Based on external (massive congestion and oedema of the face, cyanosis of the hands) and internal findings (acute emphysema, oedema and vascular congestion of the lungs), death was attributed to asphyxia [6,7,8]. The body temperature, fixation of hypostases and rigor mortis placed the time of death beyond 24 h before the discovery of the body.
Regarding the position of the victim at the time of death (before being moved by the rescue team), the distribution of postmortem lividities (face, chest and upper limbs without affecting the abdomen) was suggestive of a prone posture, with the face and trunk placed lower than the abdomen . On the other hand, the sparing of the transverse band from hypostasis, the dilatation of jugular veins, the presence of an abrasion in the posterior cervical region and haemorrhages of the neck muscles were indicative of compression of the neck between the left bed frame and the partially lifted bed base and mattress (Fig. 3A–D), causing airway occlusion and obliteration of the common carotids and the jugular veins [10, 11]. The hypostasis-free areas located on both wrists also suggested that the hands leaned on the edge of the storage compartment. Furthermore, with the application of a high-resolution radiological technique, such as micro-CT , which is useful to identify microfractures, we could additionally examine the upper airway without any risk of iatrogenic damage occurring during dissection, excluding injuries to the horns of the larynx or the hyoid bone, usually detected in cases of manual strangulation [13,14,15]; considering the abovementioned autopsy findings, indeed, compression of the neck seemed highly probable . Cervical compression could have induced a loss of consciousness mediated by carotid baroreceptors causing bradycardia and reduction of arterial flow to the brain [17, 18].
The absence of hypostases in the upper part of the chest (i.e., bilateral supraclavicular regions) and the high intensity of asphyxia signs (i.e., petechial haemorrhages in the skin, sclera and conjunctiva) indicated a compression mechanism (i.e., traumatic asphyxia), with inadequate and ineffective respiratory movements of the rib cage . Moreover, the peculiar position of the victim, trapped between the bed frame and the bed base/mattress, not only hindered breathing but also affected circulation due to the impaired venous return and the pressure on the diaphragm exerted by the abdominal viscera, determining postural/positional asphyxia [9, 19,20,21].
Integrating all the above-described findings (DSI, autopsy, radiology and histology), it was concluded that the woman’s death was caused by asphyxiation by three different mechanisms acting simultaneously: neck compression and traumatic and postural asphyxia.
Over time, given the great variety of pathophysiological mechanisms underlying asphyxiations, several classifications have been proposed in the forensic literature. Recently, Sauvageau and Boghossian, to simplify and standardize the above classification as much as possible, proposed four main categories based on autoptic and circumstantial findings: suffocation, strangulation, mechanical asphyxia and drowning . This classification does not explicitly contain the so-called atypical neck compression (i.e. compression not caused by a ligature, by strangling or by hanging) . Moreover, the proposed definition of mechanical asphyxia refers to the restriction of respiratory movements, either by the position of the body (postural or positional asphyxia) or by external chest compression by a heavy object (traumatic asphyxia).
Thus, based on Sauvageau and Boghossian, the case reported and discussed here should be classified as “traumatic asphyxia”, with no mention of the adjunctive asphyxia mechanism due to “neck compression”.
Commenting on the classification proposed by Sauvageau and Boghossian, Byard proposed an alternative focused on the pathophysiological processes that interfere with oxygen transfer and/or transport [23,24,25], identifying 5 different classes.
Failure to supply adequate amounts of oxygen that occurs when there is a critical reduction in environmental oxygen levels due to displacement of oxygen by other gases or to consumption of oxygen without replacement.
Failure of transfer that takes place in cases of obstruction or the presence of an obstacle in the air passages from the nose and mouth to the alveoli. This condition may occur due to internal or external obstruction of the airways or even because of compromise of the thoracic cage function.
Reduced/absent blood flow to the brain leads to failure of transport of oxygen to the tissues, a condition that occurs as a result of the compression of the neck vessels.
Failure of uptake and utilization of oxygen occurs in the case of cyanide poisoning because cells are unable to function metabolically despite an oxygen-rich milieu.
Combination of the other mechanisms, as happens in non-judicial hangings where vascular occlusion, vagal inhibition, and airway compression and occlusion coexist simultaneously.
We retain that the present case could be fully classified into the last category of Byard’s proposal, where the failure to transfer oxygen from the environment to the lungs coexists with the inability to efficiently transport oxygen to the brain and other tissues due to the compression of the arterial and venous vessels of the neck. The vascular compression not only contributed to death but also to the loss of consciousness. This information, in addition to the other circumstantial (position of the victim, malfunction of the suspension system of the ottoman storage bed), autopsy-related (no signs of violence or grasping on the body), radiological (no signs of manual or ligature strangulation), and toxicological data (low blood concentration of benzodiazepines) support an accidental manner of death, which is most common in traumatic and positional asphyxial fatalities [26, 27].
In conclusion, although both the above-commented classifications are widely disseminated and accepted throughout the forensic community, we believe that, in complex and unusual cases, identifying and classifying the exact pathophysiological mechanisms of asphyxia (as suggested by Byard) could add valuable information to the reconstruction of the dynamics of the fatal event.
Last but not least, the position of the victim and the loss of consciousness undoubtedly facilitated the impossibility of wriggling her body and lifting the bed. For this reason, we believe that the storage space of ottoman beds should be preferably emptied or loaded under the supervision of another person, although we recognize that this could be unpractical. Indeed, in the case reported here, a second person at the scene would have promptly lifted the bed and applied first aid, probably preventing the death of the victim. We also underline that the safety systems must be periodically reviewed by qualified personnel to detect and repair defects and damage that can put people’s lives at risk. Finally, the localization of the bloodstain on the lateral edge of the bed defined the distance of the body from the bed suspension fulcrum. We recommend that the instruction manuals for ottoman storage beds should recommend loading/unloading the storage space by positioning oneself on the side opposite to the lever fulcrum. Thus, although this would probably require a non-ordinary effort, in the event of a malfunction of the suspension system, the person would be in an advantageous lever position to lift the bed base and mattress.