Where Are We Now?
Pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is defined as either a focal or global overcoverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum [2]. This pathoanatomy is thought to cause impingement and injury to the acetabular labrum, resulting in secondary injury to the articular cartilage and in some patients, osteoarthritis (OA) [4]. On the other end of the spectrum is acetabular dysplasia, where the femoral head is undercovered by the acetabulum leading to a decrease in the amount of weight bearing articular cartilage. Subsequently, increased forces across the joint can, in some patients, lead to OA [3, 8, 12].
Pincer FAI has been defined variably, including a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) over 40° or 45° and/or an anterior center-edge angle (ACEA) over 40°. Acetabular profunda, acetabular protrusion, or the presence of a crossover sign are also used to describe pincer FAI [2].
There has been little consensus regarding a radiographic definition of pincer FAI [6]. In a cross-sectional study, Gosvig and colleagues [5] reported a relationship between pincer morphology and radiographic OA [5]. Conversely, one prospective study [11] reported no relationship between pincer FAI and OA development, while another prospective study reported a protective effect of pincer FAI on the development of OA [1]. Acetabular dysplasia is more-consistently associated with the development or presence of OA [1, 11]. In one of those studies [1], patients with an LCEA over 40° and an ACEA over 40° had a relative risk of developing incident OA over a 5-year period of 0.34 compared to the rest of the cohort, meaning they were three times less likely to develop OA.
In turn, pincer treatment with acetabuloplasty has been associated with poorer outcomes of hip preserving surgery when compared to other indications [7, 9]. This makes furthering our understanding of pincer FAI a critical focus of research in the field of hip preservation surgery. Pun and colleagues have reported on a measure of pincer FAI looking at acetabular fossa size and size of the weight bearing cartilage that is present in the acetabulum. This adds to prior work by Steppacher and colleagues [10], who similarly identified that patients with different morphologies of pincer FAI have differing amounts of weight-bearing cartilage in their acetabulum.
Where Do We Need To Go?
While Pun and colleagues have advanced an interesting anatomic and radiologic concept to further our understanding of pincer FAI, further study is needed to validate this concept. The increased weight-bearing articular cartilage area in the Type 1 pincer acetabulum—where there is a smaller fossa and more weight-bearing cartilage—may explain why some natural history data suggests a protective effect of acetabular overcoverage on the development of OA [1], as the forces on the joint may have been distributed through a larger surface area. In addition, this new understanding of acetabular subtypes in pincer FAI may also help explain some of the heterogeneous outcomes from the treatment of the pincer hip [7, 9]. We now must take this concept and apply it in a larger scale to patients in our practices to determine the prevalence of these two subtypes of pincer acetabula. In turn, we need to understand our ability to differentiate between the two subtypes; can we do this reliably with clinically available imaging? Once we successfully diagnose those with Type 1 pincer versus Type 2 pincer acetabula, where there is a larger fossa and less weight-bearing cartilage, we then can inquire whether patients with Type 2 pincer acetabula report worse outcomes with acetabuloplasty compared to those with Type 1 pincer acetabula, or whether these patients with Type 2 pincer acetabula develop more-rapid joint development of OA. If this is the case, then a change in practice may be needed with the adoption of reorienting acetabular osteotomy for the Type 2 pincer acetabulum. Further study would then be needed to determine whether this change leads to better patient reported and radiographic outcomes after intervention.
How Do We Get There?
Although the authors of the current study present acetabular fossa size and size of weight bearing cartilage in the acetabulum as a potential important variable in determining appropriate treatment of pincer FAI, we need more studies to validate this concept. First, epidemiologic studies looking at those with the diagnosis of pincer FAI must be done to calculate the prevalence of each of these subtypes and whether we can reliably differentiate between the two. We will need to understand the intra- and inter-rater reliability of our diagnostic methods. Preliminary laboratory-science studies on finite element models of the hip joint could provide computational data to support the hypothesis that these two subtypes of pincer acetabula have differing mechanical properties. In addition, cadaveric experiments of hip joint articular cartilage pressures could be performed investigating the effect of increasing the acetabular fossa size and therefor decreasing articular cartilage surface area on the cartilage contact pressures in the pincer hip. This could then be translated into humans using dual-plane fluoroscopy computer models to understand the in-vivo mechanical differences between pincer hips with larger (Type 1) or smaller (Type 2) weight-bearing articular surfaces.
Retrospective clinical studies looking at the patient reported and radiographic outcomes of acetabuloplasty for the Type 1 and Type 2 pincer hips could provide insight as to whether either of the subtypes is prone to poorer outcomes or OA progression. Given the heterogeneity of treatment protocols among centers that treat pincer FAI, multicenter collaborations could likely identify and potentially match similar patients who underwent either acetabular reorientation or acetabuloplasty for comparative studies. Prospectively collected uniform data from the Academic Network of Conservation Hip Outcome Research group may be able to support such a study. Ultimately, randomized studies comparing acetabuloplasty to acetabular reorientation for each variant of pincer FAI would provide Level 1 evidence to answer this question. However, this is unlikely to be feasible given the need for clinical equipoise of the investigators, the low incidence of isolated pincer FAI in young patients undergoing surgical intervention for hip pain, and the difficulty in completing randomized studies in surgical interventions. Therefore, further prospective cohort analysis looking at these new three-dimensional imaging measures and acetabular subtypes will likely provide us the best available information to guide future treatment of patients with pincer FAI.
References
Agricola R, Heijboer MP, Roze RH, Reijman M, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Verhaar JAN, Weinans H, Waarsing JH. Pincer deformity does not lead to osteoarthritis of the hip whereas acetabular dysplasia does: Acetabular coverage and development of osteoarthritis in a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1514–1521.
Crawford EA, Welton KL, Kweon C, Kelly BT, Larson CM, Bedi A. Arthroscopic treatment of pincer-type impingement of the hip. JBJS Rev. 2015;3:e4–e4.
Gala L, Clohisy JC, Beaule PE. Hip dysplasia in the young adult. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:63–73.
Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.
Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Palm H, Troelsen A. Prevalence of malformations of the hip joint and their relationship to sex, groin pain, and risk of osteoarthritis: a population-based survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1162–1169.
Gupta AK, Abrams GD, Nho SJ. What’s new in femoroacetabular impingement surgery: Will we be better in 2023? Sports Health. 2014;6:162–170.
Hanke MS, Steppacher SD, Zurmühle CA, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M. Hips with protrusio acetabuli are at increased risk for failure after femoroacetabular impingement surgery: A 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2016;474:2168–2180.
Henak CR, Abraham CL, Anderson AE, Maas SA, Ellis BJ, Peters CL, Weiss JA. Patient-specific analysis of cartilage and labrum mechanics in human hips with acetabular dysplasia. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22:210–217.
Steppacher SD, Huemmer C, Schwab JM, Tannast M, Siebenrock KA. Surgical hip dislocation for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: Factors predicting 5-year survivorship. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2013;472:337–348.
Steppacher SD, Lerch TD, Gharanizadeh K, Liechti EF, Werlen SF, Puls M, Tannast M, Siebenrock KA. Size and shape of the lunate surface in different types of pincer impingement: Theoretical implications for surgical therapy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22:951–958.
Thomas GER, Palmer AJR, Batra RN, Kiran A, Hart D, Spector T, Javaid MK, Judge A, Murray DW, Carr AJ, Arden NK, Glyn-Jones S. Subclinical deformities of the hip are significant predictors of radiographic osteoarthritis and joint replacement in women. A 20 year longitudinal cohort study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22:1504–1510.
Wiberg G. The anatomy and roentgenographic appearance of a normal hip joint. Acta Chir Scand. 1939;83(Suppl 58):7–38
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This CORR Insights® is a commentary on the article “Is Increased Acetabular Cartilage or Fossa Size Associated With Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement?” by Pun and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5063-1.
The author certifies that he, or a member of his immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR ® or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®.
This CORR Insights® comment refers to the article available at DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5063-1.
About this article
Cite this article
Wylie, J.D. CORR Insights®: Is Increased Acetabular Cartilage or Fossa Size Associated With Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475, 1024–1026 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5083-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5083-x