Skip to main content
Log in

Forensic science, genetics and wildlife biology: getting the right mix for a wildlife DNA forensics lab

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wildlife DNA forensics is receiving increasing coverage in the popular press and has begun to appear in the scientific literature in relation to several different fields. Recognized as an applied subject, it rests on top of very diverse scientific pillars ranging from biochemistry through to evolutionary genetics, all embedded within the context of modern forensic science. This breadth of scope, combined with typically limited resources, has often left wildlife DNA forensics hanging precariously between human DNA forensics and academics keen to seek novel applications for biological research. How best to bridge this gap is a matter for regular debate among the relatively few full-time practitioners in the field. The decisions involved in establishing forensic genetic services to investigate wildlife crime can be complex, particularly where crimes involve a wide range of species and evidential questions. This paper examines some of the issues relevant to setting up a wildlife DNA forensics laboratory based on experiences of working in this area over the past 7 years. It includes a discussion of various models for operating individual laboratories as well as options for organizing forensic testing at higher national and international levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ogden R, Dawnay N, McEwing R. Wildlife DNA forensics—bridging the gap between conservation genetics and law enforcement. Endangered Species Res. 2009;9:179–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL. Hypervariable minisatellite regions in human DNA. Nature. 1985;314:67–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gill P, Jeffreys AJ, Werrett DJ. Forensic applications of DNA ‘fingerprints’. Nature. 1985;318:577–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burke T, Bruford MW. DNA fingerprinting in birds. Nature. 1987;327:149–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thommasen HV, Thomson MJ, Shutler GG, Kirby LT. Development of DNA fingerprints for use in wildlife forensic science. Wildl Soc Bull. 1989;17:321–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cronin MA, Palmisciano DA, Vyse ER, Cameron DG. Mitochondrial-DNA in wildlife forensic-science—species identification of tissues. Wildl Soc Bull. 1991;19:94–105.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baker CS, Palumbi SR. Which whales are hunted?—a molecular genetic approach to monitoring whaling. Science. 1994;265:1538–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DeSalle R, Birstein VJ. PCR identification of black caviar. Nature. 1996;381:197–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wasser SK, Shedlock AM, Comstock K, et al. Assigning African elephant DNA to geographic region of origin: applications to the ivory trade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:14847–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Budowle B, Garofano P, Hellman A, et al. Recommendations for animal DNA forensic and identity testing. Int J Legal Med. 2005;119:295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dawnay N, Ogden R, Thorpe RS, et al. A forensic STR profiling system for the Eurasian badger: a framework for developing profiling systems for wildlife species. Forensic Sci Int: Genetics. 2008;2:47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Butler JM. Debunking some urban legends surrounding validation within the forensic DNA community. Profiles DNA. 2006;9:3–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Ross McEwing for numerous discussions of these issues over many years, as well as to Ed Espinoza and Linzi Wilson-Wilde for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. RO is part-funded by the UK Darwin Initiative.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Ogden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogden, R. Forensic science, genetics and wildlife biology: getting the right mix for a wildlife DNA forensics lab. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6, 172–179 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9178-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9178-5

Keywords

Navigation