Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pancreatic Neoplasia: A Practical Cross-sectional Imaging Primer for the Nonradiologist

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to provide a practical review of basic pancreatic imaging protocols and key cross-sectional imaging findings of the more common pancreatic neoplasms.

Methods

We performed a literature search and reviewed numerous cases archived in the radiology department of a large university hospital to find examples which illustrate the key cross-sectional imaging findings of pancreatic neoplasms.

Results

We reviewed the literature and provided several practical examples of common cross-sectional imaging findings in patients with pancreatic neoplasms.

Conclusions

Cross-sectional imaging plays a pivotal role in the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms and allows proper triage of patients for conservative, medical or surgical management due to its ability to reliably detect and characterize pancreatic lesions, determine involvement of local structures, and assess metastatic disease. Familiarity with the key imaging findings will allow the clinician to better implement imaging data into daily practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Yokoyama R, Miyoshi T, et al. Pancreas: optimal scan delay for contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2006;241:167–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Miyoshi T, Shiratori Y, et al. MDCT of the pancreas: optimizing scanning delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular, and hepatic contrast enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:751–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sheridan MB, Ward J, Guthrie JA, Spencer JA, Craven CM, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer: a comparative study with receiver operating characteristic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:583–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nishiharu T, Yamashita Y, Abe Y, Mitsuzaki K, Tsuchigame T, et al. Local extension of pancreatic carcinoma: assessment with thin-section helical CT versus with breath-hold fast MR imaging—ROC analysis. Radiology. 1999;212:445–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schima W, Fugger R, Schober E, Oettl C, Wamser P, et al. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced helical hydro-CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:717–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brugge WR. The role of EUS in the diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:S18–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee TY, Kim MH, Park do H, Seo DW, Lee SK, et al. Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis with atypical pancreatic imaging findings from pancreatic cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:343–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heinrich S, Goerres GW, Schafer M, Sagmeister M, Bauerfeind P, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography influences on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer and its cost-effectiveness. Ann Surg. 2005;242:235–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kauhanen SP, Komar G, Seppanen MP, Dean KI, Minn HR, et al. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;250:957–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fontham ET, Correa P. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 1989;69:551–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsuchiya R, Noda T, Harada N, Miyamoto T, Tomioka T, et al. Collective review of small carcinomas of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 1986;203:77–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Megibow AJ, Zhou XH, Rotterdam H, Francis IR, Zerhouni EA, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability—report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology. 1995;195:327–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McNulty NJ, Francis IR, Platt JF, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, et al. Multi–detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast-enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology. 2001;220:97–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Boland GW, O’Malley ME, Saez M, Fernandez-del-Castillo C, Warshaw AL, et al. Pancreatic-phase versus portal vein-phase helical CT of the pancreas: optimal temporal window for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:605–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Atri M, Garcia P, Reinhold C. A comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:49–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Keogan MT, Tyler D, Clark L, Branch MS, McDermott VG, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma: role of FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1565–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, Kadell BM, Sayre J. Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1439–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Campbell F, Azadeh B. Cystic neoplasms of the exocrine pancreas. Histopathology. 2008;52:539–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Federle MP, McGrath KM. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2007;36:365–76. ix.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sidden CR, Mortele KJ. Cystic tumors of the pancreas: ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging features. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2007;28:339–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen-Scali F, Vilgrain V, Brancatelli G, Hammel P, Vullierme MP, et al. Discrimination of unilocular macrocystic serous cystadenoma from pancreatic pseudocyst and mucinous cystadenoma with CT: initial observations. Radiology. 2003;228:727–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McGrath KM, Krasinskas AM, Federle MP. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2007;36:377–90. ix-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalb B, Sarmiento JM, Kooby DA, Adsay NV, Martin DR. MR imaging of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Radiographics. 2009;29:1749–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Procacci C, Carbognin G, Biasiutti C, Guarise A, Ghirardi C, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: spectrum of CT and MR findings with pathologic correlation. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1939–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Coleman KM, Doherty MC, Bigler SA. Solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. Radiographics. 2003;23:1644–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Madan AK, Weldon CB, Long WP, Johnson D, Raafat A. Solid and papillary epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas. J Surg Oncol. 2004;85:193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cantisani V, Mortele KJ, Levy A, Glickman JN, Ricci P, et al. MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas in adult and pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:395–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Adsay NV, Klimstra DS. Cystic forms of typically solid pancreatic tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2000;17:81–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Solcia E, Sessa F, Rindi G, Villani L, Riva C, et al. Classification and histogenesis of gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumours. Eur J Clin Invest. 1990;20 Suppl 1:S72–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kloppel G, Heitz PU. Pancreatic endocrine tumors. Pathol Res Pract. 1988;183:155–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Buetow PC, Parrino TV, Buck JL, Pantongrag-Brown L, Ros PR, et al. Islet cell tumors of the pancreas: pathologic-imaging correlation among size, necrosis and cysts, calcification, malignant behavior, and functional status. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1175–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S, Marchal G, Baert AL, Mertens L. Helical CT for the preoperative localization of islet cell tumors of the pancreas: value of arterial and parenchymal phase images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1437–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Huai JC, Zhang W, Niu HO, Su ZX, McNamara JJ, et al. Localization and surgical treatment of pancreatic insulinomas guided by intraoperative ultrasound. Am J Surg. 1998;175:18–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Suite 3950 PUH S. Tower, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA

    Matthew T. Heller, Nathan Johnson & Antonio Fargiano

Authors
  1. Matthew T. Heller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nathan Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio Fargiano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew T. Heller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heller, M.T., Johnson, N. & Fargiano, A. Pancreatic Neoplasia: A Practical Cross-sectional Imaging Primer for the Nonradiologist. J Gastrointest Canc 43, 148–156 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-010-9250-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-010-9250-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation