DNA reviews: low level DNA profiling

DNA Review

Abstract

Low copy number (LCN) DNA profiling has recently been scrutinized in the United Kingdom following the comments of Mr Justice Weir made during the trial of suspected terrorist Sean Hoey. Mr Hoey was acquitted of all charges related to the Omagh bombing of 1998, following the inadmissibility of key DNA evidence during this trial. The Association of Chief Police Officers and Crown Prosecution Service, initially suspended the use of this technique, but quickly reinstated its use following an internal enquiry. This review describes the low copy number technique and the sample types that are now routinely collected from suspects, victims, and crime scenes for examination by this method.

Keywords

Forensic DNA transfer Low copy number (LCN) Touch DNA Stochastic effects 

References

  1. 1.
    Gill P, Whitaker J, Flaxman C, Brown N, Buckleton J. An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;112(1):17–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Taberlet P, Griffin S, Goossens B, Questiau S, Manceau V, Escaravage N, et al. Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24(16):3189–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gill P. Application of low copy number DNA profiling. Croat Med J. 2001;42(3):229–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whitaker J, Cotton E, Gill P. A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;123(2–3):215–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gill P, Curran J, Neumann C, Kirkham A, Clayton T, Whitaker J, et al. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness. Forensic Sci Int: Genetics. 2008;2(2):91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Oorschot R, Jones MK. DNA fingerprints from fingerprints. Nature. 1997;387(6635):767.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wiegand P, Kleiber M. DNA typing of epithelial cells after strangulation. Int J Legal Med. 1997;110(4):181–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ladd C, Adamowicz M, Bourke M, Scherczinger C, Lee H. A systematic analysis of secondary DNA transfer. J Forensic Sci. 1999;44(6):1270–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rutty G. An investigation into the transference and survivability of human DNA following simulated manual strangulation with consideration of the problem of third party contamination. Int J Legal Med. 2002;116(3):170–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rutty G, Hopwood A, Tucker V. The effectiveness of protective clothing in the reduction of potential DNA contamination of the scene of crime. Int J Legal Med. 2003;117(3):170–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Port N, Bowyer V, Graham E, Batuwangala M, Rutty G. How long does it take a static speaking individual to contaminate their immediate environment? Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2006;2(3):157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wickenheiser R. Trace DNA: a review, discussion of theory, and application of the transfer of trace quantities of DNA through skin contact. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47(3):442–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lowe A, Murray C, Whitaker J, Tully G, Gill P. The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces. Forensic Sci Int. 2002;129(1):25–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Graham E, Rutty G. Investigation into “normal” background DNA on adult necks: Implications for DNA profiling of manual strangulation victims. J Forensic Sci. 2008 (In press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.East Midlands Forensic Pathology UnitUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations