Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Confounding by Indication in Retrospective Studies of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Antiepileptic Treatment and Mortality

  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a highly fatal disease with few proven treatments. Data to guide clinician decisions for therapies, including antiepileptic drugs (AED), are limited. Published studies on AED treatment in ICH have provided conflicting results. We investigated the effect of AED treatment on 90-day mortality after ICH in a large prospectively ascertained cohort.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively assembled cohort of patients with ICH in the supratentorial regions, comparing 90-day mortality and modified Rankin Score among 543 patients treated with AED during hospitalization and 639 AED-free ICH. Supratentorial ICH location was categorized as lobar or deep hemispheric.

Results

Multivariate analysis demonstrated an association between AED treatment and reduced 90-day mortality in supratentorial ICH (OR = 0.62, 95 % CI 0.42–0.90, p = 0.01) and the subset of lobar ICH (OR = 0.49, 95 % CI 0.25–0.96, p = 0.04). When analyses were restricted to subjects surviving longer than 5 days from ICH, however, no association between AED treatment and a 90-day outcome, regardless of hemorrhage location (all p > 0.15), was detected, despite more than adequate power to detect the originally observed association.

Conclusion

These results suggest that AED treatment in acute ICH is not associated with 90-day mortality or outcome and that any detected association could arise by confounding by indication, in which the most severely affected patients are those in whom AEDs are prescribed. They provide a cautionary example of the limitations of drawing conclusions about treatment effects from observational data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qureshi AI, Tuhrim S, Broderick JP, Batjer H, Hondo H, Hanley DF. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(19):1450–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Asch CJ, Luitse MJ, Rinkel GJ, van der Tweel I, Algra A, Klijn CJ. Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:167–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Herdt V, Dumont F, Henon H, Derambure P, Vonck K, Leys D, Cordonnier C. Early seizures in intracerebral hemorrhage: incidence, associated factors, and outcome. Neurology. 2011;77(20):1794–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vespa PM, O’Phelan K, Shah M, et al. Acute seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage: a factor in progressive midline shift and outcome. Neurology. 2003;60(9):1441–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Messe SR, Sansing LH, Cucchiara BL, Herman ST, Lyden PD, Kasner SE. Prophylactic antiepileptic drug use is associated with poor outcome following ICH. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(1):38–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Naidech AM, Garg RK, Liebling S, Levasseur K, Macken MP, Schuele SU, Batjer HH. Antiepileptic use and outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2009;40(12):3810–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reddig RT, Nixdorf KE, Jensen MB. The prophylactic use of an antiepileptic drug in intracerebral hemorrhage. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011;113(10):895–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor S, Heinrichs RJ, Janzen JM, Ehtisham A. Levetiracetam is associated with improved cognitive outcome for patients with intracranial hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(1):80–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brookhart MA, Sturmer T, Glynn RJ, Rassen J, Schneeweiss S. Confounding control in healthcare database research: challenges and potential approaches. Med Care. 2010;48(6 Suppl):S114–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. FitzMaurice E, Wendell L, Snider R, et al. Effect of statins on intracerebral hemorrhage outcome and recurrence. Stroke. 2008;39(7):2151–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Flibotte JJ, Hagan N, O’Donnell J, Greenberg SM, Rosand J. Warfarin, hematoma expansion, and outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2004;63(6):1059–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Morioka J, Fujii M, Kato S, et al. Surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage has greater remedial value than conservative therapy. Surg Neurol. 2006;65(1):67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Institute for Neurological Disease and Stroke RO1NS059727, NIH R01NS073344, NIH K23NS059774. The authors thank Shawn Murphy and Henry Chueh and the Partners Health Care Research Patient Data Registry group for facilitating use of their database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Rosand.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Battey, T.W.K., Falcone, G.J., Ayres, A.M. et al. Confounding by Indication in Retrospective Studies of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Antiepileptic Treatment and Mortality. Neurocrit Care 17, 361–366 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-012-9776-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-012-9776-z

Keywords

Navigation