Abstract
Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) harbors rearranged during transfection (RET) gene and rarely RAS gene mutations. The knowledge of the type of gene mutation in MTC is important to determine the treatment of the patients and the management of their family members. Targeted next-generation sequencing with a panel of 47 genes was performed in a total of 12 cases of sporadic (9/12) and hereditary MTC (3/12). Two of three hereditary MTCs had RET/C634R mutation, while the other one harbored two RET mutations (L790F and S649L). All the sporadic MTC had RET/M918T mutation except one case with HRAS mutation. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) can provide comprehensive analysis of molecular alterations in MTC in a routine clinical setting, which facilitate the management of the patient and the family members.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare malignant tumor of the thyroid gland arising from the parafollicular cells (C cells), often associated with elevated serum calcitonin levels. It accounts for 3.5–10 % of all thyroid cancers [3–6], and for 13.4% of all thyroid cancer-related deaths [7]. It occurs in both sporadic and hereditary forms. The former accounts for approximately 25 % of all MTC cases, which often occur as part of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes type 2A (MEN 2A)/familial MTC (FMTC) and MEN2B [7]; whereas, the latter is more common and constitutes 70–80 % of MTC [4, 7].
Germline activating mutations in proto-oncogene rearranged during transfection (RET) are identified as the genetic basis for MEN2A, MEN2B, and FMTC syndromes. Greater than 90 different RET mutations in exons 5, 8, 10, 11, 12 to 16, and 19 have been associated with hereditary MTC. Most of these are missense mutations, which lead to constitutive activation of the RET tyrosine kinase [8]. American Thyroid Association (ATA) has published recommendations on the timing of prophylactic thyroidectomy and the extent of surgery, which were based on genotype–phenotype correlations that stratify mutations into four risk levels [9, 10].
Up to half of the sporadic MTC harbor somatic RET mutations, located in exons 10, 11, 15, and 16 [11]. Recently RAS mutations have been reported in a subset of sporadic MTCs [1, 2]. These commonly occur in exons 2, 3, and 4 of HRAS and KRAS [12], while NRAS mutations are rare [1, 12]. The knowledge of the type of gene mutation in MTC is important to determine the treatment of the patients and the management of their family members. Furthermore, recently, the type of somatic mutation of RET in tumor tissue has proved to have a prognostic value for anti-tyrosine kinase therapy, such as Vandetanib [13].
The conventional methods for detecting RET mutation are polymerase chain reaction amplification (PCR)/Sanger sequencing-based testing, such as restriction enzyme analysis, amplification-refractory mutation system (ARMS) assay, and direct DNA sequencing following PCR [13, 14]. Recently, implementing Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows concurrent analysis of many genes/exons in a single assay instead of one DNA fragment at a time (Sanger sequencing) [15, 16]. Many clinical laboratories are now implementing targeted NGS panels covering dozens of disease-associated genes [15, 17–19].
In this study, we are reporting our experience of detecting the molecular alterations in a series of MTC using NGS in a routine clinical setting.
Materials and Medthods
This study was approved by the University of Pennsylvania institutional Review Board. A total of 12 cases of MTC were included in this study diagnosed at the University of Pennsylvania health system (2005 to 2015). Medical record review was performed to collect clinical information. This case cohort included three patients who were referred to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, and the outside surgical pathology slides were reviewed; unstained slides and/or paraffin embedded blocks were received for NGS.
The hematoxylin and eosin stained slides were reviewed to confirm at least 10 % of tumor cellularity. The tumor area was extracted for genomic DNA according to manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Inc.). Targeted analysis for mutations in the regions specified in this testing panel was achieved by enrichment of those genomic loci using the Illumina Truseq Amplicon Assay (Illumina, San Diego, CA). DNA was quantified using a fluorescent-based measurement (Qubit, Life Technologies), and 20 to 250 ng of DNA was used for custom target enrichment. Sequencing of enriched libraries was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform using multiplexed, paired end reads to an average depth of coverage greater than 1000. Analysis and interpretation utilized a customized bioinformatics process. All variants listed are with reference to the hg19 genome build. The sequencing panel consists of 47 genes (ABL1, AKT1, ALK, APC, ATM, BRAF, CDH1, CSF1R, CTNNB1, EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB4, FBXW7, FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, FLT3, GNA11, GNAQ, GNAS, HNF1A, HRAS, IDH1, JAK2, JAK3, KDR, KIT, KRAS, MET, MLH1, MPL, NOTCH1, NPM1, NRAS, PDGFRA, PIK3CA, PTEN, PTPN11, RB1, RET, SMAD4, SMARCB1, SMO, SRC, STK11, TP53, VHL).
Results
The case cohort of 12 patients comprised of 7 males and 5 females with a mean age of 50.2 years (31–71 years) (Table 1). Three patients had hereditary MTC; case 1 had a history of pheochromocytoma, and case 3 had a history of parathyroid adenoma. Lymph node metastases were present in 10 out of 12 cases (10/12, 83.3 %). Five cases had distant metastasis (41.7 %). Clinical follow-up ranged from 1 to 12 years (average 4.7 years); three patients died of disease (Table 1).
Successful 47 genes NGS was performed in all 12 cases (Table 1). Eleven out of 12 cases (91.7 %) harbored RET mutation. Only one case of sporadic MTC had HRAS mutation; all the remaining sporadic MTC had RET/M918T mutation. Two of the hereditary MTC had RET/C634R mutation; while the remaining one harbored two RET mutations (L790F and S649L).
Discussion
Multiplex next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis is capable of detecting the full range of mutation types of multiple genes on limited and/or minute specimens [21]. The gene panel used in this study contains all the common genes associated with MTC, including RET, HRAS, NRAS, and KRAS. The low input quantity of DNA acceptable for NGS makes it applicable to various types of specimens in a clinical laboratory [22, 23]. In this study, NGS detected as low as 4.15 % allele frequency (cases 5), which only requires about 10 % tumor burden in one specimen compared with 30 to 40 % of tumor content for Sanger sequencing [24].
The RET gene is composed of 21 exons located on chromosome 10 (10q11.2) [25] and plays an important role in the development of the parathyroid, urogenital system, and neural crest—including ganglia, adrenal medulla, and thyroid C cells [26]. Different mutations in the RET gene are associated with varying phenotypes of MEN2A/FMTC and MEN2B including age of onset, aggressiveness of MTC, and with or without associated pheochromocytoma or primary hyperparathyroidism [10]. All three cases of hereditary MTCs in this study had the phenotype of MEN2A/FMTC. North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society recently published consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of MTC, which were developed by classifying RET mutations into three groups based on aggressiveness of MTC or level of risk [9, 20]. Hereditary MTC with mutation of p.M918T are the most aggressive tumor (level 3), in which metastasis can develop in the first year of life [9]. Several professional groups have developed guidelines for the timing of prophylactic thyroidectomy, all of which are based on the perceived clinical behavior of the specific RET mutation [10, 20]. The three cases of hereditary MTC in this study had low risk RET mutations (level 1 and 2) (Table 1).
Multiple somatic mutations of RET can occur at a very low rate [11]. In this study, one of the hereditary MTC had two RET point mutations (p.L790F, c.2370G>T and p.S649L, c.1946C>T). RET/L790F mutation is associated with a non-aggressive form of MEN2 [9]. Bihan reported 77 French patients from 19 families with a mutation in codon 790 of the RET; only one patient had pheochromocytoma, and no patient had primary hyperparathyroidism [9]. Frank-Raue reported 47 patients with mutation in codon 790 of the RET; none of them had pheochromocytoma or primary hyperparathyroidism [27]. RET/S649L is a rare mutation, which is associated with MEN2A [28]. It is generally regarded as low risk mutation. Colombo-Benkmann documented three patients with RET/S649L had MTC, but two of them carrying both the S649L mutations and a second mutation (C634W or V804L), which are high-risk mutations [28, 29]. However, RET/S649L can be associated with primary parathyroidism [29], which explains the parathyroid adenoma in our case.
RET mutations can occur in greater than half of the cases of sporadic MTC [11]. The M918T mutation is the most common mutation in sporadic MTC [11, 30]. In this study, eight out of nine cases (88.9 %) of sporadic MTC showed M918T mutation. The remaining case had HRAS mutation. The family of human RAS genes includes the highly homologous HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS genes, which encode GTPases that function as molecular switches in regulating pathways that are responsible for diverse cellular processes. Activating mutations of RAS genes are found in about 30 % of all human cancers. In thyroid carcinoma, RAS gene point mutations, mainly in NRAS, are detected in follicular adenoma and carcinoma [31]. RAS mutations were reported in a subset of sporadic MTCs [1, 2]. Mutations commonly occur in HRAS and KRAS [12], while NRAS mutations are rare [1, 12, 31]. RAS mutations are almost always mutually exclusive with RET mutations, which present in 10 to 45 % of RET wild-type sporadic tumors [12, 30].
In this study, the patient with HRAS mutation had both medullary carcinoma and parathyroid adenoma. This patient had a very aggressive disease, and died at age of 46, 3 years after first being diagnosed with MTC. Ciampi reported that the outcome of patients with a somatic RET mutation was significantly worse than the outcome of both RAS-positive/RET-negative and RAS-negative/RET-negative cases [2]. Margarida reported that there was no statistically significant difference in clinical and pathological characteristics between RAS-positive and RAS-negative cases without somatic RET mutations [1]. However, a study by Moura showed that MTC with RAS mutations have an intermediate risk between those with RET mutations in exons 15 and 16, which are associated with the worst prognosis, and cases with other RET mutations, that follows an indolent clinical course [31].
Conclusions
NGS can provide comprehensive analysis of molecular alterations in MTC in a routine clinical setting, which facilitate determining the treatment of the patient and prophylactic thyroidectomy for the patient’s family members harboring mutations. In this study, two of the hereditary MTC had RET/C634R mutation, while the other one harbored two RET mutations (L790F and S649L). All the sporadic MTC had RET/M918T mutation except one case with HRAS mutation in this series.
References
Moura MM, Cavaco BM, Pinto AE, Leite V: High prevalence of RAS mutations in RET-negative sporadic medullary thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011, 96(5):E863–E868.
Ciampi R, Mian C, Fugazzola L, Cosci B, Romei C, Barollo S, Cirello V, Bottici V, Marconcini G, Rosa PM et al: Evidence of a low prevalence of RAS mutations in a large medullary thyroid cancer series. Thyroid 2013, 23(1):50–57.
Figlioli G, Landi S, Romei C, Elisei R, Gemignani F: Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and RET proto-oncogene: mutation spectrum in the familial cases and a meta-analysis of studies on the sporadic form. Mutat Res 2013, 752(1):36–44.
DeLellis RA: Pathology and genetics of tumours of endocrine organs, vol. 8: IARC; 2004.
Maxwell JE, Sherman SK, O’Dorisio TM, Howe JR: Medical management of metastatic medullary thyroid cancer. Cancer 2014, 120(21):3287–3301.
Hundahl SA, Fleming ID, Fremgen AM, Menck HR: A National Cancer Data Base report on 53,856 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the US, 1985-1995. Cancer 1998, 83(12):2638–2648.
Kebebew E, Ituarte PH, Siperstein AE, Duh QY, Clark OH: Medullary thyroid carcinoma: clinical characteristics, treatment, prognostic factors, and a comparison of staging systems. Cancer 2000, 88(5):1139–1148.
Margraf RL, Crockett DK, Krautscheid PM, Seamons R, Calderon FR, Wittwer CT, Mao R: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 RET protooncogene database: repository of MEN2-associated RET sequence variation and reference for genotype/phenotype correlations. Hum Mutat 2009, 30(4):548–556.
Bihan H, Murat A, Fysekidis M, Al-Salameh A, Schwartz C, Baudin E, Thieblot P, Borson-Chazot F, Guillausseau PJ, Cardot-Bauters C et al: The clinical spectrum of RET proto-oncogene mutations in codon 790. Eur J Endocrinol 2013, 169(3):271–276.
Kloos RT, Eng C, Evans DB, Francis GL, Gagel RF, Gharib H, Moley JF, Pacini F, Ringel MD, Schlumberger M: Medullary thyroid cancer: management guidelines of the American Thyroid Association. Thyroid 2009, 19(6):565–612.
Dvorakova S, Vaclavikova E, Sykorova V, Vcelak J, Novak Z, Duskova J, Ryska A, Laco J, Cap J, Kodetova D et al: Somatic mutations in the RET proto-oncogene in sporadic medullary thyroid carcinomas. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2008, 284(1–2):21–27.
Boichard A, Croux L, Al Ghuzlan A, Broutin S, Dupuy C, Leboulleux S, Schlumberger M, Bidart JM, Lacroix L: Somatic RAS mutations occur in a large proportion of sporadic RET-negative medullary thyroid carcinomas and extend to a previously unidentified exon. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012, 97(10):E2031–E2035.
Wells SA, Jr., Robinson BG, Gagel RF, Dralle H, Fagin JA, Santoro M, Baudin E, Elisei R, Jarzab B, Vasselli JR et al: Vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2012, 30(2):134–141.
Zupan A, Glavač D: The development of rapid and accurate screening test for RET hotspot somatic and germline mutations in MEN2 syndromes. Exp Mol Pathol 2015, 99(3):416–425.
Aziz N, Zhao Q, Bry L, Driscoll DK, Funke B, Gibson JS, Grody WW, Hegde MR, Hoeltge GA, Leonard DG et al: College of American Pathologists’ laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing clinical tests. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015, 139(4):481–493.
Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR: DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1977, 74(12):5463–5467.
Sehgal AR, Gimotty PA, Zhao J, Hsu J-M, Daber R, Morrissette JD, Luger SM, Loren AW, Carroll M: DNMT3A mutational status affects the results of dose-escalated induction therapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2015:clincanres. 0327.2014.
Gleeson FC, Kipp BR, Voss JS, Campion MB, Minot DM, Tu ZJ, Klee EW, Sciallis AP, Graham RP, Lazaridis KN: Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Mutation Profiling Using Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Personalized Care for Rectal Cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 2015, 143(6):879–888.
Valero III V, Saunders TJ, He J, Weiss MJ, Cameron JL, Dholakia A, Wild AT, Shin EJ, Khashab MA, O’Broin-Lennon AM: Reliable Detection of Somatic Mutations in Fine Needle Aspirates of Pancreatic Cancer With Next-generation Sequencing. Ann Surg 2015, May 27, 2015.
Chen H, Sippel RS, O’Dorisio MS, Vinik AI, Lloyd RV, Pacak K: The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors: pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, and medullary thyroid cancer. Pancreas 2010, 39(6):775–783.
Karnes HE, Duncavage EJ, Bernadt CT: Targeted next-generation sequencing using fine-needle aspirates from adenocarcinomas of the lung. Cancer Cytopathol 2014, 122(2):104–113.
Kanagal-Shamanna R, Portier BP, Singh RR, Routbort MJ, Aldape KD, Handal BA, Rahimi H, Reddy NG, Barkoh BA, Mishra BM et al: Next-generation sequencing-based multi-gene mutation profiling of solid tumors using fine needle aspiration samples: promises and challenges for routine clinical diagnostics. Mod Pathol 2014, 27(2):314–327.
Wei S, Lieberman D, Morrissette JJ, Baloch ZW, Roth DB, McGrath C: Using "residual" FNA rinse and body fluid specimens for next-generation sequencing: An institutional experience. Cancer Cytopathol 2015.
Warth A, Penzel R, Brandt R, Sers C, Fischer JR, Thomas M, Herth FJ, Dietel M, Schirmacher P, Blaker H: Optimized algorithm for Sanger sequencing-based EGFR mutation analyses in NSCLC biopsies. Virchows Arch 2012, 460(4):407–414.
Krampitz GW, Norton JA: RET gene mutations (genotype and phenotype) of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 2014, 120(13):1920–1931.
Mulligan LM: RET revisited: expanding the oncogenic portfolio. Nat Rev Cancer 2014, 14(3):173–186.
Frank-Raue K, Machens A, Scheuba C, Niederle B, Dralle H, Raue F: Difference in development of medullary thyroid carcinoma among carriers of RET mutations in codons 790 and 791. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008, 69(2):259–263.
Wells SA, Jr., Pacini F, Robinson BG, Santoro M: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma: an update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013, 98(8):3149–3164.
Colombo-Benkmann M, Li Z, Riemann B, Hengst K, Herbst H, Keuser R, Gross U, Rondot S, Raue F, Senninger N et al: Characterization of the RET protooncogene transmembrane domain mutation S649L associated with nonaggressive medullary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Endocrinol 2008, 158(6):811–816.
Chernock RD, Hagemann IS: Molecular pathology of hereditary and sporadic medullary thyroid carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol 2015, 143(6):768–777.
Moura MM, Cavaco BM, Leite V: RAS proto-oncogene in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer 2015, 22(5):R235–R252.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This study was approved by the University of Pennsylvania institutional Review Board.
Funding Support
No specific funding was disclosed.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, S., LiVolsi, V.A., Montone, K.T. et al. Detection of Molecular Alterations in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Using Next-Generation Sequencing: an Institutional Experience. Endocr Pathol 27, 359–362 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-016-9446-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-016-9446-3