Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Hemicellulose Extracts from Two Pulping Woodchips with Green Liquor Followed by Scale-Up Pre-Hemicellulose Extraction

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of different pre-pulping extraction conditions on two types of raw material, hardwood oak chips and softwood pine chips. The chips were air-dried, and 2-g samples were extracted in a Dionex ASE-200 with alkaline solutions of a partially recovered form of kraft pulping liquor called green liquor (GL). The GL was applied at different alkali charges of 0–5 % on dry wood weight. The extractions were performed at various H-factors from 500 to 1100 with temperatures ranging from 170 to 190 °C. As the alkali charge decreased, the amount of monosaccharides in the extracts increased while the remaining solids decreased. The highest xylose + mannose + galactose (xmg) concentrations (12.73 and 11.12 g/L for extracts derived from hardwood and softwood, respectively) were detected with a hot water extraction (GL 0 %) at 180 °C and an H-factor of 900. However, low amounts of remaining solids were obtained under these conditions (65.77% and 74.42%, for hard- and soft woods, respectively). We also performed an extraction that was scaled-up in a 1-L Parr reactor with 80 g of woodchips under pre-optimized condition through ASE-200. In this condition, the xmg and acetic acid concentrations of the hardwood extracts were 9.74 and 9.94 g/L, respectively, whereas their concentrations in the softwood extracts were 3.59 and 3.76 g/L, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gullichsen, J., & Fogelholm, C. J. (1999). In J. Gullichsen & H. Paulapuro (Eds.), Chemical pulping, book 6A of papermaking science and technology (p. A28). Helsinki: Fapet Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yoon, S. H., & van Heiningen, A. (2010). Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 16(1), 74–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. van Heiningen, A. R. P. (2006). Pulp Pap-Canada, 107(6), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Heiningen, A.R.P., Zou, H., Yoon, S.H., Jiang, J., & Goyal, G. (2006). Process of treating a lignocellulosic material. U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/640, 820.

  5. Mao, H., Genco, J., van Heiningen, A., & Pendse, H. (2008). Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy, 2, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brasch, D. J., & Free, K. W. (1965). TAPPI, 48(4), 245–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Amidon, T., & Liu, S. (2009). Biotechnology Advances, 27(5), 542–550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mendes, C. V. T., Carvalho, M. G. V. S., Baptista, C. M. S. G., Rocha, J. M. S., Soares, B. I. G., & Sousa, G. D. A. (2009). Food and Bioproducts Processing, 87(3), 197–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frederick, W. J. (2008). Biomass and Bioenergy, 32(12), 1293–1302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoon, S. H., & van Heiningen, A. R. P. (2008). TAPPI, 7(7), 22–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, H. J., Ramaswamy, S., Al-Dajani, W. W., & Tschirner, U. W. (2010). Bioresource Technology, 101(2), 624–631.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Dajani, W. W., & Tschirner, U. W. (2008). TAPPI, 7(6), 3–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mao, H., Genco, J., van Heiningen, A., & Pendse, H. (2010). BioResources, 5(2), 525–544.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jin, Y., Jameel, H., Chang, H., & Phillips, R. (2010). Journal of Wood Chemistry Technology, 30(1), 86–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Um, B. H., Friedman, B., & van Walsum, G. P. (2011). Holzforschung, 65(1), 51–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Tmpleton, D., & Crocker. D. (2011). National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL/TP-510-42618 ed. Golden, CO.

  17. Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., & Tmpleton, D. (2006). National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL/TP-510-42623 ed. Golden, CO.

  18. Sluiter, A., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., & Tmpleton, D. (2005). National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL/TP-510-42619 ed. Golden, CO.

  19. Sticklen, M. B. (2008). Nature Reviews Genetics, 9, 433–443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lai, Y. Z. (2001). Chemical degradation. In D. N. S. Hon & N. Shiraishi (Eds.), Wood and cellulose chemistry (pp. 443–512). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Casebier, R. L., Hamilton, J. K., & Hergert, H. L. (1973). TAPPI, 56(3), 135–139.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Garrote, G., Dominguez, H., & Parajo, J. C. (1999). Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 74(11), 1101–1109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brigham, J. S., Adney, W. S., & Himmel, M. E. (1996). In C. Wyman (Ed.), Handbook on bioethanol: production and utilization (pp. 119–141). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wethern, J. D. (1952). TAPPI, 35(6), 267–271.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson, J. O., & Wise, L. E. (1952). TAPPI, 35(7), 331–336.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lawther, J. M., Sun, R. C., & Banks, W. B. J. (1995). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 43(3), 667–675.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sjostrom, E. (1974). Holzforschung, 28(3), 99–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Palmqvist, E., & Hahn-Hagerdal, B. (2000). Bioresource Technology, 74(1), 17–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Patil, R.A. (2012). M.S. thesis, The University of Maine, Orono.

  30. Walton, S. L., Hutto, D., Genco, J. M., van Walsum, G. P., & van Heiningen, A. R. P. (2010). Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 49(24), 12638–12645.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoon, S. H., Tunc, M. S., & van Heiningen, A. (2011). TAPPI, 11(1), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Palmqvist, E., & Hahn-Hagerdal, B. (2000). Bioresource Technology, 74, 25–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Leschinsky, M., Patt, R., & Sixta, H. (2007). Pulp and paper conference, Helsinki, 7–14.

  34. Casebier, R. L., Hamilton, J. K., & Hergert, H. L. (1969). TAPPI, 52(12), 2369–2377.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Biermann C.J. (1996). Handbook of pulping and papermaking, 2nd ed., Academic Press, Inc.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (Grant #: 2012R1A1A1003107). This work was also financed by the International Collaborative R&D Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy (Grant #: 20128520100020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung Hwan Um.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S.J., Um, B.H. Comparison of Hemicellulose Extracts from Two Pulping Woodchips with Green Liquor Followed by Scale-Up Pre-Hemicellulose Extraction. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 175, 2501–2515 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1408-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1408-y

Keywords

Navigation