Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Toxic Effect of Bulk Copper Oxide (CuO) and CuO Nanoparticles on Human Red Blood Cells

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Destruction of red blood cell is associated with anemia and other pathological status; hence, the hemolytic effects of all chemicals and particles which come into contact with blood components must be considered. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles are potential substitutes for common material and particles, and assessment of their effect on blood components is a necessary part of their safety evaluation. High surface-to-volume ratio of nanoparticles may cause their toxic effects differ from those observed for bulk material. The aim of this study was to compare the hemolytic effects of CuO nanoparticles and bulk CuO. Red blood cells were isolated from blood of healthy subjects and hemolytic effects assayed following treatment of cells with 0.005–0.25 mM of CuO (bulk and nanoparticles) for 6 h. For assessment of other parameters, cells were incubated with 0.01, 0.05, and 0.25 mM of CuO nanoparticles and bulk CuO for 1, 2, and 3 h. Our results demonstrate that CuO nanoparticles, in particular, caused toxic hemolytic effects in concentration-dependent manner, and this effect maybe through formation of ROS, glutathione depletion, and lipid peroxidation. In conclusion, CuO nanoparticles are shown to effectively destruct human red blood cells in comparison to bulk CuO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dunphy Guzmán KA, Taylor MR, Banfield JF (2006) Environmental risks of nanotechnology: national nanotechnology initiative funding, 2000–2004. ACS Publications

    Google Scholar 

  2. Helland A, Wick P, Koehler A, Schmid K, Som C (2007) Reviewing the environmental and human health knowledge base of carbon nanotubes. Environ Health Persp 115(8):1125–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin CR (1994) Nanomaterials: a membrane-based synthetic approach. Science 266(5193):1961–1966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nel AE, Mädler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek EM, Somasundaran P et al (2009) Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano–bio interface. Nat Mater 8(7):543–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dingman J (2008) Guest commentary: nanotechnology: its impact on food safety. J Environ Health 70(6):47–50

    Google Scholar 

  6. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Persp 113(7):823–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Applerot G, Lellouche J, Lipovsky A, Nitzan Y, Lubart R, Gedanken A et al (2012) Understanding the antibacterial mechanism of CuO nanoparticles: revealing the route of induced oxidative stress. Small 8(21):3326–3337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Katsumiti A, Thorley AJ, Arostegui I, Reip P, Valsami-Jones E, Tetley TD et al (2018) Cytotoxicity and cellular mechanisms of toxicity of CuO NPs in mussel cells in vitro and comparative sensitivity with human cells. Toxicol In Vitro 48:146–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh G, Beddow J, Mee C, Maryniak L, Joyce EM, Mason TJ (2017) Cytotoxicity study of textile fabrics impregnated with CuO nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Int J Toxicol 36(6):478–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Borkow G, Gabbay J (2005) Copper as a biocidal tool. Curr med chem 12(18):2163–2175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Naika HR, Lingaraju K, Manjunath K, Kumar D, Nagaraju G, Suresh D et al (2015) Green synthesis of CuO nanoparticles using Gloriosa superba L. extract and their antibacterial activity. J Taibah Uni Sci 9(1):7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dobrovolskaia MA, Clogston JD, Neun BW, Hall JB, Patri AK, McNeil SE (2008) Method for analysis of nanoparticle hemolytic properties in vitro. Nano Lett 8(8):2180–2187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pourahmad J, Shaki F, Tanbakosazan F, Ghalandari R, Ettehadi HA, Dahaghin E (2011) Protective effects of fungal β-(1→ 3)-D-glucan against oxidative stress cytotoxicity induced by depleted uranium in isolated rat hepatocytes. Hum Exp Toxicol 30(3):173–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wasowicz W, Neve J, Peretz A (1993) Optimized steps in fluorometric determination of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances in serum: importance of extraction pH and influence of sample preservation and storage. Clin Chem 39(12):2522–2526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hissin PJ, Hilf R (1976) A fluorometric method for determination of oxidized and reduced glutathione in tissues. Anal biochem 74(1):214–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Semisch A, Ohle J, Witt B, Hartwig A (2014) Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of nano-and microparticulate copper oxide: role of solubility and intracellular bioavailability. Part Fibre Toxicol 11(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grassian VH, Adamcakova-Dodd A, Pettibone JM, O’shaughnessy PI, Thorne PS (2007) Inflammatory response of mice to manufactured titanium dioxide nanoparticles: comparison of size effects through different exposure routes. Nanotoxicology 1(3):211–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Heinlaan M, Ivask A, Blinova I, Dubourguier HC, Kahru A (2008) Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. Chemosphere 71(7):1308–1316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Karlsson HL, Cronholm P, Gustafsson J, Moller L (2008) Copper oxide nanoparticles are highly toxic: a comparison between metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Chem Res Toxicol 21(9):1726–1732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brigger I, Morizet J, Aubert G, Chacun H, Terrier-Lacombe MJ, Couvreur P et al (2002) Poly (ethylene glycol)-coated hexadecylcyanoacrylate nanospheres display a combined effect for brain tumor targeting. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 303(3):928–936

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pattan G, Kaul G (2014) Health hazards associated with nanomaterials. Toxicol Ind Health 30(6):499–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cronholm P, Karlsson HL, Hedberg J, Lowe TA, Winnberg L, Elihn K et al (2013) Intracellular uptake and toxicity of Ag and CuO nanoparticles: a comparison between nanoparticles and their corresponding metal ions. Small 9(7):970–982

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Midander K, Cronholm P, Karlsson HL, Elihn K, Möller L, Leygraf C et al (2009) Surface characteristics, copper release, and toxicity of nano-and micrometer-sized copper and copper (II) oxide particles: a cross-disciplinary study. Small 5(3):389–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Naz S, Gul A, Zia M (2019) Toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles: a review study. IET Nanobiotechnol 14(1):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahamed M, Siddiqui MA, Akhtar MJ, Ahmad I, Pant AB, Alhadlaq HA (2010) Genotoxic potential of copper oxide nanoparticles in human lung epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 396(2):578–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Karlsson HL (2010) The comet assay in nanotoxicology research. Anal Bioanal Chem 398(2):651–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lanone S, Rogerieux F, Geys J, Dupont A, Maillot-Marechal E, Boczkowski J et al (2009) Comparative toxicity of 24 manufactured nanoparticles in human alveolar epithelial and macrophage cell lines. Part Fibre Toxicol 6(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Arafa AF, Ghanem HZ, Soliman MS, Emad EM (2017) Modulation effects of quercetin against copper oxide nanoparticles-induced liver toxicity in rats. Egypt Pharm J 16(2):78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodhe Y, Skoglund S, Wallinder IO, Potácová Z, Möller L (2015) Copper-based nanoparticles induce high toxicity in leukemic HL60 cells. Toxicol In Vitro 29(7):1711–1719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jalal Pourahmad and Mohammad Hadi Zarei: Project administration, Writing–review and editing, Methodology, study conception, and design; Maryam Salami: Writing–original draft, Formal analysis, Material preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Hadi Zarei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This research was done in Shahid Beheshti University of medical science (SBMU) at faculty of pharmacy and given ethical approval by research ethic committee of SBMU. After became aware of our investigation, donors are asked to fill out the approval form.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to Publish

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of data.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pourahmad, J., Salami, M. & Zarei, M.H. Comparative Toxic Effect of Bulk Copper Oxide (CuO) and CuO Nanoparticles on Human Red Blood Cells. Biol Trace Elem Res 201, 149–155 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-022-03149-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-022-03149-y

Keywords

Navigation