Skip to main content
Log in

Cultivation of Rhodobacter sphaeroides in the Stirred Bioreactor with Different Feeding Strategies for CoQ10 Production

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The logistic growth model combined with the Luedeking-Piret equation was adopted in this study to model the batch production of CoQ10 in the cultivation of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The simulation results indicated that CoQ10 production was a primary metabolite. As being a primary metabolite, a longer cell growing stage would tend to accumulate more biomass and lead to a higher CoQ10 concentration being produced. In this context, a fed-batch operation by molasses feeding was performed to increase the biomass and subsequent CoQ10 production. Three different molasses feeding strategies were operated in this study. Results suggested that the fed-batch operation with molasses controlled at 10 ± 1 g/l could increase the cell mass and CoQ10 concentration to reach their maximum values of 18.6 g/l and 83.8 mg/l, respectively, nearly 2.2 times and 1.9 times their respective values obtained in the batch cultivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kawamukai, M. (2002). Journal of Bioscience & Bioengineering, 94, 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lieberman, A., Lyons, K., Levine, J., & Myerburg, R. (2005). Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 11, 81–84. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2004.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi, J.H., Ryu, Y.W., & Seo, J.H. (2005). Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 68, 9–15. doi:10.1007/s00253-005-1946-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cluis, C.P., Burja, A.M., & Martin, V.J.J. (2007). Trends in Biotechnology, 25, 514–521. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.08.008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sasaki, K., Watanabe, M., Suda, Y., Ishizuka, A., & Noparatnaraporn, N. (2005). Journal of Bioscience & Bioengineering, 100, 481–488.l. doi:10.1263/jbb.100.481.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshisa, H., Kotani, Y., Ochiai, K., & Araki, K. (1998). The Journal of General & Applied Microbiology, 44, 19–26. doi:10.2323/jgam.44.19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benkortbi, O., Hanini, S., & Bentahar, F. (2007). Biochemical Engineering Journal, 36, 14–18. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2006.06.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Songa, H., Jang, S.H., Park, J.M., & Lee, S.Y. (2007). Biochemical Engineering Journal, 40, 107–115. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2007.11.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ha, S.J., Kim, S.Y., Seo, J.H., Oh, D.K., & Lee, J.K. (2007). Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 74, 974–980. doi:10.1007/s00253-006-0744-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Park, Y.C., Kim, S.J., Choi, J.H., Lee, W.H., Park, K.M., Kawamukai, M., et al. (2005). Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 67, 192–196. doi:10.1007/s00253-004-1743-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yen, H.W., & Chiu, C.H. (2007). Enzyme & Microbial Technology, 4, 1600–1604.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wee, Y.J., Kima, J.N., Yunb, J.S., & Ryua, H.W. (2004). Enzyme & Microbial Technology, 34, 568–573. doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Luedeking, R., & Piret, E.L. (1959). Journal of Biochemical & Microbiological Technology & Engineering, 1, 393–412. doi:10.1002/jbmte.390010406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the National Science Council of the R.O.C. for the financial supports (NSC 95-2221-E-029-007) in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-Wei Yen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yen, HW., Feng, CY. & Kang, JL. Cultivation of Rhodobacter sphaeroides in the Stirred Bioreactor with Different Feeding Strategies for CoQ10 Production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160, 1441–1449 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8576-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8576-1

Keywords

Navigation