Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comparative Structural and Bioanalytical Study of IVIG Clinical Lots

  • Research
  • Published:
Molecular Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intravenous immunoglobulin are important bio-therapeutics used in the replacement therapy for primary and secondary immunodeficiencies, chronic inflammatory disorders and several autoimmune haematologic disorders. Currently, a number of immunoglobulin intravenous (IVIG) products have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are available commercially. It is known that small differences in the manufacturing processes as well as in the formulations may affect their clinical efficacy and tolerability. Therefore, given the complexity of the multi-step process required for the isolation of IVIG from human plasma, it is necessary to ensure a rigorous quality control of final products. We show here that a set of different bioanalytical techniques can be conveniently used to comparatively characterize, at a quantitative and qualitative level, different lots of IVIG preparations and to unveil randomly occurring impurities which can also affect the overall product stability. We have used circular dichroism, surface plasmon resonance and two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE), and have demonstrated that this combination of bioanalytical approaches is very useful to improve the quality control of antibodies and to monitor the reliability of the IVIG manufacturing process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaveri, S. V., Maddur, M. S., Hegde, P., Lacroix-Desmazes, S., & Bayry, (2011). Intravenous immunoglobulins in immunodeficiencies: More than mere replacement therapy. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 164(Suppl 2), 2–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Navarro, R. P., Ballow, M., Fenrick, B., & Pezalla, E. J. (2012). Considerations for the optimal use of immunoglobulin. American Journal of Managed Care, 18(4 Suppl), S67–S78.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baerenwaldt, A., Biburger, M., & Nimmerjahn, F. (2010). Mechanisms of action of intravenous immunoglobulins. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, 6(3), 425–434.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bayry, J., Fournier, E. M., Maddur, M. S., Vani, J., Wootla, B., Sibéril, S., et al. (2011). Intravenous immunoglobulin induces proliferation and immunoglobulin synthesis from B cells of patients with common variable immunodeficiency: A mechanism underlying the beneficial effect of IVIg in primary immunodeficiencies. Journal of Autoimmunity, 36(1), 9–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Radosevich, M., & Burnouf, T. (2010). Intravenous immunoglobulin G: Trends in production methods, quality control and quality assurance. Vox Sanguinis, 98(1), 12–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vermeer, A. W., & Norde, W. (2000). The thermal stability of immunoglobulin: Unfolding and aggregation of a multi-domain protein. Biophysical Journal, 78(1), 394–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Whitmore, L., Wallace, B. A., & DICHROWEB. (2004). An online server for protein secondary structure analyses from circular dichroism spectroscopic data. Nucleic Acids Research, 1(32(web server issue)), W668–W673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnsson, B., Lofas, S., & Lindquist, G. (1991). Immobilization of proteins to a carboxymethyldextran-modified gold surface for biospecific interaction analysis in surface plasmon resonance sensors. Analytical Biochemistry, 198, 268–277.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. In accordance with EU pharmacopoeia: the values are stated in the leaflet accompanying the reference preparation (BRP—batch 3). See also: British pharmacopoeia volume IV, appendix XIV. Journal of Blood and Related Products.

  10. Whitmore, L., & Wallace, B. A. (2008). Protein secondary structure analyses from circular dichroism spectroscopy: Methods and reference databases. Biopolymers, 89(5), 392–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, S., & Sweeney, H. M. (1979). Modulation of Protein A Formation in Staphylococcus aureus by Genetic Determinants for Methicillin Resistance. Journal of Bacteriology, 140(3), 1028–1035.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Velge-Roussel, F., Breton, P., Lescure, F., Guillon, X., Bout, D., & Hoebeke, J. (1995). Analysis of human CD4-antibody interaction using the BIAcore system. Journal of Immunological Methods, 183(1), 141–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sandomenico, A., Monti, S. M., Marasco, D., Dathan, N., Palumbo, R., Saviano, M., et al. (2009). IgE-binding properties and selectivity of peptide mimics of the FcvarepsilonRI binding site. Molecular Immunology, 46(16), 3300–3309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Annamaria Sandomenico or Menotti Ruvo.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 4996 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandomenico, A., Severino, V., Chambery, A. et al. A Comparative Structural and Bioanalytical Study of IVIG Clinical Lots. Mol Biotechnol 54, 983–995 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-013-9655-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-013-9655-7

Keywords

Navigation