Abstract
In this paper we describe and explore a management tool called the Caux Round Table Self-Assessment and Improvement Process (SAIP). Based upon the Caux Round Table Principles for Business — a stakeholder-based, transcultural statement of business values — the SAIP assists executives with the task of shaping their firm’s conscience through an organizational self-appraisal process. This process is modeled after the self-assessment methodology pioneered by the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Program.
After briefly describing the SAIP, we address three topics. First, we examine similarities and differences between the Baldrige approach to corporate self-assessment and the self-assessment process utilized within the SAIP. Second, we report initial findings from two beta tests of the tool. These illustrate both the SAIP’s ability to help organizations strengthen their commitment to ethically responsible conduct, and some of the tool’s limitations. Third, we briefly analyze various dimensions of the business scandals of 2001–2002 (Enron, WorldCom, Tyco, etc.) in light of the ethical requirements articulated with the SAIP. This analysis suggests that the SAIP can help link the current concerns of stakeholders — for example, investors and the general public — to organizational practice, by providing companies with a practical way to incorporate critical lessons from these unfortunate events.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Selznick, P. (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Harper & Row, New York.
Bennis, W. (2002, January 17). A corporate fear of too much truth. New York Times, p. D11.
Goodpaster, K. E., (1989) Ethical imperatives and corporate leadership, in: Andrews, K., ed. Ethics in Practice. Harvard Business School Press, Boston: 212–228.
Environics, Ltd. (1999) Millennium Poll on Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved May 15, 2003, from http://www.pwcglobal.com/extweb/ncpressrelease.nsf/0/07eab72b718eelee852567fc005ee5df/$FILE/Millennium_Exec.A4.pdf
Hill and Knowlton, Inc. (2001) Corporate Citizen Watch Survey. Retrieved May 15, 2003, from http://www.hillandknowlton.com/common/file.php/pg/dodo/hnk_global/binaries/7/HK%202001%20Corp%20Citizen%20Watch.pdf
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP. (2002) Sustainability Survey Report. Retrieved May 15, 2003, from:http://www.pwcglobal.com/extweb/ncsurvres.nsf/0cc1191c627d157d8525650600609c03/9ff9d50e5171b38b85256c400056c1c8/$FILE/Sustainability%20Final.pdf
Kaku, R. (1997) The path of kyosei. Harvard Business Review 75(4): 55–63.
Goodpaster, K.E. (1998) Bridging east and west in management ethics: Kyosei and the moral point of view, in K.E. Goodpaster, L.L. Nash, & J.B. Matthews, eds. Policies and Persons: A Casebook in Business Ethics. McGraw-Hill, New York: 529–539.
Goodpaster, K.E., Maines, T.D., & Weimerskirch, A.M. (2003, December 1). Ethical re-engineering. Minneapolis Star-Tribune, p. D3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goodpaster, K.E., Maines, T.D. & Weimerskirch, A.M. A baldrige process for ethics?. SCI ENG ETHICS 10, 243–258 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0020-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0020-x