Skip to main content
Log in

Public procurement in ESIF-programmes and -projects: a challenging balancing act

  • Article
  • Published:
ERA Forum Aims and scope

Abstract

With around 351. 8 billion Euro the cohesion policy accounts for almost one third of the European Union’s budget in the period 2014–2020. Numerous programmes and projects are co-funded by the so-called European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). Errors in public procurement cause almost half of all irregularities detected in these programmes and projects. Many of these errors could be avoided if ESIF-programmes would not foresee such strict rules for purchases and the intensity and frequency of controls of programmes and projects would be reduced to an adequate level. Based on five hypotheses the present article illustrates difficulties and helpful approaches for the challenging balancing act between ESIF- and EU-procurement rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/legislation/regulations/.

  2. European Commission, Key recommendations of the High Level Group on Simplification for the post 2020 Cohesion Policy. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/newsroom/pdf/simplification_proposals_key.pdf, [3].

  3. According to Art. 2 (36) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 an irregularity means any infringement of a provision of European law resulting from an act or omission by an economic operator which has, or would have, the effect of prejudicing the general budget of the European Union or budgets managed by it, either by reducing or losing revenue accruing from own resources collected directly on behalf of the Union, or by an unjustified item of expenditure.

  4. EC decision C(2913) 9527 of 19 December 2013, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/cocof/2013/cocof_13_9527_annexe_en.pdf, [1].

  5. EC decision C(2913) 9527 of 19 December 2013, p. 7.

  6. EC decision C (2019) 3452 of 14 May 2019, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/GL_corrections_pp_irregularities_EN.pdf, [2].

  7. EC decision C (2017) 7782 final, pp. 6 ff.

  8. European Commission’s Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the ERDF, the ESF Plus, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Funds, the internal security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument, COM (2018), 375 available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/budget-may2018-common-provisions_en.pdf, [6].

  9. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund and external financing instruments COM (2018) 374, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52018PC0374&from=EN, [7].

  10. For more information see the EC guidelines of simplified cost options, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/thefunds/fin_inst/pdf/simpl_cost_en.pdf, [4].

References

  1. EC decision C (2019) 3452 of 14 May 2019. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/GL_corrections_pp_irregularities_EN.pdf

  2. European Commission: Decision C (2017) 7782 final, draft version of 27 November 2017. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/3/2017/EN/C-2017-7782-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-1.PDF

  3. European Commission: Key recommendations of the High Level Group on Simplification for the post 2020 Cohesion Policy (2 April 2019). Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/newsroom/pdf/simplification_proposals_key.pdf

  4. European Commission: Guidelines on simplified cost options. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/thefunds/fin_inst/pdf/simpl_cost_en.pdf

  5. European Court of Auditors: Annual report on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2014. Available at https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/annualreports-2014/annualreports-2014-EN.pdf

  6. European Commission: Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the ERDF, the ESF Plus, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Funds, the internal security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument, COM (2018), 375 final. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/budget-may2018-common-provisions_en.pdf

  7. European Commission: Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund and external financing instruments, COM (2018) 374 final. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52018PC0374&from=EN

  8. European Court of Auditors: Special report No 10/2015: efforts to address problems with public procurement in EU cohesion expenditure should be intensified (2 April 2019). Available at https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR15_10/SR_PROCUREMENT_EN.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Bauer.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauer, C. Public procurement in ESIF-programmes and -projects: a challenging balancing act. ERA Forum 20, 307–320 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-019-00576-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-019-00576-8

Keywords

Navigation