Abstract
Wildlife DNA forensics is receiving increasing coverage in the popular press and has begun to appear in the scientific literature in relation to several different fields. Recognized as an applied subject, it rests on top of very diverse scientific pillars ranging from biochemistry through to evolutionary genetics, all embedded within the context of modern forensic science. This breadth of scope, combined with typically limited resources, has often left wildlife DNA forensics hanging precariously between human DNA forensics and academics keen to seek novel applications for biological research. How best to bridge this gap is a matter for regular debate among the relatively few full-time practitioners in the field. The decisions involved in establishing forensic genetic services to investigate wildlife crime can be complex, particularly where crimes involve a wide range of species and evidential questions. This paper examines some of the issues relevant to setting up a wildlife DNA forensics laboratory based on experiences of working in this area over the past 7 years. It includes a discussion of various models for operating individual laboratories as well as options for organizing forensic testing at higher national and international levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ogden R, Dawnay N, McEwing R. Wildlife DNA forensics—bridging the gap between conservation genetics and law enforcement. Endangered Species Res. 2009;9:179–95.
Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL. Hypervariable minisatellite regions in human DNA. Nature. 1985;314:67–73.
Gill P, Jeffreys AJ, Werrett DJ. Forensic applications of DNA ‘fingerprints’. Nature. 1985;318:577–9.
Burke T, Bruford MW. DNA fingerprinting in birds. Nature. 1987;327:149–52.
Thommasen HV, Thomson MJ, Shutler GG, Kirby LT. Development of DNA fingerprints for use in wildlife forensic science. Wildl Soc Bull. 1989;17:321–6.
Cronin MA, Palmisciano DA, Vyse ER, Cameron DG. Mitochondrial-DNA in wildlife forensic-science—species identification of tissues. Wildl Soc Bull. 1991;19:94–105.
Baker CS, Palumbi SR. Which whales are hunted?—a molecular genetic approach to monitoring whaling. Science. 1994;265:1538–9.
DeSalle R, Birstein VJ. PCR identification of black caviar. Nature. 1996;381:197–8.
Wasser SK, Shedlock AM, Comstock K, et al. Assigning African elephant DNA to geographic region of origin: applications to the ivory trade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:14847–52.
Budowle B, Garofano P, Hellman A, et al. Recommendations for animal DNA forensic and identity testing. Int J Legal Med. 2005;119:295–302.
Dawnay N, Ogden R, Thorpe RS, et al. A forensic STR profiling system for the Eurasian badger: a framework for developing profiling systems for wildlife species. Forensic Sci Int: Genetics. 2008;2:47–53.
Butler JM. Debunking some urban legends surrounding validation within the forensic DNA community. Profiles DNA. 2006;9:3–6.
Acknowledgments
The author is grateful to Ross McEwing for numerous discussions of these issues over many years, as well as to Ed Espinoza and Linzi Wilson-Wilde for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. RO is part-funded by the UK Darwin Initiative.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogden, R. Forensic science, genetics and wildlife biology: getting the right mix for a wildlife DNA forensics lab. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6, 172–179 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9178-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9178-5