Skip to main content

Wildlife DNA Profiling and Its Forensic Relevance

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of DNA Profiling
  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

Wildlife DNA forensics is a relatively new field emerging to tackle challenges in wildlife crime investigation. It is an applied field which is a combination of conservation genetics and forensic genetics. DNA evidences are crucial and hold great evidential value in human identification. DNA evidence analysis techniques have been in focus since years. The present technological advantage is achieved through years of research and development in molecular techniques. The process of evidence analysis and reporting in DNA-based evidence in human identification is not much different than wildlife forensic analysis. There may be difference in case assessment and evaluation of scientific data, but the fundamental principles of forensic investigation remain same.

The nature of wildlife crimes is different, and the laws controlling it are as well. The legality of any act is decided by a number of factors, such as the species involved, geographic location, source, and age. DNA evidence analysis helps wildlife law enforcement to answer important case-related questions, which are based on the above factors. Wildlife DNA profiling is essential to meet the increasing need of investigative tools in wildlife crime investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alacs E, Georges A, FitzSimmons N, Robertson J (2009) DNA detective: a review of molecular approaches to wildlife forensics. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 3:180–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen R, Schregel J, Kopatz A, Tobiassen C, Knappskog PM, Hagen SB et al (2012) A forensic DNA profiling system for Northern European brown bears (Ursus arctos). Forensic Sci Int Genet 6:798–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker CS, Cooke JG, Lavery S, Dalebout ML, Yu M, Funashi N et al (2007) Estimating the number of whales entering trade using DNA profiling and capture-recapture analysis of market products. Mol Ecol 16:2617–2626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bär W, Brinkmann B, Budowle B, Carracedo A et al (2000) Guidelines for mitochondrial DNA typing. Vox Sang 79:121–125. Birds through DNA barcodes. Plos Biol 2:1657–1663

    Google Scholar 

  • British Ecological Society (2020) Researchers turn DNA detectives to aid rhino poaching prosecutions with forensic evidence. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 21, 2020 from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/12/201215164923.htm

  • Butler JM (2010) Fundamentals of forensic DNA typing. Elsevier, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Foead N, Elliott W, Ziegler S, Van Gool M, Nijman V (2005) WWF’s species action plan for the conservation of orangutans in the wild. WWF’s Species Action Plan, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantz L, Schraiber J, Madsen O et al (2015) Evidence of long-term gene flow and selection during domestication from analyses of Eurasian wild and domestic pig genomes. Nat Genet 47:1141–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore S, Peakall R, Robertson J, Organelle (2007) DNA haplotypes reflect crop-use characteristics and geographic origins of Cannabis sativa. Forensic Sci Int 172:179–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glover KA, Hansen MM, Skaala O (2009) Identifying the source of farmed escaped Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): Bayesian clustering analysis increases accuracy of assignment. Aquaculture 290:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, Dewaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 270:313–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM (2004) Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol 2(10):e312

    Google Scholar 

  • Helyar SJ, Hemmer J, Bekkevold D, Taylor MI, Ogden R, Limborg MT et al (2007) Application of SNPs for population genetics of nonmodel organisms: new opportunities and challenges. Mol Ecol Resour 11:123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin DM, Kocher TD, Wilson AC (1991) Evolution of the cytochrome-b gene of mammals. J Mol Evol 32:128–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishida Y, Georgiadis NJ, Hondo T, Roca AL (2013) Triangulating the provenance of African elephants using mitochondrial DNA. Evol Appl 6:253–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li DS, Cui HM, Wang CD, Ling SS, Huang Z, Zhang HM (2011) A fast and effective method to perform paternity testing for Wolong giant pandas. Chin Sci Bull 56(24):2559–2564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linacre A, Gusmão L, Hecht W et al (2011) ISFG: recommendations regarding the use of non-human (animal) DNA in forensic genetic investigations. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5:501–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nazareno AG, dos Reis MS (2014) Where did they come from: genetic diversity and forensic investigation of the threatened palm species Butia eriospatha. Conserv Genet 15:441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden R (2011) Unlocking the potential of genomic technologies for wildlife forensics. Mol Ecol Resour 11:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden R, Jen M (2015) A review of wildlife forensic science and laboratory capacity to support the implementation and enforcement of CITES. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) CoP17 Doc. 25 Annex 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Palsboll PJ, Berube M, Skaug HJ, Raymakers C (2006) DNA registers of legally obtained wildlife and derived products as means to identify illegal takes. Conserv Biol 20:1284–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbisà E, Tanzariello F, Reyes A, Pesole G (1998) Mammalian mitochondrial D-loop region structural analysis: identification of new conserved sequences and their functional and evolutionary implications. Gene 205:125–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00404-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz TS, Karl SA (2008) Population genetic assignment of confiscated gopher tortoises. J Wildl Manag 72:254–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN (2009) The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol 74(2):329–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wasser SK, Clark WJ, Drori O, Kisamo ES, Mailand C, Mutayoba B et al (2008) Combating the illegal trade in African elephant ivory with DNA forensics. Conserv Biol 22:1065–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolfe M, Primrose S (2004) Food forensics: using DNA technology to combat misdescription and fraud. Trends Biotechnol 22:222–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulhas Gondhali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gondhali, U., Mishra, A. (2021). Wildlife DNA Profiling and Its Forensic Relevance. In: Dash, H.R., Shrivastava, P., Lorente, J.A. (eds) Handbook of DNA Profiling. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9364-2_41-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9364-2_41-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9364-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9364-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics