Abstract
Endocrinopathies during pregnancy constitute a challenging issue, being prevalent and requiring appropriate management to avoid maternal and fetal complications. This review aims to summarize and present major endocrine problems during pregnancy, the appropriate screening, maternal monitoring and management, fetal monitoring, and follow-up. Glucose metabolism, thyroid function, as well as calcium and vitamin D metabolism are the main endocrine domains that should be screened and monitored during pregnancy. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most prevalent endocrine disease during pregnancy, followed by thyroid disorders. Specific recommendations are provided for the optimal clinical care of pregnant women and their offspring for GDM, thyroid disorders, and calcium and vitamin D disorders.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Endocrine disorders and their management during pregnancy pose therapeutic challenges for endocrinologists and obstetricians due to their potentially harmful maternal and fetal health effects. Gestation results in physiological endocrine changes, attributed to the placental function and the fetal-maternal interaction. Fetal endocrine gland development and hormone secretion are completed during the second trimester of pregnancy. Before this hallmark, fetal hormonal needs depend solely on maternal contribution, which remains substantial during pregnancy. Endocrine parameters that must be examined during pregnancy are glucose metabolism, thyroid function, and calcium and vitamin D metabolism. The respective endocrine disorders can be categorized into pre-existing and gestation-induced. The diagnosis is often demanding due to the overlap of symptoms between normal pregnancy and endocrine disease. This review summarizes the literature and guidelines regarding screening and managing of major endocrinopathies during pregnancy, providing a comprehensive, updated and clinically-oriented guide for endocrinologists and obstetricians.
Study design and methods
To identify publications on endocrine disorders during pregnancy, a literature search was conducted in PubMed up to September 2022. Attention was paid to relevant guidelines. Information regarding screening and management of major endocrinopathies during pregnancy was collected, analyzed and qualitatively re-synthesized.
Glucose metabolism disorders
Pathophysiology
Hyperglycemia during pregnancy is classified into overt or pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). GDM is defined as glucose intolerance of variable degree with onset during pregnancy, usually during the second trimester, that was not PGDM. Pregnancy is characterized by a high risk of developing glucose metabolism disorders, considering that insulin resistance increases from the 24th to 28th gestational week. GDM is prevalent, complicating 7–8% of pregnancies [1].
Fetal glucose needs are met through maternal glucose transport via the placenta due to the concentration gradient between them. As the pregnancy progresses, a rise in fetal glucose requirements results in increased maternal hepatic glucose production and transport [2]. Simultaneously, the pancreatic β-cells are increased in mass to promote insulin production and prevent excessive glucose delivery to the fetus [3]. Failure of this process leads to hyperglycemia, usually between the 24th and 28th gestational weeks.
GDM has been strongly linked with reversible and non-reversible adverse effects for the mother and the fetus. On the one hand, pregnancies complicated with GDM are correlated with early complications, such as preeclampsia, spontaneous miscarriage, preterm birth, dystocia, and increased cesarian section rates. Later, women with GDM are susceptible to developing cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and GDM in a subsequent pregnancy. On the other hand, fetal complications may be apparent early, such as macrosomia, birth trauma, shoulder dystocia, hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, preterm birth, and stillbirth. Offspring have a higher prevalence of obesity, metabolic syndrome and T2DM [4].
Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus
Identifying women at high risk for developing GDM is of clinical relevance. The main risk factors for developing GDM are advanced maternal age, obesity, abnormal weight gain in pregnancy, first-degree relative with T2DM, a history of GDM, macrocosmia (newborn > 4 kg), perinatal complications, and polycystic ovary syndrome [5]. Although screening women with low GDM risk may not be cost-effective, these women represent a small percentage; thus, identifying and excluding them from screening may add unnecessary complexity to the screening process [6]. Therefore, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends universal GDM screening starting from the 24th gestational week [7].
Early glucose screening must be performed on all pregnant women during the first antenatal visit by measuring fasting glucose in venous blood to identify GDM and pre-existing T2DM. Under normal conditions, fasting glucose values do not exceed 92 mg/dl; if they are between 92 and 125 mg/dl, a diagnosis of GDM is made. If they exceed 125 mg/dl (a confirmatory test is needed the following day), overt T2DM is diagnosed [2]. In pregnant women with normal fasting glucose concentrations at first antenatal screening, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is performed between the 24th–28th gestational week [5, 8].
GDM screening in asymptomatic pregnancies consists of a 2-step or 1-step approach at the 24th–28th gestational week. According to the 2-step approach, widely used in the United States, venous glucose concentrations are measured 1 h after a 50 g oral glucose administration without regard to the time of day or previous meals. Glucose concentrations that meet or exceed the institutional screening threshold imply women at high risk of GDM, who demand further testing. The second step is a 100 g, 3 h OGTT: 100 g of glucose are given in the morning after an 8 h overnight fasting. The diagnostic threshold of the first step varies from 130 to 140 mg/dl. The lower threshold provides higher sensitivity but results in more false-positive results compared with the 140 mg/dl threshold; therefore, it should be considered in populations with higher GDM prevalence. Different glucose thresholds have been proposed for the second step [9, 10]: Carpenter and Coustan or National Diabetes Data Group sets can be applied.
According to the 1-step approach, all pregnant women undergo a 75 g 2 h OGTT. A diet rich in carbohydrates (minimum of 180 g/day) should have been followed for three days, while OGTT should be conducted after 10 h fasting. Blood samples are collected in the fasting state, and 60 and 120 min following the glucose load. The diagnostic threshold values are 92, 180, and 153 mg/dl, respectively (Table 1). GDM is confirmed when at least one of these values is abnormal [8]. There is no consensus among national and international organizations regarding the optimal diagnostic approach; the choice is usually based on local clinical practices. Nevertheless, the 1-step approach is usually preferred and applied, since it is more cost-effective and simplifies the screening process [11]. Although glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reflects the average blood glucose concentrations, it is not an accurate index during pregnancy, and has no strong correlation with the risk of complications [12].
Management of gestational diabetes mellitus
Appropriate management of hyperglycemia during pregnancy reduces maternal and fetal complications. According to American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines, therapeutic options for GDM are dietary changes, physical exercise, and insulin therapy [13]. Notably, metformin is not recommended as a first-line agent by ADA. On the contrary, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend using metformin as a first-line agent in women whose diabetes is not adequately controlled by diet, before the institution of insulin therapy [14].
The first therapeutic step is conservative, based on mild exercise, such as walking for at least 30 min/day, unless contraindicated, together with a low-glycemic diet, consisting of three main meals and three snacks. The total caloric intake starts from 1800 kcal/day, consisting of 35–45% carbohydrates, 20–25% proteins, and 30–40% fat. Women diagnosed with GDM are advised to perform self-measurements of fasting (target < 95 mg/dl) and postprandial (target < 140 mg/dl) capillary glucose concentrations. Postprandial blood glucose should be monitored 1 h after starting a meal [5].
Findings from fetal ultrasound regarding fetal estimated weight, abdominal circumference, and amniotic fluid contribute to the decision-making. In more detail, insulin therapy initiation is recommended if 10–20% or more of glucose concentrations are abnormal after two weeks of appropriate diet and exercise. Ultrasound findings suggesting fetal macrosomia or increased amniotic fluid indicate the need for insulin initiation. In women with elevated fasting and postprandial glucose concentrations, the recommended starting total dosage is 0.7–1.0 units/kg/day, administered by multiple injections combining long- or intermediate-acting and short-acting insulin. When hyperglycemia occurs at a specific time, insulin administration should target to correct those values. NPH, detemir, regular, lispro, aspart and insulin degludec (recently approved) are safe to use during pregnancy [8, 15]. Post-partum insulin is discontinued in case of GDM, and women are encouraged to breastfeed. Women with a GDM history have a nearly 10-fold higher risk of T2DM compared with those with a normoglycemic pregnancy [16]. Therefore, it is recommended to perform a 75 g OGTT three months post-delivery. If the results are normal, the OGTT should be repeated in one year and, after that, every three years [8].
Oral and non-insulin injectable anti-diabetic agents are generally contradicted as they cross the placenta. Metformin crosses the placenta to the fetus [17], and its concentrations are similar to or higher than those in the pregnant woman; as a result, some safety issues remain [18]. In more detail, metformin may act as an endocrine disruptor, affecting the expression of gonad-related genes [19]. Metformin may also inhibit mitochondrial activity and result in nutrient restriction, negatively affecting the function, growth, or differentiation of fetal or placental tissues [20]. Mild nutrient prenatal restriction accompanied by nutrient excess in childhood may predispose an increased risk of obesity. Notably, metformin exposure during pregnancy results in higher BMI (body mass index), waist-to-height ratio, and waist circumference, as well as borderline increased fat mass in the offspring compared with insulin exposure [21,22,23]. Furthermore, metformin offers inadequate glycemic control for the treatment of GDM compared with insulin [24, 25].
ADA guidelines do not recommend metformin as a first-line agent during pregnancy [13], as its long-term safety for the offspring is unknown. The latter remains to be evaluated by studies in adults exposed to metformin in utero [19]. Metformin should be discontinued by the end of the first trimester, when used to treat polycystic ovary syndrome and induce ovulation [19], since it does not reduce the risk of spontaneous abortion or GDM in high-risk women with obesity, pre-existing insulin resistance or polycystic ovary syndrome [26, 27].
Nevertheless, metformin can be used to treat GDM under specific circumstances. As it crosses the placenta, metformin improves glucose levels and insulin resistance in the fetus, leading to a reduced risk of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants, neonatal hypoglycemia, respiratory distress syndrome and pregnancy loss [28]. The use of metformin during pregnancy has been associated with a reduced risk of neonatal hypoglycemia and maternal weight gain [29,30,31]. Metformin reduces maternal and neonatal hypoglycemia, and admissions in newborn intensive care unit compared with insulin [32]. Moreover, a recent systematic review and a meta-analysis indicated that metformin during pregnancy is strongly correlated with a lower maternal weight (mean difference −1.14 kg, 95% CI −2.22 to −0.06), though shorter gestational age at delivery (mean difference −0.16 weeks, 95% CI −0.30 to −0.02) compared with insulin [29]. Furthermore, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial demonstrated that metformin as add-on therapy in insulin-resistant pregnant women led to improved glycemic control and a significant reduction in gestational gain weight, fewer cesarean births and lower insulin requirements compared with placebo [33]. Additionally, infants of mothers taking metformin weighed less, were less likely to be extremely LGA, to weigh 4000 g or more at birth, and displayed decreased adipose and fat mass. On the other hand, metformin can decrease the risk of pre-eclampsia. According to a systematic review and meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials, metformin use during pregnancy is strongly associated with a reduced risk of preeclampsia (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48–0.95; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%] compared with insulin [34].
According to NICE guidelines, women with diabetes may be advised to use metformin as an adjunct or alternative to insulin during pregnancy, when the likely benefits from improved blood glucose control outweigh the potential for harm [14]. Likewise, according to the ADA recommendations, metformin can be offered as an alternative option in women with GDM, who may not be able to use insulin safely and effectively, due to cost, language barriers and unwillingness for an injectable therapy, after discussion of the known risks and proper counseling [13]. Nevertheless, metformin should be avoided in women with hypertension or preeclampsia or at high risk for intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) due to the potential for growth restriction or acidosis in the background of placental insufficiency [35]. Understanding the risks and benefits of metformin on maternal and fetal health will help clinicians to advise and manage women with GDM properly.
Women with PGDM should replace oral medication with insulin, while type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) requires initiation of insulin suitable for pregnancy or implementation of an insulin pump. As insulin resistance increases during the second trimester, the adaptation of insulin doses is important. General recommendations for women with PGDM are similar to those with GDM. However, glycemic targets are slightly different: ≤100 in the fasting state, ≤130 at 60 min postprandially, and ≤140 mg/dl at 120 min) [1, 36]. Contaminant medication, such as statins, should be interrupted during gestation, even if dyslipidemia is present, while only safe for pregnancy anti-hypertensive agents should be used to avoid adverse fetal outcomes (Fig. 1).
Thyroid disorders
Pathophysiology
Thyroid hormones are important in early embryogenesis for fetal brain development, embryo growth, and tissue differentiation. The fetal thyroid gland begins to form during the 4th gestational week, but it does not function until the second trimester. Maternal thyroxine still accounts for 30% of fetal serum thyroxine at term [37, 38].
During pregnancy, physiological hormonal changes and increased metabolic needs result in alterations in thyroid physiology [increased estrogen and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) concentrations, placenta development, increase in plasma volume and renal clearance]. Increased estrogens lead to an elevated hepatic production of serum thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG), which reaches a plateau during the 20th week. As a result, gradually higher total triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) serum concentrations are observed up to the 20th week (1.5 of threshold) [39]. Moreover, hCG, which has structural similarities to thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), stimulates TSH receptors, leading to elevated thyroid hormone production and reduced serum TSH concentrations via negative feedback. Therefore, TSH is completely suppressed in 20% of pregnant women, while another 2% may develop temporary hyperthyroxinemia. Furthermore, the development of the placenta, which results in the degradation of T3 and T4, the increase in plasma volume, and the increase in renal clearance, leads to elevated T4 production (50% approximately) and a similar increase in total daily iodine requirements. Thyroid hormones are converted into active forms (T4 to T3) via deiodinase, whose concentration and activity are upregulated by the placenta [37]. The thyroid gland is enlarged, especially if there is iodine deficiency [38]. These pathophysiological changes may lead to gestation-induced thyroid disorders or deregulation of pre-existing thyroid dysfunction.
Screening for thyroid function
There is no consensus on whether universal thyroid function screening during pregnancy should be performed. American Thyroid Association (ATA) and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) suggest that screening should be offered in high-risk subgroups, such as those with a history of thyroid dysfunction, infertility, head/neck radiation, obesity or clinical suspicion of thyroid disease [37, 40].
TSH is the gold standard test to screen for thyroid function in pregnant women. Due to the physiologic changes in thyroid hormone concentrations during pregnancy, a trimester-specific reference range is necessary. TSH concentrations may be misleading during the first trimester, but they are accurate in the following two. Trimester-specific TSH thresholds are: first trimester 0.1–2.5 mU/l, second trimester 0.2–3.0 mU/l [Endocrine Society, ATA, European Thyroid Association (ETA)] and third trimester 0.3–3.0 mU/l (Endocrine Society, ATA) or 0.2–3.5 mU/l (ETA) (Table 2). In case of abnormal TSH concentrations, thyroid hormones should be measured to diagnose overt thyroid dysfunction. Free thyroid hormones are preferred to total, since the latter depend largely on the TBG concentration [41]. However, when investigating hyperthyroidism, total T3 is preferred over fT3 [42]. In euthyroid women, routine testing for autoantibodies to thyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) and thyroglobulin (anti-Tg) is not recommended.
Hypothyroidism
Primary overt maternal hypothyroidism is defined as the presence of an elevated TSH and a decreased serum fT4 concentration during pregnancy. Subclinical hypothyroidism is defined by fT4 concentrations within the reference range. Inversely, isolated hypothyroxinemia is defined as low fT4 concentrations accompanied by normal TSH concentrations [37].
Subclinical hypothyroidism (TSH > 4 mU/l) has a prevalence of 2–3% among pregnant women, while 0.3–0.5% present with overt hypothyroidism [38]. Up to 15% of pregnant women may develop TSH concentrations above 2.5 mU/l. The most common causes of overt hypothyroidism are iodine deficiency, worldwide, and chronic autoimmune thyroiditis (Hashimoto thyroiditis) in the developed world. Most women remain asymptomatic; however, some present with fatigue, constipation, weight gain, and cold intolerance [37]. Untreated overt hypothyroidism is a risk factor for miscarriage, preeclampsia, GDM, placental abruption and preterm labor, whereas subclinical hypothyroidism has been associated with fewer adverse pregnancy outcomes [38].
Management of hypothyroidism
Replacement therapy with levothyroxine (LT4) should be given to pregnant women with overt hypothyroidism to reduce the risk of maternal and fetal complications. If TSH does not exceed threshold values, LT4 replacement is generally contradicted in pregnant women with positive anti-TPO or anti-Tg. Full replacement therapy is achieved with LT4 at 1.1 μg/kg/day. LT4 dosage should be adapted to reach and maintain serum trimester-specific TSH concentrations [40]. Thyroid function tests should be repeated every 4–6 weeks. If hypothyroidism has been diagnosed before pregnancy, adjusting the preconception daily LT4 dose is suggested: most women require a 25–30% increase in dosage after the 5th–6th gestational week [41]. Postpartum, some women decrease the T4 dosage to the preconception level, while 75% may quit LT4 [41].
LT4 treatment for subclinical hypothyroidism among pregnant women remains controversial. LT4 therapy is associated with a reduced risk of pregnancy loss among pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism [43, 44]. However, subgroup analysis indicated that the benefit of treatment on pregnancy was only observed in women with a TSH above 4.0 mU/l at baseline [44]. Similarly, LT4 treatment for pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism (TSH > 4.0 mU/l) at the first prenatal visit with or without TPO-antibody positivity leads to a significant reduction in preterm birth [45, 46]. A meta-analysis indicated a decreased risk of pregnancy loss (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66–0.94) and increased risk of preterm labor (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.14–2.91) in women with subclinical hypothyroidism treated with LT4, leading to debates regarding the treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy [47]. The heterogeneity of results is attributed to differences in LT4 doses, the timing of treatment initiation, and definitions of subclinical hypothyroidism in each study. As a result, the Endocrine Society (US) recommends treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism irrespective of anti-TPO status [36]. On the other hand, ATA guidelines suggest that LT4 therapy may be considered for anti-TPO positive women with TSH concentrations >2.5 mU/l and below the upper limit of the pregnancy-specific reference range or for anti-TPO negative women with TSH > 10 mU/l [48]. However, this recommendation remains weak.
Hyperthyroidism
Subclinical hyperthyroidism is defined by decreased serum TSH concentration and normal fT4 concentrations. With a 1–2% prevalence, subclinical hyperthyroidism has not been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes [49, 50]. On the other hand, overt hyperthyroidism, defined as decreased TSH and increased fT4 concentrations, is rare during pregnancy (0.2–0.7%); Grave’s disease is the cause of 95% of these cases [49]. Considering the changes in thyroid function during gestation, low TSH and high fT4 and fT3 concentrations are well-tolerated, especially during the first trimester. Hyperthyroidism symptoms include palpitations, diaphoresis, heat intolerance, and weight loss [48]. Untreated overt hyperthyroidism is a risk factor for preeclampsia, maternal heart failure and thyroid storm, fetal thyrotoxicosis, preterm birth, low birth weight, miscarriage, and stillbirth [51, 52].
A low serum TSH concentration during gestation could be the outcome of physiological gestational hormonal changes or indicate hyperthyroidism. Suggestive of the latter is the clinical evidence of autoimmunity or thyroid receptor antibodies [TRAb or thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins (TSI)] or a goiter. TRAb should be measured between the 24th and 28th gestational week in pregnant women with a neonate with hyperthyroidism, a history of Graves’ disease or current Graves’ disease, thyroidectomy before pregnancy, treatment with 131I due to hyperthyroidism, or fetal tachycardia accompanied by goiter IUGR [39]. In patients with Graves’ disease, TRAb and TSI may indicate those at higher risk for fetal and maternal complications [40]. As a result, a high index of clinical suspicion is necessary for early detection. Thyroid scan with 99mTc is contradicted during pregnancy. When thyrotoxicosis concerns T3, total T3 concentrations should be monitored as an index of thyroid function [48].
Management of hyperthyroidism
Treatment of hyperthyroidism due to Graves’ disease or toxic thyroid nodules involves anti-thyroid drugs (ATDs) and aims to regulate the symptoms and maintain maternal fT4 concentrations in the upper limit of normal. Thionamide ATDs [methimazole (MMI), carbimazole (CBZ), propylthiouracil (PTU)] can be used during pregnancy. Treatment with the lowest effective dose aims to maintain fT4 concentrations within the high-normal range, regardless of TSH concentrations, to avoid fetal hypothyroidism. In case of pre-existing or newly diagnosed hyperthyroidism demanding therapy during pregnancy, PTU and MMI are recommended during the first and second/third trimester, respectively.
MMI and PTU may have adverse effects on the gravida [41]. MMI has been associated with potential teratogenic effects, such as aplasia cutis and other congenital malformations, since it crosses the placenta [53]. As a result, MMI should be avoided during the first trimester. A woman on ATDs for Grave’s disease, currently euthyroid, could attempt to discontinue therapy and monitor the thyroid function closely during the first trimester. Especially during the 6th–10th gestational weeks, when ATDs have the greatest teratogenic effect, drug suspension could be recommended. However, if this is not possible, PTU is considered the first-line agent during the first trimester, whereas MMI is preferred in the second and third trimesters. If a patient has a severe adverse reaction or is non-adherent to ATDs and has uncontrolled hyperthyroidism, thyroidectomy is recommended, optimally in the second trimester [41, 48]. In the rare case of fetal hyperthyroidism, MMI, PTU, and CBZ effectively cross the placenta; therefore, ATDs for maternal hyperthyroidism also modulate fetal thyroid function [48]. Notably, the effect of ATDs is more potent in the fetus than in the mother [54]. To avoid deleterious fetal complications, the aim is to maintain maternal fT4 concentrations at or just above the pregnancy-specific upper normal limit, using the lowest effective dose of ATDs [54].
Postpartum thyroiditis
Of pregnant women with positive anti-TPOs or anti-TGs, 4–10% will develop autoimmune post-partum thyroiditis within the first year after delivery [41]. It is characterized by temporary hyperthyroidism due to the destruction of thyroid parenchyma, followed by hypothyroidism, presenting mild, non-specific symptoms. The diagnosis is based on new-onset TSH and fT4 concentrations outside the normal range. This state should be distinguished from Graves’ disease, which demands therapy with ATDs [41]. Most commonly, transient postpartum thyroiditis will resolve spontaneously; after transient hypothyroidism, euthyroidism will be restored. However, in one-third of affected women, thyroiditis will persist and evolve into permanent, overt hypothyroidism, which may demand LT4 replacement.
Vitamin D and calcium metabolism disorders
Pathophysiology
Vitamin D, produced in the skin by direct exposure to ultraviolet B radiation or received through fortified food intake, undergoes hydroxylation to form the active 125(OH)2D, regulating calcium homeostasis and bone health. The active vitamin D promotes calcium and phosphorus intestinal absorption and deposition to the bones, and reduces their renal clearance [55]. Increased calcium demands during gestation are met through increased absorption and mobilization from the skeleton, while renal absorption remains unchanged [56]. Calcium metabolism during pregnancy aims to satisfy the needs of the developing fetus, such as the mineralization of the skeleton, through the active transfer of calcium across the placenta [56]. During the third trimester, 80% of calcium transfer occurs via the placenta. Biomarkers of bone absorption (NTx, CTx) and production (P1NP, bALP) are increased during the first and third trimester of pregnancy, respectively; an increase in 1,25(OH)2D is also observed. Parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), secreted by the mammary gland, placenta, and myometrium, facilitates calcium transfer via the placenta. PTHrP activates the PTH/PTHrP receptor and induces 1α-hydroxylation to produce the active form of vitamin D.
Vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preeclampsia, GDM, low birth weight and preterm birth [57]. Vitamin D deficiency is very prevalent among pregnant women, especially in populations with risk factors such as darker skin, limited sun exposure due to residing in cold climates and northern regions or wearing protective garments, and vegetarians [58, 59]. Thus, early detection of calcium metabolism disorders is important to prevent serious maternal and fetal complications.
Hypovitaminosis D
25(OH)D serum concentrations can be used as an index of vitamin D status in pregnant women. There is no consensus on the threshold that indicates deficiency. Recent evidence suggests that 25(OH)D concentrations should be maintained above 30 ng/ml to avoid pregnancy outcomes [60]. Vitamin D deficiency in pregnant and lactating women should be managed with up to 4000 IU of vitamin D3 daily [61, 62]. Consumption of low-fat dairy foods for sufficient calcium intake is advised. Calcium supplementation in doses of 500–1000 mg daily is recommended, especially during the second and third trimesters, considering the increased need for calcium during this period. High-dose calcium supplementation (≥1 g/day) is recommended for women at high risk of gestational hypertension in areas with low calcium intake [63].
Increased calcium needs occur during lactation, as calcium is transferred via breast milk. Increased bone and renal reabsorption but not elevated intestinal adsorption during pregnancy are the main mechanisms for maintaining calcium homeostasis during lactation. The strongest regulators are increased PTHrP concentrations secreted by the mammary gland and reduced estradiol concentrations due to hyperprolactinemia. Even one year after terminating breastfeeding may be required to achieve a positive balance in calcium metabolism. Subsequently, calcium supplementation in doses of 500–1000 mg daily is recommended during lactation; 25(OH)D concentrations should be maintained above 30 ng/ml.
Primary hyperparathyroidism
Parathyroid gland disorders are rarely seen during pregnancy and lactation. Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) resulting in clinical hypercalcemia is mainly due to single adenoma, less commonly to hyperplasia and rarely to malignancy. PHPT has been associated with maternal and fetal complications, such as hypercalcemic crisis, preeclampsia, hypertension, IUGR, low birth weight, preterm birth, stillbirth, and increased perinatal death rates (up to 30%). Most affected pregnant women present with nausea, vomiting, weight loss, anorexia, weakness, and fatigue. Other symptoms include headaches, lethargy, agitation, and confusion. Nephrolithiasis, bone disease, acute pancreatitis and new-onset hypertension can also be present; less than 25% of patients are asymptomatic [64].
Considering the normal decrease in calcium concentrations during pregnancy, diagnosis of hypercalcemia and PHPT is usually delayed and based on persistently increased serum calcium (>9.5 mg/dl) and increased PTH concentrations. Increased 24 h urinary calcium excretion can be an indicator for screening for PHPT. Close monitoring, hydration and avoidance of medications that could elevate calcium constitute the recommended management for asymptomatic pregnant women with serum calcium concentrations <1 mg above the normal range. In symptomatic patients with complications and persistent hypercalcemia, surgical removal is recommended during the second trimester [56], while surgical options should be offered in asymptomatic women post-partum, before the next pregnancy.
Hypoparathyroidism
Hypoparathyroidism is caused by damage or removal of parathyroid glands after thyroid surgery; other rare causes are idiopathic and autoimmunity. The resulting hypocalcemia leads to a further drop in maternal calcium concentrations during pregnancy. Thus, it can be detrimental to fetal skeletal development, leading to intrauterine death. Maternal manifestations of hypocalcemia, such as muscle tension, paresthesia, and tetany, have been reported during pregnancy [64, 65].
Diagnosis of hypoparathyroidism is based on persistently low PTH and calcium accompanied by high serum phosphate concentrations. Severe hypocalcemia symptoms include paresthesia, carpopedal spasm, stridor, dyspnea, and seizures. Chvostek and Trousseau signs may be present [64]. Treatment of hypoparathyroidism is based on calcium and vitamin D supplementation, aiming to achieve low-normal concentrations of serum ionized calcium concentration or calcium corrected for albumin [65]. The most used combination is high-dose calcium supplementation (1–2 g/day) with calcitriol (1–3 μg/day). Vitamin D (cholecalciferol) can also be used in a weekly dose of 50,000–150,000 IU [64].
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis is a rare clinical condition during pregnancy or lactation. It is observed among women with major risk factors or secondary osteoporosis. A rare type of osteoporosis associated with pregnancy should be mentioned. It is a temporary condition, usually located in the hip during the third trimester of pregnancy. The main symptoms are unilateral or bilateral hip pain, dystrophy, limited mobility, difficulty in walking and hip fracture. It is attributed to local malfunction factors, such as vascular congestion, nerve compression, and sympathetic system dysfunction; it is usually self-limited.
Conclusions
Endocrine disorders are among the most prevalent pregnancy complications with possible adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. If diagnosed early in pregnancy, they can be treated timely, avoiding further adverse outcomes. To offer appropriate maternal care and prevent severe complications, global and national health organizations have proposed screening and management guidelines. Clinicians should be aware of possible glucose metabolism, thyroid, calcium and vitamin D disorders during pregnancy and their optimal management.
References
A. Ornoy, M. Becker, L. Weinstein-Fudim, Z. Ergaz, Diabetes during Pregnancy: A Maternal Disease Complicating the Course of Pregnancy with Long-Term Deleterious Effects on the Offspring. A Clinical Review. Int J. Mol. Sci. 22, 2965 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22062965
M. Lende, A. Rijhsinghani, Gestational Diabetes: Overview with Emphasis on Medical Management. Int J. Environ. Res Pub. Health. 17, 9573 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249573
Parrettini S., Caroli A., Torlone E. Nutrition and Metabolic Adaptations in Physiological and Complicated Pregnancy: Focus on Obesity and Gestational Diabetes. Front Endocrinol. (Lausanne).11, (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.611929
E.U. Alejandro, T.P. Mamerto, G. Chung, A. Villavieja, N.L. Gaus, E. Morgan et al. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Harbinger of the Vicious Cycle of Diabetes. Int J. Mol. Sci. 21, 5003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145003
S.Y. Kim, N.P. Deputy, C.L. Robbins, Diabetes During Pregnancy: Surveillance, Preconception Care, and Postpartum Care. J. Women’s Health (Larchmt.) 27, 536–541 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7052
D.R. Danilenko-Dixon, J.T. van Winter, R.L. Nelson, P.L. Ogburn, Universal versus selective gestational diabetes screening: Application of 1997 American Diabetes Association recommendations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 181, 798–802 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70304-2
V.A. Moyer, Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 160, 414–420 (2014). https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-2905
E. Anastasiou, G. Farmakidis, A. Gerede, D.G. Goulis, E. Koukkou, A. Kourtis et al. Clinical practice guidelines on diabetes mellitus and pregnancy: Ι. Pre-existing type 1 type 2 diabetes Mellit. Hormones 19, 593–600 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-020-00192-z
US Preventive Services Task Force, K.W. Davidson, M.J. Barry, C.M. Mangione, M. Cabana, A.B. Caughey et al. Screening for Gestational Diabetes: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 326, 531–538 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.11922
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 131, e49–e64 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501.
S. Celen, Y. Yildiz, S. Kahyaoglu, O. Kaymak, M. Ozel, H. Timur et al. Cost-effectivity analysis of one-step versus two-step screening for gestational diabetes. Eurasia. J. Med. 44, 84–87 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5152/eajm.2012.20
W. Yu, N. Wu, L. Li, H. OuYang, M. Qian, H. Shen, A Review of Research Progress on Glycemic Variability and Gestational Diabetes. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 13, 2729–2741 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S261486
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee:, B. Draznin, V.R. Aroda, G. Bakris, G. Benson et al. 15. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care 45, S232–S243 (2022). https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-S015
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): Guidelines. Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. 2020.
L. Ringholm, N.C. Do, P. Damm, E.R. Mathiesen, Pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes using insulin degludec. Acta Diabetol. 59, 721–727 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-021-01845-0
E. Vounzoulaki, K. Khunti, S.C. Abner, B.K. Tan, M.J. Davies, C.L. Gillies, Progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a known history of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 369, m1361 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1361
B. Charles, R. Norris, X. Xiao, W. Hague, Population pharmacokinetics of metformin in late pregnancy. Ther. Drug Monit. 28, 67–72 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ftd.0000184161.52573.0e
N. Lascar, J. Brown, H. Pattison, A.H. Barnett, C.J. Bailey, S. Bellary, Type 2 diabetes in adolescents and young adults. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 6, 69–80 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30186-9
S.A. Paschou, B.H.R. Wolffenbuttel, Metformin use during pregnancy: Is it really safe? J. Diabetes. 10, 984–985 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.12813
A.M. Valent, L.A. Barbour, Management of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome During Pregnancy. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 50, 57–69 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2020.10.005
J.A. Rowan, E.C. Rush, L.D. Plank, J. Lu, V. Obolonkin, S. Coat et al. Metformin in gestational diabetes: the offspring follow-up (MiG TOFU): body composition and metabolic outcomes at 7-9 years of age. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 6, e000456 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000456
L.G.E. Hanem, S. Stridsklev, P.B. Júlíusson, Ø. Salvesen, M. Roelants, S.M. Carlsen et al. Metformin Use in PCOS Pregnancies Increases the Risk of Offspring Overweight at 4 Years of Age: Follow-Up of Two RCTs. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 103, 1612–1621 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-02419
L.G.E. Hanem, Ø. Salvesen, P.B. Juliusson, S.M. Carlsen, M.C.F. Nossum, M.Ø. Vaage et al. Intrauterine metformin exposure and offspring cardiometabolic risk factors (PedMet study): a 5-10 year follow-up of the PregMet randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health. 3, 166–174 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30385-7
J.A. Rowan, W.M. Hague, W. Gao, M.R. Battin, M.P. Moore; MiG Trial Investigators, Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 2003–2015 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0707193
J. Gui, Q. Liu, L. Feng, Metformin vs insulin in the management of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 8, e64585 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064585
E. Vanky, S. Stridsklev, R. Heimstad, P. Romundstad, K. Skogøy, O. Kleggetveit et al. Metformin versus placebo from first trimester to delivery in polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, controlled multicenter study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 95, E448–E455 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-0853
S.A.R. Doi, L. Furuya-Kanamori, E. Toft, O.A.H. Musa, N. Islam, J. Clark et al. Metformin in pregnancy to avert gestational diabetes in women at high risk: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes. Rev. 21, e12964 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12964
S. Butalia, L. Gutierrez, A. Lodha, E. Aitken, A. Zakariasen, L. Donovan, Short- and long-term outcomes of metformin compared with insulin alone in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet. Med. 34, 27–36 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13150
M. Balsells, A. García-Patterson, I. Solà, M. Roqué, I. Gich, R. Corcoy, Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 350, h102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h102
Z. Nachum, N. Zafran, R. Salim, N. Hissin, J. Hasanein, Y. Gam Ze Letova et al. Glyburide Versus Metformin and Their Combination for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Study. Diabetes Care. 40, 332–337 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2307
Y.-F. Jiang, X.-Y. Chen, T. Ding, X.-F. Wang, Z.-N. Zhu, S.-W. Su, Comparative efficacy and safety of OADs in management of GDM: network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 100, 2071–2080 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-4403
M.I. Ibrahim, A. Hamdy, A. Shafik, S. Taha, M. Anwar, M. Faris, The role of adding metformin in insulin-resistant diabetic pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 289, 959–965 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-3090-7
D.S. Feig, L.E. Donovan, B. Zinman, J.J. Sanchez, E. Asztalos, E.A. Ryan et al. Metformin in women with type 2 diabetes in pregnancy (MiTy): a multicentre, international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 8, 834–844 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30310-7
A. Alqudah, M.C. McKinley, R. McNally, U. Graham, C.J. Watson, T.J. Lyons et al. Risk of pre-eclampsia in women taking metformin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet. Med. 35, 160–172 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13523
L.A. Barbour, D.S. Feig, Metformin for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Progeny, Perspective, and a Personalized Approach. Diabetes Care. 42, 396–399 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2337/dci18-0055
E. Anastasiou, G. Farmakidis, A. Gerede, D.G. Goulis, E. Koukkou, A. Kourtis et al. Clinical practice guidelines on diabetes mellitus and pregnancy: ΙI. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Hormones (Athens) 19, 601–607 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-020-00193-y
S. Anandappa, M. Joshi, L. Polanski, P.V. Carroll, Thyroid disorders in subfertility and early pregnancy. Ther. Adv. Endocrinol. Metab. 11, 204201882094585 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042018820945855
S.L. Andersen, S. Andersen, Turning to Thyroid Disease in Pregnant Women. Eur. Thyroid J. 9, 225–233 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1159/000506228
K. Poppe, MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Thyroid and female infertility: more questions than answers?! Eur. J. Endocrinol. 184, R123–R135 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-1284
ACOG Practice Bulletin, Thyroid Disease in Pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 135, e261–e274 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003893.
L. De Groot, M. Abalovich, E.K. Alexander, N. Amino, L. Barbour, R.H. Cobin et al. Management of Thyroid Dysfunction during Pregnancy and Postpartum: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97, 2543–2565 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1210/JC.2011-2803
D.S. Ross, H.B. Burch, D.S. Cooper, M.C. Greenlee, P. Laurberg, A.L. Maia et al. 2016 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid 26, 1343–1421 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1089/THY.2016.0229
S. Maraka, N.M. Singh Ospina, D.T. O’Keeffe, R. Rodriguez-Gutierrez, A.E. Espinosa De Ycaza, C.-I. Wi et al. Effects of Levothyroxine Therapy on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Subclinical Hypothyroidism. Thyroid 26, 980–986 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2016.0014
S. Maraka, R. Mwangi, R.G. McCoy, X. Yao, L.R. Sangaralingham, N.M. Singh Ospina et al. Thyroid hormone treatment among pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism: US national assessment. BMJ 356, i6865 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6865
S. Nazarpour, F. Ramezani Tehrani, M. Simbar, M. Tohidi, S. Minooee, M. Rahmati et al. Effects of Levothyroxine on Pregnant Women With Subclinical Hypothyroidism, Negative for Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 103, 926–935 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-01850
S. Nazarpour, F. Ramezani Tehrani, M. Simbar, M. Tohidi, H. Alavi Majd, F. Azizi, Effects of levothyroxine treatment on pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with autoimmune thyroid disease. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 176, 253–265 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-0548
S. Nazarpour, F. Ramezani Tehrani, M. Amiri, R. Bidhendi Yarandi, F. Azizi, Levothyroxine treatment and pregnancy outcomes in women with subclinical hypothyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 300, 805–819 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05245-2
E.K. Alexander, E.N. Pearce, G.A. Brent, R.S. Brown, H. Chen, C. Dosiou et al. 2017 Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Disease During Pregnancy and the Postpartum. Thyroid 27, 315–389 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2016.0457
A.C. Dong, A. Stagnaro-Green, Differences in Diagnostic Criteria Mask the True Prevalence of Thyroid Disease in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Thyroid 29, 278–289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1089/THY.2018.0475
B.M. Casey, J.S. Dashe, C.E. Wells, D.D. McIntire, K.J. Leveno, F.G. Cunningham, Subclinical Hyperthyroidism and Pregnancy Outcomes. Obstet. Gynecol. 107, 337–341 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000197991.64246.9a
P. Harn-A-morn, P. Dejkhamron, T. Tongsong, S. Luewan Pregnancy Outcomes among Women with Graves’ Hyperthyroidism: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM10194495
S. Turunen, M. Vääräsmäki, A.M. Lahesmaa-Korpinen, M.K. Leinonen, M. Gissler, T. Männistö et al. Maternal hyperthyroidism and pregnancy outcomes: A population-based cohort study. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 93, 721–728 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/CEN.14282
S.L. Andersen, J. Olsen, P. Laurberg, Antithyroid Drug Side Effects in the Population and in Pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 101, 1606–1614 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1210/JC.2015-4274
N. Momotani, J.Y. Noh, N. Ishikawa, K. Ito, Effects of propylthiouracil and methimazole on fetal thyroid status in mothers with Graves’ hyperthyroidism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82, 3633–3636 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.82.11.4347
B. Schröder-Heurich, C.J.P. Springer, F. von Versen-Höynck, Vitamin D Effects on the Immune System from Periconception through Pregnancy. Nutrients 12, 1432 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12051432
C.S. Kovacs, Calcium and Bone Metabolism Disorders During Pregnancy and Lactation. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 40, 795–826 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2011.08.002
S. Agarwal, O. Kovilam, D.K. Agrawal, Vitamin D and its impact on maternal-fetal outcomes in pregnancy: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 58, 755 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1220915
C. Palacios, L. Gonzalez, Is vitamin D deficiency a major global public health problem? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 144PA,138 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSBMB.2013.11.003.
L.M. Bodnar, H.N. Simhan, R.W. Powers, M.P. Frank, E. Cooperstein, J.M. Roberts, High prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in black and white pregnant women residing in the northern United States and their neonates. J. Nutr. 137, 447–452 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/JN/137.2.447
B.W. Hollis, Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels indicative of vitamin D sufficiency: implications for establishing a new effective dietary intake recommendation for vitamin D. J. Nutr. 135, 317–322 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/JN/135.2.317
M.F. Holick, N.C. Binkley, H.A. Bischoff-Ferrari, C.M. Gordon, D.A. Hanley, R.P. Heaney et al. Evaluation, Treatment, and Prevention of Vitamin D Deficiency: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96, 1911–1930 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1210/JC.2011-0385
Vitamin D: Screening and Supplementation During Pregnancy | ACOG n.d. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2011/07/vitamin-d-screening-and-supplementation-during-pregnancy# (Accessed January 17, 2022).
WHO, Guideline: Calcium Supplementation in Pregnant Women. World Health Organ. 70, 1–35 (2013)
S.A. Sullivan, Parathyroid Diseases. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 62, 347–358 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000447
D.S. Ali, K. Dandurand, A.A. Khan, Hypoparathyroidism in Pregnancy and Lactation: Current Approach to Diagnosis and Management. J. Clin. Med. 10, 1378 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071378
Funding
Open access funding provided by HEAL-Link Greece.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Paschou, S.A., Bletsa, E., Papazisi, M. et al. Screening and management of major endocrinopathies during pregnancy: an update. Endocrine 80, 10–19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03237-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03237-y