Skip to main content
Log in

“The past is a different country, they do things differently there”: using the SEER data-base to assess prognosis in neuroendocrine tumours

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are still considered to be rare neoplasms, and their epidemiology has been classically studied in large population-based cancer registries. Besides the benefits and the limitations that a cancer registry may have for all the registered cancers, the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Programme, has a number of drawbacks for the study of NENs. The change in management of NENs, either from diagnostic or from therapeutic points of view, the role of the Ki-67 labelling index and introduction of sensitive functional imaging, along with the misclassification of the more benign types of NENs, are the main limitations of the prognostic ability of the SEER data-base, particularly when including older data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Trama, Epidemiology of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. In: G. Beretta, A. Berruti, E. Bombardieri, N. Fazio, O. Goletti, (eds.) Neuroendocrine Neoplasia Management. Springer, Cham (2021)

  2. J.C. Yao, M. Hassan, A. Phan, C. Dagohoy, C. Leary, J.E. Mares, E.K. Abdalla, J.B. Fleming, J.N. Vauthey, A. Rashid, D.B. Evans, One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 3063–3072 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Dasari, C. Shen, D. Halperin, B. Zhao, S. Zhou, Y. Xu, T. Shih, J.C. Yao, Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA. Oncol. 3, 1335–1342 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Z. Xu, L. Wang, S. Dai, M. Chen, F. Li, J. Sun, F. Luo, Epidemiologic trends of and factors associated with overall survival for patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA. Netw. Open. 4, e2124750 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Günther, G. Tulipano, P. Dournaud, C. Bousquet, Z. Csaba, H.J. Kreienkamp, A. Lupp, M. Korbonits, J.P. Castaño, H.J. Wester, M. Culler, S. Melmed, S. Schulz, International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature. Pharmacol. Rev. 70, 763–835 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Bajetta, D. De Toma, A. Antonucci, R. Bajetta, M. Valente, History of Neuroendocrine Neoplasia. In: G. Beretta, A. Berruti, E. Bombardieri, N. Fazio, O. Goletti, (eds) Neuroendocrine Neoplasia Management. Springer, Cham. (2021)

  7. E. Merola, M.E. Pavel, F. Panzuto, G. Capurso, N. Cicchese, A. Rinke, T.M. Gress, E. Iannicelli, D. Prosperi, P. Pizzichini, V. Prasad, P. Kump, R. Lipp, S. Partelli, M. Falconi, B. Wiedenmann, G. Delle Fave, Functional imaging in the follow-up of enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: clinical usefulness and indications. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 102, 1486–1494 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V. Prasad, V. Ambrosini, M. Hommann, D. Hoersch, S. Fanti, R.P. Baum, Detection of unknown primary neuroendocrine tumours (CUP-NET) using (68)Ga-DOTA-NOC receptor PET/CT. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 37, 67–77 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Cives, E. Pelle’, J. Strosberg, Emerging treatment options for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J. Clin. Med. 9, 3655 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Panzuto, L. Boninsegna, N. Fazio, D. Campana, M. Pia Brizzi, G. Capurso, A. Scarpa, F. De Braud, L. Dogliotti, P. Tomassetti, G. Delle Fave, M. Falconi, Metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic endocrine carcinomas: analysis of factors associated with disease progression. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 2372–2377 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Klöppel, S. La Rosa, Ki67 labeling index: assessment and prognostic role in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Virchows. Arch. 472, 341–349 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Daskalakis, M. Tsoli, R. Srirajaskanthan, E. Chatzellis, K. Alexandraki, A. Angelousi, M. Pizanias, H. Randeva, G. Kaltsas, M.O. Weickert, Lung metastases in patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: an appraisal of the validity of thoracic imaging surveillance. Neuroendocrinology 108, 308–316 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. K.I. Alexandraki, M. Pizanias, I. Uri, D. Thomas, T. Page, D. Kolomodi, C.S. Low, O. Adesanya, M. Tsoli, D.J. Gross, H. Randeva, R. Srirajaskanthan, S. Grozinsky-Glasberg, G. Kaltsas, M.O. Weickert, The prognosis and management of neuroendocrine neoplasms-related metastatic bone disease: lessons from clinical practice. Endocrine 64, 690–701 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. U.F. Pape, U. Berndt, J. Müller-Nordhorn, M. Böhmig, S. Roll, M. Koch, S.N. Willich, B. Wiedenmann, Prognostic factors of long-term outcome in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Endocr. Relat. Cancer. 15, 1083–1097 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K.I. Alexandraki, M. Kaltsatou, G. Kyriakopoulos, V. Mavroeidi, A. Kostopoulou, K. Atlan, S. Theocharis, G. Rindi, A.B. Grossman, S. Grozinsky-Glasberg, G.A. Kaltsas, Distinctive features of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms exhibiting an increment in proliferative activity during the course of the disease. Endocrine 72, 279–286 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. H. You, A. Kandathil, M. Beg, L. De Blanche, S. Kazmi, R.M. Subramaniam, Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT and F-18 FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of low and intermediate versus high-grade neuroendocrine tumors. Nucl. Med. Commun. 41, 1060–1065 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. D.L. Chan, G.A. Ulaner, D. Pattison, D. Wyld, R. Ladwa, J. Kirchner, B.T. Li, W.V. Lai, N. Pavlakis, P.J. Roach, D.L. Bailey, Dual PET imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker. J. Nucl. Med. 62, 1278–1284 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. K.I. Alexandraki, A. Spyroglou, S. Kykalos, K. Daskalakis, G. Kyriakopoulos, G.C. Sotiropoulos, G.A. Kaltsas, A.B. Grossman, Changing biological behaviour of NETs during the evolution of the disease: progress on progression. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 28, R121–R140 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Kyriakopoulos, V. Mavroeidi, E. Chatzellis, G.A. Kaltsas, K.I. Alexandraki, Histopathological, immunohistochemical, genetic and molecular markers of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Ann. Transl. Med. 6, 252 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Spyroglou, K. Bramis, K.I. Alexandraki, Neuroendocrine neoplasms: evolving and future treatments. Curr. Opin. Endocr. Metab. Res. 19, 15–21 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Öberg, A. Califano, J.R. Strosberg, S. Ma, U. Pape, L. Bodei, G. Kaltsas, C. Toumpanakis, J.R. Goldenring, A. Frilling, S. Paulson, A meta-analysis of the accuracy of a neuroendocrine tumor mRNA genomic biomarker (NETest) in blood. Ann. Oncol. 31, 202–212 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Tarquini, M.R. Ambrosio, M. Albertelli, P.B. de Souza, R. Gafà, I. Gagliardi, A. Carnevale, P. Franceschetti, M.C. Zatelli, A tool to predict survival in stage IV entero-pancreatic NEN. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 44, 1185–1192 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. I. Gagliardi, M. Tarquini, M.R. Ambrosio, E. Giannetta, P. Borges de Souza, R. Gafà, A. Carnevale, P. Franceschetti, M.C. Zatelli, NEP-score thresholds predict survival of patients with bronchial carcinoids. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 11, 621557 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. F. Panzuto, E. Merola, M.E. Pavel, A. Rinke, P. Kump, S. Partelli, M. Rinzivillo, V. Rodriguez-Laval, U.F. Pape, R. Lipp, T. Gress, B. Wiedenmann, M. Falconi, G. Delle Fave, Stage IV gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a risk score to predict clinical outcome. Oncologist 22, 409–415 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Pusceddu, F. Barretta, A. Trama, L. Botta, M. Milione, R. Buzzoni, F. De Braud, V. Mazzaferro, U. Pastorino, E. Seregni, L. Mariani, G. Gatta, M. Di Bartolomeo, D. Femia, N. Prinzi, J. Coppa, F. Panzuto, L. Antonuzzo, E. Bajetta, M.P. Brizzi, D. Campana, L. Catena, H. Comber, F. Dwane, N. Fazio, A. Faggiano, D. Giuffrida, K. Henau, T. Ibrahim, R. Marconcini, S. Massironi, M.P. Žakelj, F. Spada, S. Tafuto, E. Van Eycken, J.M. Van der Zwan, T. Žagar, L. Giacomelli, R. Miceli; NEPscore Working Group, A classification prognostic score to predict OS in stage IV well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr. Relat. Cancer. 25, 607–618 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Daskalakis, M. Tsoli, A. Karapanagioti, M. Chrysochoou, D. Thomas, S. Sougioultzis, I. Karoumpalis, G.A. Kaltsas, K.I. Alexandraki, Recurrence and metastatic potential in Type 1 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf). 91, 534–543 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Grozinsky-Glasberg, K.I. Alexandraki, A. Angelousi, E. Chatzellis, S. Sougioultzis, G. Kaltsas, Gastric Carcinoids. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North. Am. 47, 645–660 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. U.F. Pape, A. Perren, B. Niederle, D. Gross, T. Gress, F. Costa, R. Arnold, T. Denecke, U. Plöckinger, R. Salazar, A. Grossman; Barcelona Consensus Conference participants, ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms from the jejuno-ileum and the appendix including goblet cell carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology 95, 135–156 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Grozinsky-Glasberg, K.I. Alexandraki, D. Barak, V. Doviner, P. Reissman, G.A. Kaltsas, D.J. Gross, Current size criteria for the management of neuroendocrine tumors of the appendix: are they valid? Clinical experience and review of the literature. Neuroendocrinology. 98, 31–37 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. K.I. Alexandraki, G.A. Kaltsas, S. Grozinsky-Glasberg, E. Chatzellis, A.B. Grossman, Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms: diagnosis and management. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 23, R27–R41 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by K.I.A. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krystallenia I. Alexandraki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alexandraki, K.I., Zatelli, M.C. & Grossman, A.B. “The past is a different country, they do things differently there”: using the SEER data-base to assess prognosis in neuroendocrine tumours. Endocrine 75, 725–727 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-021-02959-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-021-02959-9

Navigation