Abstract
Objective
We sought to identify similarities and differences in the diagnostic requirements for ancillary testing for determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) around the world.
Methods
We reviewed diagnostic requirements for ancillary testing for BD/DNC in 78 unique official national BD/DNC protocols obtained from contacts worldwide between January 2018 and April 2019.
Results
Details provided on the performance and interpretation of ancillary tests for determination of BD/DNC were variably provided and inconsistent. Approximately half of all protocols that included each ancillary test provided details about study performance: 63% of protocols that included conventional cerebral angiography, 55% of protocols that included electroencephalography, 50% of protocols that included somatosensory evoked potentials, 48% of protocols that included transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, 43% of protocols that included nuclear medicine flow study and 41% of protocols that included brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Similarly, about half of all protocols that included each ancillary test provided details about study interpretation: 66% of protocols that included electroencephalography, 59% of protocols that included brainstem auditory evoked potentials, 56% of protocols that included somatosensory evoked potentials, 55% of protocols that included transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, 52% of protocols that included conventional cerebral angiography and 49% of protocols that included nuclear medicine flow study.
Interpretation
Diagnostic requirements for ancillary testing in BD/DNC determination vary around the world. We hope that the World Brain Death Project will improve worldwide consensus on the diagnostic requirements for ancillary testing in BD/DNC, both for performance and interpretation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data
Ariane Lewis takes responsibility for the data and accuracy of data analysis.
References
Lewis A, Bakkar A, Kreiger-Benson E, et al. Determination of death by neurologic criteria around the world. Neurology. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009888.
Kramer A. Ancillary Testing in Brain Death. Semin Neurol. 2015;35(02):125–38.
Greer DM, Wang HH, Robinson JD, et al. Variability of Brain Death Policies in the United States. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(2):213–8.
Wijdicks EFM. Brain death worldwide: accepted fact but no global consensus in diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58:20–5.
Wahlster S, Wijdicks E, Patel P, et al. Brain death declaration: Practices and perceptions worldwide. Neurology. 2015;84(18):1870–9.
Hornby K, Shemie SD, Teitelbaum J, Doig C. Variability in hospital-based brain death guidelines in Canada. Can. J. Anesth. 2006;53(6):613–9.
A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. JAMA 1968;205(6):337–40.
Beecher HK. Definitions of life and death for medical science and practice. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1970;169(2):471–4.
Wijdicks EFM. The case against confirmatory tests for determining brain death in adults. Neurology. 2010;75(1):77–83.
Dalle Ave AL, Bernat JL. Inconsistencies Between the Criterion and Tests for Brain Death. J. Intensive Care Med. 2018;Epub ahead of print.
Gastala J, Fattal D, Kirby PA, et al. Brain death: Radiologic signs of a non-radiologic diagnosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019;185:105465.
Lewis A, Adams N, Chopra A, Kirschen MP. Use of Ancillary Tests When Determining Brain Death in Pediatric Patients in the United States. J Child Neurol. 2017;32(12):975–80.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance obtaining protocols for this project: Abualia, Mohammad (Jordan), Abulhasan, Yasser (Kuwait), Abente, Silvia (Paraguay), Agerlin, Niels (Denmark), Akhtar, Naveed (Qatar), Alarcon Aviles, Tomas (Ecuador), Anamnart, Chumpol (Thailand), Arab, Ouail (Algeria), Araqi Houssaini, Adil (Morocco), Arguello Lopez, Becket (Nicaragua), Armendariz Landois, Paulina (Mexico), Ashayeriahmadabad, Rezan (Iran), Attar, Besher (Saudi Arabia), Badenes, Rafael (Spain), Beca, John (New Zealand), Berlot, Rok (Slovenia), Bohatyrewicz, Romuald (Poland), Boldbaatar, Khatantuul (Mongolia), Bulic, Sebina (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Busic, Mirela (Croatia), Castillo Abrego, Guadalupe (Honduras, Panama), Chan, Louisa (Malaysia), Charpentier, Julien (France), Chumbe Mendoza, Maria Mercedes (Peru), Cohen, Jonathan (Israel), Cornejo, Francisco (El Salvador), Cronberg, Tobias (Denmark, Sweden), Demeritte, Edwin (Bahamas), Do, Son (Vietnam), Duska, Frantisek (Czech Republic, Ireland, Slovakia), Eismant, Aleksandr (Belarus), Erakovic, Jevto (Montenegro), Faruq, Mohammad Omar (Bangladesh), Getova, Radostina (Bulgaria), Gogovska, Lodi (Macedonia), Gradisek, Primoz (Slovenia), Groysman, Leonid (Romania), Hadjigeorgiou, Georgios (Cyprus), Hoppe, Arnold (Chile), Jowi, James (Kenya), Keller, Emanuela (Switzerland), Khoury, Samia (Lebanon), Kirkegaard, Hans (Denmark), Kirste, Gunter (Germany), Ko, Sang-Bae (South Korea), Kobata, Hitoshi (Japan), Kornips, Bert (Netherlands), Kõrv, Janika (Estonia), Kuroda, Yasuhiro (Japan), Lisnic, Vitalie (Moldova), Lucic-Samardzija, Vesna (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Lukic, Stevo (Serbia), Lundeg, Ganbold (Mongolia), Machado, Calixto (Cuba), Mallia, Pierre (Malta), Mallick, Uzzwal Kumar (Bangladesh), Manara, Alex (UK), Mariano, Geraldine (Philippines), Marquevich, Victoria (Argentina), Maryenko, Lidiya (Ukraine), Mejia, Jorge (Colombia), Milivojevic, Natasa (Slovenia), Mora, Jacobo (Venezuela), Moreno, Rui (Portugal), Mouhaoui, Mohammed (Morocco), Opdam, Helen (Australia), Palazis, Lakis (Cyprus), Panday, Avidesh (Trinidad and Tobago), Piva, Jefferson (Brazil), Puppo, Corina (Uruguay), Rhassane, Ahmed (Morocco), Saelim, Kantara (Thailand), Sandroni, Caludio (Italy), Schmutzhard, Erich (Austria), Scrifvars, Marcus (Finland), Shrestha, Gentle (Nepal), Silesky, Juan (Costa Rica), Sinkin, Mikhail (Kazakhstan, Russia), Sorensen, Dag Wendelbo (Norway), Swiat, Maciej (Poland), Tchantchaleishvili, Nana (Georgia), Thorkelsson, Thordur (Iceland), Tsertsvadze, Iakob (Georgia), Tong Kiat, Kwek (Singapore), Topcuoglu, Mehmet Akif (Turkey), Tsivgoulis, Georgios (Cyprus), Varelas, Panayiotis (Greece), Wang, Yuyang (China), Westphal, Glauco (Brazil), Yu-Chang Yeh, Tony (Taiwan), Zairinal, Ramdinal Aviesena (Indonesia), Zirpe, Kapil (India).
Funding
No authors received financial compensation for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AL was responsible for conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript, statistical analysis and final approval of the manuscript. AB, EK-B, AK and JL are responsible for analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision of the manuscript and final approval of the manuscript. SDS, GS, ST and DG are responsible for conception and design, data collection, critical revision of the manuscript and final approval of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Although five of the authors of this paper comprise the Steering Committee of the World Brain Death Project, this paper is not part of the World Brain Death Project. Ariane Lewis is a Deputy Editor for the Disputes and Debates Section of Neurology and was a guest editor for Neurosurgical Focus and Seminars in Neurology. Sam D. Shemie is Medical Advisor to Canadian Blood Services Deceased Organ Donation and an Associate Investigator at MUHC Research Institute. David Greer is the Editor in Chief for Seminars in Neurology and receives research support from Becton Dickenson and an NIH R01.
Ethical Approval
IRB review of this study was waived due to absence of human subjects.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lewis, A., Liebman, J., Kreiger-Benson, E. et al. Ancillary Testing for Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria Around the World. Neurocrit Care 34, 473–484 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01039-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01039-6