Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Relationships Between Sulphate Reduction and COD/VFA Utilisation Using Grass Cellulose as Carbon and Energy Sources

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The release of mine effluents can have a damaging impact on receiving water bodies. Therefore, treatment of mine waters before discharge is imperative. A novel biological \( {\hbox{SO}}_4^{2 - } \) removal technology has been developed whereby the degradation/fermentation products of grass cellulose, volatile fatty acids (VFA), function as the electron donors and \( {\hbox{SO}}_4^{2 - } \) as the electron acceptor. The aim of the study presented here was to elucidate the interactions between the cellulose degradation rate, the chemical oxygen demand (COD), VFA production and its/utilisation rate as well as the sulphate reduction rate. To this end, two stirred batch reactors were operated: a test and a control reactor. The results showed that high COD and VFA concentrations were achieved after cellulose degradation, which resulted in a rapid decrease in the \( {\hbox{SO}}_4^{2 - } \) concentration in the test reactor. The VFA results indicated that propionic and butyric acids were preferentially utilised, producing acetate. In the control reactor, the VFA and the COD production increased initially at the same rate, followed later by a decrease at a similar rate. These results suggest that the degradation products formed were utilised by the methanogenic bacteria to produce methane rather than by the sulphate-reducing bacteria, since the control reactor contained no sulphate (Visser 1995). Furthermore, these results showed a clear relationship between the COD/VFA production and the \( {\hbox{SO}}_4^{2 - } \) reduction in the test reactor and between the COD and VFA pattern in the control reactor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Younger, P. L., & Wolkersdorfer, C. (2004). Mining impact on the fresh water environment: Technical and managerial guidelines for catchment scale management. Mine Water and the Environment, 23, S2–S80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maree, J. P. (1994). Neutralization of acidic effluents with limestone. Water Research Commission Report No. 355/1/94.

  3. Maree, J. P., Hagger, M. J., Strobos, G., Hlabela, P., Cronjé, H., van Niekerk, A., et al. (2003). Neutralization of acid leachate at a nickel mine with limestone. In Proc. Sudbury 2003 Mining and the Environment, 28th CLRA Meeting, Laurentian University, Sudbury, 25–28 May 2003.

  4. Günther, P. (2006). Emalahleni mine water reclamation project. In Proceedings of Mine Water Drainage (South African Perspective). Randfontein, 19–20 Oct 2006.

  5. Hulshoff-Pol, L. W., Lens, P. N. L., Stams, A. J. M., & Lettinga, G. (1998). Anaerobic treatment of sulphate rich wastewaters. Biodegradation, 9, 213–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lens, P. N. L., Visser, A., Janssen, A. J. H., Hulshoff Pol, L. W., & Lettinga, G. (1998). Biotechnological treatment of sulphate-rich wastewaters. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 28(1), 41–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De Smul, A., Dries, J., Goethals, L., Grootaerd, H., & Verstraete, W. (1997). High rate of microbial sulphate reduction in a mesophile ethanol fed expanded-granular-sludge-blanket reactor. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 48, 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Greben, H. A., Maree, J. P., Singmin, Y., & Mnqanqeni, S. (2000). Biological sulphate removal from acid mine effluent using ethanol as carbon and energy source. Water Science and Technology, 42(3–4), 339–344.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greben, H. A., Baloyi, L. M., Sigama, S., & Venter, S. N. (2009). Bioremediation of sulphate rich mine effluents using grass cuttings and rumen fluid microorganisms. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 100(2–3), 163–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Visser, A. (1995). The anaerobic treatment of sulphate containing wastewater. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

  11. Oude Elferink, S. J. W. H. (1998). Sulphate-reducing Bacteria in Anaerobic Bioreactors. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

  12. Mizuno, O., Li, Y. Y., & Noike, T. (1998). The behaviour of sulphate-reducing bacteria I acidogenic phase of anerobic digestion. Water Research, 32, 1626–1634.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Greben, H. A., Baloyi, L. M., & Venter, S. N. (2007). Grass cellulose as cost effective energy source for biological sulphate removal. Water SA, 33(5), 729–735.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Greben, H. A., Sigama, J., Burke, L., & Venter, S. N. (2008). Cellulose fermentation products as energy sources for biological sulphate reduction. WRC report K5/1728.

  15. Postgate, J. R. (1984). The sulphate-reducing bacteria (2nd ed., p. 208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hungate, R. E. (1966). The rumen and its microbes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. APHA. (1985). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (16th ed.). Washington DC: American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harmsen, H. J. M. (1996). Detection, phylogeny and population dynamic of synthrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria in anaerobic sludge. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen.

  19. Logan, M. V., Reardon, K. F., Figueroa, L. A., Mclain, J. E. T., & Ahmann. (2005). Microbial community activities during establishment, performance and decline of bench-scale passive treatment systems for mine drainage. Water Research, 39, 4537–4551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rinzema, A., & Lettinga, G. (1988). Anaerobic treatment of sulfate containing wastewater. In D. L. Wise (Ed.), Biotreatment systems, 3 (pp. 65–109). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marschner, B., & Kalbitz, K. (2003). Controls of bioavailability and biodegradability of dissolved organic matter in soils. Geoderma, 113, 211–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W., & Pretorius, I. S. (2002). Microbial cellulose utilisation: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 66(3), 506–577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Greben, H. A., & Baloyi, J. (2004a). The beneficial use of a bio-waste product in the biological sulphate removal technology. In Proceedings Wisa Biennial Conference and Exhibition, Cape Town, South Africa, 2–6 May 2004.

  24. Vallero, M. V. G., Lens, P. N. L., Bakker, C., & Lettinga, G. (2003). Sulfidogenic volatile fatty acid degradation in a baffled reactor. Sub-department of Environmental Technology, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

  25. Greben, H. A., Tjatji, M., & Maree, J. P. (2004b). Biological sulphate reduction at different feed COD/SO4 ratios using propionate and acetate as the energy source. In 8th IMWA Conference Newcastle upon Thyne, England.

  26. Reis, M. A. M., Almeida, J. S., Lemos, P. C., & Carrondo, M. J. T. (1992). Effect of hydrogen sulphide on growth of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 40, 593–600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sonakya, V., Raizada, N., Dalhoff, R., & Wilderer, P. A. (2003). Water Science and Technology, 48(8), 255–259.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Mulopo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulopo, J., Greben, H., Sigama, J. et al. The Relationships Between Sulphate Reduction and COD/VFA Utilisation Using Grass Cellulose as Carbon and Energy Sources. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 163, 393–403 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-9047-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-010-9047-4

Keywords

Navigation