained by inducing RNAi in plants through the introduction of a sequence homologous to the virus in the form of a hairpin (hp) . One of the advantages of RNAi is the silencing signal which is not limited to individual cells, but can spread to neighboring cells and more distant tissues [21, 22].
RNA interference is an emerging technology for developing insect resistance genes. Many transgenic RNAi-based genetically modified (GM) plants, targeting insects have been developed, including GM corn, GM rice, and GM cotton, and additional GM crops are in the process of development. Various researchers have tried to use RNAi technology to obtain resistance against geminiviruses [23, 24, 25, 26]. Recently, RNAi-based resistance has been successfully applied in beans against Bean golden mosaic virus in Brazil [27, 28].
In this study, two elite cotton varieties i.e., MNH-786 and VH-289 were transformed with an amplicon RNAi construct against V2 gene of CLCuKoV-Bur. The philosophy of silencing of this gene was to restrict virus movement and further spread. Similar efforts were made for transforming Indian cotton varieties with RNAi gene constructs targeting V2 and Intergenic region (IR) [15, 29].
Materials and Methods
Two hundred and forty Nucleotides from V2 of Cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus-Burewala (CLCuKoV-Bur; Accession No. AM421522) were taken to make hairpin construct synthetically. Both sense and antisense sequences of V2 are separated by 115 nucleotides from an intron of Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus (MYMIV), Accession No. FM202439, to induce hairpin. The IR of CLCuMuV (Accession No. AY312430) was used, which presumably contains both the Rep promoter and the viral origin of replication. The IR, which is used for higher expression of siRNAs, consists of 287 nt . The only way this amplicon construct can work is by having two IRs for replicational release by the Rep of the infecting virus. However, to make the construct as a defective interfering molecule, 247 nt from Poly A of Cotton leaf curl Multan alpha satellite (CLCuMuA), accession no. AJ132344, were added after the hairpin construct. As a result, the total size of the construct would be 1.479 kb which is approximately equal to the defective molecules of DNA A of begomoviruses.
Internal primer details for gene amplification of RNAi gene construct and real-time PCR
Product size (bp)
ClCuV Burewala (F)
ClCuV Burewala (R)
ClCuV Multan beta (F)
ClCuV Multan beta (R)
Confirmation of Amplicon-Based Begomovirus Construct
The amplicon V2 RNAi construct was confirmed through amplification using gene-specific primers. The construct was also confirmed, using plasmid as template, through restriction digestion analysis. Furthermore, confirmation of successful electroporation in Agrobacterium was also done through colony PCR using gene-specific primers.
On request, seeds of cotton varieties MNH 786 and VH 289 were provided by the Cotton Research Institute, Multan and Cotton Research Institute, Vehari, respectively.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
The CTAB method was used for genomic DNA isolation of putative transgenic cotton plants . Amplification of the transgene with specific primers was done by PCR to confirm the successful transformation. DNA isolated from putative plants was used as a template; the plasmid construct was used as positive control, while the DNA isolated from untransformed plants was used as negative control. The PCR master mix was composed of 3 µl (10 ng) of template DNA, 2 µl PCR Buffer (10×), 2.5 µl MgCl2, 2 µl forward primer (10 pmol), 2 µl reverse primer (10 pmol), 2µl dNTPs (2 mM), and 1 µl (1.25 units) of Taq DNA polymerase (Fermantas cat # EP0402). The PCR reaction was initiated with denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min and subjected to 35 cycles as follows: 95 °C for 1 min, 59 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min. Extension phase was prolonged for 10 min at 72 °C. The transgenic plants were screened at T0, T1 and T2 generation on the basis of PCR results.
Monitoring of Disease Symptoms and Determination of Viral Disease Index
Monitoring of CLCuV symptoms of transgenic cotton plants was done through random selection. None of the plant was sprayed with whitefly control. The disease index was calculated using a scale described by Akhtar and Khan . The inoculation of transgenic along with control cotton plant was done by incubating each transgenic and control plant with ten viruliferous whiteflies (produced by feeding on symptomatic non-transgenic plants). PCR reaction was performed to confirm and select the infected whiteflies in controlled greenhouse condition, and observation were taken after 3 week-interval of plant inoculation with whitefly.
Percentage disease index was established by following the procedure determined by Farooq et al.  and applied in cotton by Akhtar et al. . According to this formula, disease index of cotton line with a factor 100/6 in which 100 determined percentage and 6 determined total level of disease index [35, 36].
Virus Titer Determination Through Real-Time Quantitative PCR
The virus titer in different transgenic plants with amplicon V2 RNAi was determined through Thermo Scientific Maxima SYBR Green qPCR kit (cat# K0241). The DNA of transgenic and non-transformed plants was diluted 10× before using as a template. CLCuKoV-Bur plasmid construct and CLCuMB plasmid construct were used as the standard for absolute quantification, while virus-infected plants were used as positive control. The master mix contained 10 µl SYBER green, 0.35 µl of Forward primer (10 pmol, Table 1), 0.35 µl of Reverse primer (10 pmol, Table 1), and 8.3 µl of template DNA (100/reaction). The qPCR reaction was started with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 59 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. A final extension was given at 72 °C for 10 min.
Southern Blot Analysis
The transgene copy no was determined using the Southern blot analysis as described by Southern . Genomic DNA from apical leaves of putative transgenic cotton plants and untransformed control plants was isolated using Thermo scientific Genomic DNA purification kit (cat # K0512) by following the manufacturer’s guidelines. Genomic DNA (20 μg) was digested with HindIII enzyme according to the supplier’s instructions (Enzyme Production Lab of the National Centre of excellence in molecular biology (CEMB), Pakistan). The color was detected by 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium (BCIP/NBT) tablets (Sigma B5655) dissolved in water according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH)
Labeling of the probe for transgene detection was done by Fluorescein ULS® Labeling Kit (Fermentas K0641) by following the instructions given by the manufacturer, and in situ hybridization was carried out according to protocol described by Rahman et al.  on metaphase chromosomal spreads.
Transformation of RNAi Gene Construct in Cotton Embryos
The record of transformation experiments done for RNAi construct transformation
No. of embryos isolated
No. of shoots in test tubes after 30 days
Plants acclimatized and thrived in field
No. of plants shifted to soil pots
No. of plants shifted to Field
Transformation Efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation
No. of embryos isolated
No. of plants obtained after 8 weeks
Transformation efficiency (%)
Confirmation of Gene Integration in T0, T1, and T2 Transgenic Plants
A total of 11 MNH-786 and 12 VH-289 transgenic events were used for cultivation of the T1 generation. The plants were also analyzed. PCR to amplify a 540 bp region of amplicon V2 RNAi construct was performed for T1 transgenic cotton using plasmid as positive and wild-type cotton plants as negative controls with the same primers as were used for analysis of putative transgenic plants in T0 generation. Seeds of transgenic T1 events were used to rise the T2 generation. The T2 generation plants were tested through PCR. PCR analysis confirmed the presence of the amplicon V2 RNAi construct.
Viral Disease Index
Viral disease Index of transgenic plants
Disease index (%)
Absence of symptoms
Thickening of a few small veins or the presence of leaf enations on 10 or fewer leaves of plants
Thickening of the small group of veins
Thickening of veins, but no leaf curling
Severe vein thickening or leaf curling at the top of the third plant
Severe vein thickening or leaf curling on half of the plant
Severe vein thickening, leaf curling, stunted growth of the plant and less fruit production
Disease ratings of transgenic and non-transgenic plants
No. of plants under disease rating 6
No. of plants under disease rating 5
No. of plants under disease rating 4
No. of plants under disease rating 3
No. of plants under disease rating 2
No. of plants under disease rating 1
No. of plants under disease rating 0
Non-transgenic control plants
Transgenic plants MNH-786
Transgenic plants MVH-289
Virus Titer of T1 Transgenic Plants
Location of Transgene in Cotton
Southern Blot Analysis
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Cotton is the white gold of Pakistan’s economy. Pakistan is the largest exporter of cotton yarn. Therefore the efforts to improve crop production, improve fiber quality, and pest management by genetic modification are critical. Cultivation of resistant crops and use of insecticides are currently the two major controls used for CLCuD . According to Mansoor et al. , CLCuD-resistant crops were successfully developed in 1990s, but the virus soon developed resistance to these varieties . An alternative strategy to control CLCuD could be RNAi. The results presented here have shown that the amplicon V2 RNAi approach, which is targeted against highly conserved V2 gene of the begomovirus, has the potential to provide resistance against CLCuKoV-Bur CLCuD in transgenic cotton plants. The majority of the transgenic cotton plants, upon challenge with viruliferous whiteflies in a contained environment, showed lower disease symptoms as well as disease index ratings. qPCR analyses showed the presence of virus in all transgenic plants, but there was a significant difference in virus titer compared with wild-type cotton plants. The level of resistance obtained here may be more accurately stated as highly tolerant to infection. These results are consistent with several studies that have exploited the RNAi approach for transgenic resistance against geminiviruses. According to Ali et al. , effective resistance in plants against monopartite begomoviruses can be obtained by applying a miRNA approach. [15, 41, 42, 43, 44].
In the present study, the amplicon V2 RNAi gene construct was transformed in elite cotton varieties MNH-786 and VH-289. V2 protein in monopartite virus is a symptom determinant and elicited cell death. When expressed in plants using Potato virus X-based vector, it can act as a suppressor of gene silencing [45, 46]. Moreover, V2 encoded by CLCuMV is a very strong suppressor of gene silencing . Tobacco plants were developed harboring an antisense construct targeting the AV2 gene of Tomato leaf curl New Delhi Virus (ToLCNDV) . Upon challenging with virus-infectious clones of ToLCNDV, transgenic plants remained asymptomatic, although viral DNA could be detected by PCR. Satyavathi et al.  transformed Indian cotton variety F-846 with Agrobacterium transformation by targeting V2 genes of CLCuKoV using a RNAi approach . Transgenic cotton plants exhibited a true Mendelian pattern of inheritance and were tolerant to complex virus including CLCuD. In this study, we are not only reporting the development of cotton transgenic plants, but we have conducted a comprehensive study on the resistance of amplicon V2 RNAi construct. Our results have shown that the amplicon V2 RNAi approach can provide high tolerance in transgenic cotton plants. In order to achieve a resistance to immunity, the amplicon V2 RNAi can be coupled with other types of resistance and tolerance.
Cotton varieties MNH-786 and VH-289 were transformed via Agrobacterium Strain LBA4404. A total of 84 experiments were performed to transform the RNAi gene in cotton. The number of plantlets obtained after 8 weeks for both transgenic varieties was low, i.e., 278 for MNH-786 and 196 for VH-289. Thus, the transformation efficiency of MNH-786 and VH-289 was 3.75 % and 2.88 %, respectively (Table 3). Bakhsh et al.  reported higher transformation efficiency (20 %) of Agrobacterium strain (LBA4404) in tobacco plants , but cotton is harder to transform, and our results were similar to the work of Majeed et al.  in which transformation efficiency in cotton was 5.17 % [49, 50].
Eighty-six putative transgenic plants of MNH-786 and 43 putative transgenic rooted plants of VH-289 were shifted to soil pots. PCR confirmed the successful integration of the RNAi gene into cotton genome. The number of plants was further reduced during acclimatization, and the numbers of T0 generation plants shifted to the field was 24 and 26 for MNH-786 and VH-289, respectively. Once the plants began flowering, their flowers were self-pollinated to avoid gene transfer .
The seeds of the T0 generation were sown in the field during August 2013, with ten seeds of a single event sown in a row. The plants were not protected from whitefly attack at this stage.
The whitefly attack on transgenic plants of the T1 generation was seen at a very early stage of sowing. The plants were continuously observed during this menace. The viral index of all plants in the field was calculated using a formula as described by Akhtar and Khan . Four plants were selected from both varieties (VH-289 and MNH-786) along with one non-transgenic plant to determine the viral titer via RT-PCR. The plants having minimum symptoms showed minimum viral titer and vice versa (Fig. 7). The results of real-time PCR were of utmost importance for the selection of plants for the T2 generation. The other important factor considered for selection of plants was the PCR result which confirmed RNAi gene integration in T1 plants. The integration of RNAi gene construct in plants of T2 generation was confirmed via PCR using gene-specific internal primers. Three out of six MNH-786 and five out of eight VH-289 T3 plants were confirmed after PCR analysis. qPCR assay was performed to quantify virus titer in plants showing minimum and maximum symptoms (from each variety). Interestingly, a positive correlation was observed between the virus titer and disease index.
Both the varieties (MNH-786 and VH-289) showed almost similar results.
To determine the transgene location and copy number in the transgenic plants, the FISH analysis was done. Transformants with a single copy were achieved in both the varieties. In the case of two events from different varieties, the transgene locations were observed on different chromosomes. Transformed plants (vv. MC2-8) showed transgene insertion at chromosome No. 6, whereas in VC2-11 line, it was at chromosome No. 16. This has been observed in other transformation events and the different locations maybe due to various factors which are involved in the transformation of the transgene into the host genome [52, 53].
The molecular analyses performed in this study showed the positive integration of the RNAi gene construct in T0, T1, and T2 generations. Cotton is an important crop not only for Pakistan, but also India where CLCuD is a big threat to cotton as well. Any successful transgenic varieties could have a big impact in countries throughout the globe where CLCuD is a threat. The positive integration of an RNAi-based gene in cotton varieties and absolute quantification determining viral titer of transgenic plants gives hope for a promising future for transgenic crops in Pakistan.
This material is based upon work supported by the “Pakistan–U.S. Cotton Productivity Enhancement Program” of ICARDA funded by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), under Agreement No. 58-6402-0-178F. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USDA or ICARDA.
Aneela Yasmeen, Sarfraz Kiani, Afshan Butt, and Aftab Ahmad have done transformation, result analysis, and manuscript preparation. Faheem Akram performed the FISH analysis. Muhammad Zubair, Muhammad Nauman Tahir, and Sohail Akhtar performed the cloning. Imran Amin and Shaheen Aftab developed cloning strategy; Abdul Qayyum Rao and Idrees Ahmad Nasir developed cotton transformation strategy; Tayyab Husnain, Shahid Mansoor, Jodi Scheffler, and Brian Scheffler provided overall supervision for the project and manuscript revision and proofreading.
The research work was funded by the “Pakistan–U.S. Cotton Productivity Enhancement Program” of ICARDA funded by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), under Agreement No. 58-6402-0-178F and Grant No. 1198.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
- 1.Azam, S., Samiullah, T. R., Yasmeen, A., Din, S., Iqbal, A., Rao, A. Q., et al. (2013). Dissemination of Bt cotton in cotton growing belt of Pakistan. Advancements in Life Sciences, 1, 18–26.Google Scholar
- 3.Shahid, A. A., Bano, S., Khalid, S., Samiullah, T. R., Bajwa, K. S., & Ali, M. A. (2016). Biosafety assessment of transgenic Bt cotton on model animals. Advancements in Life Sciences, 3, 97–108.Google Scholar
- 7.Akhtar, K. P., Haq, M. A., Hussain, M., & Khan, A. I. (2002). Whitefly transmitted gemini virus and associated disorder in cotton: A review. Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology, 14, 140–150.Google Scholar
- 12.Kauter, G. (2007). Cotton leaf curl virus study tour. Narrabri, NSW: Australian Cotton Growers Research Association Inc.Google Scholar
- 13.Khan, M. A. U., Shahid, A. A., Rao, A. Q., Shahid, N., Latif, A., ud Din, S., et al. (2015). Defense strategies of cotton against whitefly transmitted CLCuV and Begomoviruses. Advancements in Life Science, 2, 58–66.Google Scholar
- 33.Doyle, J. J., & Doyle, J. L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bullentin, 19, 11–15.Google Scholar
- 34.Akhtar, K. P., & Khan, M. S. I. (2002). Modified scale for the assessment of cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV). Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology, 14, 88–90.Google Scholar
- 35.Farooq, et al. (2011). An overview of cotton leaf curl virus disease (CLCuD) a serious threat to cotton productivity. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(13), 1823–1831.Google Scholar
- 36.Akhtar, K. P., Khan, A. I., Hussain, M., Haq, M. A., & Khan, M. S. I. (2003). Upland cotton varietal response to cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV). Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension, 5, 29–34.Google Scholar
- 38.Rahman, M., Noreen, S., Husnain, T., & Riazuddin, S. (2010). Fast and efficient method to determine the position of alien genes in transgenic plants. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 22(3), 223–231.Google Scholar
- 41.Aragão, F. J. L., Ribeiro, S. G., Barros, L. M. G., Brasileiro, A. M., Maxwell, D. P., et al. (1998). Transgenic beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) engineered to express viral antisense RNAs show delayed and attenuated symptoms to bean golden mosaic geminivirus. Molecular Breeding, 4, 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Amin, I., Patil, B. L., Briddon, R. W., Mansoor, S., & Fauquet, C. M. (2011). Comparison of phenotypes produced in response to transient expression of genes encoded by four distinct begomoviruses in Nicotianabenthamiana and their correlation with the levels of developmental miRNAs. Virology Journal, 8, 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Bakhsh, A., Anayol, E., & Ozcan, S. F. (2014). Comparison of transformation efficiency of five Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains in Nicotianatabacum L. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 26(3), 259–264.Google Scholar
- 53.Yin, Z., & Malepszy, S. (2003). The transgenes are expressed with different level in plants. Biotechnologia, 2(61), 236–260.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.