Skip to main content
Log in

Inverse association between 1,5-anhydroglucitol and neonatal diabetic complications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A glycemic control marker to predict neonatal diabetic complications is unavailable. We aimed to examine if 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) can predict neonatal complications in women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Methods

Prospective observational study from December 2011 to August 2013. We recruited 105 women, 70 diabetic (gestational and pregestational) and 35 nondiabetic. 1,5-AG at birth was compared between the two groups.

In the diabetic group 1,5-AG, HbA1c, and fructosamine were measured before glycemic control initiation (first visit), after 4–6 weeks (second visit), and at delivery. Women were divided to poor (1,5-AG values below median at birth) and good (1,5-AG values at median and above) glycemic control groups. Mean daily glucose charts were collected. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal diabetic complications: respiratory distress, hypoglycemia, polycythemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and large for gestational age.

Results

Mean 1,5-AG in the nondiabetic group was similar to that of the diabetic group without the composite outcome and was significantly higher than in the diabetic group with the composite outcome.

The rate of the composite outcome was higher in the poor glycemic control group compared with the good glycemic control group (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.8 95% CI [1.2–12.3]). Only 1,5-AG was inversely associated with the composite outcome at all time points; the second visit was the only independent risk factor in multivariable logistic regression (OR 0.7 95% CI 0.54–0.91). The rest of the glycemic markers were not associated with neonatal composite outcome.

Conclusions

1,5-AG is inversely associated with neonatal diabetic complications and is superior to other glycemic markers in predicting those complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.M. Hedderson, A. Ferrara, D.A. Sacks, Gestational diabetes mellitus and lesser degrees of pregnancy hyperglycemia: association with increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet. Gynecol. 102(4), 850–856 (2003)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. O. Langer, D.A. Rodriguez, E.M. Xenakis et al. Intensified versus conventional management of gestational diabetes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 170(4), 1036–1046 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. C.H. Raine III, Self-monitored blood glucose: a common pitfall. Endocr. Pract. 9(2), 137–139 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Cosson, B. Baz, F. Gary et al. Poor reliability and poor adherence to self-monitoring of blood glucose are common in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and may be associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care 40(9), 1181–1186 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K.M. Dungan, 1,5-anhydroglucitol (GlycoMark) as a marker of short-term glycemic control and glycemic excursions. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 8(1), 9–19 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Hashimoto, M. Koga, Indicators of glycemic control in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnant women with diabetes mellitus. World J. Diabetes 6(8), 1045–1056 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A.G. Cahill, M.G. Tuuli, R. Colvin, W.T. Cade, G.A. Macones, Markers of glycemic control and neonatal morbidity in high-risk insulin-resistant pregnancies. Am. J. Perinatol. 33(2), 151–156 (2016)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. J.B. Buse, J.L. Freeman, S.V. Edelman, L. Jovanovic, J.B. McGill, Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol (GlycoMark): a short-term glycemic marker. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 5(3), 355–363 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Yamanouchi, Y. Tachibana, H. Akanuma et al. Origin and disposal of 1,5-anhydroglucitol, a major polyol in the human body. Am. J. Physiol. 263(2 Pt 1), E268–E273 (1992)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Yamanouchi, I. Akaoka, Y. Akanuma, H. Akanuma, E. Miyashita, Mechanism for acute reduction of 1,5-anhydroglucitol in rats treated with diabetogenic agents. Am. J. Physiol. 258(3 Pt 1), E423–E427 (1990)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Yoshioka, S. Saitoh, C. Negishi et al. Variations of 1-deoxyglucose(1,5-anhydroglucitol) content in plasma from patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Clin. Chem. 29(7), 1396–1398 (1983)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Akanuma, K. Ogawa, Y. Lee, Y. Akanuma, Reduced levels of plasma 1,5-anhydroglucitol in diabetic patients. J. Biochem. 90(1), 157–162 (1981)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Tetsuo, T. Hamada, K. Yoshimatsu, J. Ishimatsu, T. Matsunaga, Serum levels of 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol during the normal and diabetic pregnancy and puerperium. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 69(6), 479–485 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Yamanouchi, Y. Akanuma, Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5 AG): new clinical marker for glycemic control. Diabetes Res Clin. Pract. 24, S261–S268 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S.S. Delaney, R.Y. Coley, Z. Brown, 1,5-Anhydroglucitol: a new predictor of neonatal birth weight in diabetic pregnancies. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 189, 55–58 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. L.A. Wright, I.B. Hirsch, T.A. Gooley, Z. Brown, 1,5-Anhydroglucitol and neonatal complications in pregnancy complicated by diabetes. Endocr. Pract. 21(7), 725–733 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A.B. Caughey, M. Turrentine, ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190 summary: gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet. Gynecol. 131(2), 406–408 (2018)

  18. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care 42(Suppl 1), S13–S28 (2019)

  19. M.W. Carpenter, D.R. Coustan, Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 144(7), 768–773 (1982)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 28(12), 1039–1057 (1979)

  21. O. Langer, L. Brustman, A. Anyaegbunam, R. Mazze, The significance of one abnormal glucose tolerance test value on adverse outcome in pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 157(3), 758–763 (1987)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. O. Langer, A. Anyaegbunam, L. Brustman, M. Divon, Management of women with one abnormal oral glucose tolerance test value reduces adverse outcome in pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 161(3), 593–599 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. J.T. Roeckner, L. Sanchez-Ramos, R. Jijon-Knupp, A.M. Kaunitz, Single abnormal value on 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test during pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 215(3), 287–297 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Ben Haroush, Y. Yogev, R. Chen et al. The postprandial glucose profile in the diabetic pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 191(2), 576–581 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Dollberg, Z. Haklai, F.B. Mimouni, I. Gorfein, E.S. Gordon, Birth weight standards in the live-born population in Israel. Isr. Med Assoc. J. 7(5), 311–314 (2005)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Stettler, M. Stahl, S. Allemann et al. Association of 1,5-anhydroglucitol and 2-h postprandial blood glucose in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 31(8), 1534–1535 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. K.M. Dungan, J.B. Buse, J. Largay et al. 1,5-anhydroglucitol and postprandial hyperglycemia as measured by continuous glucose monitoring system in moderately controlled patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 29(6), 1214–1219 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. N. Nowak, J. Skupien, K. Cyganek, B. Matejko, M.T. Malecki, 1,5-Anhydroglucitol as a marker of maternal glycaemic control and predictor of neonatal birthweight in pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 56(4), 709–713 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. de Veciana, C.A. Major, M.A. Morgan et al. Postprandial versus preprandial blood glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy. N. Engl. J. Med 333(19), 1237–1241 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Legacy Heritage Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enav Yefet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

All participants in the study gave signed an informed consent form.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ssupplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yefet, E., Twafra, S., Shwartz, N. et al. Inverse association between 1,5-anhydroglucitol and neonatal diabetic complications. Endocrine 66, 210–219 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-019-02058-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-019-02058-w

Keywords

Navigation