Abstract
Purpose
Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, a risk factor for gastric cancer, is prevalent in Japan. Consequently, some municipalities across Japan are implementing HP screening and treatment programs for adolescents. However, little is known about parents’ attitudes and awareness regarding HP screening for their children. This study aimed to elucidate parental perspectives on HP screening for their children and identify the factors influencing these attitudes.
Methods
This study focused on the parents of first-year junior high school students in Yokosuka City, Kanagawa Prefecture, where an HP screening and treatment program had been implemented for adolescents. The survey questionnaire was distributed among parents in all 23 public junior high schools in Yokosuka City.
Results
Among the 618 respondents, 86.4% supported HP screening for their children. Regression analysis identified sufficient knowledge about HP (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 5.80; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.10–16.03) and being in their 40s (aOR = 2.25; 95% CI, 1.35–3.77) as significant factors influencing supportive attitudes. For parents favoring the screening, common reasons included perceiving it as a promising opportunity (53.2%) and considering the test necessary (44.0%). In contrast, those who opposed screening frequently cited it as unnecessary (66.7%) or believed that their children did not have HP.
Conclusions
A significant proportion of parents in Yokosuka City, Japan, demonstrated a good understanding of HP and expressed a high level of interest in HP screening for their children. Further investigation of parents’ attitudes is essential for the effective implementation of adolescent HP screening programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Screening plays a crucial role in preventive interventions by facilitating early disease diagnosis and treatment in apparently healthy individuals. This strategy is particularly effective in mitigating the long-term consequences of chronic infections, such as hepatitis B and C viruses, tuberculosis, and Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, all of which can lead to severe disease conditions and even cancers, if left untreated [1,2,3]. HP eradication has been shown to reduce the recurrence of gastric cancer, especially in regions with high incidence rates, such as Japan and South Korea [4,5,6]. Recent studies have suggested that HP eradication may also suppress the development of gastric cancer in asymptomatic adults [7, 8], leading to the implementation of screening and treatment strategies in high-risk areas, particularly in Asia [9, 10]. Thus, addressing HP infection and reducing the incidence of gastric cancer are crucial public health objectives.
In several countries, including those in Asia where the prevalence of gastric cancer is high, there has been a growing interest in screening adolescents for HP [11,12,13,14,15]. HP is believed to cause infection during infancy and to increase the risk of cancer over time by inducing metaplasia in the gastric epithelium. In Japan, the estimated cumulative incidence risk for gastric cancer from birth to 85 years in the infected population is reported to be 17.0% for men and 7.7% for women [16]. Eradicating HP before the progression to gastritis is thought to offer a potentially more effective preventive approach for gastric cancer [17]. However, there is a dearth of research on the optimal age for HP screening and eradication. Japan, with its high incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer, has started conducting screening and treatment interventions for adolescents at the municipal level [12, 18,19,20].
Yokosuka City, an urban area in Japan, was an early adopter of the HP screening program for adolescents. The city initiated a pilot program for HP testing in junior high school students in 2017 and later introduced HP testing as a screening tool for all second-year junior high school students in 2019. This involved measuring antibodies in urine samples collected at school and performing a urea breath test at a medical institution if the outcome was positive. Subsequently, eradication treatment was provided to those who tested positive for HP. To date, approximately 10,000 students have participated in this program. Similar to adult screening initiatives, sustaining and improving primary testing participation rates continues to be a substantial challenge in these screening programs.
Adolescent health screening relies heavily on parents’ understanding and support. This element is evident in contexts like the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, where an individual’s decision to participate in screening is influenced by their understanding of HPV and cervical cancer, as well as their parents’ perception [21, 22]. Likewise, comprehending a disease like HP entails not only recognizing it as an infectious disease but also grasping complex medical knowledge, including implications for potential future gastric cancer risk. Despite the importance of these factors, surveys exploring how parents perceive their children’s HP screening outcomes and their level of comprehension regarding the infection are lacking.
Our study aimed to clarify the key determinants affecting parental decisions regarding HP screening for their children and to evaluate parents’ current level of knowledge about the infection. To achieve this, we conducted a questionnaire-based survey of middle school students’ parents in Yokosuka City, Kanagawa Prefecture, focusing on their perceptions and understanding of HP and its related screening procedures. Through this study, we sought to identify effective methods to enhance HP screening programs for adolescents, address the identified issues to increase participation rates, and improve the overall effectiveness of these programs.
Materials and Methods
Participants and Setting
This study conducted a questionnaire-based survey of respondents for 5 weeks, from April 7, 2022, to May 13, 2022. The eligible population comprised 2793 first-year students enrolled in all 23 municipal middle schools in Yokosuka City, Kanagawa Prefecture. With the cooperation of the Health Management Support Division of Yokosuka City, and Yokosuka City Board of Education, the survey consisted of 15 questions and was administered via an online response platform. QR codes and URLs providing access to the survey were distributed at each middle school and were subsequently conveyed to parents by their children. Although the content was primarily in Japanese, non-Japanese-speaking parents were offered English language guidance, and response forms were also provided in English language. Participation was voluntary and informed consent was obtained upon completion of the survey. No specific monetary compensations or incentives were offered for completing the survey. Before implementation, this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Yokosuka City Medical Association (approval number 1) and Fukushima Medical University (approval number 2022-030).
Questionnaire Content
The items in the questionnaire, which tested the knowledge of HP among parents, were developed with reference to previous studies [23, 24]. The survey items encompassed fundamental knowledge of HP, sources of medical information, awareness of HP screening among middle school students in Yokosuka, willingness to allow their children to participate in screening, and the reasons for their decisions. The questions related to knowledge regarding HP covered aspects such as harmful effects of HP, site of infection, mode of transmission, and details about testing and treatment. Respondents were also asked about their basic characteristics, including sex, family history of HP and cancer, history of HP testing/treatment, participation in cancer screening, occupation (medical or non-medical), the respondent’s relationship with the student, student’s sex, age, presence of siblings, and cohabiting family members (Supplementary file). Internal validity of the questionnaire was assessed by two gastroenterologists (HS and YM) and one internist (MT). To ensure anonymity, the survey did not collect data identifying individuals, and responses with missing data on the willingness to allow children to participate in HP screening were excluded from the analyses.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical descriptions are presented as medians (quartiles) for continuous variables and as proportions for categorical variables. For knowledge regarding HP, respondents were categorized based on the number of correct answers to the following seven questions: insufficient knowledge (0–2 correct answers), intermediate knowledge (3-4 correct answers), and sufficient knowledge (5–7 correct answers). We conducted univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The following factors, which seemed to influence the willingness of children to undergo HP testing [23], including the respondents’ age, sex, categorized HP knowledge, presence of HP in the family, family history of cancer, HP testing, and adherence to cancer screening, were included for the analysis. p-values of 0.05 or less were deemed statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using Stata/IC ver 15.1 for Mac (College Station, TX: StataCorp, USA).
Results
Demographics of Respondents
Of the 2793 eligible students, 618 parents responded, representing a response rate of 22.1%. Respondents’ demographics are presented in Table 1. Most of the respondents were mothers (90.4%) in their 30s and 40s (87.4%). Regarding medical history, 230 (37.2%) had undergone HP testing, 49 (7.9%) had received HP treatment, 124 (20.1%) reported a family history of HP infection, 153 (24.8%) reported a family history of cancer, and 43 (7.0%) had stomach cancer. In terms of medical information sources, 490 respondents (79.3%) referred to the Internet, 436 (70.6%) to television, and 278 (45%) consulted their primary care physicians (Supplementary Table 1).
Respondents’ Awareness and Knowledge of HP
Table 2 presents the percentage of correct answers regarding knowledge of HP among the respondents. The correct response rates for questions related to the harmfulness of HP, sites of infection, modes of transmission, and family infection were 88.7, 84.1, 61.5, and 47.2%, respectively. Notably, 95.7% correctly identified the diseases caused by HP, and 85.6% knew that they could be detected during screening. Additionally, 90.3% correctly answered that HP could be treated with oral medications. Of the seven questions, 19 (3.1%) answered 0–2 correctly; 100 (16.2%), 3–4; and 499 (80.8%), 5–7. The choices for each item are presented in Supplementary Table 2. Regarding the preferred HP testing methods, 61.7% of respondents preferred blood testing, 38.3% preferred urine testing, and 31.1% opted for breath testing (Supplementary Table 3).
Parental Desire for HP Screening in Children
Among the 618 respondents, 534 (86.4%) expressed their support for HP screening of their children. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations with supportive attitudes towards HP screening for children, which included sufficient knowledge of HP (odds ratio (OR) 6.25, 95% CI 2.41–16.2, p < 0.05), being in their 40s (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.35–3.77, p < 0.05), family history of HP infection (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.01–4.01, p < 0.05), high adherence to cancer screening (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.19–4.54, p < 0.05), and being a healthcare professional (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.04–5.22, p < 0.05) (Table 3). Multivariable regression analysis further confirmed the significant associations of sufficient knowledge of HP (OR 5.80, 95% CI 2.10–16.03, p < 0.05) and being in their 40s (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.35–3.77, p < 0.05) with parental preference for screening. Since the number of respondents in the “insufficient knowledge (0–2 correct answers)” category, which was used as the reference category for knowledge level, was small, a similar multivariable regression analysis was also conducted using insufficient and middle knowledge (0–4 correct answers) as the reference category for knowledge level, and similar results were obtained (Supplementary Table 4).
Reasons for Parental Preferences Regarding HP Screening for Children
Regarding the reasons for wanting their child to undergo HP screening, the most common response was, “It is a favorable opportunity” (53.2%), followed by “HP testing is necessary” (44.0%), and “The cost is covered”, along with “Family members have undergone HP testing” (Supplementary Table 5a). Conversely, among the 12 respondents who did not prefer that their child should undergo HP testing, the most common reasons were “HP testing is unnecessary” (66.7%), followed by “Our child does not have HP”, “We are not familiar with Helicobacter pylori”, “Our child’s friends are not interested in the screening”, and “No one in the family has undergone HP testing” (Supplementary Table 5b).
Discussion
In this study, we conducted a comprehensive survey to assess knowledge and attitudes towards HP screening among the parents of first-year middle school students in Yokosuka City, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. The findings revealed a high degree of understanding of HP among parents, with a significant majority indicating a desire to have their children screened. Notably, a positive correlation was observed between higher levels of knowledge and supportive attitudes towards screening for children. While it is important to note that the association between the level of knowledge of HP and desire for screening their children is not necessarily causal, this study may imply the importance of providing accurate information about HP to parents when offering HP screening for children. Further exploration of the reasons behind different attitudes towards HP screening is warranted. Future research should be focused on personalized strategies based on participation preferences, such as targeted educational campaigns, personalized communication, and involving healthcare professionals to address specific concerns and provide detailed information.
The knowledge levels of the participating parents regarding HP were notably high, with > 80% rated as having a good understanding of HP, which contrasts with previous surveys conducted in different countries. For instance, a study in a Singapore hospital involving an Asian population revealed that only 30.2% of respondents had a correct understanding of HP [24]. Similarly, a study in China on the general population reported correct answers for HP infectivity and prevention at 35% and 43.6%, respectively [23]. Another study involving multi-ethnic Asian students showed that only 30.2% of the participants were aware of HP [24]. The high level of knowledge observed among parents in our study can be attributed to the widespread availability of HP screening for adults in Japan, particularly through the ABC method, which measures HP antibodies and pepsinogen levels in the blood and is implemented in many municipalities in Japan including Yokosuka City [25]. The successful implementation of HP screening in both children and adults in the targeted region of this study might explain the higher level of parental knowledge of HP. Therefore, it is essential to not only to raise awareness but also to promote a correct understanding of HP as a preventive measure for gastric cancer and deliver information that meets the expectations of the general population in such regions.
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate parental intention regarding HP screening in children. Interestingly, over 80% of the respondents expressed a desire for their children to undergo screening, mirroring the high level of interest observed in adult HP screening. In a study conducted on the general population in China, with a gastric cancer mortality rate of 15.9 per 100,000 persons [26], over 80% of participants expressed willingness to undergo HP screening for gastric cancer prevention [23]. Similarly, in Korea, 73.7% of the general population supported the “HP screen and treat” strategy [27]. It is widely acknowledged that lack of knowledge about HP contributes to negative attitudes towards screening [23, 28], which aligns with parents’ screening intentions for their children. Although not statistically significant after adjustment, a family history of HP infection, working in the medical profession, and a positive attitude towards cancer screening showed a positive trend for providing HP screening for children. These findings highlight the role of parents’ own experiences and engagement with HP, which may generate interest in HP-related issues and influence their willingness to screen their children. These insights are vital for planning HP screening for children, as regions with parents demonstrating sufficient knowledge, experience, and interest in preventive medical behaviors related to HP are more likely to be receptive to screening initiatives, whereas regions with low awareness may have less inclination for children’s screening. Therefore, a preliminary assessment of parental understanding and interest regarding HP in different regions is necessary when considering HP screening for children.
The most common reason cited among those who did not prefer that their child should undergo HP testing was the belief that the test was unnecessary, coupled with the perception that the children did not have HP. Such perceptions of HP infections have been frequently reported, even in regions with a high prevalence of HP, where a considerable proportion of individuals report not being infected or perceive a very low risk of gastric cancer [27]. Although the HP infection rate among Japanese teenagers is reported to be < 5% [15], it may contribute to such indifference or normalcy bias. To address these attitudes, future awareness campaigns and information provision should emphasize the importance and effectiveness of HP screening.
Conversely, among parents desiring HP screening for their children, the most common reasons were that it presented a favorable opportunity, screening was necessary, and that it was cost-free. These reasons indicate a positive understanding of HP and willingness to participate in screening, without any barriers or reasons to decline. It is evident that some individuals are comfortable participating in the screening, express a desire for it, and lack reasons to refuse based on their understanding of HP. In particular, it is worth noting that cost is known to be a barrier for undergoing any screening and that many respondents in this study said they would like their children to undergo screening because it does not cost anything. Yokosuka City pays for the cost of testing and treatment of HP for junior high school students in the city. On the other hand, tests for HP and screening tests for stomach cancer, which are generally offered to adults, incur costs. To ensure that those who convey a desire for screening receive it, it is critical to eliminate institutional barriers, remove participation obstacles, and minimize economic burden. Furthermore, providing a comprehensive explanation of the necessity of HP screening is crucial for maintaining a positive attitude towards participation.
Understanding the direction and reasons behind screening preferences is essential to effectively approach different groups with varying inclinations towards HP screening among adolescents [29]. For instance, the most common reason parents wanted their children to undergo HP screening was “It’s a favorable opportunity”, which may reflect the psychological tendency to choose the default option [30]. Additionally, the presentation of screening participation is crucial and can be influenced by framing techniques. In this study, the reasons for desiring screening included the absence of cost, avoidance of hospital visits, and test necessity. For these elements, the framing technique was used for adding emphasis, for example, “If you miss this screening opportunity, you will have to pay for the screening” or “If you miss the screening, you will have to visit a hospital.” Explanations highlighting losses may increase the willingness to participate, but whether gain framing or loss framing are useful is still uncertain for promoting the HP screening participation for adolescents. Further accumulation of cases would help in determining the optimal approach for individuals who do not wish to undergo screening, or whose preferences are undecided.
In terms of future implications, this study revealed a high interest among parents in having their children undergo screening for HP. However, a small number of individuals either declined to participate or expressed tentative attitudes towards it. Understanding the factors, health perspectives, and reasons of these individuals is crucial for efficient screening. Furthermore, there are regional variations in the provision of HP screening for adolescents in Japan. Therefore, conducting large-scale surveys in diverse regions would yield more meaningful outcomes. Additionally, specific issues related to adolescent screening, such as the psychological burden on individuals undergoing screening and parental attitudes, were not explored extensively in this study. We did not collect any information regarding the desire of children for participation in the screening. As for cancer screening in adolescents, the willingness of the children to undergo screening has been reported to be important [31]. Future research should address these differences by examining the challenges encountered in other screening programs, such as pediatric thyroid cancer screening, in which the psychological impact on individuals and parental attitudes has been discussed.
This study has several limitations. First, this study included a survey sample restricted to a single municipality in Japan, where HP screening was available for adolescents, potentially limiting its representativeness for other municipalities. Conducting a study that encompasses multiple municipalities would yield more robust results. Furthermore, the response rate of the survey was 22%, and the act of responding itself may indicate an interest in HP, potentially introducing bias and limiting the generalizability of the results to the entire population. For example, 14.1% of respondents in their 20s to 40s in Yokosuka City were reported to be healthcare workers [32], while 16.5% of the overall respondents in this survey were healthcare workers, which was slightly higher. It is possible that those interested in HP were more likely to respond. Therefore, the general public may have less knowledge related to HP than was obtained in this study. On the other hand, in order to collect responses from more general parents, this study was conducted with the cooperation of the Health Management Support Division of Yokosuka City and the Yokosuka City Education Board, in which parents were notified. Such a study testing citizens’ knowledge of HP is unprecedented, and we believe it will be of interest in future research. Hence, unbiased survey methods are warranted. Lastly, as the survey was conducted in schools in Yokosuka City, sensitive background information such as educational background and income could not be collected.
Conclusion
The parents of middle school students in the study were familiar with HP and expressed a strong desire for screening their children for HP. Having sufficient knowledge was significantly related to the desire to have their children undergo HP screening. Further investigation of parental attitudes towards children’s screening is crucial for the appropriate implementation of screening programs.
Data Availability
Data supporting the findings of this study are not publicly available. However, data are available from the authors upon request.
References
Burke RM, Nliwasa M, Feasey HRA, Chaisson LH, Golub JE, Naufal F, et al. Community-based active case-finding interventions for tuberculosis: A systematic review. Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(5):e283–99.
Kamal E, Asem N, Hassany M, Elshishiney G, Abdel-Razek W, Said H, et al. Nationwide hepatitis C virus screening and treatment of adolescents in Egyptian schools. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;7(7):658–65.
So S, Terrault N, Conners EE. Universal adult hepatitis B screening and vaccination as the path to elimination. JAMA. 2023;329(19):1639–40.
Forman D, Newell DG, Fullerton F, Yarnell JW, Stacey AR, Wald N, et al. Association between infection with Helicobacter pylori and risk of gastric cancer: Evidence from a prospective investigation. BMJ. 1991;302(6788):1302–5.
Fukase K, Kato M, Kikuchi S, Inoue K, Uemura N, Okamoto S, et al. Effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori on incidence of metachronous gastric carcinoma after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: An open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9636):392–7.
Lee YC, Chiang TH, Chou CK, Tu YK, Liao WC, Wu MS, et al. Association between helicobacter pylori eradication and gastric cancer incidence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(5):1113–24.e5.
Leung WK, Wong IOL, Cheung KS, Yeung KF, Chan EW, Wong AYS, et al. Effects of Helicobacter pylori treatment on incidence of gastric cancer in older individuals. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(1):67–75.
Ford AC, Yuan Y, Forman D, Hunt R, Moayyedi P. Helicobacter pylori eradication for the prevention of gastric neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7(7):Cd005583. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005583.pub2.
Yamaguchi Y, Nagata Y, Hiratsuka R, Kawase Y, Tominaga T, Takeuchi S, et al. Gastric cancer screening by combined assay for serum anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody and serum pepsinogen levels–the ABC method. Digestion. 2016;93(1):13–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441742.
Lei WY, Lee JY, Chuang SL, Bair MJ, Chen CL, Wu JY, et al. Eradicating Helicobacter pylori via (13)C-urea breath screening to prevent gastric cancer in indigenous communities: a population-based study and development of a family index-case method. Gut. 2023;17.
Salomaa-Rasanen A, Kosunen TU, Aromaa AR, Knekt P, Sarna S, Rautelin H. A “screen-and-treat” approach for Helicobacter pylori infection: A population-based study in Vammala. Finland Helicobacter. 2010;15(1):28–37.
Akamatsu T, Ichikawa S, Okudaira S, Yokosawa S, Iwaya Y, Suga T, et al. Introduction of an examination and treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection in high school health screening. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46(12):1353–60.
Sivapalasingam S, Rajasingham A, Macy JT, Friedman CR, Hoekstra RM, Ayers T, et al. Recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Bolivian children and adults after a population-based “screen and treat” strategy. Helicobacter. 2014;19(5):343–8.
Akamatsu T, Okamura T, Iwaya Y, Suga T. Screening to identify and eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection in teenagers in Japan. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015;44(3):667–76.
Saito H, Nishikawa Y, Masuzawa Y, Tsubokura M, Mizuno Y. Helicobacter pylori infection mass screening for children and adolescents: A systematic review of observational studies. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2021;52(2):489–97.
Kawai S, Wang C, Lin Y, Sasakabe T, Okuda M, Kikuchi S. Lifetime incidence risk for gastric cancer in the Helicobacter pylori-infected and uninfected population in Japan: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Int J Cancer. 2022;150(1):18–27.
Nozaki K, Shimizu N, Ikehara Y, Inoue M, Tsukamoto T, Inada K, et al. Effect of early eradication on Helicobacter pylori-related gastric carcinogenesis in Mongolian gerbils. Cancer Sci. 2003;94(3):235–9.
Kusano C, Gotoda T, Suzuki S, Ikehara H. The administrative project of Helicobacter pylori infection screening among junior high school students in an area of Japan with a high incidence of gastric cancer. Gut. 2018;67:A43–4.
Kakiuchi T, Matsuo M, Endo H, Nakayama A, Sato K, Takamori A, et al. A Helicobacter pylori screening and treatment program to eliminate gastric cancer among junior high school students in Saga Prefecture: A preliminary report. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54(8):699–707.
Kaji E, Yoden A, Otani M, Okuhira T, Aomatsu T, Tamai H, et al. Helicobacter pylori test-and-treat strategy for second-year junior high school students aimed at the prevention of gastric cancer in Takatsuki City. Helicobacter. 2020;25(4):e12696.
Davies C, Stoney T, Hutton H, Parrella A, Kang M, Macartney K, et al. School-based HPV vaccination positively impacts parents’ attitudes toward adolescent vaccination. Vaccine. 2021;39(30):4190–8.
Park Y, Ki M, Lee H, Lee JK, Oh JK. Parental factors affecting decision to vaccinate their daughters against human papillomavirus. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2023;16(3):133–8.
Wu Y, Su T, Zhou X, Lu N, Li Z, Du Y. Awareness and attitudes regarding Helicobacter pylori infection in Chinese physicians and public population: A national cross-sectional survey. Helicobacter. 2020;25(4):e12705.
Teng TZJ, Sudharsan M, Yau JWK, Tan W, Shelat VG. Helicobacter pylori knowledge and perception among multi-ethnic Asians. Helicobacter. 2021;26(3):e12794.
Miki K. Gastric cancer screening by combined assay for serum anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody and serum pepsinogen levels - “ABC method”. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2011;87(7):405–14.
Yan X, Lei L, Li H, Cao M, Yang F, He S, et al. Stomach cancer burden in China: Epidemiology and prevention. Chin J Cancer Res. 2023;35(2):81–91.
Shin DW, Cho J, Kim SH, Kim YJ, Choi HC, Son KY, et al. Preferences for the “screen and treat” strategy of Helicobacter pylori to prevent gastric cancer in healthy Korean populations. Helicobacter. 2013;18(4):262–9.
Wang YX, Zou JY, Hu LF, Liu Q, Huang RL, Tang T, et al. What is the general Chinese public’s awareness of and attitudes towards Helicobacter pylori screening and associated health behaviours? A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e057929.
Hallek M, Ockenfels A, Wiesen D. Behavioral economics interventions to improve medical decision-making. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022;119(38):633–9.
Zucchelli MM, Gambetti E, Giusberti F, Nori R. Use of default option nudge and individual differences in everyday life decisions. Cogn Process. 2024;25(1):75–88.
Sugisaki K, Ueda S, Ueji M, Monobe H, Yako-Suketomo H, Eto T, et al. A cross-sectional investigation of cancer-screening intentions, sources of information, and understanding of cancer in Japanese adolescents. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(1):102–8.
Yokosuka City. Yokosuka City Statistics. 2023 (in Japanse). https://www.city.yokosuka.kanagawa.jp/0830/data/t-k-syo/now.html#t-k-0. Accessed 22 May 2024.
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff of the Yokosuka Medical Association, Yokosuka City Board of Education, and the Health Management Support Division of Yokosuka City for coordinating and conducting the questionnaire-based survey. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception of the study: HS, MT, YM. Data collection: HS, YM. Investigation: YM. Data analysis and interpretation: HS. Drafting of the article: HS. Critical revision of the article: MT, YM, MM, TK, YE. Final approval of the version to be published: all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
The ethics committees of the Yokosuka Medical Association (No.1) and Fukushima Medical University (2022–030) reviewed and approved this study.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to survey response.
Conflict of Interest
MT received a research grant from the Pfizer Health Research Foundation and Moderna for research not associated with this study. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Saito, H., Uchiyama, T., Matsuoka, M. et al. Parental Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Helicobacter Pylori Screening in Adolescents: A School-Based Questionnaire Study Among Guardians of Junior High School Students in Yokosuka City, Japan. J Gastrointest Canc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01082-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01082-y