Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 265–286 | Cite as

Case-Based Knowledge and Ethics Education: Improving Learning and Transfer Through Emotionally Rich Cases

  • Chase E. Thiel
  • Shane Connelly
  • Lauren Harkrider
  • Lynn D. Devenport
  • Zhanna Bagdasarov
  • James F. Johnson
  • Michael D. Mumford
Article

Abstract

Case-based instruction is a stable feature of ethics education, however, little is known about the attributes of the cases that make them effective. Emotions are an inherent part of ethical decision-making and one source of information actively stored in case-based knowledge, making them an attribute of cases that likely facilitates case-based learning. Emotions also make cases more realistic, an essential component for effective case-based instruction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of emotional case content, and complementary socio-relational case content, on case-based knowledge acquisition and transfer on future ethical decision-making tasks. Study findings suggest that emotional case content stimulates retention of cases and facilitates transfer of ethical decision-making principles demonstrated in cases.

Keywords

Case-based knowledge Case-based learning Emotion Ethical decision-making Sensemaking 

References

  1. Antes, A. L., Thiel, C. E., Martin, L. E., Mumford, M. D., Devenport, L. D., & Connelly, S. (2011). Reflection on past experience as a source of knowledge to inform ethical decision-making. Ethics and Behavior (submitted).Google Scholar
  2. Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. (2001). Analogy use in naturalistic settings: The influence of audience, emotion, and goals. Memory and Cognition, 29, 703–735.Google Scholar
  3. Bommer, M., Gratto, C., Gravander, J., & Tuttle, M. (1987). A behavioral model of ethical and unethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brock, M. E., Vert, A., Kligyte, V., Waples, E. P., Sevier, S. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). Mental models: An alternative evaluation of a sensemaking approach to ethics instruction. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cagle, J. A. B., & Baucus, S. (1996). Case studies of ethics scandals: Effects on ethical perceptions of finance students. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caughron, J. J., Antes, A. L., Stenmark, C. K., Thiel, C. E., Wang, X., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Devenport, L. D., & Brown, R. P. (2011). Sensemaking strategies for ethical decision-making. Ethics and Behavior, 5, 351–366.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, D. J. (2003). Curricular approaches to research ethics training for psychiatric investigations. Psychopharmacology, 171, 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christian, M. S., Edwards, B. D., & Bradley, J. C. (2010). Situational judgment tests: Constructs and a meta-analysis of their criterion-related validity. Personnel Psychology, 63(1), 83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christianson, S. (1992). Handbook of emotion and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Clore, G. L., & Ortony, A. (2000). Cognition in emotion: Always, sometimes, or never? In R. D. Lane & L. Nadel (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of emotion (pp. 24–61). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Connelly, S., Allen, M. T., & Waples, E. (2007). The impact of content and structure on a case-based approach to developing leadership skills. International Journal of Learning and Change, 2, 218–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahl, D. W., & Moreau, P. (2002). The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dubitzky, W., Schuster, A., Hughes, J., & Bell, D. (1997). Advanced case knowledge architecture based on fuzzy objects. Applied Intelligence, 7, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Easton, G. (1992). Learning from case studies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Falkenberg, L., & Woiceshyn, J. (2008). Enhancing business ethics: Using cases to teach moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feret, M. P., & Glasgow, J. I. (1997). Combining case-based and model-based reasoning for the diagnosis of complex devices. Applied Intelligence, 7, 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frijda, N. H. (1986). Emotions. New York City, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gaudine, A., & Thorne, L. (2001). Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gentner, D., & Medina, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition, 65, 263–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldstein, T. L., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in organizations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  23. Hammond, K. J. (1990). Case-based planning: A framework for planning from experience. Cognitive Science, 14, 385–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, W. B., & Nelson, N. (1999). Mentor-protégé relationships in graduate training: Some ethical concerns. Ethics and Behavior, 9, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keefer, M., & Ashley, K. D. (2001). Case-based approaches to professional ethics: A systematic comparison of students’ and ethicists’ moral reasoning. Journal of Moral Education, 30, 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kensinger, E. A., Uttl, B., Ohta, N., & Siegenthaler, A. L. (2006). Memory and emotion. Experimental Psychology, 54, 243–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kligyte, V., Connelly, S., Thiel, C. E., Devenport, L. D., Brown, R. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2009, April). Influence of emotions and emotion regulation strategies on ethical decision-making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the society for industrial and organizational psychology. New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  29. Kolodner, J. L. (1992). An introduction to case-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 6, 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.Google Scholar
  31. Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: A view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist, 52, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 12, 495–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kolodner, J. L., & Guzdial, M. (2000). Theory and practices of case-based learning aids. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 215–242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Kolodner, J. L., & Simpson, R. L. (1989). The MEDIATOR: Analysis of an early case-based problem solver. Cognitive Science, 13, 507–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 1019–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lundberg, C. C., Rainsford, P., Shay, J. P., & Young, C. A. (2001). Case writing reconsidered. Journal of Management Education, 25, 450–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lynn, L. (1999). Teaching and learning with cases: A guidebook. New York, NY: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  38. Mackay, D. G., Shafto, M., Taylor, J. K., Marian, D. E., Abrams, L., & Dyer, J. (2004). Relations between emotion, memory, and attention: Evidence from taboo stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks. Memory and Cognition, 32, 474–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martin, L. E., Stenmark, C. K., Thiel, C. E., Antes, A. L., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., et al. (2011). The influence of temporal orientation and affective frame on use of ethical decision-making strategies. Ethics and Behavior, 21, 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McWilliams, V., & Nahavandi, A. (2006). Using live cases to teach ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Merseth, K. K. (1996). Case and case methods in teacher education. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Gyuyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 722–744). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Moberg, D. J., & Velasquez, M. (2004). The ethics of mentoring. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., et al. (2008). Sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 18, 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mumford, M. D., Devenport, L. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., et al. (2006). Validation of ethical decision-making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics and Behavior, 16, 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Osborn, H. K. (2002). Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues: The many faces of multi-level issues (pp. 3–63). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Van Doorn, J. R. (2001). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology, 5, 225–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parkinson, B. (1996). Emotions are social. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 663–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Patalano, A. L., & Siefert, C. M. (1997). Opportunistic planning: Being reminded of pending goals. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Richardson, B. (1993). Why we need to teach crisis management and to use case studies to do it. Management Education and Development, 24, 138–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rippen, A., Booth, C., Bowie, S., & Jordan, J. (2002). A complex case: Using the case study method to explore uncertainty and ambiguity in undergraduate business education. Teaching in Higher Education, 7, 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 4, 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Steinel, W., Van Kleef, G. A., & Harinck, F. (2008). Are you talking to me?! Separating the people from the problem when expressing emotions in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 362–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stenmark, C., Antes, A. L., Wang, X., Caughron, J., Thiel, C. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Strategies in forecasting outcomes in ethical decision-making: Identifying and analyzing the causes of the problem. Ethics and Behavior, 20, 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Taylor, R. S., & Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Simulation versus text: Acquisition of explicit and implicit information. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor, R. S., Russ-Eft, D. F., & Chan, D. W. L. (2005). A meta-analytic review of behavior modeling training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 692–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., & Griffith, J. A. (2011). The influence of ethical decision-making: Comparison of a primary and secondary appraisal. Ethics and Behavior, 21(5), 380–408.Google Scholar
  59. Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. The Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  60. Urbanac, F. R. (1998). A business education resource for ethics sites on the web. Journal of Education for Business, 73, 314–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Kleef, G. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Van Kleef, G. A., & Cote, S. (2007). Expressing anger in conflict: When it helps and when it hurts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1557–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ward, T. B., Patterson, M. J., Sifonis, C. M., Dodds, R. A., & Saunders, K. N. (2002). The role of graded category structure in imaginative thought. Memory and Cognition, 30, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Werhane, P. H. (2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2, 367–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Woehr, D. J., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chase E. Thiel
    • 1
  • Shane Connelly
    • 2
  • Lauren Harkrider
    • 1
  • Lynn D. Devenport
    • 1
  • Zhanna Bagdasarov
    • 1
  • James F. Johnson
    • 1
  • Michael D. Mumford
    • 2
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  2. 2.Center for Applied Social ResearchUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations