Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is an autoimmune intraepidermal bullous disease with a prevalence of 0.1–0.7 per 100,000 individuals [1]. Clinical demonstration of the disease includes flaccid blisters and erosions present within both skin and mucous membranes [2]. Characteristics of the PV disease are IgG deposits localized within lesional epidermis revealed in direct immunofluorescence examination (DIF) and circulating autoantibodies present in indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). The target antigens are cadherin molecules: desmoglein (DSG) 3 and DSG 1 [3]. After attachment of antibodies to antigens, several synergistic processes take place leading to loss of cell adhesion [4]. It is suggested that both signaling-dependent and signaling-independent pathways contribute to acantholysis development [5]. All those processes occur with participation of various cytokines and chemokines, wherein elevated levels were detected in serum, blister fluid, and perilesional skin of patients with PV. Moreover, levels of some of them were found correlating with activity of PV [6].
The Janus kinases (JAKs) and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs) are a family of proteins constituting signaling pathway. In mammals, the STAT family includes seven members (STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5a, STAT5b, STAT6) and four tyrosine kinases (JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2) [7, 8]. The cascade might be activated by numerous signaling molecules; it enables intercellular communication and plays a significant role in proliferation, growth, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis of cells [9]. There have been inflammatory and autoimmune diseases identified where the JAK/STAT signaling is disrupted [10, 11]. However, there are no reports concerning the JAK/STAT pathway and its contribution to pathogenesis of pemphigus vulgaris yet to be published.
Thus far, literature data seem to indicate an influential role of JAK/STAT in the pathogenesis of autoimmune skin disorders, with IL-4, INF, TNF-α, IL-6, IFNs, and IL-17 being key mediators [10, 11]. Specifically, the JAK/STAT pathway is instrumental for the Th2 cell differentiation [9]. That is why the aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of proteins JAK3, STAT2, STAT4, and STAT6 in skin lesions and perilesional area in patients with pemphigus vulgaris as well as in the control group.
Materials and methods
Patients
The study included 15 persons with PV (11 women and 4 men; range 59 to 89 years, average 72.51 years). All patients were at an active stage of the disease, before administration of any (systemic or topical) treatment. The control group comprised 10 healthy, unrelated volunteers, matched for sex and age. Skin samples of healthy volunteers have been taken from similar areas of those of disease’s groups. Diagnosis of PV was established based on medical history, clinical picture, and immunofluorescence findings.
Before entering the study, all the patients gave their informed written consent. The study protocol RNN/132/07/KB was approved by the Local Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Lodz.
Methods
Immunohistochemical methods were used to evaluate expression of JAK3, STAT2, STAT4, and STAT6 in both lesional and perilesional skin, and compared with healthy control skin. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were mounted onto SuperFrost slides, deparaffinized, then treated in a solution of TRS and transferred to distilled water. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in distilled water and then, sections were rinsed with Tris-buffered saline (TBS, Dako, Denmark), and incubated with primary rabbit polyclonal antibody against STAT2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), mouse monoclonal antibody against STAT4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), and primary rabbit polyclonal antibody against STAT6 (Santa Cruz biotechnology Inc.) and incubated overnight with mouse monoclonal antibody against JAK3. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using EnVision-horseradish peroxidase kit (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Visualization was performed by incubation of the sections in a solution of 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DakoCytomation, Denmark). After washing, the sections were counter-stained with hematoxylin and coverslipped. For each antibody and for each sample, a negative control was processed.
Semiquantitative analysis
Expression was evaluated according to methodology derived from research by Tam et al. [12]. In each specimen, staining intensity of JAK3, STAT2, STAT4, and STAT6 was recorded semiquantitatively by two independent observers in 7–9 high-power fields using in each field a weighted histoscore method according to Kirkegaard et al. (2006), also known as the H score system [13]. The immunoexpression score was calculated as follows (1 × % cells staining weakly positive) + (2 × % cells staining moderately positive) + (3 × % cells staining strongly positive). The mean score for each specimen was calculated by averaging grades assigned by the two authors and approximating the arithmetical mean to the nearest unity. All values were expressed as the mean ± SD (standard deviation).
Results
In healthy skin samples, expression of JAK3 was found throughout the epidermis with the horny layer being strongly stained by the antibody against JAK3. Immunoreactivity of STAT2, STAT4, and STAT6 antibodies was more strongly detected in the granular layer than in lower layers of epidermis. The horny cell layer was not stained with the antibodies against STAT2, STAT4, and STAT6 (Figs. 1 and 2).
Expression of JAK3 was significantly higher in PV skin lesions (17.04 ± 4.16) in comparison with the control group (10.73 ± 3.36; p < 0.05) and perilesional skin (13.18 ± 3.81; p > 0.05). There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between JAK3 expression in PV perilesional skin and the control group.
Expression of STAT2 was higher in PV patient skin lesions (19.15 ± 1.70) than in the control group (11.06 ± 5.34; p < 0.05). There was also statistical difference evaluated between PV skin lesions and perilesional area (13.91 ± 2.61; p < 0.05), but there was no statistical significance between expression of STAT2 in PV perilesional area and the control group (p > 0.05).
There was no significant difference between expression of STAT4 in PV skin lesion (19.37 ± 1.69) and the control group (18.59 ± 3.01; p > 0.05), as well as between PV skin lesions and PV perilesional skin (19.69 ± 3.23; p > 0.05). There was also no statistical difference between expression of STAT4 in skin lesions and perilesional area in patients with PV (p > 0.05).
The medium intensity of STAT6 expression was higher in PV skin lesions (17.65 ± 1.64) as compared with that in the control group (11.56 ± 2.84; p < 0.05). There was also significant difference between STAT6 expression in PV skin lesions and perilesional PV skin (14.48 ± 2.17; p < 0.05), as well as between healthy skin and PV perilesional skin (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3).
Discussion
There are many researches investigating the activation of JAKs and STATs by particular signaling molecules. TNF-α, IL-6, IFNs, IL-17, IL-21, and IL-23 among others are known for their contribution to inflammatory process also in the course of pemphigus [8]. As explicit above, they are able to use JAK/STAT pathway to transmit their signal, especially JAK3 and STAT4, STAT6, and STAT1. That is the reason of choosing these proteins to examine in PV.
Immunohistochemical research by Nishio et al. [14] revealed higher expression of JAK2, JAK3, STAT1, and STAT5 in the horny cell layer, and abundant expression of JAK3, TYK2, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, and STAT6 in the granular layer of the epidermis in healthy volunteers. Our findings in the control group reveal differential expression and immunolocalization of JAK3, STAT2, STAT4, and STAT6 in healthy human epidermis, and are consistent with the results by Nishio et al. It is suggested, that JAK/STAT pathway may play an important role in keratinocyte differentiation [15].
The JAK/STAT signaling pathway might be activated by numerous signaling cytokines, growth factors, and hormones, such as interferon-α/β/γ (IFN-α/β/γ), IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12, IL-15, IL-19, IL-20, IL-21, IL-22, and IL-23, erythropoietin (Epo), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) [16, 17]. Attachment of the signaling molecule to its transmembrane receptor is the first step of signaling cascade; then, activation of the associated with the receptor JAK takes place. After activation, JAKs phosphorylate cytokine receptors, what enables STAT monomers to bind to the complex and form homo- and heterodimers due to tyrosine phosphorylation. Activated STATs translocate to the cell nucleus and bind to DNA, what enables transcription of target genes [18].
In the pathomechanism of PV, both humoral and cell-mediated immune response are involved. It is reported that PV patients show an increased expression of numerous cytokines and chemokines. Literature data indicates that elevated levels of IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-15, and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) were found in the serum and/or blister fluid of patients with PV [18, 19]. Data concerning Th1 and Th17 pathway are inconsistent, showing contrary levels of IL-2, IFNγ, and IL-17 present in PV patients, what makes Th1 and Th17 pathways’ role in PV pathogenesis still an open issue [19].
It is crucial to underline that obtained results concerning particular cytokine levels are equivocal in majority of analyzed studies. Up to date studies examining cytokine levels in PV patients have several limitations. First of all, the number of patients included in researches is relatively small. Moreover, serum and tissue samples were collected at various points of the disease course [20]. Although widely examined, this issue requires further studies.
STAT4 and STAT6 are both strongly involved in inflammatory processes, as they are activated by proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-12, IFNγ (both activate STAT4) and IL-4, IL-13 (activating STAT6) [21]. It is reported that JAK2 and JAK1, JAK3 and STAT6, as a IL-4 signaling components, are critical for Th1 cell differentiation, and JAK1 and 3/STAT6, as a IL-4 signaling pathway, are essential for Th2 differentiation [22]. Our results suggest that STAT6 may contribute to PV pathogenesis, probably due to its contribution to Th2 immune responses. This results stay in accordance with the majority of published researches, suggesting Th2-pathway upregulation and elevated serum levels of IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10 in PV patients [23]. Moreover, IL-6 is one of the cytokines of which level is shown to be correlating with PV severity, what underlines meaning of STAT6 upregulation in PV [24].
Balance disturbance in Th1/Th2 response in PV pathomechanism has been widely reported [25]. Lee at al. [26] reported decreased level of IFNγ and supported suppressed Th1 response in PV active stage. However, in literature, there are also contradictory results concerning Th1 pathway and its role in PV pathogenesis present. Results by Timoteo et al. [27] showing increased IFNγ serum level suggest that PV induces Th1 immune response. Our results follow studies showing no relevant differences in Th1 cytokine serum levels as compared with control group [6]. In our research, estimated expression of STAT4, high but similar in every examined sample, indicates that this protein does not participate in pathogenesis of PV.
As reported, STAT2 is involved in transmitting signal initiated mainly by interferons [28]. The expression of STAT2, significantly higher in PV skin lesions than in healthy skin, suggests participation of STAT2 and cytokines activating it (interferons α and β) in pathogenesis of the disease. Interferons α and β activate JAK1 and TYK2 kinases, and subsequently STAT1 and STAT2 proteins, while IFNγ requires JAK1 and JAK2 kinases and STAT1 homodimers in signal transmitting. As mentioned, interferons use JAK/STAT pathway to transmit their signals as well. Interferons α and β activate JAK1 and TYK2 kinases, and subsequently STAT1 and STAT2 proteins, while IFNγ uses JAK1 and JAK2 kinases and STAT1 homodimers in transmitting signal [28].
The results of our research suggest that STAT2 may be involved in proinflammatory reactions taking place in both PV lesional and perilesional areas. The contribution of STAT2 to PV pathogenesis needs to be further examined.
Reports concerning transmitting IL-17 signal by STAT proteins are equivocal [29]. However, results of numerous researches indicate that JAK3/STAT3 pathway mediates IL-23 and IL-6 dependent signals and implicates the Th17 cell differentiation, and hence indirectly promotes IL-17A transcription [30]. IL-17A is able to induce Th2 cell activation, directly recruit neutrophils and eosinophils, and produce cytokines and metalloproteinases [31]. JAK3 also acts on receptors with common γ chain (IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21), crucial to lymphocyte maturation and function [32].
There are single reports concerning role of Th17 cells in PV pathogenesis. Arakawa et al. [33] reported presence of Th17 cells in PV skin lesions, but without correlation with disease activity or anti-DSG3 antibody level. On the other hand, Giordano et al. and Timoteo et al. [27] reported increased level of IL-17A in PV patients as compared with control. However, results by Lee et al. and Masjedi et al. indicated no significant difference in IL-17A level between PV and healthy control. [26].
Expression of JAK/STAT proteins in PV and their suggested role in pathogenesis of the disease create new potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of blistering diseases. JAK inhibitors have shown positive clinical results in skin diseases, like psoriasis, alopecia areata, and allergic dermatitis among others [29].
The presented study is the first one exploring the expression of JAK/STAT proteins in pemphigus. It would be of great importance to examine expression of all JAK/STAT proteins in PV patients and compare findings with results obtained in a comparable research.
Undoubtedly, the examined issue brings prospects for future studies. The confrontation of particular JAK/STAT expressions and cytokine levels in serum and blister fluid could give more detailed data on the role of examined proteins and cytokines in PV pathogenesis. However, this issue requires further studies, as a target for new therapeutic agents as well.
References
Langan SM, Smeeth L, Hubbard R, Fleming KM, Smith CJ, West J. Bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus vulgaris – incidence and mortality in the UK: population based cohort study. Br Med J. 2008;337:160–3.
Kitajima Y, Aoyama Y. A perspective of pemphigus from bedside and laboratory-bench. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2007;33:57–66.
Amagai M, Klaus-Kovtun V, Stanley JR. Autoantibodies against a novel epithelial cadherin in pemphigus vulgaris, a disease of cell adhesion. Cell. 1991;67:869–77.
Stanley JR, Amagai M. Pmephigus, bullous impetigo, and the staphylococcal scaled-skin syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1800–10.
Saito M, Stahley SN, Caughman CY, et al. Signaling dependent and independent mechanism in pemphigus vulgaris blister formation. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50696.
Giordano CN, Sinha AA. Cytokine networks in pemphigus vulgaris: an integrated viewpoint. Autoimmunity. 2012;45:427–39.
Rawlings JS, Rosler KM, Harrison DA. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:1281–3.
O’Shea JJ, Holland SM, Staudt LM. JAKs and STATs in immunity, immunodeficiency, and cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:161–70.
Cnop M, Welsh N, Jonas JC, Jӧrns A, Lenzen S, Eizirik DL. Mechanisms of pancreatic β-cell death in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54:97–107.
Sigurdsson S, Nordmark G, Gӧring HH, et al. Polymorphisms in the tyrosine kinase 2 and interferon regulatory factor 5 genes are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76:528–37.
Bao L, Zhang H, Chan LS. The involvement of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway in chronic inflammatory skin disease atopic dermatitis. https://doi.org/10.4161/jkst.24137.
Tam L, Mc Glynn LM, Traynor P, Mukherjee R, Bartlett JM, Edwards J. Expression levels of the JAK/STAT pathway in the transition from hormone-sensitive to hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:378–83.
Kirkegaard T, Edwards J, Tovey S, et al. Observer variation inimmunohistochemical analysis of protein expression, time for a change? Histopathol. 2006;48:787–94.
Nishio H, Matsui K, Tsuji H, Tamura A, Suzuki K. Immunolocalisation of the janus kinases (JAK)-signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) pathway in human epidermis. J Anat. 2001;198:581–9.
Hauser PJ, Agrawal D, Hackney J, Pledger WJ. STAT3 activation accompanies keratinocyte differentiation. Cell Growth Differ. 1998;10:847–55.
Darnell JE Jr. STATs and gene regulation. Science. 1997;277:1630–5.
Ihle JN, Witthuhn BA, Quelle FW, Yamamoto K, Silvennoinen O. Signaling through the hematopoietic cytokine receptors. Ann Rev Immunol. 1995;13:369–98.
Ameglio F, D’Auria L, Cordiali-Fei P, et al. Anti-intercellular substance antibody log titres are correlated with serum concentrations of interleukin-6, interleukin 15 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha in patients with pemphigus vulgaris relationships with peripheral blood neutrophil counts, disease severity and duration and patients’ age. J Biol Reg Homeost Agents. 1999;13:220–4.
Keskin DB, Stern JNH, Fridkis-Hareli M, Ahmed AR. Cytokine profiles in pemphigus vulgaris patients trated with intravenous immunoglobulins as compared to conventional immunosppresive therapy. Cytokine. 2008;41(3):315–21.
Hertl M, Amagai M, Stanley IK, Katz SI. Recognition of desmoglein 3 by autoreactive T cells in pemphigus vulgaris patients and normal. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;110:62–6.
Takeda K, Tanaka T, Shi W, Matsumoto M, Minami M, Kashiwamura S, et al. Essential role of Stat6 in IL-4 signalling. Nature. 1996;380:627–30.
O’Shea JJ, Plenge R. JAKs and STATs in immunoregulation and immune-mediated disease. Immunity. 2012;36:542–50.
Rizzo C, Fotino M, Zhang Y, Chow S, Spizuoco A, Sinha AA. Direct characterization of human T cells in pemphigus vulgaris revelas elevated autoantigen-specific Th2 activity in association with active disease. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005;30:535–40.
D’Auria L, Bonifati C, Mussi A, D’Agosto G, DeSimone C, Giacalone B, et al. Cytokines in the sera of patients with pemphigus vulgaris: IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor alpha levels are significantly increased as compared to healthy subjects and correlate with disease activity. Eur Cytokine Netw. 1997;8:383–7.
Zheng WP, Flavell RA. The transcription factor GATA-3 is necessary and sufficient for Th2 cytokine gene expression in CD4 cells. Cell. 1997;16:587–96.
Lee SH, Hong WJ, Kim SC. Analysis of serum cytokine profile in pemphigus. Ann Dermatol. 2017;29:438–45.
Timoteo RP, da Silva MV, Botelho Miguel C, Silva DAA, Catarino JDS, Rodrigues VJ, et al. Th1/Th17- related cytokines and chemokines and their implications in the pathogenesis of pemphigus vulgaris. Mediat Inflamm. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7151285.
Kaneko T, Tamai K, Matsuzaki Y, et al. Interferon-γ down-regulates expression of the 230-kDa bullous pemphigoid antigen gene (BPAG1) in epidermal keratinocytes via novel chimeric sequences of ISRE and GAS. Exp Dermatol. 2006;15:308–14.
McGovern JL, Notley CA. Production of IL-17: what’s STAT got to do with it? JAKSTAT. 2012. https://doi.org/10.4161/jkst.20409.
Damsky W, King BA. JAK inhibitors in dermatology: the promise of a new drug class. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:736–44.
Toosi S, Bystryn JC. Potential role of interleukin-17 in the pathogenesis of bullous pemphigoid. Med Hypotheses. 2010;74:727–8.
Ghoresci K, Laurence A, O’Shea JJ. Selectivity and therapeutic inhibition of kinases: to be or not to be? Nat Immunol. 2009;10:356–60.
Arakawa M, Dainichi T, Yasumoto S, Hashimoto T. Lesional Th17 cells in pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. J Dermatol Sci. 2009;53:228–31.
Funding
The study was funded by the research projects of Medical University of Lodz: No. 503/1-152-01/503-11-002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Before entering the study, all the patients gave their informed written consent. The study protocol RNN/132/07/KB was approved by the Local Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Lodz.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Juczynska, K., Wozniacka, A., Waszczykowska, E. et al. Expression of JAK3, STAT2, STAT4, and STAT6 in pemphigus vulgaris. Immunol Res 68, 97–103 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-020-09122-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-020-09122-y