Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Update in the treatment of traumatic brain injury

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

This review focuses on recent advances in the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) during 2004 and 2005. Injured brain is a very heterogeneous structure, significantly evolving over time. Implementation of multimodal neuromonitoring will certainly provide more insights into pathophysiology of TBI. More studies are needed to determine how to best incorporate these new parameters into effective management protocols. Based on current literature, corticosteroids should not be indicated for the treatment of TBI. Avoidance or immediate treatment of secondary insults remains a mainstream of clinical care for patients with TBI. It seems that the therapy should focus on control of intracranial hypertension, and values of cerebral perfusion pressure around 60 mm Hg appear to correlate with favorable outcome in most patients. Hypertonic saline may become a preferred osmotherapeutic agent in severely head-injured patients, especially those with refractory intracranial hypertension. Benefit and indications for performing a decompressive craniectomy remain to be determined. Overall, individualized treatment respecting actual status of a patient’s intra- and extracranial homeostasis should be the key principle of our current therapeutic approach toward severely head-injured patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control: Injury FactBook 2001–2002. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA; 2001:1–125.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Narayan R, Michel ME, Ansell B, et al.: Clinical trials in head injury. J Neurotrauma 2002, 19:503–557. This important article extensively summarizes the recent status of clinical trials in TBIs.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sosin DM, Sniezek JE, Thurman DJ: Incidence of mild and moderate brain injury in the United States, 1991. Brain Inj 1996, 10:47–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hohenstein A, Erber R, Schilling L, Weigel R: Increased mRNA expression of VEGF within the hematoma and imbalance of angiopoietin-1 and -2 mRNA within the neomembranes of chronic subdural hematoma. J Neurotrauma 2005, 22:518–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hillered L, Vespa PM, Hovda DA: Translational neurochemical research in acute human brain injury: the current status and potential future for cerebral microdialysis. J Neurotrauma 2005, 22:3–41. This important article extensively summarizes the current knowledge of intracerebral microdialysis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashwal S, Holshouser B, Tong K, et al.: Proton MR spectroscopy detected glutamate/glutamine is increased in children with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2004, 21:1539–1552.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fountas KN, Sitkauskas A, Feltes CH, et al.: Is noninvasive monitoring of intracranial pressure waveform analysis possible? Preliminary results of a comparative study of non-invasive vs. invasive intracranial slow-wave waveform analysis monitoring in patients with traumatic brain injury. Med Sci Monit 2005, 11:CR58-CR63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Voulgaris SG, Partheni M, Kaliora H, et al.: Early cerebral monitoring using the transcranial Doppler pulsatility index in patients with severe brain trauma. Med Sci Monit 2005, 11:CR49-CR52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Deogaonkar A, Gupta R, DeGeorgia M, et al.: Bispectral Index monitoring correlates with sedation scales in braininjured patients.Crit Care Med 2004, 32:2403–2406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vespa P, Bergsneider M, Hattori N, et al.: Metabolic crisis without brain ischemia is common after traumatic brain injury: a combined microdialysis and positron emission tomography study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005, 25:763–774.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Parkin M, Hopwood S, Jones DA, et al.: Dynamic changes in brain glucose and lactate in pericontusional areas of the human cerebral cortex, monitored with rapid sampling on-line microdialysis: relationship with depolarisation-like events. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005, 25:402–413.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. CRASH Trial Management Group: Research in emergency situations: with or without relatives consent. Emerg Med J 2004, 21:703. Study discusses an issue of surrogate consent versus waiving of informed consent.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts I, Yates D, Sandercock P, et al.: Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004, 364:1321–1328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards P, Arango M, Balica L, et al.: Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury outcomes at 6 months.Lancet 2005, 365:1957–1959. Study presents result of MRC, comparing methylprednisolone versus placebo in patients with TBIs.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kemp S, Biswas R, Neumann V, Coughlan A: The value of melatonin for sleep disorders occurring post-head injury: a pilot RCT.Brain Inj 2004, 18:911–919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tenovuo O: Central acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of chronic traumatic brain injury-clinical experience in 111 patients.Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2005, 29:61–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McKee JA, Brewer RP, Macy GE, et al.: Analysis of the brain bioavailability of peripherally administered magnesium sulfate: a study in humans with acute brain injury undergoing prolonged induced hypermagnesemia. Crit Care Med 2005, 33:661–666.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bourgoin A, Albanese J, Leone M, et al.: Effects of sufentanil or ketamine administered in target-controlled infusion on the cerebral hemodynamics of severely brain-injured patients. Crit Care Med 2005, 33:1109–1113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Karabinis A, Mandragos K, Stergiopoulos S, et al.: Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN50308308]. Crit Care 2004, 8:R268-R280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinez-Perez M, Bernabe F, Pena R, et al.: Effects of expiratory tracheal gas insufflation in patients with severe head trauma and acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:2021–2027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurtoglu M, Yanar H, Bilsel Y, et al.: Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after head and spinal trauma: intermittent pneumatic compression devices versus low molecular weight heparin. World J Surg 2004, 28:807–811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bouderka MA, Fakhir B, Bouaggad A, et al.: Early tracheostomy versus prolonged endotracheal intubation in severe head injury. J Trauma 2004, 57:251–254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mayer SA, Kowalski RG, Presciutti M, et al.: Clinical trial of a novel surface cooling system for fever control in neurocritical care patients. Crit Care Med 2004, 32:2508–2515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Battison C, Andrews PJ, Graham C, Petty T: Randomized, controlled trial on the effect of a 20% mannitol solution and a 7.5% saline/6% dextran solution on increased intracranial pressure after brain injury. Crit Care Med 2005, 33:196–202; discussion 257–258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ware ML, Nemani VM, Meeker M, et al.: Effects of 23.4% sodium chloride solution in reducing intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study. Neurosurgery 2005, 57:727–736.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bullock RM, Chesnut R, Clifton GL, et al.: Management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. Part 1: guidelines for management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2000, 17:449–597. Essential literature presenting evidence-based information about treatment of severely head-injured patients.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Howells T, Elf K, Jones PA, et al.: Pressure reactivity as a guide in the treatment of cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with brain trauma. J Neurosurg 2005, 102:311–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Elf K, Nilsson P, Ronne-Engstrom E, et al.: Cerebral perfusion pressure between 50 and 60 mm Hg may be beneficial in head-injured patients: a computerized secondary insult monitoring study. Neurosurgery 2005, 56:962–971.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang JY, Xu W, Li WP, et al.: Efficacy of standard trauma craniectomy for refractory intracranial hypertension with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study. J Neurotrauma 2005, 22:623–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, S.E., Hlatky, R. Update in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Curr Treat Options Neurol 8, 167–175 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-006-0007-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-006-0007-9

Keywords

Navigation