Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 201–211 | Cite as

A Systematic Review of the Burden of Pancreatic Cancer in Europe: Real-World Impact on Survival, Quality of Life and Costs

  • A. Carrato
  • A. Falcone
  • M. Ducreux
  • J. W. Valle
  • A. Parnaby
  • K. Djazouli
  • K. Alnwick-Allu
  • A. Hutchings
  • C. Palaska
  • I. Parthenaki
Open Access
Review Article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the overall burden of pancreatic cancer in Europe, with a focus on survival time in a real-world setting, and the overall healthy life lost to the disease.

Methods

Real-world data were retrieved from peer-reviewed, observational studies identified by an electronic search. We performed two de novo analyses: a proportional shortfall analysis to quantify the proportion of healthy life lost to pancreatic cancer and an estimation of the aggregate life-years lost annually in Europe.

Results

Ninety-one studies were included. The median, age-standardised incidence of pancreatic cancer per 100,000 was 7.6 in men and 4.9 in women. Overall median survival from diagnosis was 4.6 months; median survival was 2.8–5.7 months in patients with metastatic disease. The proportional shortfall analysis showed that pancreatic cancer results in a 98 % loss of healthy life, with a life expectancy at diagnosis of 4.6 months compared to 15.1 years for an age-matched healthy population. Annually, 610,000–915,000 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) are lost to pancreatic cancer in Europe. Patients had significantly lower scores on validated health-related quality of life instruments versus population norms.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically review real-world overall survival and patient outcomes of pancreatic cancer patients in Europe outside the context of clinical trials. Our findings confirm the poor prognosis and short survival reported by national studies. Pancreatic cancer is a substantial burden in Europe, with nearly a million aggregate life-years lost annually and almost complete loss of healthy life in affected individuals.

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer Disease burden Epidemiology Survival Quality of life Proportional shortfall 

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is among the most deadly malignancies; despite being responsible for only 3 % of all new cancer diagnoses, it was the fourth most common cause of cancer death in the United States in 2013 [1] and is expected to be the second most common cause by 2030 [2]. The reported incidence is highest in developed countries, which likely reflect more accurate diagnosis, with Europe bearing a significant part of the burden [3]. In 2008, Europe carried one quarter of the global burden, despite comprising only one ninth of the world population [4]. Accurate data on cancer incidence and mortality in Europe are therefore crucial in assessing the burden of disease, the effectiveness of control programmes and for budgeting and planning at national and regional levels.

Current treatment options for pancreatic cancer are limited, with surgical resection presently the only potentially curative treatment option [5, 6]. However, owing to the frequently advanced stage at diagnosis, 80–90 % of patients have unresectable tumours [5], and long-term survival after surgical resection is poor [6]. New treatments have recently been approved and are expected: chemotherapy has demonstrated a favourable impact in overall survival when prescribed after surgery with curative intent [7]; gemcitabine and erlotinib are approved in the USA and Europe for use in metastatic disease; and nab-paclitaxel has recently been approved in Europe and the USA to treat metastatic disease. In order to improve long-term outcomes for pancreatic cancer patients, it is imperative that patients have access to the range of new treatment options. Key stakeholders in this process are healthcare payers. In order to support the introduction of these treatments, real-world survival times provide a meaningful context in which to evaluate improvements in patient outcomes. Survival times are an important way of capturing the unmet medical needs of a patient as they allow the calculation of shortfall. They also allow us to capture the unmet medical needs at a societal level through the number of aggregate life-years lost to the disease [8].

To our knowledge, no published studies have systematically reviewed the real-world survival time in Europe outside context of clinical trials. The objective of the systematic review was therefore to perform a systematic, macroscopic analysis of the burden of pancreatic cancer in Europe on individuals and health systems, to evaluate the direct and indirect costs of the disease, and to assess the extent of the unmet needs.

Methods

The research comprised two phases: a systematic review of published data and related de novo analyses.

Systematic Review Methods

Studies were identified through a search of MEDLINE and other major bibliographic databases for studies published in English through 5th April 2013. Additional information was obtained from searches of conference proceedings for the 2 years preceding April 2013 and targeted searches of health economic databases. Only epidemiological or non-interventional studies were selected for data extraction; eligibility and exclusion criteria are shown in Table 1 (see online resource for details of databases and search terms). Grey literature, such as unpublished reports from disease registry websites, was not included. Studies based on the same dataset were systematically excluded in order to avoid multiple reporting of the same data.
Table 1

Study inclusion and exclusion criteria

Study types eligible for inclusion

Study types that were excluded

• Observational/uncontrolled cohort studies (prospective/retrospective longitudinal studies, cross-sectional studies)

• Studies with both observational and interventional phases

• Database studies, registries

• Studies with no available abstract

• Interventional trials (parallel and crossover design, double-blind, single-blind, open label) with no observational phases

• Phase I, II, III or IV studies

• Case reports or case series

• Case–control studies

• In vitro studies/genetic studies/molecular epidemiology studies

• Imaging/diagnostic studies; studies assessing techniques

• Classification schemes (e.g. studies assessing staging schemes)

• Studies focusing on pathophysiology or prevention

• Systematic reviews

• Editorials, letters, comments, non-systematic review articles

• Guidelines

• Policy/prioritisation papers/research recommendations

Two independent reviewers performed the review and full-text extraction; any differences were resolved by a third reviewer. No quantitative syntheses, e.g. meta-analysis, were performed. Overall medians of median values reported in individual studies were calculated as summary measures.

De Novo Analysis: Proportional Shortfall

Proportional shortfall (PS) was calculated as follows [9]:
$$ \mathrm{P}\mathrm{S}=\frac{\mathrm{disease}\kern0.5em \mathrm{related}\kern0.5em \mathrm{QALY}\kern0.5em \mathrm{loss}}{\mathrm{remaining}\kern0.5em \mathrm{QALY}\kern0.5em \mathrm{expectation}\kern0.5em \mathrm{in}\kern0.5em \mathrm{absence}\kern0.5em \mathrm{of}\kern0.5em \mathrm{the}\kern0.5em \mathrm{disease}} $$

Quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) expectation or ‘health life’ in the absence of pancreatic cancer was calculated by multiplying the mean life expectancy of patients aged 71 in EU 28 countries (15.1 years) [10], by the mean health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of this age group (0.78 = weighted health state index for the UK population aged 65–74) [11]. Pancreatic cancer-related QALYs were calculated by multiplying the median patient survival in months, derived from the current systematic review, by the EQ-5D utility obtained from a German study of 45 pancreatic cancer patients (mean EQ-5D utility 0.65; mean age 64 years) [12].

De Novo Analysis: Aggregate Life-Years Lost

Aggregate life-years lost to pancreatic cancer was calculated from the difference in survival between pancreatic cancer patients and the general population multiplied by the annual number of incident pancreatic cancer cases across Europe obtained from three different sources: GLOBOCAN incident cases derived from crude incidence estimates (79,331 cases) [13]; crude incidence rates from the current systematic review multiplied by the EU 28 population of 507.2 million [14] (62,203 cases); and age-adjusted (European standard) rates derived from the current systematic review multiplied by the EU 28 population (52,872 cases). QALYs lost per person (calculated as per the PS analysis) were multiplied by the incident cases of pancreatic cancer in Europe to derive the aggregate QALYs lost. Analyses were performed for all patients with pancreatic cancer and metastatic patients (based on an estimated 62.5 % patients having Stage IV disease as a proportion of all patients in Stages I to IV [15]).

Results

Search and Selection of Studies

The search of the electronic databases retrieved 2027 citations; 7 additional studies were identified in conference abstracts and economic databases (Fig. 1). After review, 91 studies met the inclusion criteria (study characteristics are described in online resources).
Fig. 1

PRISMA flow diagram of the systematic review study selection process

Studies contained data from all regions of Europe, with some publications reporting data from several different counties and regions. The number of studies reporting data from the different countries is shown in Fig. 2. The Scandinavian countries, the UK and Italy were the most represented and the Baltic and Balkan states the least represented. Year of publication ranged from 1973 to 2013, with the majority (72 %) published in the last 10 years. Study durations ranged from <1 year to >60 years (see Table S1). In studies of patient registries, the number of patients with pancreatic cancer (where reported) ranged from 48 (regional registry) to 69,304 (WHO international registry) with 35 % containing >20,000 patients. Registries were not exclusively pancreatic cancer specific; individual registries also contained data for up to 1.76 million non-pancreatic cancer patients. In cohort, cross-sectional and other studies, the number of patients with pancreatic cancer ranged from 17 to 2196, with 88 % of studies including <500 patients. Where reported, the mean age of study subjects ranged from 50 to 75 years (median range 57 to 74 years). Six of the studies reported economic data and five reported data on HRQoL.
Fig. 2

Geographic distribution of the selected epidemiological studies

Incidence of Pancreatic Cancer

Seventeen publications reported age-standardised incidence data from 37 study populations in 24 countries [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]. In the majority of populations (33/37), incidence rates were reported as age-standardised based on the World Standard Population (WSP) [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]; four studies reported age-standardised data based on the European Standard Population (ESP) [29, 30, 31, 32], and five studies reported crude incidence rates [33, 34, 35, 28, 36]. Median annual incidence rates are shown in Table 2. Overall median annual incidence rates were higher in men than women for all age-adjustment standards.
Table 2

Median annual incidence rates of pancreatic cancer in Europe by sex: age-standardised and crude rates

 

Annual incidence rate per 100,000: median (range)

Women

Men

Totala

Age-standardised: World (33 studies)

4.9 (3.2–9.8)

7.6 (5–14.1)

6.29

Age-standardised: Europe (4 studies)

9.2 (7.7–11.2)

11.8 (10–16.5)

10.43

Crude: (5 studies)

11.5 (6.1–14.7)

12.2 (8–15.4)

12.27

aCalculated with weighting based on 51 or 52 % male (as per study, or assumed if not reported)

Median Survival

Median survival from diagnosis was reported in 12 studies [26, 37, 38, 33, 34, 18, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44], mainly from Nordic countries (8/12 studies), and ranged from 1 to 6.1 months, with an overall median of 4.6 (Fig. 3). The two largest studies (in Norwegian and Swedish populations of 21,663 and 16,758 patients, respectively) both reported a median survival of 3 months [33, 18]. When reported, stage at diagnosis was generally advanced, with half the studies reporting >40 % of patients with metastatic disease [26, 34, 39, 40, 41, 43]. In general, median survival was shorter in older populations (1 to 3.2 months; median age 70–76 years) versus younger ones (5 to 6.1 months; median ages 62–67 years).
Fig 3

Median survival from diagnosis in months by median age. Data represents median survival of the overall study population ordered by midpoint of study period

Survival Rates at 1 and 5 Years

Combined survival data for both sexes were available from 32 studies or sub-studies reported in 17 publications [45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 44, 34, 50, 37, 38, 33, 51, 52, 53, 54, 29, 43] (Figure S1 in the online resource). Combined 1-year survival rates ranged from 10 to 23 %. The largest study in a population of 30,025 Dutch patients [49] reported a 1-year survival rate of 16 %. The overall median 1-year survival across studies was 15 %.

Combined 5-year survival rates ranged from 0.5 % in Sweden [37] to 9 % in Slovenian [46] and German populations [47]. The two largest studies reported 5-year survival rates of 3 and 5 % [49, 48]. Overall median 5-year survival across studies was 3 %.

Survival Rates at 1 and 5 Years by Sex

Survival rates at 1 and 5 years by sex were reported in 33 studies or sub-studies in nine publications [53, 36, 38, 42, 55, 18, 56, 31, 48]. Overall median values across studies were 15 % in women and 14 % in men at 1-year and 4 % in both sexes at 5 years (Table 3).
Table 3

Survival at 1 and 5 years from diagnosis

33 studies

Survival (%): median (range)

Women

Men

1 year

15 (9 [Denmark]–29 [Malta])

14 (9 [Malta]–22 [Sweden and Finland])

5 years

4 (1.3 [Slovenia]–7.5 [Czech Rep.)

4 (0 [Switzerland]–7 [Estonia])

Survival by Disease Stage

The effect of disease stage (irrespective of intervention) on median survival from diagnosis was reported by three studies [41, 43, 39]. As expected, survival rates decreased with advancing stage. In a Dutch population between 1985 and 2001, survival rates at 1 year were 40, 30, 35, 25 and 5 % for stages I, II, III, IVa and IVb, respectively [15]. In a Finnish population between 1947 and 1980, 1-year survival rates were 53, 19, 17 and 12 % for stages I, II, III and IV, respectively [53]. In the aforementioned Dutch population, survival at 5 years was 15, 1, 5 and 1 % among patients with stages I, II, III and IV disease, respectively [15].

Median Survival by Intervention

Five studies reported survival from diagnosis by intervention; four were in Scandinavian populations [44, 37, 38, 33] and one in an Italian population [34]. Patients who underwent resection or radical surgery consistently showed the longest median survival, ranging from 11 to 25.7 months. In patients who underwent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, palliative surgery or exploratory laparotomy, median survival ranged from 2 to 8.1 months. Patients who received no surgery or best supportive care had a median survival of 1.1 month (Figure S2 in the online resource).

The shorter survival among patients treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, palliative surgery or exploratory laparotomy reflects the more advanced stage of disease in these patients (54 % of patients treated with chemotherapy/radiotherapy and 52 % with best supportive care had stage IV disease, versus 3 % of patients receiving resective/radical surgery).

Mortality

Sixteen studies reported age-standardised mortality rates, based on the WSP [57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 17, 21, 67] or ESP [68, 17, 31], and five studies reported crude rates [52, 63, 69, 64, 21]. Mortality data were derived almost solely from the World Health Organisation (WHO) and EUROCARE registries. In pan-European registry studies, median rates were from 5.0 per 100,000 in women and 7.7 per 100,000 in men, with similar rates across the EU5, Nordics and Eastern European regions. The highest median rates in men and women were recorded in Eastern Europe and the Nordic regions, respectively (Table 4).
Table 4

Annual mortality rate per 100,000 in Europe as whole and in European regions

Age-standardised, world (124 studies/sub-studies)

Annual mortality rate per 100,000: median (range)

Women

Men

Pan-European

5.0 (4.7–5.4)

7.7 (7.2–8)

EU5

4.9 (2.9–5.8)

7.4 (5.3–8.5)

Nordic

5.4 (5.2–7.9)

8.2 (6.8–9.9)

Eastern European

4.9 (2.8–7.2)

8.7 (6.3–12.3)

Age-standardised mortality rates based on the ESP in women and men ranged from 7.4 to 9.7 per 100,000, respectively, in England/Wales to 11.8 and 15.3, respectively, in the Netherlands [68, 30, 31]. Crude mortality rates per 100,000 ranged from 11.2 [52] to 16.7 [63] in women and from 12.5 [69] to 16.5 [63, 64] in men.

Data were not evenly distributed over time, with the majority coming from the period 2000 to 2006. Women had lower mortality rates than men at all time periods where data were collected.

HRQoL

Five studies reported HRQoL data [40, 70, 12, 71, 72]. In general, patients with pancreatic cancer had significantly lower scores on validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) HRQoL scales than the general population, with the most significant symptoms being pain, appetite loss and insomnia. Patients with pancreatic cancer experienced depression and anxiety; cognitive, social and physical function tended to be high, while global health was low (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Results of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire from four studies

Three studies evaluated depression and anxiety in patients with advanced disease [70, 40, 12]. In a Swedish population, 42 % of patients reported moderate or severe anxiety and depression. In a German study, the number of patients experiencing anxiety/depression was around 10-fold higher than population norms [12].

Economic Burden

Three studies reported direct costs [39, 73, 74] and two indirect costs [73, 74] associated with pancreatic cancer. In Sweden, the mean monthly total cost of care from 2005 to 2007 was just over €6500 per month [74], corresponding to €16,066 over the residual lifetime. In Germany, total costs were considerably higher at €31,375 over the residual lifetime or €48,900 per year [73]. Data on the relative contribution of indirect versus direct costs to the overall cost were not consistent between countries. In Sweden, indirect costs accounted for a greater proportion of overall costs than direct costs (€83,109 versus 16,066, respectively) [74], whereas the opposite was reported in Germany (€28,164 versus 3210) [73].

Five studies reported direct cost data [75, 39, 73, 34, 74]. Hospitalisation accounted for the major component of direct costs per residual lifetime (€7981–16,264), followed by interventions (radiology, surgery and chemotherapy; €1575–9761) and chemotherapy alone (€1423–3569).

Two studies reported indirect costs [73, 74]. In Germany, 24 % of diagnosed patients were actively employed, resulting in a mean productivity loss of €2972 [73]. In Sweden in 2009, indirect costs were slightly higher for male versus female patients aged ≤64 years, with mean short-term productivity loss of €87,205 for men and €49,895 for women; mean productivity loss per patient due to mortality was €238,843 in men and €220,543 in women [74].

De Novo Analysis of Proportional Shortfall

Mean age for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was 71 years. In Europe, the general population aged 71 can expect an additional 11.78 years of healthy life, compared with only 0.25 years for patients with pancreatic cancer (0.38 years of life expectancy multiplied by 0.65 [12]). This corresponds to an absolute shortfall of 11.53 QALYs, and a proportional shortfall of 0.98 (11.53/11.78), indicating a 98 % loss of expected healthy life (Table 5).
Table 5

Proportional shortfall due to pancreatic cancer

 

General population

Pancreatic cancer patients

Difference

Life expectancy at age 71

15.1 years

0.38 years (4.6 months)

14.7 years

Utility (ages 65–74)

0.78

0.65

0.13

QALYs

11.78 (A)

0.25 (B)

11.53 (C)

Proportional shortfall (C)/(A)

0.98

De Novo Analysis of Aggregate Life-Years Lost

At 71 years of age, the survival difference (not adjusted by QoL) between a patient with pancreatic cancer and the general population is 14.7 years of life per patient (Table 5). Using GLOBOCAN data on the number of incident pancreatic cancer cases [76], this equates to over 1 million life-years lost across Europe (Table 6) or at least 778,000 life-years lost using the incidence estimates obtained in the present review.
Table 6

Aggregate life-years and QALYs lost to pancreatic cancer across Europe (EU 28)

 

Incident casesa

Aggregate life-years lost

Aggregate QALYs lost

All pancreatic cancer

 Globocan (crude)

79,331

1,167,488

914,594

 Systematic review (crude)

62,203

915,428

717,134

 Systematic review (ESP)

52,872

778,095

609,549

Metastatic pancreatic cancer

 Globocan (crude)

44,901

663,792

519,606

 Systematic review (crude)

35,207

520,479

407,423

 Systematic review (ESP)

29,925

442,397

346,301

ESP age adjusted with European Standard Population

aMetastatic incident cases based on 62.5 % of patients in Stages IV, a figure scaled up from that in the original publication in order that proportions of patients in the study in Stages I to IV sum to 100 % [15]

Discussion

The clinical studies identified represented all regions of Europe, although the North of Europe, in particular Scandinavian countries, represented almost half studies. Survival times in pancreatic cancer are very short; this is partly explained by the lack of effective treatments and the difficulties in diagnosing the disease early. Data from large cohort studies and national/regional registries showed 1- and 5-year survival rates of about 15 and 4 %, respectively. Our estimated median survival from diagnosis of 4.6 months is in line with a median of 3 months reported in a US study of 32,452 adults with distant metastatic pancreatic cancer [77] and 10 weeks in a recent Dutch study of 3099 patients with metastatic disease [78] and reflects the high number of patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis. The longest median survival from diagnosis was reported in patients who underwent resection or radical surgery. It is likely, however, that these data are skewed by disease stage, as patients who underwent resection are more likely to have had earlier stage disease.

We found that age-standardisation methodology had a notable influence on the incidence rate, with median rates ranging from approximately 8–16 per 100,000 annually in men, and 5–15 per 100,000 in women, depending on the method used. Incidence rate standardised to the WSP gave the lowest combined incidence (6.29/100,000), which was similar to those reported by GLOBOCAN (7/100,000) [76], which includes estimates from all EU countries. The combined crude incidence rate estimated from five studies was higher at 12.27/100,000 annually. Crude incidence rates give a picture of the actual rate in a population. However, incidence (and other rates) of cancer are strongly age-dependent; therefore, comparisons of crude rates between populations may be misleading if the age composition of the populations differ. Although age-standardisation facilitates comparisons, standardised rates can be deceiving if the age structure of the reference population is different to that of the real population. Owing to the substantially lower rates observed with age-adjustment to the WSP, we used only crude estimates or figures adjusted to ESP in the de novo analyses.

Mortality rates were higher in men than in women in all the studies identified; given the similar survival rates between the sexes, this is most likely driven by the higher incidence in men. The majority of studies reported mortality rates as age-standardised based on the WSP; however, similar to the incidence data, this resulted in substantially lower rates than ESP age-adjusted and crude estimates, making it questionable whether this standardisation method is appropriate for the European population. Mortality rates across European regions and individual countries were comparable to the Europe-wide figures. However, one study that used data from the WHO database reported appreciably higher mortality rates in eastern European accession countries compared with the European Union [79].

Expectedly, HRQoL scores were significantly lower and levels of depression and anxiety higher in patients with pancreatic cancer compared with population norms, indicating that there is scope to improve supportive care of patients until screening or early diagnosis is improved, or treatments that provide clear survival advantages become available.

A limitation of the current study is the lack of quantitative analysis, such as meta-analysis, of the epidemiological data. Nonetheless, we were able to quantify the aggregate number of life-years and QALYs lost due to pancreatic cancer in Europe each year. Various methods of incorporating equity concerns into standard QALY-based economic evaluations have been implemented, such as considering different incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) thresholds [80]. The PS approach that we have used includes an equity-weighting component that demonstrates the nearly complete loss of healthy life associated with pancreatic cancer. Recent developments such as value-based pricing in the UK and policies in other countries reflect an increasing willingness of decision-makers to account for such weightings in QALY-related assessments [81, 82]. The estimates of aggregate life-years and QALYs lost to pancreatic cancer demonstrate the magnitude of the disease’s impact in Europe and raise the question of how health systems are managing this burden.

We found few studies that assessed the cost of pancreatic cancer; in those identified, methodologies varied between studies. Hospitalisation accounted for the major component of direct costs, followed by interventions and chemotherapy, with some variation between countries. This was consistent with data from a large US study showing that hospitalisations and cancer-directed procedures accounted for the largest fraction of health care costs [83].

Conclusions

The findings of this systematic review show that the real-world median survival time of patients with pancreatic cancer in Europe was less than 5 months and less than 10 % of patients survived beyond 5 years. Survival at 1 year was highest in patients with early stage disease who undergo resection, highlighting the need for improved early diagnosis. Our results confirm those of individual pan-European registry studies and US studies that report similar incidence and mortality rates for pancreatic cancer, reflecting the poor prognosis. Our analyses demonstrate the considerable burden of pancreatic cancer in Europe, with almost a million aggregate life-years lost and an almost complete loss of healthy life in affected individuals. Quantifying the number of life-years and QALYs lost provides a method to compare the relative burden of different cancers in the context of value-based pricing and to evaluate treatment options in view of the projected increase in disease burden [2] over the next 15 years.

Notes

Funding

This work was funded by Celgene Corporation.

Conflict of Interest

AP and KD are employed by Celgene and own shares in the company. KAA, AH, CP and IP are employees of Dolon Ltd., which received payment from Celgene for services undertaken in support of this work. AC and JV have acted as a paid consultant to Celgene. AF has acted as a paid consultant to Celgene and also Merck Serono, Amgen, Bayer, Sanofi, Roche and Lilly. MD has acted as a paid consultant to Celgene, Novartis, Sanofi, Merck and Roche.

Supplementary material

12029_2015_9724_MOESM1_ESM.docx (400 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 399 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(1):11–30. doi:10.3322/caac.21166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74(11):2913–21. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-0155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):74–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Teague A, Lim KH, Wang-Gillam A. Advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a review of current treatment strategies and developing therapies. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2015;7(2):68–84. doi:10.1177/1758834014564775.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Niess H, Kleespies A, Andrassy J, Pratschke P, Angele MK, Guba M, et al. Pancreatic cancer in the elderly: guidelines and individualized therapy. Chirurg. 2013;84(4):291–5. doi:10.1007/s00104-012-2455-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oberstein PE, Olive KP. Pancreatic cancer: why is it so hard to treat? Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013;6(4):321–37. doi:10.1177/1756283x13478680.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, Bassi C, Dunn JA, Hickey H, Beger H, Fernandez-Cruz L, Dervenis C, Lacaine F, Falconi M, Pederzoli P, Pap A, Spooner D, Kerr DJ, Buchler MW, European Study Group for Pancreatic C. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(12):1200–10. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lichtenberg FR. Pharmaceutical innovation, mortality reduction, and economic growth. In: Murphy KM, Topel RH, editors. Measuring the gains from medical research: an economic approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2010. p. 74–84.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van de Wetering EJ, Stolk EA, van Exel NJ, Brouwer WB. Balancing equity and efficiency in the Dutch basic benefits package using the principle of proportional shortfall. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14(1):107–15. doi:10.1007/s10198-011-0346-7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eurostat Table: Life expectancy by age and sex (2013). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database. Accessed 26 March 2014.
  11. 11.
    Kind P, Hardman G, Macran S (1999) UK Population Norms for EQ-5D. University of York Centre for Health Economics - Discussion paper. http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/discussionpapers/CHE Discussion Paper 172.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2014.
  12. 12.
    Müller-Nordhorn J, Roll S, Bohmig M, Nocon M, Reich A, Braun C, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer. Digestion. 2006;74(2):118–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    GLOBOCAN 2008 v2.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed 06 December 2013.
  14. 14.
    Eurostat Table: Population on 1 January by age and sex. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database. Accessed 26 March 2014.
  15. 15.
    Visser O, van Leeuwen FE. Stage-specific survival of epithelial cancers in North-Holland/Flevoland, The Netherlands. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(15):2321–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Borras J, Borras JM, Galceran J, Sanchez V, Moreno V, Gonzalez JR. Trends in smoking-related cancer incidence in Tarragona, Spain, 1980–96. Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12(10):903–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karim-Kos HE, de Vries E, Soerjomataram I, Lemmens V, Siesling S, Coebergh JW. Recent trends of cancer in Europe: a combined approach of incidence, survival and mortality for 17 cancer sites since the 1990s. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(10):1345–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soreide K, Aagnes B, Moller B, Westgaard A, Bray F. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer in Norway: trends in incidence, basis of diagnosis and survival 1965–2007. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45(1):82–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lepage C, Remontet L, Launoy G, Tretarre B, Grosclaude P, Colonna M, et al. Trends in incidence of digestive cancers in France. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008;17(1):13–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jooste V, Remontet L, Colonna M, Belot A, Launoy G, Binder F, et al. Trends in the incidence of digestive cancers in France between 1980 and 2005 and projections for the year 2010. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2011;20(5):375–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Valean S, Armean P, Resteman S, Nagy G, Muresan A, Mircea PA. Cancer mortality in Romania, 1955–2004. Digestive sites: esophagus, stomach, colon and rectum, pancreas, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008;17(1):9–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rozen P, Liphshitz I, Rosner G, Barchana M, Lachter J, Pel S, et al. Pancreatic cancer in Israel: the epidemiology, possibilities of prevention, early detection and screening. Isr Med Assoc J. 2009;11(12):710–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Teiblum S, Thygesen LC, Johansen C. Sixty-one years of pancreatic cancer in Denmark from 1943 to 2003: a nationwide study. Pancreas. 2009;38(4):374–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hakama M, Stenman UH, Knekt P, Jarvisalo J, Leino A, Hakulinen T, et al. Tumour markers and screening for gastrointestinal cancer: a follow up study in Finland. J Med Screen. 1994;1(1):60–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jacobsen O, Olsen SW, Nielsen NA. Pancreatic cancer in the Faroe Islands. An epidemiologic study of patients with pancreatic cancer in the Faroe Islands 1972–82. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1985;20(9):1142–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Arnar DO, Theodors A, Isaksson HJ, Gunnlaugsson GH, Tulinius H, Johannsson H, et al. Cancer of the pancreas in Iceland. An epidemiologic and clinical study, 1974–85. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1991;26(7):724–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vaktskjold A, Lebedintseva JA, Korotov DS, Tkatsjov AV, Podjakova TS, Lund E. Cancer incidence in Arkhangelskaja Oblast in northwestern Russia. The Arkhangelsk Cancer Registry. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:82.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vaktskjold A, Ungurjanu TN, Klestsjinov NM. Cancer incidence in the Nenetskij Avtonomnyj Okrug, Arctic Russia. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2008;67(5):433–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Coupland VH, Kocher HM, Berry DP, Allum W, Linklater KM, Konfortion J, et al. Incidence and survival for hepatic, pancreatic and biliary cancers in England between 1998 and 2007. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36(4):e207–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Karim-Kos HE, Kiemeney LA, Louwman MW, Coebergh JW, de Vries E. Progress against cancer in the Netherlands since the late 1980s: an epidemiological evaluation. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(12):2981–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wood HE, Gupta S, Kang JY, Quinn MJ, Maxwell JD, Mudan S, et al. Pancreatic cancer in England and Wales 1975–2000: patterns and trends in incidence, survival and mortality. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23(8):1205–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Crocetti E, Capocaccia R, Casella C, Guzzinati S, Ferretti S, Rosso S, et al. Population-based incidence and mortality cancer trends (1986–1997) from the network of Italian cancer registries. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2004;13(4):287–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Linder S, Bostrom L, Nilsson B. Pancreatic carcinoma incidence and survival in Sweden in 1980–2000: a population-based study of 16,758 hospitalized patients with special reference to different therapies. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33(5):616–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pasquali C, Sperti C, Filipponi C, Pedrazzoli S. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer in Northeastern Italy: incidence, resectability rate, hospital stay, costs and survival (1990–1992). Dig Liver Dis. 2002;34(10):723–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rutegard M, Shore R, Lu Y, Lagergren P, Lindblad M. Sex differences in the incidence of gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma in Sweden 1970–2006. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(6):1093–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baastrup R, Sorensen M, Hansen J, Hansen RD, Wurtzen H, Winther JF. Social inequality and incidence of and survival from cancers of the oesophagus, stomach and pancreas in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(14):1962–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hedberg M, Borgstrom A, Genell S, Janzon L. Survival following pancreatic carcinoma: a follow-up study of all cases recorded in Malmo, Sweden, 1977–1991. Br J Surg. 1998;85(12):1641–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lambe M, Eloranta S, Wigertz A, Blomqvist P. Pancreatic cancer; reporting and long-term survival in Sweden. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(8):1220–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hjelmgren J, Ceberg J, Persson U, Alvegard TA. The cost of treating pancreatic cancer—a cohort study based on patients’ records from four hospitals in Sweden. Acta Oncol. 2003;42(3):218–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bye A, Jordhøy MS, Skjegstad G, Ledsaak O, Iversen PO, Hjermstad MJ. Symptoms in advanced pancreatic cancer are of importance for energy intake. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(1):219–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Frigeri M, De Dosso S, Castillo-Fernandez O, Feuerlein K, Neuenschwander H, Saletti P. Chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: too close to death? Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(1):157–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mitry E, Rachet B, Quinn MJ, Cooper N, Coleman MP. Survival from cancer of the pancreas in England and Wales up to 2001. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(SUPPL1):S21–3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mukherjee S, Hudson E, Reza S, Thomas M, Crosby T, Maughan T. Pancreatic cancer within a UK cancer network with special emphasis on locally advanced non-metastatic pancreatic cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008;20(7):535–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bjerregaard JK, Mortensen MB, Schonnemann KR, Pfeiffer P. Characteristics, therapy and outcome in an unselected and prospectively registered cohort of pancreatic cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(1):98–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cronin-Fenton DP, Erichsen R, Mortensen FV, Dikinis S, Norgaard M, Jacobsen J. Pancreatic cancer survival in central and northern Denmark from 1998 through 2009: a population based cohort study. Clin Epidemiol. 2011;3(SUPPL):19–25.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Faivre J, Forman D, Esteve J, Obradovic M, Sant M. Survival of patients with primary liver cancer, pancreatic cancer and biliary tract cancer in Europe. EUROCARE Working Group. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34(14 Spec No):2184–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hiripi E, Gondos A, Emrich K, Holleczek B, Katalinic A, Luttmann S, et al. Survival from common and rare cancers in Germany in the early 21st century. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(2):472–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Micheli A, Ciampichini R, Oberaigner W, Ciccolallo L, de Vries E, Izarzugaza I, et al. The advantage of women in cancer survival: an analysis of EUROCARE-4 data. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(6):1017–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nienhuijs SW, van den Akker SA, de Vries E, de Hingh IH, Visser O, Lemmens VE. Nationwide improvement of only short-term survival after resection for pancreatic cancer in the Netherlands. Pancreas. 2012;41(7):1063–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Desauw C, El Hajbi F, Ligier K, Duhamel A, Richard F, Rose C. Pathological proof and survival for patients with billiary-tract or pancreatic tumor. Vienna: ESMO annual meeting. European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO); 2012.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Luo J, Adami HO, Reilly M, Ekbom A, Nordenvall C, Ye W. Interpreting trends of pancreatic cancer incidence and mortality: a nation-wide study in Sweden (1960–2003). Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(1):89–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Allen-Mersh TG, Earlam RJ. Pancreatic cancer in England and Wales: surgeons look at epidemiology. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1986;68(3):154–8.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Appelqvist P, Viren M, Minkkinen J, Kajanti M, Kostiainen S, Rissanen P. Operative finding, treatment, and prognosis of carcinoma of the pancreas: an analysis of 267 cases. J Surg Oncol. 1983;23(3):143–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Carpelan-Holmstrom M, Nordling S, Pukkala E, Sankila R, Luttges J, Kloppel G, et al. Does anyone survive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A nationwide study re-evaluating the data of the Finnish Cancer Registry. Gut. 2005;54(3):385–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sant M, Aareleid T, Berrino F, Bielska LM, Carli PM, Faivre J, et al. EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990–94–results and commentary. Ann Oncol. 2003;14 Suppl 5:v61–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vercelli M, Capocaccia R, Quaglia A, Casella C, Puppo A, Coebergh JW. Relative survival in elderly European cancer patients: evidence for health care inequalities. The EUROCARE Working Group. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2000;35(3):161–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bosetti C, Bertuccio P, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Zeegers MP, Boffetta P. Pancreatic cancer: overview of descriptive epidemiology. Mol Carcinog. 2012;51(1):3–13. doi:10.1002/mc.20785.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fernandez E, La Vecchia C, Porta M, Negri E, Lucchini F, Levi F. Trends in pancreatic cancer mortality in Europe, 1955–1989. Int J Cancer. 1994;57(6):786–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Levi F, Lucchini F, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Pancreatic cancer mortality in Europe: the leveling of an epidemic. Pancreas. 2003;27(2):139–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Levi F, Lucchini F, Negri E, Boyle P, La Vecchia C. Mortality from major cancer sites in the European Union, 1955–1998. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(3):490–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Malvezzi M, Arfe A, Bertuccio P, Levi F, La Vecchia C, Negri E. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2011. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(4):947–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Malvezzi M, Bertuccio P, Levi F, La Vecchia C, Negri E. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2012. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(4):1044–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Arfe A, Malvezzi M, Bertuccio P, Decarli A, La VC, Negri E. Cancer mortality trend analysis in Italy, 1970–2007. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2011;20(5):364–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rosso T, Malvezzi M, Bertuccio P, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Decarli A. Cancer mortality in Italy, 2008, and predictions for 2012. Tumori. 2012;98(5):559–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Adanja B, Vlajinac H, Jarebinski M, Jovanovic D, Sipetic S, Marinkovic J. Trends in cancer mortality of the digestive tract in Belgrade, Yugoslavia, 1975–1989. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994;10(1):99–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bray I, Brennan P, Boffetta P. Projections of alcohol- and tobacco-related cancer mortality in Central Europe. Int J Cancer. 2000;87(1):122–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Markovic-Denic L, Vlajinac H, Zivkovic S, Miljus D. Cancer mortality among men in Central Serbia: 1985–2006 survey study. Croat Med J. 2008;49(6):792–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hill C, Benhamou E, Doyon F. Trends in cancer mortality, France 1950–1985. Br J Cancer. 1991;63(4):587–90.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Levi F, La Vecchia C, Randimbison L. Cancer mortality in Switzerland, 1990–1994. Soz Praventivmed. 1997;42(1):37–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Labori KJ, Hjermstad MJ, Wester T, Buanes T, Loge JH. Symptom profiles and palliative care in advanced pancreatic cancer: a prospective study. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14(11):1126–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Pezzilli R, Falconi M, Zerbi A, Casadei R, Valli L, Varale R, et al. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for different diseases: a follow-up study. Pancreas. 2011;40(6):938–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zabernigg A, Gamper EM, Giesinger JM, Rumpold G, Kemmler G, Gattringer K, et al. Taste alterations in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a neglected side effect? Oncologist. 2010;15(8):913–20.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Müller-Nordhorn J, Bruggenjurgen B, Bohmig M, Selim D, Reich A, Noesselt L, et al. Direct and indirect costs in a prospective cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer. Alim Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22(5):405–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Tingstedt B, Andersson E, Flink A, Bolin K, Lindgren B, Andersson R. Pancreatic cancer, healthcare cost, and loss of productivity: a register-based approach. World J Surg. 2011;35(10):2298–305. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1208-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bachmann M, Peters T, Harvey I. Costs and concentration of cancer care: evidence for pancreatic, oesophageal and gastric cancers in National Health Service hospitals. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8(2):75–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. http://globocan.iarc.f. Acessed 06 December 2013.
  77. 77.
    Worni M, Guller U, White RR, Castleberry AW, Pietrobon R, Cerny T, et al. Modest Improvement in Overall Survival for Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: a Trend Analysis Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry From 1988 to 2008. Pancreas. 2013. doi:10.1097/MPA.0b013e318291fbc5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Bernards N, Haj Mohammad N, Creemers GJ, de Hingh IH, van Laarhoven HW, Lemmens VE. Ten weeks to live: a population-based study on treatment and survival of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in the south of the Netherlands. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(3):403–10. doi:10.3109/0284186x.2014.953257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Levi F, Lucchini F, Negri E, Zatonski W, Boyle P, La Vecchia C. Trends in cancer mortality in the European Union and accession countries, 1980–2000. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(9):1425–31. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Chabot I, Rocchi A. Oncology drug health technology assessment recommendations: Canadian versus UK experiences. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;6:357–67. doi:10.2147/CEOR.S66309.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    NICE ‘central’ to value-based pricing of medicines (2013). http://www.nice.org.uk/news/article/nice-central-to-valuebased-pricing-of-medicines. Accessed 26 March 2015.
  82. 82.
    Analysing the Potential Impact of UK “Value-Based Pricing” (2013). http://www.ohe.org/case-studies/analysing-potential-impact-uk-value-based-pricing. Accessed 26 March 2015.
  83. 83.
    O’Neill CB, Atoria CL, O’Reilly EM, LaFemina J, Henman MC, Elkin EB. Costs and trends in pancreatic cancer treatment. Cancer. 2012;118(20):5132–9. doi:10.1002/cncr.27490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Carrato
    • 1
  • A. Falcone
    • 2
  • M. Ducreux
    • 3
  • J. W. Valle
    • 4
  • A. Parnaby
    • 5
  • K. Djazouli
    • 5
  • K. Alnwick-Allu
    • 6
  • A. Hutchings
    • 6
  • C. Palaska
    • 6
  • I. Parthenaki
    • 6
  1. 1.Medical Oncology DepartmentRamon y Cajal University HospitalMadridSpain
  2. 2.Unit of Medical OncologyPisa University HospitalPisaItaly
  3. 3.Gastrointestinal UnitGustave Roussy InstituteVillejuifFrance
  4. 4.Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
  5. 5.Celgene CorporationBoudrySwitzerland
  6. 6.Dolon LtdLondonUK

Personalised recommendations