Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optic Nerve Sheath Viscoelastic Properties: Re-Examination of Biomechanical Behavior and Clinical Implications

  • Original work
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Meta-analyses show a variable relationship between optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and the presence of raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Because optic nerve sheath (ONS) tissue can be deformed, it is possible that ONSD reflects not only the current ICP but also prior deforming biomechanical exposures. In this post hoc analysis of two published data sets, we characterize ONS Young’s modulus (E, mechanical stress per unit of strain) and calculate threshold pressure for plastic deformation.

Methods

The authors of two previously published articles contributed primary data for these unique post hoc analyses. Human cadaveric ex vivo measurements of ONSD (n = 10) and luminal distending pressure (range 5 to 65 mm Hg) were used to calculate E and the threshold pressure for plastic deformation. Clinical in vivo measurements of ONSD and ICP during endotracheal tube suction from patients with traumatic brain injury (n = 15) were used to validate the ex vivo cadaveric findings.

Results

Ex vivo ONS estimate of E was 140 ± 1.3 mm Hg (mean ± standard error), with evidence of plastic deformation occurring with distending pressure at 45 mm Hg. Similar E (71 ± 10 mm Hg) was estimated in vivo with an average ICP of 34 ± 2 mm Hg.

Conclusions

Ex vivo, ONS plastic deformation occurs at levels of pressure commonly seen in patients with raised ICP, leading to distortion of the ICP–ONSD relationship. This evidence of plastic deformation may illustrate why meta-analyses fail to identify a single threshold in ONSD associated with the presence of raised ICP. Future studies characterizing time-dependent viscous characteristics of the ONS will help determine the time course of ONS tissue biomechanical behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Fernando SM, Tran A, Cheng W, et al. Diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure in critically ill adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koziarz A, Sne N, Kegel F, et al. Bedside optic nerve ultrasonography for diagnosing increased intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(12):896–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Robba C, Santori G, Czosnyka M, et al. Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(8):1284–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen HC, Helmke K. The subarachnoid space surrounding the optic nerves. An ultrasound study of the optic nerve sheath. Surg Radiol Anat. 1996;18(4):323–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubourg J, Javouhey E, Geeraerts T, Messerer M, Kassai B. Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(7):1059–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaiman M, Gottlieb P, Bekerman I. Quantitative relations between the eyeball, the optic nerve, and the optic canal important for intracranial pressure monitoring. Head Face Med. 2014;10:32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen HC, Lagrèze W, Krueger O, Helmke K. Dependence of the optic nerve sheath diameter on acutely applied subarachnoidal pressure - an experimental ultrasound study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89(6):e528–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maissan IM, Dirven PJ, Haitsma IK, Hoeks SE, Gommers D, Stolker RJ. Ultrasonographic measured optic nerve sheath diameter as an accurate and quick monitor for changes in intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg. 2015;123(3):743–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shin A, Yoo L, Park J, Demer JL. Finite element biomechanics of optic nerve sheath traction in adduction. J Biomech Eng. 2017;139(10):101010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shin A, Park J, Le A, Poukens V, Demer JL. Bilaminar mechanics of the human optic nerve sheath. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45(7):854–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hua Y, Voorhees AP, Sigal IA. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure: revisiting factors influencing optic nerve head biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(1):154–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Carew EO, Patel J, Garg A, Houghtaling P, Blackstone E, Vesely I. Effect of specimen size and aspect ratio on the tensile properties of porcine aortic valve tissues. Ann Biomed Eng. 2003;31(5):526–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. East L, Lyon M, Agrawal P, et al. Increased intracranial pressure damages optic nerve structural support. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36(22):3132–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Forouzandeh F, Bozorgi MH, Meshkat B, Fatouraee N. Measurement of mechanical properties of human saphenous vein using an inflation experiment. Paper presented at the Iranian Conference of Biomedical Engineering, Tehran, Iran, 18–20 December 2013.

  15. MacLean NF, Dudek NL, Roach MR. The role of radial elastic properties in the development of aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29(4):703–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RCT conceived the study. KH, HCH, IMM, and RJS were authors of the previously published data. ML, AAA, and RCT performed the statistical analysis of the data set and wrote the original manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Luchette.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval/Informed Consent

Post hoc analysis of previously published data. RCT contacted the authors of the two primary reports and gained approval for the analyses as well as co-opting the main authors as collaborators in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luchette, M., Helmke, K., Maissan, I.M. et al. Optic Nerve Sheath Viscoelastic Properties: Re-Examination of Biomechanical Behavior and Clinical Implications. Neurocrit Care 37, 184–189 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01462-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01462-x

Keywords

Navigation