Ansell, C. (2012). What is a “democratic experiment”? Contemporary Pragmatism,
9(2), 159–180.
Article
Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal,
99(394), 116–131.
Article
Google Scholar
Asveld, L. (2006). Informed consent in the fields of medical and technological practice: An explorative comparison. Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology,
10(1), 16–29.
Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Böschen, S. (2013). Modes of constructing evidence: Sustainable development as social experimentation; the cases of chemical regulations and climate change politics. Nature and Culture,
8(1), 74–96.
Article
Google Scholar
Butler, B. E. (Ed.). (2012). Democratic experimentalism. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T., & Russo, M. J. (1999). Social experimentation. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: McNally.
Google Scholar
Collingridge, D. (1980). The social control of technology. London: Frances Pinter.
Google Scholar
Collingridge, D. (1992). The management of scale: Big organizations, big decisions, big mistakes. London and New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Daniels, N. (1996). Justice and justification. Reflective equilibrium in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York: Holt.
Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Holt.
Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic, the theory of inquiry. New York: Holt.
Google Scholar
Dorf, M. C., & Sabel, C. F. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review,
98(2), 267–473.
Article
Google Scholar
Drexler, K. E. (1986). Engines of creation. The coming era of nanotechnology. New York: Anchor Books.
Google Scholar
Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., & Grady, C. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical? The Journal of the American Medical Association,
283(20), 2701–2711.
Article
Google Scholar
Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., & Grady, J. O. (2008). An ethical framework for biomedical research. In Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Christine Grady, Robert A. Crouch, Reidar K. Lie, Frank G. Miller, & David Wendler (Eds.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 123–135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Felt, U., Wynne, B., Callon, M., Gonçalves, M. E., Jasanoff, S., Jepsen, M., Joly, P.-B., Konopasek, Z., May, S., Neubauer, C., Rip, A., Siune K., Stirling, A. & Tallacchini, M. (2007). Taking European knowledge society seriously. Report of the expert group on science and governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research, Science, Economy and Society.
Fisher, E., & Lightner, M. (2009). Entering the social experiment: A case for the informed consent of graduate engineering students: Social Epistemology. A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy,
23(3), 283–300.
Google Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. J., & Borning, A. (2006). Value sensitive design and information systems. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations (pp. 348–372). Armonk, NY: M.E., Sharpe.
Google Scholar
Gieryn, T. F. (2006). City as truth-spot. Laboratories and field-sites in urban studies. Social Studies of Science,
36(1), 5–38.
Article
Google Scholar
Gross, M. (2009). Collaborative experiments: Jane Addams, Hull house and experimental social work. Social Science Information,
48(1), 81–95.
Article
Google Scholar
Gross, M. (2010). Ignorance and surprise: Science, society, and ecological design. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Gross, M., & Hoffmann-Riem, H. (2005). Ecological restoration as a real-world experiment: Designing robust implementation strategies in an urban environment. Public Understanding of Science,
14(3), 269–284.
Article
Google Scholar
Gross, M., & Krohn, W. (2005). Society as experiment: Sociological foundations for a self-experimental society. History of the Human Sciences,
18(2), 63–86.
Article
Google Scholar
Hansson, S. O. (2004). Weighing risks and benefits. Topoi,
23(2), 145–152.
Article
Google Scholar
Herbold, R. (1995). Technologies as social experiments: The construction and implementation of a high-tech waste disposal site. In A. Rip, T. Misa, & J. Schot (Eds.), Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment (pp. 185–198). London and New York: Pinter.
Google Scholar
Hutchison, R. (2010). Chicago school of urban sociology. In Ray Hutchison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of urban studies (pp. 127–131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. F., Van de Poel, I., & Osseweijer, P. (2010). Sunscreens with titanium dioxide (TiO2) nano-particles. A societal experiment. Nanoethics,
4, 103–113.
Article
Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva,
41(3), 223–244.
Article
Google Scholar
Krohn, W., & Weingart, P. (1987). Commentary: Nuclear power as a social experiment-European political “fall out” from the Chernobyl meltdown. Science, Technology and Human Values,
12(2), 52–58.
Google Scholar
Krohn, W., & Weyer, J. (1994). Society as a laboratory. The social risks of experimental research. Science and Public Policy,
21(3), 173–183.
Google Scholar
Levidow, L., & Carr, S. (2007). GM crops on trial: Technological development as a real-world experiment. Futures,
39(4), 408–431.
Article
Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review,
19(2), 79–88.
Article
Google Scholar
Lorimer, J., & Driessen, C. (2014). Wild experiments at the Oostvaardersplassen: Rethinking environmentalism in the anthropocene. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,
39(2), 169–181.
Article
Google Scholar
Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (1983). Ethics in engineering (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (1996). Ethics in engineering (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Millo, Y., & Lezaun, J. (2006). Regulatory experiments: Genetically modified crops and financial derivatives on trial. Science and Public Policy,
33(3), 179–190.
Article
Google Scholar
Morone, J. G., & Woodhouse, E. J. (1986). Averting catastrophe: Strategies for regulating risky technologies. California: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Nordmann, A. (2007). If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. Nanoethics,
1(1), 36–46.
Article
Google Scholar
Nordmann, A. (2009). European experiments. In Carol Harrison & Ann Johnson (Eds.), National identity: The role of science and technology, Osiris 24 (pp. 278–302). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. (2003). Some limits of informed consent. Journal of Medical Ethics,
29(1), 4–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Owen, R., Bessant, J. R., & Heintz, M. (2013). Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Chichester: John Wiley.
Book
Google Scholar
Park, R. E. (1929). The city as social laboratory. In Thomas V. Smith & Leslie D. White (Eds.), Chicago: An experiment in social science research (pp. 1–19). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Phoenix, C., & Drexler, E. (2004). Safe exponential manufacturing. Nanotechnology,
15(8), 869–872.
Article
Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1945). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Rip, A., Misa, T., & Schot, J. (Eds.). (1995). Managing technology in society. The approach of constructive technology assessment. London and New York: Pinter.
Google Scholar
Robaey, Z., & Simons, A. (2015). Responsible management of social experiments: Challenges for policymaking. In Bert-Jaap Koops, Ilse Oosterlaken, Henny Romijn, Tsjalling Swierstra, & Jeroen van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible innovation (2nd ed., pp. 87–103). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2010). Experimentalist governance in the European union: Towards a new architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. (2014). Experiments in practice. London: Pickering & Chatto.
Google Scholar
Small, A. W. (1921). The future of sociology. Publications of the American Sociological Society,
15, 174–193.
Google Scholar
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1978). Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. (2011). Nuclear energy as a social experiment. Ethics, Policy and Environment,
14(3), 285–290.
Article
Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I. (2015). Morally experimenting with nuclear energy. In Behnam Taebi & Sabine Roeser (Eds.), The ethics of nuclear energy: Risk, justice and democracy in the post-fukushima era (pp. 179–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Wertheimer, A. (2008). Exploitation in clinical research. In Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Christine Grady, Robert A. Crouch, Reidar K. Lie, Frank G. Miller, & David Wendler (Eds.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 201–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. B. (1988). Searching for safety. New Brunswick, USA: Transaction Books.
Google Scholar
Woodhouse, E. J., & Collingridge, D. (1993). Incrementalism, intelligent trial-and-error, and political decision theory. In Harry Redner (Ed.), An heretical heir of the enlightenment: Science, politics and policy in the work of Charles E. Lindblom (pp. 131–154). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Google Scholar