Abstract
Purpose
The use of open-source automated insulin delivery systems (OS-AIDs), for the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D), has increased over recent years in all age groups. Real-life data has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these systems, however, studies in the pediatric population remain limited. In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of transition to an OS-AIDs on glycemic parameters, and on several aspects related to quality of life. In addition, we aimed to characterize the socioeconomic position of families who chose this treatment modality, assess their motivations to do so, and evaluate treatment satisfaction.
Methods
In this multi-center observational real-life study from the AWeSoMe Group, we compared glycemic parameters of 52 individuals with T1D (56% males, mean diabetes duration 4.2 ± 3.9 years), from the last clinic visit prior to OS-AIDs initiation to the most recent clinic visit while using the system. Socioeconomic position (SEP) index was retrieved from the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. Caregivers completed questionnaires assessing reasons for system initiation and treatment satisfaction.
Results
Mean age at OS-AIDs initiation was 11.2 ± 4 years, range 3.3–20.7 years with a median usage duration of 11.1 months (range 3–45.7). Mean SEP Index was 1.033 ± 0.956 (value range: −2.797 to 2.590). Time in range (TIR) of 70 to 180 mg/dl increased from 69.0 ± 11.9 to 75.5 ± 11.7%, (P < 0.001), and HbA1c decreased from 6.9 ± 0.7 to 6.4 ± 0.6%, (P < 0.001). Time in tight range (TITR) of 70 to 140 mg/dl increased from 49.7 ± 12.9 to 58.8 ± 10.8% (P < 0.001). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia or DKA were reported. Reduction in diabetes burden and sleep quality improvement were the main reasons for OS-AID initiation.
Conclusions
In our cohort of youth with T1D, the transition to an OS-AID resulted in greater TIR and less severe hypoglycemia regardless of age, diabetes duration or SEP, which was found to be above average. The overall improvement in glycemic parameters in our study population with excellent baseline glycemic control, provides additional evidence of beneficence and efficacy of OS-AIDs in the pediatric population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N.C. Foster, R.W. Beck, K.M. Miller, M.A. Clements, M.R. Rickels, L.A. DiMeglio, D.M. Maahs, W.V. Tamborlane, R. Bergenstal, E. Smith, B.A. Olson, S.K. Garg, State of Type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016–2018. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 21(2), 66–72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2018.0384
A. Addala, M. Auzanneau, K. Miller, W. Maier, N. Foster, T. Kapellen, A. Walker, J. Rosenbauer, D.M. Maahs, R.W. Holl, A decade of disparities in diabetes technology use and HbA1c in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a transatlantic comparison. Diabetes Care 44(1), 133–140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-0257
R.A. Lal, L. Ekhlaspour, K. Hood, B. Buckingham, Realizing a closed-loop (artificial pancreas) system for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. Endocr. Rev. 40(6), 1521–1546 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2018-00174
D.M. Lewis, Do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system and the OpenAPS movement. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 49(1), 203–213 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2019.10.005
K. Braune, R.A. Lal, L. Petruzelkova, G. Scheiner, P. Winterdijk, S. Schmidt, L. Raimond, K.K. Hood, M.C. Riddell, T.C. Skinner, K. Raile, S. Hussain; Network OIHP, Group OLA, Open-source automated insulin delivery: international consensus statement and practical guidance for health-care professionals. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 10(1), 58–74 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00267-9
Central Bureau of Statistics (2013). Characterisation and classification of geographical units by the socio-economic level of the population (2008). https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/publications/DocLib/2013/1530/pdf/e_print.pdf
T. Battelino, T. Danne, R.M. Bergenstal, S.A. Amiel, R. Beck, T. Biester, E. Bosi, B.A. Buckingham, W.T. Cefalu, K.L. Close, C. Cobelli, E. Dassau, J.H. DeVries, K.C. Donaghue, K. Dovc, F.J. Doyle III, S. Garg, G. Grunberger, S. Heller, L. Heinemann, I.B. Hirsch, R. Hovorka, W. Jia, O. Kordonouri, B. Kovatchev, A. Kowalski, L. Laffel, B. Levine, A. Mayorov, C. Mathieu, H.R. Murphy, R. Nimri, K. Norgaard, C.G. Parkin, E. Renard, D. Rodbard, B. Saboo, D. Schatz, K. Stoner, T. Urakami, S.A. Weinzimer, M. Phillip, Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care 42(8), 1593–1603 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2337/dci19-0028
J.W. Lum, R.J. Bailey, V. Barnes-Lomen, D. Naranjo, K.K. Hood, R.A. Lal, B. Arbiter, A.S. Brown, D.J. DeSalvo, J. Pettus, P. Calhoun, R.W. Beck, A real-world prospective study of the safety and effectiveness of the loop open source automated insulin delivery system. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 23(5), 367–375 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0535
K. Braune, S. O’Donnell, B. Cleal, D. Lewis, A. Tappe, I. Willaing, B. Hauck, K. Raile, Real-world use of do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: online survey and analysis of self-reported clinical outcomes. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7(7), e14087 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2196/14087
M.S. Choi, S. Lee, J. Kim, G. Kim, S.M. Park, J.H. Kim, Do-it-yourself open artificial pancreas system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: real-world data. Diabetes Metab. J. 46(1), 154–159 (2022). https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2021.0011
L. Petruzelkova, P. Jiranova, J. Soupal, M. Kozak, L. Plachy, V. Neuman, S. Pruhova, B. Obermannova, S. Kolouskova, Z. Sumnik, Pre-school and school-aged children benefit from the switch from a sensor-augmented pump to an AndroidAPS hybrid closed loop: a retrospective analysis. Pediatr. Diabetes 22(4), 594–604 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.13190
A. Gawrecki, D. Zozulinska-Ziolkiewicz, M.A. Michalak, A. Adamska, M. Michalak, U. Frackowiak, J. Flotynska, M. Pietrzak, S. Czapla, B. Gehr, A. Araszkiewicz, Safety and glycemic outcomes of do-it-yourself AndroidAPS hybrid closed-loop system in adults with type 1 diabetes. PLoS One 16(4), e0248965 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248965
R. Jeyaventhan, G. Gallen, P. Choudhary, S. Hussain, A real-world study of user characteristics, safety and efficacy of open-source closed-loop systems and Medtronic 670G. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 23(8), 1989–1994 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14439
A. Melmer, T. Zuger, D.M. Lewis, S. Leibrand, C. Stettler, M. Laimer, Glycaemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes using an open source artificial pancreas system (OpenAPS). Diabetes Obes. Metab. 21(10), 2333–2337 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13810
Z. Wu, S. Luo, X. Zheng, Y. Bi, W. Xu, J. Yan, D. Yang, J. Weng, Use of a do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system is associated with better glucose management and higher quality of life among adults with type 1 diabetes. Ther. Adv. Endocrinol. Metab. 11, 2042018820950146 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042018820950146
M.J. Burnside, D.M. Lewis, H.R. Crocket, R.A. Meier, J.A. Williman, O.J. Sanders, C.A. Jefferies, A.M. Faherty, R.G. Paul, C.S. Lever, S.K.J. Price, C.M. Frewen, S.D. Jones, T.C. Gunn, C. Lampey, B.J. Wheeler, M.I. de Bock, Open-source automated insulin delivery in type 1 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 387(10), 869–881 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2203913
M.J. Schoelwer, L.G. Kanapka, R.P. Wadwa, M.D. Breton, K.J. Ruedy, L. Ekhlaspour, G.P. Forlenza, E.C. Cobry, L.H. Messer, E. Cengiz, E. Jost, L. Carria, E. Emory, L.J. Hsu, S.A. Weinzimer, B.A. Buckingham, R.A. Lal, M.C. Oliveri, C.C. Kollman, B.B. Dokken, D.R. Chernavvsky, R.W. Beck, M.D. DeBoer, D.C.L.T.R.G. i, Predictors of time-in-range (70–180 mg/dL) achieved using a closed-loop control system. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 23(7), 475–481 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0646
K. Braune, K.A. Gajewska, A. Thieffry, D.M. Lewis, T. Froment, S. O’Donnell, J. Speight, C. Hendrieckx, J. Schipp, T. Skinner, H. Langstrup, A. Tappe, K. Raile, B. Cleal, Why #WeAreNotWaiting-Motivations and self-reported outcomes among users of open-source automated insulin delivery systems: multinational survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 23(6), e25409 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2196/25409
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice C, 7. Diabetes technology: standards of medical care in diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care 45(Suppl 1), S97–S112 (2022). https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-S007
Acknowledgements
An abstract of this manuscript was presented as a poster at the 60th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology (ESPE), Rome, Italy, September 17th 2022 and can be accessed at https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/525606. We would like to express our gratitude and appreciation to the participants and their families.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.N., Z.L., M.R., Y.L., and O.P.-H. contributed to the study design. J.N., M.R., Y.L., A.B., O.P.-H., A.H., E.S., N.L., T.B., and Z.L. assisted with data collection. A.F. contributed to the manuscript writing and data interpretation, O.P.-H., A.B., and A.H. participated in data analysis and review of the manuscript. All contributing authors advised on analysis or interpretation of the data and all authors commented on and revised the manuscript and approved the submission. J.N. the corresponding author, had access to the study data and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from all adult patients (18 years old or above) or by the parents or guardians of children (under 18 years of age).
Ethics approval
The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Each center obtained local ethics committee approval.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nir, J., Rachmiel, M., Fraser, A. et al. Open-source automated insulin delivery systems (OS-AIDs) in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes in a real-life setting: the AWeSoMe study group experience. Endocrine 81, 262–269 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-023-03398-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-023-03398-4