Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Erratum to: J. Coat. Technol. Res. (2009) 6(1):47–65 DOI 10.1007/s11998-008-9115-7
The results reported in Table 5: Results of stress–strain analysis were not calculated correctly. The correct values for Table 5 are given.
In addition, the text on the previous page, column 1, needs modification. It was “However, a significant decrease in the area under the curve and strain at break is observed. The sample becomes less flexible. Going from 0% to 1% crosslinker for the low T g latex shows hardly any difference in Young’s modulus. However from 1% to 5% of crosslinker Young’s modulus values go from approximately 20 to 38 MPa.”
It should be modified to “However, the area under the curve goes through a maximum at 1% and then levels out to a lower value at 5%, while a decrease in the strain at break is observed. The sample becomes less flexible. Going from 0% to 1% crosslinker for the low Tg latex shows an increase in Young’s modulus from 9 to 20 MPa. However, from 1% to 5% of crosslinker Young’s modulus values go from approximately 20 to 45 MPa.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s11998-008-9115-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joshi, R.G., Provder, T., Ziemer, P. et al. Erratum to: Investigation of the effect of precoalescence or postcoalescence crosslinking on film formation, properties, and latex morphology. J Coat Technol Res 7, 529–530 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-010-9266-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-010-9266-1