Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Aligning Incentives in Orthopaedics: Opportunities and Challenges—the Case Medical Center Experience

  • Symposium: ABJS Carl T. Brighton Workshop on Health Policy Issues in Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

For 30 years, the orthopaedic faculty at Case Western Reserve University worked as an independent private corporation within University Hospitals Case Medical Center (Hospital). However, by 2002, it became progressively obvious to our orthopaedic practice that we needed to modify our business model to better manage the healthcare regulatory changes and decreased reimbursement if we were to continue to attract and retain the best and brightest orthopaedic surgeons to our practice. In 2002, our surgeons created a new entity wholly owned by the parent corporation at the Hospital. As part of this transaction, the parties negotiated a balanced employment model designed to fully integrate the orthopaedic surgeons into the integrated delivery system that included the Hospital. This new faculty practice plan adopted a RVU-based compensation model for the physicians, with components that created incentives both for clinical practice and for academic and administrative service contributions. Over the past 5 years, aligning incentives with the Hospital has substantially increased the clinical productivity of the surgeons and has also benefited the Hospital and our patients. Furthermore, aligned incentives between surgeons and hospitals could be of substantial financial benefit to both, as Medicare moves forward with its bundled project initiative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Academy of Family Practice. Physician Productivity Discussion Paper. Available at: www.aafp.org/online/etc/medialib/aafp_org/documents/prac_mgt/physprod.Par.0001.File.tmp/physprod.pdf. Accessed June 9, 2009.

  2. Barro JR, Bozic KJ, Zimmerman AM. Performance pay for MGOA physicians (A). Harv Bus School. March 2002. 9-902-159.

  3. Buppert C. Can you explain how reimbursement based on RVUs works? Medscape Nurses. 2006;8. Available at: www.medscape.com/viewarticle/542161. Accessed June 9, 2009.

  4. Clarifications to Certain Exceptions to Medicare Limits on Physician Referrals, Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. Pub L No. 108-173, 117 Stat. 2066 (2003) (codified at 42 USC §1395nn).

  5. CMS Announces Demonstration to Encourage Greater Collaboration and Improve Quality Using Bundled Hospital Payments, Health and Human Resources, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Press Release. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/. Accessed December 21, 2008.

  6. Ethics in Patient Referral Act of 1989, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989 (OBRA 1989). Pub L No. 101-239, § 6204, 103 Stat. 2106 (1989) (codified at 42 USC § 1395nn).

  7. Extension of Self-Referral Ban to Additional Specified Services, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (OBRA 1993). PubL No. 103-66, 107 Stat. 312 (1993) (codified at 42 USC § 1395nn).

  8. Final 2008 hospital outpatient prospective payment system (HOPPS) rule (72 Fed. Reg. 42370 (August 2, 2007)).

  9. Final 2008 hospital outpatient prospective payment system (HOPPS) rule (72 Fed. Reg. 66580 (November 27, 2007)).

  10. Final 2008 inpatient hospital prospective payment system (IPPS) rule (72 Fed. Reg. 47130 (August 22, 2007)).

  11. Final Stark phase III regulations (72 Fed. Reg. 51012 (September 5, 2007)).

  12. Hariri S, Bozic KJ, Lavernia C, Prestipino A, Rubash HE. Medicare physician reimbursement: past, present, and future. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2536-2546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). Pub L 104-191, 110 Stat. 2024 (1996) (codified at 42 USC § 1320d-2).

  14. Home Health Pay for Performance Demonstration, Health and Human Resources, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare Demonstrations. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/DemoProjectsEvalRpts/MD/list.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed December 22, 2008.

  15. Internal Revenue Code §501(c)(3), 1954.

  16. Joiner KA, Libecap A, Cress AE, Wormsley S, St Germain P, Berg R, Malan P. Supporting the academic mission in an era of constrained resources: approaches at the University of Arizona College of Medicine. Acad Med. 2008;83:837–844.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marcus RE, Dennis DA, Morrey BF, Winquist RA, Zenty TF. A team approach to orthopedics: surgeons and hospitals working together. Orthop Today. 2009;29:32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Medicare Acute Care Episode (ACE) Demonstration, Health and Human Resources, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare Demonstrations. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/DemoProjectsEvalRpts/MD/list.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed December 22, 2008.

  19. Medicare Acute Care Episode (ACE) Demonstration. More Information/ Frequently Asked Questions about the Acute Care Episode (ACE) Demonstration. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/DemoProjectsEvalRpts/MD/list.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed June 9, 2009.

  20. Medicare Acute Care Episode (ACE) Demonstration. Provider Incentive, or Gainsharing, Program Rules and Proposal Requirements. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/DemoProjectsEvalRpts/MD/list.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed June 9, 2009.

  21. Medicare Acute Care Episode (ACE) Demonstration. Terms and Conditions. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/DemoProjectsEvalRpts/MD/list.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed June 9, 2009.

  22. Physician Ownership and Referral, Section 152 of the Social Security Act Amendments of 1994 (SSA 1994). Pub L No. 103-432 (1994) (codified at 42 USC § 1395nn).

  23. Stark regulations. 60 FR 41914 (Aug. 14 1995).

  24. Stark regulations. 66 FR 856 (Jan. 4, 2001).

  25. Stark regulations. 69 FR 16054 (Mar. 26, 2004).

  26. Stark regulations. 71 FR 45140 (Aug. 6, 2006).

  27. Stark regulations. 73 FR 48434 (Aug. 19, 2008).

  28. Stark regulations. Limitation on Certain Physician Referrals, 42 USC §1395nn(e) (2008).

  29. Stark regulations. 42 USC §§1395nn(b)-1395nn(e).

  30. Warner JJ, Herndon JH, Cole BJ. An academic compensation plan for an orthopaedic department. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:64–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Valerie Schmedlen for assisting with the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-5043, USA

    Randall E. Marcus MD

  2. University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Thomas F. Zenty III MPA, MHSA & Harlin G. Adelman Esq.

Authors
  1. Randall E. Marcus MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas F. Zenty III MPA, MHSA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Harlin G. Adelman Esq.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randall E. Marcus MD.

About this article

Cite this article

Marcus, R.E., Zenty, T.F. & Adelman Esq., H.G. Aligning Incentives in Orthopaedics: Opportunities and Challenges—the Case Medical Center Experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 2525–2534 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0956-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0956-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation