Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Blood and Stool Arsenic Levels Are Decisive for Diagnosing Children’s Functional Gastrointestinal Disease (FGD)

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pediatric gastroenteritis is a potentially fatal disease that accounts for 10% of childhood deaths. The main risk is environmental factors and nutrition. Arsenic (As) is commonly found in the earth’s crust. As is an essential element that can form many organic compounds. In children, it causes diarrhea, gums, tongue lesions, diabetes, conjunctivitis, ocular opacity, and impaired immune response. It also causes low growth, mental retardation, and neurological problems. It is also known as the cause of many cancers that originate at an early age. Regionally, there is an iron and steel industry for almost a century. According to the Rome IV criteria, the blood and stools of 50 children aged 6–18 years, male and female, living in our province with functional gastrointestinal disease (FGD), were screened for As, and compared with the Healthy group (control) of 30 children. The results were evaluated with the Mann–Whitney Rank Sum Test. When blood and stool As values in males were compared with control samples, a high level of significance (p = 0.001) was found between both blood and stool As values in sick males and the control group (p < 0.005). In females, blood and stool As median values were also highly significant when compared with the control group (p = 0.001). According to these data, when the sick children (children with male and female gender) are compared with the healthy ones, the difference is highly significant (p < 0.005). High blood As levels in children indicate environmental pollution. It can be said that blood As levels are high as a result of food, water, and inhaler exposure. The presence of a high level of significant difference in stool means that the amount of As is high in the foods consumed daily. High levels of As are in blood and stools; It was evaluated that FGD could be the cause of nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and colic. The increase in blood and stool As values due to environmental pollution is an important reason for FGD. For diseases of uncertain cause (such as FGD) resulting from chronic As exposure, blood and especially stool As values are more significant than urinary As levels. In conclusion, As a diagnostic criterion, it was concluded that blood and stool As values are an important marker in children with functional abdominal pain with other metals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Coryell M, McAlpine M, Pinkham NV, McDermott TR, Walk S (2018) The gut microbiome is required for full protection against acute arsenic toxicity in mouse models. Nat Commun 9(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fraser S, Paton D (2003) Does advertising increase labour supply? Time series evidence from the UK. Appl Econ 35(11):1357–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Franzblau A, Lilis RJ (1989) Acute arsenic intoxication from environmental arsenic exposure. Arch Environ Health 44(6):385–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhai Q, Cen S, Jiang J, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen W (2019) Disturbance of trace element and gut microbiota profiles as indicators of autism spectrum disorder: a pilot study of Chinese children. Environ Res 171:501–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Skröder Löveborn H, Kippler M, Lu Y, Ahmed S, Kuehnelt D, Raqib R, Vahter M (2016) Arsenic metabolism in children differs from that in adults. Toxicol Sci 152(1):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Catalani S (2009) Lancet-Oncology—a summary of the review on IARC carcinogens: metallic elements, dusts and fibers. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 31(2):182–183

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnold MG, Gokulan K, Doerge DR, Vanlandingham M, Cerniglia CE, Khare S (2019) A single or short time repeated arsenic oral exposure in mice impacts mRNA expression for signaling and immunity related genes in the gut. Food Chem Toxicol 132:110597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hemond HF, Solo-Gabriele HM (2004) Children’s exposure to arsenic from CCA-treated wooden decks and playground structures. Risk Anal 24(1):51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Trepka MJ, Heinrich J, Schulz C, Krause C, Popescu M, Wjst M, Wichmann HE (1996) Arsenic burden among children in industrial areas of eastern Germany. Sci Total Environ 180(2):95–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. von Ehrenstein OS, Poddar S, Yuan Y, Mazumder DG, Eskenazi B, Basu A, Hira-Smith M, Ghosh N, Lahiri S, Haque R (2007) Children’s intellectual function in relation to arsenic exposure. Epidemiology 18:44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vahter ME (2007) Interactions between arsenic-induced toxicity and nutrition in early life. J Nutr 137(12):2798–2804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang J, Zhang G, Lin Z, Luo Y, Fang H, Yang L, Xie J, Guo L (2020) Determination of arsenicals in mouse tissues after simulated exposure to arsenic from rice for sixteen weeks and the effects on histopathological features. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 200:110742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall LL, George SE, Kohan MJ, Styblo M, Thomas DJ (1997) In Vitro methylation of inorganic arsenic in mouse intestinal cecum. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 147(1):101–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yost L, Tao S-H, Egan S, Barraj L, Smith K, Tsuji J, Lowney Y, Schoof R, Rachman NJ (2004) Estimation of dietary intake of inorganic arsenic in US children. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 10(3):473–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Setia R, Dhaliwal SS, Singh R, Kumar V, Taneja S, Kukal SS, Pateriya B (2021) Phytoavailability and human risk assessment of heavy metals in soils and food crops around Sutlej river India. Chemosphere 263:128321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bibi M, Hashmi MZ, Malik RN (2015) Human exposure to arsenic in groundwater from Lahore district, Pakistan. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 39(1):42–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Santra SC, Samal AC, Bhattacharya P, Banerjee S, Biswas A, Majumdar J (2013) Arsenic in foodchain and community health risk: a study in Gangetic West Bengal. Procedia Environ Sci 18:2–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kwon E, Zhang H, Wang Z, Jhangri GS, Lu X, Fok N, Gabos S, Li X-F, Le XC (2004) Arsenic on the hands of children after playing in playgrounds. Environ Health Perspect 112(14):1375–1380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Del Rio M, Alvarez J, Mayorga T, Dominguez S, Sobin C (2017) A comparison of arsenic exposure in young children and home water arsenic in two rural West Texas communities. BMC Public Health 17(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dong X, Shulzhenko N, Lemaitre J, Greer RL, Peremyslova K, Quamruzzaman Q, Rahman M, Hasan OSI, Joya SA, Golam M (2017) Arsenic exposure and intestinal microbiota in children from Sirajdikhan, Bangladesh. PLoS One 12(12):e0188487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamadani JD, Tofail F, Nermell B, Gardner R, Shiraji S, Bottai M, Arifeen S, Huda SN, Vahter M (2011) Critical windows of exposure for arsenic-associated impairment of cognitive function in pre-school girls and boys: a population-based cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 40(6):1593–1604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts SM, Munson JW, Lowney YW, Ruby MV (2007) Relative oral bioavailability of arsenic from contaminated soils measured in the cynomolgus monkey. Toxicol Sci 95(1):281–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu K, Cable PH, Abo RP, Ru H, Graffam ME, Schlieper KA, Parry NM, Levine S, Bodnar WM, Wishnok JS (2013) Gut microbiome perturbations induced by bacterial infection affect arsenic biotransformation. Chem Res Toxicol 26(12):1893–1903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. States JC, Barchowsky A, Cartwright IL, Reichard JF, Futscher BW, Lantz RC (2011) Arsenic toxicology: translating between experimental models and human pathology. Environ Health Perspect 119(10):1356–1363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamauchi H, Takata A (2021) Arsenic metabolism differs between child and adult patients during acute arsenic poisoning. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 410:115352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yi Y, Gao S, Xia J, Li C, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Liang A, Ji S (2020) Study of the accumulation and distribution of arsenic species and association with arsenic toxicity in rats after 30 days of oral realgar administration. J Ethnopharmacol 247:111576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chung JS, Kalman DA, Moore LE, Kosnett MJ, Arroyo AP, Beeris M, Mazumder G, Hernandez AL, Smith AH (2002) Family correlations of arsenic methylation patterns in children and parents exposed to high concentrations of arsenic in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect 110(7):729–733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shen H, Niu Q, Xu M, Rui D, Xu S, Feng G, Ding Y, Li S, Jing M (2016) Factors affecting arsenic methylation in arsenic-exposed humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(2):205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bergman Å, Heindel JJ, Jobling S, Kidd K, Zoeller TR, Organization WH (2013) State of the science of endocrine disrupting chemicals 2012. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/78102/WHO_HSE_PHE_IHE_2013.1_eng.pdf

  30. WHO U (2013) State of the science of endocrine disrupting chemicals 2012: an assessment of the state of the science of endocrine disruptors prepared by a group of experts for the United Nations Environment Programme and World Health Organization. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sun HJ, Xiang P, Luo J, Hong H, Lin H, Li H-B, Ma LQ (2016) Mechanisms of arsenic disruption on gonadal, adrenal and thyroid endocrine systems in humans: a review. Environ Int 95:61–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gehle K (2009) ATSDR case studies in environmental medicine: arsenic toxicity. Vol: GRA and I, issue: GRA and I, pages 1–124

  33. ATSDR U (2012) Toxicological profile for chromium. In: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/TSP/ToxProfiles/ToxProfiles.aspx?id=62&tid=17

  34. Wei B, Yu J, Li H, Yang L, Xia Y, Wu K, Gao J, Guo Z, Cui N (2016) Arsenic metabolites and methylation capacity among individuals living in a rural area with endemic arseniasis in Inner Mongolia, China. Biol Trace Elem Res 170(2):300–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zuzolo D, Cicchella D, Demetriades A, Birke M, Albanese S, Dinelli E, Lima A, Valera P, De Vivo B (2020) Arsenic: geochemical distribution and age-related health risk in Italy. Environ Res 182:109076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Egendorf SP, Gailey AD, Schachter AE, Mielke HW (2020) Soil toxicants that potentially affect children’s health. Curr ProblPediatr Adolesc Health Care 50(1):100741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dong X, Shulzhenko N, Lemaitre J, Greer RL, Peremyslova K, Quamruzzaman Q, Rahman M, Hasan OSI, Joya SA, Golam M (2017) Arsenic exposure and intestinal microbiota in children from Sirajdikhan, Bangladesh. PLoS One 12(12):e0188487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dabeka RW, McKenzie AD, Lacroix GM, Bowe CCS, Graham RA, Conacher HB, Verdeer P (1993) Survey of arsenic in total diet food composites and estimation of the dietary intake of arsenic by Canadian adults and children. J AOAC Int 76(1):14–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Choudhry ZK, Misbahuddin M, Hossain AM, Saleh AA (2009) Inhibitory effect of arsenic on aerobic gut flora in rat. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 35(3):79–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Karabük University Scientific Research Projects Unit for their support for our study.

Funding

We would like to thank Karabük University Scientific Research Projects Unit for their support for our study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Namık Bilici (Ph.D.): Methodology, Investigation Formal analysis, Software, Investigation, Data Curation, Review; Erkan Doğan (M.D.: Visualization, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Conceptualization; Eylem Sevinç (Ph.D.): Investigation, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft Preparation; Nergiz Sevinç (Ph.D.): Visualization, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft Preparation; Gülsema Akıncı (Ph.D.): Visualization, Data Curation, Conceptualization; Ahmet Musmul (Ph.D.): Visualization, Investigation, Data Curation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis. Mustafa Cengiz (Ph.D.): Corresponding Author, Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Software, Data Curation, Review & Editing Preparation, Writing—Original Draft, Preparation; İlknur Kulcanay Şahin (Ph.D.): Investigation, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft Preparation Behnaz Aslanipour (Ph.D.): Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Software; Adnan Ayhanci (Ph.D.): Methodology, Investigation Formal analysis, Software, Investigation, Data Curation, Review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Cengiz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The approval of the ethics committee was obtained from the Karabük University Rectorate, Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee, with the decision dated 10.11.2020 and numbered 2020/346.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bilici, N., Doğan, E., Sevinç, E. et al. Blood and Stool Arsenic Levels Are Decisive for Diagnosing Children’s Functional Gastrointestinal Disease (FGD). Biol Trace Elem Res 200, 3050–3059 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02919-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02919-4

Keywords

Navigation