Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating propensity of roller spatter during application of water-based architectural paints: effect of thickeners and volume solids

  • Published:
Journal of Coatings Technology and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During roll coating application of water-based architectural paints, fibers are formed between roller and substrate. These fibers progressively thin and break up into several tiny droplets leading to the wastage of paints. This defect is widely known as spattering. In the current study, the propensity to spatter in fully formulated mid pigment volume concentration water-based architectural paints based on varying the type of thickeners, namely a combination of cellulosic with clay, cellulosic, and hydrophobically modified poly acetal/ketal polyether (HMPAPE), at similar and varying volume solids is investigated. The spatter tendency of paint is qualitatively assessed using ASTM D4707. Also, a new approach to quantify the spread area of spattered droplets is developed by thresholding-based image segmentation using an image processing toolbox of Mathematica. This newly developed quantitative approach will greatly help the formulator to better differentiate between formulations. Rheological tests, namely viscosity curve, amplitude sweep, frequency sweep, and first normal stress difference test, are carried out to unravel the flow and viscoelastic properties of paints in depth. An in-house custom-built fiber drawing device on a contact angle drop shape analyzer instrument is fabricated to study the extensional properties of paints. At the same volume solids, the paint based on a combination of cellulosic with clay thickener spatters the most, while the paint based on HMPAPE thickener spatters the least. This is mainly attributed to the chemistry, molecular weight, and thickening mechanism of thickeners. Eventually, a reliable correlation is established between observed spatter and the frequency-dependent elastic modulus outside the linear viscoelastic range at the same and varying solids for paints based on the different types of thickener. This correlation will help chemists to quickly screen formulations to minimize the spattering during roll coat application, thus saving time, cost, and manpower.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eley, RR, “Applied Rheology in the Protective and Decorative Coatings Industry.” Rheol. Rev., 173–240 (2005)

  2. Glass, JE, “Dynamics of Roll Spatter and Tracking. 1. Commercial Latex Trade Paints.” J. Coat. Technol., 50 (640) 53–60 (1978)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Glass, JE, “Dynamics of Roll Spatter and Tracking. 2. Formulation Effects in Experimental Paints.” J. Coat. Technol., 50 (640) 61–68 (1978)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Glass, JE, “Dynamics of Roll Spatter and Tracking. 3. Importance of Extensional Viscosities.” J. Coat. Technol., 50 (641) 56–71 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Glass, JE, “Dynamics of Roll Spatter and Tracking. 4. Importance of g-Star Recovery and n1 in Tracking.” J. Coat. Technol., 50 (641) 72–78 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McKinley, GH, “Visco-Elasto-Capillary Thinning and Break-Up of Complex Fluid.” HML Report Number 05-P-04, (2005) Accessed on 18 Feb 2018

  7. Fernando, RH, Xing, LL, Glass, JE, “Rheology Parameters Controlling Spray Atomization and Roll Misting Behaviour of Waterborne Coatings.” Prog. Org. Coat., 40 (1–4) 35–38 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boger, DV, Walters, K, Rheological Phenomena in Focus, 4th ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Massouda, DF, “Analysis and Prediction of Roll-Spatter from Latex Paints.” J. Coat. Technol., 57 (722) 27–36 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shay, GD, “Thickeners and Rheology Modifiers.” In: Koleske, JV (ed.) Paint Testing Manual, 15th ed. pp. 268–285 (Chapter 30) (2012)

  11. Bhattacharya, SN, Kamal, MR, Gupta, RK, Polymeric Nanocomposites: Theory and Practice. Carl Hanser Publishers (2008)

  12. White, JL, Czarnecki, L, Tanaka, H, “Experimental Studies of the Influence of Particle and Fiber Reinforcement on the Rheological Properties of Polymer Melts.” Rubber Chem. Technol., 53 (4) 823–835 (1980)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sadeghy, K, James, DF, “Elasticity of Associative Polymer Solutions and Slip at High Shear Stress.” J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 90 (2–3) 127–158 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Soules, DA, Fernando, RH, Glass, JE, “Dynamic Uniaxial Extensional Viscosity (DUEV) Effects in Roll Application I. Rib and Web Growth in Commercial Coatings.” J. Rheol., 32 (2) 181–198 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernando, RH, Glass, JE, “Dynamic Uniaxial Extensional Viscosity (DUEV) Effects in Roll Application II. Polymer Blend Studies.” J. Rheol., 32 (2) 199–213 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vanderslice, CW, Young, T-S, “Rheological and Applied Properties of Latex Paints Thickened with Conventional and Hydrophobically Modified Hydroxyethyl Cellulose.” In: Western Coatings Societies’ 20th Biennial Symposium and Show in San Francisco, California (1991)

  17. Sharma, V, Haward, SJ, Serdy, J, Keshavarz, B, Soderlund, A, Threlfall-Holmes, P, McKinley, GH, “The Rheology of Aqueous Solutions of Ethyl Hydroxy-Ethyl Cellulose (EHEC) and Its Hydrophobically Modified Analogue (hmEHEC): Extensional Flow Response in Capillary Break-Up, Jetting (ROJER) and in a Cross-Slot Extensional Rheometer.” Soft Matter, 11 (16) 3251–3270 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dexter, RW, “Measurement of Extensional Viscosity of Polymer Solutions and Its Effects on Atomization from a Spray Nozzle.” Atom. Sprays, 6 (2) 167–191 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM D4707-97, “Standard Test Method for Measuring Paint Spatter Resistance During Roller Application.” (2003)

  20. Patton, TC, Paint Flow and Pigment Dispersion: A Rheological Approach to Coating and Ink Technology, 2nd ed. Wiley, Hoboken (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bhavsar, R, Shreepathi, S, “Evolving Empirical Rheological Limits to Predict Flow-Levelling and Sag Resistance of Waterborne Architectural Paints.” Prog. Org. Coat., 101 15–23 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones, FN, Nichols, ME, Pappas, SP, Organic Coatings: Science and Technology. Wiley, Hoboken (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramsay, JDF, “Colloidal Properties of Synthetic Hectorite Clay Dispersions: I. Rheology.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 109 (2) 441–447 (1986)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sau, AC, “Hydrophobically Modified Poly(acetal-polyethers).” US Patent 5574127, 1996

  25. Hendel, RA, Yan, L, Cheng, L, “Methods for Controlling Silica Scale in Aqueous Systems.” US Patent 7316787 B2, 2008

  26. Sau, AC, “Suppression of Aqueous Viscosity of Associative Polyacetal-Polyethers.” US Patent 6809132 B2, 2004

  27. Eley, RR, “Applied Rheology and Architectural Coating Performance.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 16 (2) 263–305 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hyun, K, Wilhelm, M, Klein, CO, Cho, KS, Nam, JG, Ahn, KH, Lee, SJ, Ewoldt, RH, McKinley, GH, Prog. Polym. Sci., 36 1697–1753 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ewoldt, RH, Hosoi, AE, McKinley, GH, J. Rheol., 52 1427–1458 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bauman, T, Sullivan, T, Middleman, S, “Ribbing Instability in Coating Flows: Effect of Polymer Additives.” Chem. Eng. Commun., 14 (1–2) 35–46 (1982)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Barnes, HA, Huttton, JF, Walters, K, An Introduction to Rheology. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chatterjee, T, Van Dyk, AK, Ginzburg, VV, Nakatani, AI, “Formulation-Controlled Positive and Negative First Normal Stress Differences in Waterborne Hydrophobically Modified Ethylene Oxide Urethane (HEUR)-Latex Suspensions.” ACS Macro Lett., 6 (7) 716–720 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Franck, AJ, “Normal Stresses in Shear Flow.” TA Instruments-Technical Note AN007 (Accessed on 18 Feb 2019)

  34. Hoyt, JW, Taylor, JJ, Runge, CD, “The Structure of Jets of Water and Polymer Solution in Air.” J. Fluid Mech., 63 (4) 635–640 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bouse, LF, Carlton, JB, Jank, PC, “Effect of Water Soluble Polymers on Spray Droplet Size.” Trans. ASAE, 31 (6) 1633–1639 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ritesh Bhavsar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2302 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaudhary, S., Bhavsar, R. & Chada, V.G.R. Investigating propensity of roller spatter during application of water-based architectural paints: effect of thickeners and volume solids. J Coat Technol Res 17, 413–425 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-019-00287-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-019-00287-2

Keywords

Navigation