Chalmers, T. C., Frank, C. S., & Reitman, D. (1990). Minimizing the three stages of publication bias. JAMA, 263(10), 1392–1395.
Article
Google Scholar
Chalmers, I. (1990). Under reporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA, 263, 1405–1408.
Article
Google Scholar
Connor, J.T. (2008). Positive reasons for publishing negative findings. American Journal of Gastroenterology, Sep;103(9), 2181–2183.
Cutas, D., & Shaw, D. (2015). Writers blocked: On the wrongs of research co-authorship and some possible strategies for improvement. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1315–1329.
Article
Google Scholar
Dirnagl, U., & Lauritzen, M. (2010). Fighting publication bias: introducing the Negative Results section. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 30, 1263–1264.
Article
Google Scholar
Duyx, B., Urlings, M. J. E., Swaen, G. H. M., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2017). Scientific citations favor positive results: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 88, 92–101.
Article
Google Scholar
Dwan, K., Altman, D. G., Arnaiz, J. A., Bloom, J., Chan, A.-W., Cronin, E., et al. (2008). Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS ONE, 3(8), e3801. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003081.
Article
Google Scholar
Fanelli, D. (2012). Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics, 90, 891–904.
Article
Google Scholar
Hansson, S. O. (2017). Who should be author? Theoria, 83, 99–102.
Article
Google Scholar
Helgesson, G. (2015). Scientific authorship and intellectual involvement in the research – should they coincide? Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 18(2), 171–175.
Article
Google Scholar
Helgesson, G., Bülow, W., Eriksson, S., & Godskesen, T. (2019). Should the deceased be listed as authors? Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(5), 331–338.
Article
Google Scholar
Helgesson, G., & Eriksson, S. (2019). Authorship order. Learned Publishing, 32(2), 106–112.
Article
Google Scholar
Helgesson, G., & Eriksson, S. (2018). Revise the ICMJE Recommendations regarding authorship responsibility! Learned Publishing, 31(3), 267–269.
Article
Google Scholar
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Accessed 2 Oct, 2020 at http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/
Laflin, M. T., Glover, E. D., & McDermott, R. J. (2005). Publication ethics: An examination of authorship practices. American Journal of Health Behavior, 29, 579–587.
Article
Google Scholar
Marušić, A., Bošnjak, L., & Jerončić, A. (2011). A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e23477.
Article
Google Scholar
Moffatt, B. (2018). Scientific authorship, pluralism, and practice. Accountability in Research: policies and quality assurance, 25(4), 199–211.
Article
Google Scholar
Academy, N., & of Science, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM). . (2017). Fostering integrity in research. . The National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
Nylenna, M., Fagerbakk, F., & Kierulf, P. (2014). Authorship: Attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers. BMC Medical Ethics, 15(1), 53.
Article
Google Scholar
Okonta, P., & Rossouw, T. (2013). Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria. Developing World Bioethics, 13(3), 149–157.
Article
Google Scholar
Osborne, J. W., & Holland, A. (2009). What is authorship?, and what should it be A survey of prominent guidelines for determining authorship in scientific publications. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.7275/25pe-ba85.
Article
Google Scholar
Puljak, L., & Sambunjak, D. (2000). Can authorship be denied for contract work? Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 1031–1037.
Article
Google Scholar
Sauermann, H., & Haeussler, C. (2017). Authorship and contribution disclosures. Science. Advances, 3(11), e1700404.
Google Scholar
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2009). Responsible conduct of research. (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Book
Google Scholar
Smith, E., & Williams-Jones, B. (2012). Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: A review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(2), 199–212.
Article
Google Scholar
Smith, E., Hunt, M., & Master, Z. (2014). Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries. BMC Medical Ethics, 15, 42.
Article
Google Scholar
Smith, E., & Master, Z. (2017). Best practices to order authors in multi/interdisciplinary health science research publications. Accountability in Research: policies and quality assurance, 24(4), 243–267.
Article
Google Scholar
Smith, E., Williams-Jones, B., Master, Z., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., Paul-Hus, A., et al. (2020). Misconduct and misbehavior related to authorship disagreements in collaborative science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 1967–1993.
Article
Google Scholar
Song, F., Eastwood, A., Gilbody, S., Duley, L., & Sutton, A. (2000). Publication and related biases: a review. Health Technology and Assessment, 4(10), 1–115.
Article
Google Scholar
Tijdink, J. K., Schipper, K., Bouter, L. M., Maclaine Pont, P., de Jonge, J., & Smulders, Y. M. (2016). How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers. British Medical Journal Open, 6(2), e008681.
Google Scholar
Wislar, J., Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P. B., & DeAngelis, C. D. (2011). Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ, 343, d6128. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6128.
Article
Google Scholar