Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Biohythane Production from Distillery Spent Wash with Addition of Landfill Leachate and Sewage Wastewater

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid development of the industrial and domestic sectors has led to the rise of several energy and environmental issues. In accordance with sustainable development and waste minimization issues, biohydrogen production along with biomethane production via two-stage fermentation process using microorganisms from renewable sources has received considerable attention. In the present study, biohythane production with simultaneous wastewater treatment was studied in a two-stage (Biohydrogen and Biomethane) fermentation process under anaerobic conditions. Optimization of high organic content (COD) distillery spent wash effluent (DSPW) with dilution using sewage wastewater was carried out. Addition of leachate as a nutrient source was also studied for effective biohythane production. The experimental results showed that the maximum biohythane production at optimized concentration (substrate concentration of 60 g/L with 30% of leachate as a nutrient source) was 67 mmol/L bio-H2 and with bio-CH4 production of 42 mmol/L.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim, S.-H., Mudhoo, A., Pugazhendhi, A., Saratale, R. G., Surroop, D., Jeetah, P., Park, J.-H., Saratale, G. D., & Kumar, G. (2019). A perspective on galactose-based fermentative hydrogen production from macroalgal biomass: trends and opportunities. Bioresource Technology, 280, 447–458.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thangavel, M., Arianna, B., Karthik, R., Desika, P., Manickam, M., Richard, P. L., & Arivalagan, P. (2018). Review on cultivation and thermochemical conversion of microalgae to fuels and chemicals: process evaluation and knowledge gaps. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1053–1064.

  3. Yu, Q., Jing, W., Benyi, X., Ming, C., Toshimasa, H., Jun, C., & Yu-You, L. (2019). Strategy of adjusting recirculation ratio for biohythane production via recirculated temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of food waste. Energy, 179, 1235–1245.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kiran, K. P., Vijaya, K. S., Chaitanya, N., Bhagawan, D., Himabindu, V., & Lakshmi Narasu, M. (2017). Effect of operational parameters on biohydrogen production from dairy wastewater in batch and continuous reactors. Biofuels, 8(6), 693–699.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Preeti, M., Balachandar, G., & Debabrata, D. (2017). Improvement in biohythane production using organic solid waste and distillery effluent. Waste Management, 66, 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shiva, K. S., Ramakrishna, S. U. B., Vijaya, K. S., Srilatha, K., Rama Devi, B., & Himabindu, V. (2018). Synthesis of titanium (IV) oxide composite membrane for hydrogen production through alkaline water electrolysis. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 25, 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bolzonella, D., Battista, F., Cavinato, C., Gottardo, M., Micolucci, F., Lyberatos, G., & Pavan, P. (2018). Recent developments in biohythane production from household food wastes: a review. Bioresource Technology, 257, 311–319.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiravut, S., Chonticha, M., Poonsuk, P., & Sompong, O-T. (2018). Pilot-scale of biohythane production from palm oil mill effluent by two-stage thermophilic anaerobic fermentation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44, 3347–3355.

  9. Jemal, F., Nurelegne, T., & Stijn, W.H.V.H. (2017). Adsorption of distillery spent wash on activated bagasse fly ash: kinetics and thermodynamics. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 5(6), 5381–5388.

  10. Sridevi, K., Sivaraman, E., & Mullai, P. (2014). Back propagation neural network modelling of biodegradation and fermentative biohydrogen production using distillery wastewater in a hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Bioresource Technology, 165, 233–240.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karadag, D., & Puhakka, J. A. (2010). Enhancement of anaerobic hydrogen production by iron and nickel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(16), 8554–8560.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Preeti, M., & Debabrata, D. (2014). Biohydrogen production from Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08 using distillery effluent. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 7496–7507.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Da Silva, T. L., Gouveia, L., & Reis, A. (2014). Integrated microbial processes for biofuels and high value-added products: the way to improve the cost effectiveness of biofuel production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98(3), 1043–1053.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saharan, B. S., Sahu, R. K., & Sharma, D. (2011). A review on biosurfactants: fermentation, current developments and perspectives. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Journal, 2011, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ZhiPing, L., WenHui, W., Ping, S., JinSong, G., & Jin, C. (2015). Characterization of dissolved organic matter in landfill leachate during the combined treatment process of air stripping, Fenton, SBR and coagulation. Waste Management, 41, 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  16. American Public Health Association. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vijaya Krishna, S., Kiran Kumar, P., Kavita, V., Bhagawan, D., Himabindu, V., Lakshmi Narasu, M., & Radhika, S. (2019). Enhancement of biohydrogen production from distillery spent wash effluent using electro-coagulation process. Energy, Ecology and Environment., 4(4), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-019-00122-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Panga Kiran, K., Vijaya Krishna, S., Verma, K., Pooja, K., Bhagawan, D., & Himabindu, V. (2018). Phycoremediation of sewage wastewater and industrial flue gases for biomass generation from microalgae. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 25, 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vijaya Krishna, S., Kiran Kumar, P., Chaitanya, N., Bhagawan, D., Himabindu, V., & Lakshmi Narasu, M. (2017). Biohydrogen production from brewery effluent in a batch and continuous reactor with anaerobic mixed microbial consortia. Biofuels, 8(6), 701–707.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yemm, E. W., & Willis, A. J. (1954). The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. The Biochemical Journal, 57(3), 508–514.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kiran Kumar, P., Vijaya Krishna, S., Kavita, V., Pooja, K., Bhagawan, D., Srilatha, K., & Himabindu, V. (2018a). Bio oil production from microalgae via hydrothermal liquefaction technology under subcritical water conditions. Mimet, 153, 108–117.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kiran Kumar, P., Vijaya Krishna, S., Swami Naidu, S., Kavita, V., Bhagawan, D., & Himabindu, V. (2019). Biomass production from microalgae Chlorella grown in sewage, kitchen wastewater using industrial CO2 emissions: comparative study. Carbon Resources Conversion, 2(2), 126–133.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thanomsub, B., Anupunpisit, V., Chanphetch, S., Watcharachaipong, T., Poonkhum, R., & Srisukonth, C. (2002). Effects of ozone treatment on cell growth and ultrastructural changes in bacteria. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 48(4), 193–199.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Verma, K., Gupta, D., & Gupta, A. B. (2016). Optimization of ozone disinfection and its effect on trihalomethanes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(3), 3021–3032.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chiu-Yue, L., & Chao-Hui, C. (2006). Fermentative hydrogen production from xylose using anaerobic mixed microflora. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 31, 832–840.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hisanori, W., & Hidekichi, Y. (2011). Biohydrogen using leachate from an industrial waste landfill as inoculums. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 13, 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Balasubramani, R., & Karuppan, M. (2018). Influence of sulfuric acid concentration on biohydrogen production from rice mill wastewater using pure and coculture of Enterobacteraerogenes and Citrobacterfreundii. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(19), 9254–9258.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chang, S., Jianzheng, L., & Feng, L. (2011). Continuous biohydrogen production from diluted molasses in an anaerobic contact reactor. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 5(1), 140–148.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, J. Z., Li, B. K., Zhu, G. F., Ren, N. Q., Bo, L. X., & He, J. G. (2007). Hydrogen production from diluted molasses by anaerobic hydrogen producing bacteria in an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(15), 3274–3283.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Anubha, K., & Raman, P. (2017). Producing sustained renewable energy and removing organic pollutants from distillery wastewater using consortium of sludge microbes. International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, 11(6), 520–524.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, B., Wan, W., & Wang, J. (2009). Effect of ammonia concentration on fermentative hydrogen production by mixed cultures. Bioresource Technology, 100(3), 1211–1213.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chong, M. L., Sabaratnam, V., Shirai, Y., & Hassan, M. A. (2009). Biohydrogen production from biomass and industrial wastes by dark fermentation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(8), 3277–3287.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pawinee, S., Pramoch, R., Malinee, L., & Sumaeth, C. (2011). Hydrogen production from alcohol distillery wastewater containing high potassium and sulfate using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 12810–12821.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Inara, A. S., Stella, T. L., Marcos, R. S., Marcia Andreia, M. S. V., & Valeria, R. (2017). Landfill leachate enhances fermentative hydrogen production from glucose and sugarcane processing derivatives. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 20(2), 777–786.

    Google Scholar 

  35. O-Thong, S., Prasertsan, P., Intrasungkha, N., Dhamwichukorn, S., & Birkeland, N. (2007). Improvement of biohydrogen production and treatment efficiency on palm oil mill effluent with nutrient supplementation at thermophilic condition using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 41(5), 583–590.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sreethawong, T., Niyamapa, T., Neramitsuk, H., Rangsunvigit, P., Leethochawalit, M., & Chavadej, S. (2010). Hydrogen production from glucose-containing wastewater using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor: effects of COD loading rate, nitrogen content, and organic acid composition. Chemical Engineering Journal, 160(1), 322–332.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, C. H., & Chang, J. S. (2007). Continuous biohydrogen production from starch with granulated mixed bacterial microflora. Energy and Fuels, 22(1), 93–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin, C. Y., Chang, C. C., & Hung, C. H. (2008a). Fermentative hydrogen production from starch using natural mixed cultures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33(10), 2445–2453.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee, D. Y., Li, Y. Y., & Noike, T. (2009). Continuous H2 production by anaerobic mixed microflora in membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 100(2), 690–695.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ismail, I., Hassan, M. A., Abdul Rahman, N. A., & Chen, S. S. (2010). Thermophilic biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using suspended mixed culture. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34(1), 42–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lay, J. J. (2000). Modeling and optimization of anaerobic digested sludge converting starch to hydrogen. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 68(3), 269–278.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ren, N. Q., Chua, H., Chan, S. Y., Tsang, Y. F., Wang, Y. J., & Sin, N. (2007). Assessing optimal fermentation type for bio-hydrogen production in continuous-flow acidogenic reactors. Bioresource Technology, 98(9), 1774–1780.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Paolo, D., Estefania, P., Aino-Maija, L., Gavin, C., & Piet, N. L. L. (2018). Temperature control as key factor for optimal biohydrogen production from thermo mechanical pulping wastewater. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 137, 214–221.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tugba, K., Kubra, A., Haris, N. A., Cansu, V., Didem, E., Duygu, K., Jale, Y., Guven, O., & Nuri, A. (2018). Determining the effect of trace elements on biohydrogen production from fruit and vegetable wastes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43, 10666–10677.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Giallo, J., Gaudin, C., Belaich, J., Petitdemange, E., & Caillet-Mangin, F. (1983). Metabolism of glucose and cellobiose by cellulolytic mesophilic Clostridium sp. strain H10. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 45(3), 843–849.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Heeg, K., Pohl, M., Sontag, M., Mumme, J., Klocke, M., & Nettmann, E. (2014). Microbial communities involved in biogas production from wheat straw as the sole substrate within a two-phase solid state anaerobic digestion. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 37(8), 590–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Munir, R. I., Schellenberg, J., Henrissat, B., Verbeke, T. J., Sparling, R., & Levin, D. B. (2014). Comparative analysis of carbohydrate active enzymes in Clostridium termitidis CT1112 reveals complex carbohydrate degradation ability. PLoS One, 9(8), e104260.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang, G., Mu, Y., & Yu, H.-Q. (2005). Response surface analysis to evaluate the influence of pH, temperature and substrate concentration on the acidogenesis of sucrose-rich wastewater. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 23, 175–184.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Yasin, N. H. M., Man, H. C., Yusoff, M. Z. M., & Hassan, M. A. (2011). Microbial characterization of hydrogen-producing bacteria in fermented food waste at different pH values. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(16), 9571–9580.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Gazliya, N., Kuldeep, R., Thirugnanasambandam, S., & Vijayanand, S. M. (2018). Mechanistic investigations in ultrasonic pretreatment and anaerobic digestion of landfill leachates. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6(2), 1690–1701.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the University Grants Commission (UGC) BSR Fellow, Government of India/Bharat Sarkar - Sanctions order No. F.18-1/2011(BSR) for providing facilities and Dr. D Bhagawan would like to thank the UGC for the encouragement to carry out the research work (order No. F./31-1/2017/PDFSS-2017-18- TEL-14164 and Dr. Kavita Verma would like to acknowledge the Department of Biotechnology (DBT-RA Program in Biotechnology and Life Sciences), Government of India/Bharat Sarkar.

Funding

This work received financial support from the University Grants Commission (UGC) BSR Fellow, Government of India/Bharat Sarkar – Sanctions, order no. F.18-1/2011(BSR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Himabindu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saranga, V.K., Kumar, P.K., Verma, K. et al. Effect of Biohythane Production from Distillery Spent Wash with Addition of Landfill Leachate and Sewage Wastewater. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 190, 30–43 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-019-03087-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-019-03087-x

Keywords

Navigation