Abstract
Morphometrics of the hard palate is an important aspect of forensic anthropology and odontology. Palatine triangle is a triangular area in the hard palate formed by the palatine processes of the maxillae, which can aid intraoral bone grafts. We present the osteological measurements of the palatine triangle (maxillary palate) based on sex, compare it with other hard palate parameters, and establish the correlation between them. Seventy-seven male skulls and 36 female skulls were examined. Various morphometric measurements of the hard palate and palatine triangle were performed meticulously. Mean and standard deviation of each parameter were computed for groups using SPSS 16.0. Relationships between all parameters were analyzed using Pearson’s rank correlation test. The mean palatine length was 38.84 ± 3.75 mm in males and 37.22 ± 4.12 mm in females; the mean palatine breadth was 31.36 ± 2.61 mm in males and 29.78 ± 3.07 mm in females. The mean area of the palatine triangle was 600.88 ± 80.16 mm2 in male skulls and 547.96 ± 94.28 mm2 in the female skulls. Statistically significant difference in various measurements of the palatine triangle and hard palate between the male and female skulls was noted. Leptostaphyline (narrow palate) was the most prominent type of palate. The area of the palatine triangle showed a strong positive correlation between the total length and breadth of the palate for both male and female skulls. A strong positive correlation was also observed between the palate length and the palatine triangle length. Palatine index and palate breadth had a statistically significant moderate linear relationship. The maxillary palate length, breadth, and area of the palatine triangle were higher in males when compared to females in South Indian origin skulls. Most of the skulls had a narrow palate. The results of this metric analysis of the palatine triangle may lead to a new concept of anatomical research into studying the hard palate, which can be used for sexual dimorphism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Morphometrics involves the measurement of structures and shapes. It has diverse applications in different scientific fields [1]. Morphometric evaluation of many bony structures of the human body has been carried out. Studying the morphometry of the cranial bones, especially the hard palate, is an essential aspect of forensic anthropology and forensic odontology as it plays a vital role in identifying humans and/or sex in mass disasters and criminal cases, even if less human remains or samples are available. The hard palate is formed by the palatine processes of the maxillae anteriorly and the horizontal plates of the palatine bone posteriorly [2]. These bones meet at a cruciform suture, the intersection of intermaxillary, interpalatine, and palatomaxillary sutures.
Although many studies have focused on the various morphometrics of the hard palate [3, 4], there is no data regarding the measurements of the palatine triangle in the human skull. We hypothesize that the shape of the hard palate depends on the triangle’s measurements. Palatine triangle is a triangular area in the hard palate bounded by the greatest transverse diameter of the palate posteriorly and by the lines converging from the extremities of the transverse diameter to the alveolar point (Fig. 1). The palatine processes of the maxillae form this triangle [5]. The palatine triangle is an important component, as an increase in the total length of the hard palate results predominantly from an increase in the anteroposterior dimension of the triangle [6]. A limited number of studies have assessed the palatine process of the maxilla (PPM) as a potential intraoral donor site for reconstructing the oral and maxillofacial region [7]. Morphometrics of the palatine triangle becomes a counterpart of the diameters of the bones which form the hard palate and therefore make it possible to deduce to what extent the palatine processes of the maxilla are engaged in the formation of the hard palate [8].
As the Southern part of India is composed of a heterogeneous population wherein the craniofacial growth is influenced by racial, ethnic, sexual, and dietary differences, standard data of the local population is fundamental in evaluating and diagnosing craniofacial abnormalities [3]. Therefore, this study aims to present the osteological measurements of the palatine triangle based on sex, compare it with other palatal parameters, and establish the correlation between them. Morphological classification of the hard palate was determined by calculating the palatine index, and sexual dimorphism in measurements was also noted, thereby providing reference data of palatal measurements of the South Indian population.
Materials and methods
The study included a total of 113 dry adult skulls obtained from the Department of Anatomy. This study complies with the Helsinki Declaration and local ethical guidelines. The authors certify that they have obtained the Institutional Ethics Committee clearance for this study. Skulls that were modified and fetal skulls were excluded from the study. All skulls were first examined for sex determination using the standard method [9]. If more traits pointed towards a female, it was taken as a female skull, and the same criteria were applied to male skulls. Seventy-seven male skulls and 36 female skulls were examined. The hard palate was measured using a calibrated rigid ruler and silk suture thread. All measurements of the palate were taken twice, in the same manner, and by the same investigator to avoid interobserver variability. The following measurements were taken and aggregated based on sex (Fig. 1):
-
1.
Maxillary palate breadth (BC): Maximum width of the hard palate at the gingival margin of the maxillary second molar of one side to the other side.
-
2.
Maxillary palate length (AE): Maximum length of the hard palate from the anterior margin of the incisive fossa to the posterior nasal spine.
-
3.
Sides of the palatine triangle (AB, AC): Maximum transverse diameter of the palate from the outer border of second molar teeth (BC) and measurement of the lines converging from ends of transverse diameter to the incisive fossa.
-
4.
Length of the palatine triangle (AD): Maximum length of the hard palate from the anterior margin of the incisive fossa to the midpoint of the maximum width of the palate.
-
5.
Area of the palatine triangle.
-
6.
Palatine index = maximum palatine width (BC)/maximum palatine length (AE) × 100.
Based on the palatine index (%), palates were then categorized as leptostaphyline/narrow palate (≤ 79.9%), mesostaphyline/ medium palate (80–84.95%), and brachystaphyline/broad palate (≥ 85%).
The mean and standard deviation of each parameter were calculated using SPSS v 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). P-value (level of significance) was set at 0.05. Independent t-test was performed to compare the various parameters and to determine whether there were any differences between male and female skulls. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to assess the associations between the measured variables. Results were represented in relevant tables and graphs.
Results
Sex differences
There was a statistically significant difference in the measurements of the hard palate and the palatine triangle between the male and female skulls (p < 0.05) (Table 1).
Descriptive statistics
The mean maxillary palatine length was 38.84 ± 3.75 mm in males and 37.22 ± 4.12 mm in females. The mean maxillary palatine breadth was 31.36 ± 2.61 mm in males and 29.78 ± 3.07 mm in females (Table 1).
Dimensions of the palatine triangle
Statistical analysis showed significant differences indicating sex differences in various measurements of the palatine triangle between the male and female skulls (Table 1). The mean area of the palatine triangle was 600.88 ± 80.16 mm2 in male skulls and 547.96 ± 94.28 mm2 in the female skull; the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.003) (Fig. 2).
Types of palate
In the Palatine index (%), the ratio of the length to the breadth was calculated. The values indicated that the leptostaphyline/narrow palate percentage was 47% in male skulls and 55% in female skulls. The percentage of mesostaphyline/medium palate was 22% in male skulls and 14% in female skulls. The percentage of the brachystaphyline/broad palate was 31% in male skulls and 31% in female skulls. It was noted that no statistically significant difference was found in the palatine index among the male and female skulls (p > 0.05) (Table 2).
Analysis of correlation
Pearson correlation analysis was performed between the palatal measurements and the palatine triangle. The area of the palatine triangle showed a strong positive correlation between the total length of the maxillary palate (r = 0.80; p = 0.001) and the total breadth of the maxillary palate (r = 0.70; p = 0.001) for both male and female skulls (Table 3). A strong positive correlation was also observed between the length of the palate and the length of the palatine process of the maxilla (length of palatine triangle) (r = 0.99; p = 0.001) (Fig. 3). Based on these results, we can state that area of the palatine triangle and the palate dimensions has a statistically significant linear relationship which is expected, as breadth/length are components of the maxillary palate. This indicates that these variables tend to increase together (Figs. 4 and 5).
The palatine index and breadth of the maxillary palate had a statistically significant moderate linear relationship (r = 0.57; p = 0.001). The direction of the relationship is positive, meaning that the shape of the palate is dependent on the breadth of the palate. There was a negative statistically non-significant relationship between the palatine index and the area of the palatine triangle (r = −0.15) (Table 4).
Discussion
The hard palate is preserved even during severe damage to the skull. It is appropriate for studying sexual dimorphism as previous studies have affirmed that palatine length and width are higher in males than in females [10]. Compared to extraoral sites, intraoral donor sites like the palatine process of the maxilla are more advantageous owing to their location, accessibility, size, and type of graft [7, 11]. Most of the studies conducted to date are preliminary clinical and radiological studies on the available bone volume in the palatine bones of the maxilla as an alternate source for intraoral grafts [12]. In only one study on dry skulls, the authors conclude that the anterior palatal region could be a reliable donor site for maxillofacial and oral surgery procedures [13]. The present study, therefore, aims to provide basic osteological measurements of the maxillary palate in the palatine triangle and their correlation with the dimensions of the hard palate.
In our study, we observed that the palatine process dimensions that reflect the palatal size were significantly higher in males than in females, indicating that these parameters are sexually dimorphic. Our findings aligned with previous reports on other populations using various study designs [14,15,16,17]. Significant differences in the palatal measurements have been observed in the literature, which can be due to the differential growth patterns of the facial region, genetic background, and ethnicity, and also due to pathologies such as allergies and prolonged mouth breathing [18]. It is very interesting to note that there existed differences in some of the measured parameters of the palate among the same population, which suggests that anatomical variations of the palate might also be present within a population [19]. The observed differences can also be due to the fact that the palate, during its development and life, is subjected to various forces that change its shape, like the forces of tongue muscles/muscles of mastication or the pull of facial muscles. This factor might also affect the concept of using the hard palate’s shape in dry skulls as a diagnostic indicator for sexual dimorphism [20].
Morphometric knowledge of the hard palate is beneficial in various dentistry disciplines like orthodontic procedures and orthognathic treatments. Correlation analysis between the various palatine measurements in the present study shows a positive relationship between these parameters. The area of the palatine triangle showed a strong positive correlation between the length and breadth of the palate for both male and female skulls. A strong positive correlation was also observed between the length of the palate and the length of the palatine process of the maxilla (length of the palatine triangle). Therefore, we can postulate that, as the length and breadth of the palatine processes of maxilla increases, the length and breadth of hard palate also increases. However, no correlation was observed between the shape of the palate and the palatine triangle, suggesting that the measurements of the palatine process do not alter the overall shape of the palate. Morphometrics of the palatine processes seems important to evaluate to what extent the diameters of the bony palate increase with an increase in the length of the palatal process. The palatine triangle could be regarded as a keystone anatomical structure that is engaged in the growth of the hard palate and in turn the development of the whole skull.
In the present study, the computation of the palatal index showed that most of the skulls had narrow (leptostaphyline) palate (47% in male skulls, 55% in female skulls). The percentage of the middle palate (mesostaphyline) was 22% in male skulls and 14% in female skulls. The percentage of the broad palate (brachystaphyline) was 31% in male skulls and 31% in female skulls, with no significant statistical difference between male and female skulls. Other studies reported similar findings [21, 22]. They also opine that around 63% of Indian skulls studied by them had a narrow palate followed by a broad palate. The knowledge of the palatine index is necessary because the palate’s shape has been associated with many syndromes such as Apert syndrome, Turner’s syndrome, Marfan syndrome, and Franceschetti–Treacher–Collins syndrome [23]. Knowledge of palatal indices would be helpful to anatomists, forensic experts, and anthropologists, as the values obtained are of importance to determine the race and gender of the human skull. It is also helpful for orthodontic procedures and surgical repair of the cleft palate, as the anatomy of the maxillary palate may influence the orthodontic expansion and speech after the surgery [24].
Conventionally, the maxilla’s anterior region comprising the maxilla’s palatine processes has been considered a recipient site for bone grafts. In contrast, very few studies have considered it a donor site for intraoral bone grafts [25]. Based on the results of a few pre-clinical and radiology studies, it is apparent that this region of the palate is advantageous and can be reliably selected as a donor site in the oral and maxillofacial reconstructive, implantology, and periodontal regeneration procedures [13]. It has been found that the quantity and quality of bone grafts that can be obtained from the palatine triangle region are similar or even superior to those of bone grafts from other intraoral donor sites. The region of the palatine triangle has also been regarded as a possible donor site for the regeneration of atrophic alveolar defects [26]. Resection of the hard palate can also be done to manage benign and malignant tumors [27].
Limitations of the study include the fact that the present investigation used dry adult human skulls for measurements of the hard palate. Although the primary objective of the study was achieved, further research is needed to answer the many clinical questions, like obtaining the most suitable graft according to the type of defect and minimizing risks and complications during these procedures.
In conclusion, the maxillary palatine length, breadth, and area of the palatine triangle were higher in males when compared to females in South Indian origin skulls. It found that most of the skulls had a narrow palate. This metric analysis of the palatine triangle may lead to a new concept of anatomical research into the study of the hard palate, which can be used for sexual dimorphism and to study craniofacial growth in this population.
Key points
-
1.
Morphometrics of the hard palate and maxillary palate was performed in South Indian origin adult human skulls.
-
2.
Measurements of the palatine triangle (maxillary palate) were correlated to other measurements of the hard palate.
-
3.
Measurements of the hard palate are useful in sex determination and are one of the key measurements in anthropology.
-
4.
The shape of the hard palate is dependent on the breadth of the hard palate. The length and breadth of the maxillary palate are higher in male skulls than in female skulls.
Availability of data and material
All data is available with the authors.
References
Ibrahim A, Alias A, Swarhib Shafie M, et al. Application of three dimensional geometric morphometric analysis for sexual dimorphism of human skull: a systematic review. IMJM. 2019;18(1):131–44.
Standring S, Gray H. Gray’s anatomy : the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier. 2008;1551.
Mahendran S, Thenmozhi MS. Sexual dimorphism of adult human palate by its dimensions in South Indian dry skulls. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2017;45(1):56–9.
Qurashi N, Ahmad Bhat F, Jabeen N, Bedar A. Morphometric evaluation of palate for sexual dimorphism in Kashmiri population. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2020;70(1):70–3.
Stan MCR, Ştefănescu C, Bordei P, Iliescu DM. Morphological peculiarities of the hard palate. ARS Medica Tomitana. 2013;19(3):117–23.
Barteczko K, Jacob M. A re-evaluation of the premaxillary bone in humans. Anat Embryol. 2004;207:417–37.
Bernades-Mayordomo R, Guijarro-Martínez R, Hernández-Alfaro F. Volumetric CBCT analysis of the palatine process of the anterior maxilla: a potential source for bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(3):406–10.
Mustafa AG, Tashtoush AA, Alshboul OA, Allouh MZ, Altarifi AA. Morphometric study of the hard palate and its relevance to dental and forensic sciences. Int J Dent. 2019;28:1687345.
Dereli AK, Zeybek V, Sagtas E, et al. Sex determination with morphological characteristics of the skull by using 3D modeling techniques in computerized tomography. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2018;14:450–9.
Burris BG, Harris EF. Identification of race and sex from palate dimensions. J Forensic Sci. 1998;43:959–63.
Berwig LC, Marquezan M, Milanesi JDM, Montenegro MM, Ardenghi TM, da Silva AMT. Do gender and age influence hard palate dimensions? A systematic review CODAS. 2018;30(5):e20170216.
Guimarães GMMF, Bernini GF, Grandizoli DK, Carvalho PSP, Gonçales ES, Ferreira JO. Evaluation of bone availability for grafts in different donor sites, through computed tomography. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28:e20190435.
Hassani A, Khojasteh A, Shamsabad AN. The anterior palate as a donor site in maxillofacial bone grafting: a quantitative anatomic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(8):1196–200.
Sumati PV, Phatak A. Determination of sex from hard palate by discriminant function analysis. Int J Basic Appl Med Sci. 2012;2(3):243–51.
Sylvan A, Souza D, Mamatha H, Jyothi N. Morphometric analysis of hard palate in south Indian skulls. Biomed Res. 2012;23(2):173–5.
Shalaby S, Eid E, Sarg N, Sewilam A. Morphometric analysis of hard palate in Egyptian skulls. Benha Med J. 2015;32(1):59.
Sinha I, Poddar R, Basu R. Morphometric analysis of hard palate in eastern Indian population. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2021;14(1):20–5.
Kareem FA, Rauf AM, Rasheed TA, Hussain FA. Correlation of three dimensions of palate with maxillary arch form and perimeter as predictive measures for orthodontic and orthognathic surgery. Children. 2021;8:514.
Sarilita E, Soames R. Morphology of the hard palate: a study of dry skulls and review of the literature. Rev Arg Anat Clin. 2015;s7(1):34–43.
Jaya Vabushana V, Thenmozhi MS, Lakshmanan G. Determination of sex using various parameters of hard palate. Drug Invent Today. 2019;12(3):1018–20.
Wahane AM, Nandanwar RA. A study of palatal indices and foramina in the hard palate of adult human skulls in central India region. Int J Anat Res. 2019;7(2):6397–403.
Varalakshmi KL, Sangeeta M, Naik SN, Acharya A. An osteological study of morphometry of hard palate and its importance. Int J Res Med Sci. 2015;3(9):2210–3.
Tangugsorn V, Skatvedt O, Krogstad O, Lyberg T. Obstructive sleep apnoea: a cephalometric study. Part I. Cervico-craniofacial skeletal morphology. Eur J Orthod. 1995;17(1):45–56.
Friede H, Lilja J, Lohmander A. Long-term, longitudinal follow-up of individuals with UCLP after the Gothenburg primary early veloplasty and delayed hard palate closure protocol: maxillofacial growth outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(6):649–56.
Yeung R. Simultaneous placement of implant and bone graft in the anterior maxilla: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(6):892–5.
BernadesMayordomo R, GuijarroMartínez R, Hernández AF. The anterior maxilla as a potential source of bone grafts: a morphometric cone beam computed tomography analysis of different anatomical areas. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(8):1049–56.
Gujar MS, Oza GS. Morphometric analysis of hard palate and its clinical importance. Natl J Clin Anat. 2018;7(1):36–40.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NK: contributed to the concept of the paper; NK, MBV, RB: investigation, methodology; AAP: analysis, and writing—original draft; NK, MRKG, KBMR: critical review and editing. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Institutional ethics committee approval has been obtained for the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, N., BV, M., Bhaskar, R. et al. Morphometric analysis of the palatine triangle in adult human skulls: a potential aid for anthropologists and intraoral bone grafts. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 19, 499–506 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-023-00577-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-023-00577-7