Skip to main content
Log in

Growing more ductile epoxies: an essential work of fracture study

  • Published:
Journal of Coatings Technology and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ambient, amine-cured epoxy compositions exist within the dual constraints of VOC regulation and the vitrification effect, which limits the ultimate T g of these materials. These combined constraints result in epoxy products that are densely crosslinked and which contain appreciable quantities of nonfugitive diluents or plasticizers. Such materials tend to be more brittle than traditional solvent-based epoxy coatings based on solid epoxy resin and polyamide hardeners. There is thus a need for a practical method to measure their fracture toughness. This work introduces the method of essential work as a useful way to determine the fracture toughness of thermoset systems. This method is then used to relate fracture toughness to the crosslink network structures of amine-cured epoxy compositions. The test compositions are varied systematically with a view to structure/properties interpretation, and employ an in situ chain extension approach to “grow” more ductile networks. Solvent uptake of selected compositions is also determined, and the relative trade-off between ductility vs. solvent uptake is examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gillham, JK, “Cure and Properties of Thermosetting Polymers.” In: Kinloch, AJ (ed.) Structural Adhesives: Developments in Resins and Primers, pp. 1–27. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London (1986)

  2. Pfaff, FA, “Mechanical Relaxation Effects in Amine Cured Epoxies.” In: Proc. SPI Epoxy Resin Formulators Conference, New Orleans, LA, Nov 3–5 (1996)

  3. Yee AF, Pearson RA Toughening Mechanisms in Elastomer-Modified Epoxies, Part 1, Mechanical Studies. J. Mater. Sci. 21, 2462–2474 (1986)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearson RA, Yee AF Toughening Mechanisms in Elastomer-Modified Epoxies, Part 2, Microscopy Studies. J. Mater Sci. 21, 2475–2488 (1986)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pearson RA, Yee AF Toughening Mechanisms in Elastomer-Modified Epoxies, Part 3, The Effect of Crosslink Density. J. Mater. Sci. 24, 2571–2580 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pearson RA, Yee AF Influence of Particle Size and Particle Size Distribution on Toughening Mechanisms in Rubber-Modified Epoxies. J. Mater. Sci. 26, 3828–3844 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cardwell BJ, Yee AF Toughening of Epoxies Through Thermoplastic Crack Bridging. J. Mater. Sci. 33, 5473–55484 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yee AF, Li D, Li X, The Importance of Constraint Relief Caused by Rubber Cavitation in the Toughening of Epoxy. J. Mater. Sci. 28, 6392–6398 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kinloch AJ, Hunston DL Effect of Volume Fraction of Dispersed Rubbery Phase on the Toughness of Rubber-Toughened Epoxy Polymers. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 6, 137–139 (1987)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ The Role of Plastic Void Growth in the Fracture of Rubber-Toughened Epoxy Polymers. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 11, 484–487 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ Modelling of the Toughening Mechanisms in Rubber-Modified Epoxy Polymers. J. Mater. Sci. 27, 2763–2769 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao K, Ye L Rate-Effect on Fracture Behavior of Core-Shell-Rubber (CSR)-Modified Epoxies. Pol. Eng. Sci. 40, 70–81 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao K, Ye L Effects of Rubber-Rich Domains and the Rubber-Plasticized Matrix on the Fracture Behavior of Liquid Rubber-Modified Araldite-F Epoxies. Pol. Eng. Sci. 40, 2288–2298 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. D5045, Amer. Soc. Test. Mater., 08.02

  15. E1820, Amer. Soc. Test. Mater., 03.01

  16. Nichols ME, Darr CA, Smith CA, Thouless MD, Fischer ER Fracture Energy of Automotive Clearcoats – I. Exp Methods Mech. Poly. Degrad. Stab. 60, 291–299 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nichols ME, Gerlock CA, Smith CA, Darr CA The Effects of Weathering on the Mechanical Performance of Automotive Paint Systems. Prog. Org. Coatings, 35, 153–159 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nichols MEJ Anticipating Paint Cracking: The Application of Fracture Mechanics to the Study of Paint Weathering. JCT, 74(924), 39 (2002)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nichols ME Using Fracture Mechanics to Characterize Organic Coatings. JCT CoatingsTech, 2(21), 62–67 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cotterell B, Reddel JK The Essential Work of Plane Stress Fracture. Int. J. Fract. 13, 267–277 (1977)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mouzakis DE, Gahleitner M, Karger-Kocsis J Toughness Assessment of Elastomeric Polypropylene (ELPP) by the Essential Work of the Fracture Method. J. Appl. Pol. Sci. 70, 873–881 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Karger-Kocsis J, Moskala EJ Molecular Dependence of the Essential and Non-Essential Work of Fracture of Amorphous Films of poly(ethylene-2,6-naphthalate) (PEN). Polymer 41, 6301–6310 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mai Y-W, Powell P Essential Work of Fracture and J-Integral Measurements for Ductile Polymers. J. Polym. Sci. Phys. B, 29, 785–793 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu J, Mai Y-W The Essential Fracture Work Concept for Toughness Measurement of Ductile Polymers. Pol. Eng. Sci. 36(18), 2275–2288 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fasce L, Bernal C, Frontini P, Mai Y-W On the Impact Essential Work of Fracture of Ductile Polymers. Pol. Eng. Sci. 41(1), 1–13 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Light ME, Lesser AJ Effect of Test Conditions on the Essential Work of Fracture in Polyethylene Terephthalate Film. J. Mater. Sci., 40, 2861–2866 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. D792, Amer. Soc. Test. Mater., 08.01

  28. Miller DR, Macosko CW A New Derivation of Post Gel Properties of Network Polymers. Macromolecules 9, 206–211 (1976)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lesser AJ, Kody RS A Generalized Model for the Yield Behavior of Epoxy Networks in Multi-axial Stress States, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys., 35, 1611–1619 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. E1356, Amer. Soc. Test. Mater., 14.02

  31. D638, Amer. Soc. Test. Mater., 08.01

  32. Pascault J-PSautereau H, Verdu J, Williams RJJ, Thermosetting Polymers, Marcel Dekker, New York, p. 369 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Prof. Alan Lesser of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, for introducing the method of essential work of fracture to us and for providing invaluable guidance; also, Fred Gelfant of Stonhard for many helpful suggestions; and Matthew Rossi for his excellent laboratory work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick A. Pfaff.

Additional information

This article was awarded the Outstanding Paper Award in New Coatings Technology at the 33rd Annual International Waterborne, High-Solids, and Powder Coatings Symposium in New Orleans, LA, February 2006, and was presented at the Thermoset Resins Formulators Association Conference in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, September 2006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfaff, F.A. Growing more ductile epoxies: an essential work of fracture study. J Coat Technol Res 4, 151–159 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-007-9013-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-007-9013-4

Keywords

Navigation