Abstract
Purpose of review
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an overburdened healthcare system. While an increased rate of ACS is expected due to the pro-thrombotic state of COVID patients, observed ACS incidence and admission rates were paradoxically decreased during the (first wave of the) pandemic. In this narrative review, we will discuss potential reasons for this decrease in ACS incidence. Furthermore, we will discuss ACS management during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we will discuss outcomes in ACS.
Recent findings
A reluctance to seek medical contact (in order not to further overburden the health system or due to fear of being infected with COVID-19 while in hospital) and unavailability of medical services seem to be important factors. This may have led to an increased symptom onset to first medical contact time and an increased rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. A trend towards less invasive management was observed (less invasive coronary angiography in NSTEMI patients and more “fibrinolysis-first” in STEMI patients), although a large variation was observed with some centers having a relative increase in early invasive management. Patients with ACS and concomitant COVID-19 infection have worse outcomes compared to ACS patients without COVID-19 infection. All of the above led to worse clinical outcomes in patients presenting with ACS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interestingly, staffing and hospital bed shortages led to experimentation with very early discharge (24 h after primary PCI) in low-risk STEMI patients which had a very good prognosis and resulted in significant shorter hospital duration.
Summary
During the COVID-19 pandemic, ACS incidence and admission rates were decreased, symptom onset to first medical contact time prolonged, and out-of-hospital rates increased. A trend towards less invasive management was observed. Patients presenting with ACS during the COVID-19 pandemic had a worse outcome. On the other hand, experimental very early discharge in low-risk patients may relieve the healthcare system. Such initiatives, and strategies to lower the reluctance of patients with ACS symptoms to seek medical help, are vital to improve prognosis in ACS patients in future pandemics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In late 2019, cases of pneumonia with an unknown etiology in Wuhan were reported by the Chinese Health Authority. A novel virus was identified, initially called 2019-nCOV (novel coronavirus 2019). After further research revealed its association with the coronavirus (CoV) which caused an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2002, the novel virus was renamed SARS-CoV-2 [1]. The disease caused by this new virus was called coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) and spread rapidly causing a large burden of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the worldwide spread as a pandemic on March 11th [2].
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Its clinical presentation is broad and ranges from cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmias, or painfree at presentation [3]. Its leading symptom is acute chest discomfort (e.g., pain, pressure, tightness, or burning), and it is caused by myocardial ischemia, and ultimately necrosis, due to coronary stenosis with or without plaque rupture and local thrombosis [3]. Its acute treatment includes antithrombotic medication and coronary revascularization and for the longer term preventive measures including lifestyle changes and secondary preventive medication [3].
In this narrative review, we will discuss the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ACS, including the impact on incidence, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.
Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on ACS Incidence
Hypercoagulopathy in COVID-19
Early in the pandemic, venous and arterial thrombotic complications were noted in patients admitted with COVID-19 including deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, acute limb ischemia, acute cerebrovascular accident, aortic thrombosis, mesenteric ischemia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and acute coronary syndrome [4•]. The pathophysiology is partly understood. SARS-CoV2 binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2). ACE-2 acts as a counter-regulatory enzyme-converting angiotensin I to angiotensin II and is present throughout the human body including endothelial cells in the small and large arteries and veins and alveolar epithelial cells in the lungs and in nasal, oral, and nasopharynx mucosa cells [5]. By binding to ACE-2, SARS-CoV2 inhibits its function, preventing angiotensin I to be broken down by ACE-2, promoting a pro-inflammatory state, as well as vasoconstriction, sodium retention and fibrosis [6]. The pro-inflammatory milieu is evidenced by high levels of cytokines IL-2, IL-7, IL-10, and IgG-induced protein 10, granulocyte-stimulating factor, macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and tumor-necrosis factor alpha [7]. This inflammation may result in an hypercoagulable state via endothelial cells dysfunction, activating platelets and tissue factor (TF), triggering the coagulation by binding of TF to factor VIIa [8, 9], leading to venous and arterial thrombosis.
COVID-19-induced ACS
Two types of myocardial infarction may occur in patients with COVID-19: type 1 myocardial infarction (caused by a critical coronary stenosis with or without plaque rupture and local thrombosis) and type 2 myocardial infarction (caused by “demand ischemia” due to hypoxemia, hypotension, anemia, and with or without underlying stable coronary artery disease) [3].
As outlined above, COVID-19 infection resulting in a pro-inflammatory state may lead to a higher propensity of plaque rupture [10] and thrombus formation [11] leading to type I acute myocardial infarction. Indeed, concomitant occurrence of ACS in patients with COVID-19 has been reported [12, 13•, 14,15,16,17]. These data suggest that COVID-19 patients presenting with ACS have a high thrombus burden including multivessel thrombus and stent thrombosis [13•] and, when compared to historical controls without COVID-19, have worse outcome with a higher risk for cardiogenic shock and increased risk of mortality [16]. These differences might be explained by differences in coagulability [12] but also increased symptom-to-admission times [16]. However, these data need to be interpreted with caution since study size is relatively small and only few studies have collected data prospectively.
Decreased ACS Admission Rates
Despite the above outlined correlation between COVID-19 infection and occurrence of venous and arterial thrombosis including ACS, a surprisingly substantial reduction in ACS admission rates was observed since the COVID-19 pandemic was declared. A reduction in STEMI presentations of 2.4% to as high as 48.9% was observed [18,19,20]. A systematic review including 11 studies with STEMI patients showed an overall reduction of 24% [21]. In NSTEMI, this was 40 to 50% during the first wave [19, 20, 22,23,24,25]. A meta-analysis including 9 studies on patients admitted with NSTEMI during the first wave showed an overall reduction of 31% [21]. Multiple studies have revealed an upward trend towards normal at the end of this first wave [19, 26].
Although not completely understood, multiple explanations were proposed, which can be divided in two subgroups: (1) a true lower overall incidence of ACS and (2) ACS underdiagnosing due to patient behavior and/or an overburdened healthcare system.
A true lower overall incidence might be explained by several reasons. Early in the pandemic, during lockdowns, patients might have been exposed to less physical and emotional stress, triggering less ACS. Sport facilities were closed, and in some countries, there was an evening curfew, limiting the possibilities to perform (vigorous) exercise. Other well-known potential triggers such as exposure to polluted air and other respiratory disease such as the flu were also reduced [27,28,29]. Furthermore, they might have improved their health behavior practice to help alleviate healthcare burden [30].
ACS underdiagnosing due to patients’ behavior and an overburdened healthcare system may be another explanation. Patients were reluctant to burden the healthcare system and seek medical help. Furthermore, they may have been reluctant to avoid contact with COVID-19 patients at the emergency departments. Indeed, symptom onset to first medical contact times was increased [21]. Furthermore, out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were increased, which could not all be attributed to COVID-19 infections, suggesting primary cardiac arrests in patients with ACS not seeking medical help [31•].
Symptom Onset-to-Treatment Time in STEMI Patients
Symptom onset to treatment time in ACS during the pandemic may have been influenced by the above-mentioned overburdened healthcare system and possible reluctance to seek medical attention. Studies have indeed shown increased symptom onset to first medical contact time [32], symptom onset to door time [33], and symptom onset to balloon time [34]. A meta-analysis of 28 studies published in 2022 showed an average increase in symptom onset to first medical contact time of 91 min during the first wave in 2020 when compared to the same period in 2019 [21].
In-hospital delay appears to have been only limited as other studies have shown door-to-balloon time was not increased [35, 36]. The aforementioned meta-analysis including 24 studies which reported door-to-balloon times showed a statistical significant but in absolute terms only modest increase in door-to-balloon time of 5 min [21].
Treatment Strategies During the Pandemic
In parallel to the previously described decline in ACS presentation and admission rates, a drop in PCI rates was observed. In a large study performed in the UK, PCI in STEMI patients decreased with 18% and PCI in NSTEMI patients with 37% [20]. However, from the patients admitted for ACS, the proportion of patients undergoing PCI was slightly increased during the first wave of the pandemic [20]. A Chinese study on the other hand showed a lower percentage of invasive strategy in patients presenting with NSTEMI early in the pandemic period as compared with NSTEMI patients presenting in the same period one year earlier [37]. It may therefore be hypothesized that the impact of the pandemic on treatment strategies was not uniform across all geographies but rather dependent on several factors including local healthcare protocols, geographical factors (rural vs. urban agglomerations), and intensity of the pandemic expressed in the number of infected and hospitalized.
A “fibrinolysis-first” treatment strategy (instead of primary PCI) was proposed as an alternative strategy for acute revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI to alleviate the overburdened healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic [38, 39]. This strategy however led to a lower rate of timely reperfusion with an increased rate of recurrent ischemia and a higher rate of cardiogenic shock, and more patients developed heart failure in a Chinese hospital in Beijng [38]. Another study performed in a hospital in Tianjin, China, compared treatment strategies early in the COVID-19 pandemic period (January to February 2020) with the same period one year earlier [37]. A primary PCI strategy was performed more often in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period, while thrombolytic therapy was performed more often in the early pandemic period [37]. This did not result in differences in 30-day all-cause mortality or major cardiac adverse event rates in STEMI patients presenting during the different periods [37].
Length of Hospital Admission
During the pandemic, especially during the first wave, the length of hospital admissions was reduced for both NSTEMI and STEMI, as shown by several studies. A large study in the UK showed a reduction in median admission time from 5 days (interquartile range 3–11) to 3 days (IQR 2–6) for NSTEMI and 3 days (IQR 2–6) to 2 days (IQR 2–4) in STEMI patients [20]. An analysis from the Mass General Brigham health system revealed that length of stay for patients admitted for ACS was significantly shorter during the first pandemic wave (March 2020) compared with the same period 1 year earlier (median of 4.8 days [IQR 2.4–8.3 days] versus 6.0 days [IQR 3.1–9.6 days], p < 0.003) [40••]. A cross-sectional study performed in the USA showed a reduction in median hospital length of stay of 7 h in the early COVID-19 period (February 23, 2020) and 6 h in the later COVID-19 period (March 29, 2020, to May 16, 2020) [19]. Early discharge of ACS patients increased bed capacity, preserved resources in an already overburdened healthcare system, and minimized the risk of exposure of ACS patients to COVID-19 in-hospital. Therefore, local protocols have been developed to aim for “very early discharge” in STEMI patients, defined as discharge 24 h after primary PCI in low-risk patients. For example, the Ottawa Heart Institute in Canada introduced the Very Early Hospital Discharge (VEHD) protocol [41]. Earlier research showed that early discharge (24 h to 3 days) after primary PCI was safe, as shown in a meta-analysis including more than 1500 STEMI patients [42]. Reports using observational data have suggested that very early discharge after 24 h is indeed safe in low-risk STEMI patients after successfully performed primary PCI [43,44,45,46].
Impact on (Long-Term) Clinical Outcomes
Clinical outcomes for ACS patients were significantly worse during the first wave in 2020 compared with the same period in 2019. A meta-analysis showed that in-hospital mortality of STEMI patients was increased by 33%, as estimated from 34 studies [21]. For NSTEMI patients, the increase in estimated in-hospital mortality was 34% using data from 8 studies [21].
Increased mortality rates can be explained by several reasons. In STEMI patients, there was a considerable treatment delay mostly caused by patient delay, as outlined above. Indeed, in STEMI patients, this led to an increased rate of patients presenting in cardiogenic shock of 33% and an increased rate of patients with mechanical complications of 80% [21]. Some studies even reported odds ratios of 2.3 up to as high as 3.6 for patients presenting with mechanical complications during the 2020 COVID pandemic compared with the same period in 2019 [47,48,49,50]. In NSTEMI patients, worse outcomes may be explained by a higher rate of conservative therapy without invasive angiography, lower reperfusion therapy rates, and longer time to first medical contact [37].
Finally, COVID-19 infection in patients with ACS resulted in a poorer prognosis compared with ACS patients without concomitant COVID-19 infections [34, 51] and may also be an important explanation for worse outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusions
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on the management of ACS care, as summarized in Fig. 1. While an increased rate of ACS during such a pandemic is plausible (due to an increase in ACS incidence triggered by COVID-19 infections), a decreased incidence of ACS and admissions rates for ACS were observed. Although some potential ACS triggers were indeed reduced, such as less vigorous exercise due to closure of sport facilities, less air pollution, and less respiratory virus infections such as the flu, a change in patient behavior with avoidance of seeking medical help when having ACS symptoms is very likely, leading to increased symptom onset to first medical contact times and an increased rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and mechanical complications of myocardial infarction. Less patients with NSTEMI underwent invasive coronary angiography, while in STEMI patients, more patients received a fibrinolysis-first management (instead of primary PCI), although a large variation was observed with some centers having a relative increase in early invasive management. Patients with ACS and concomitant COVID-19 infection have worse outcomes compared to ACS patients without concomitant COVID-19 infection. All of the above led to worse clinical outcomes in patients presenting with ACS during the COVID pandemic. Very early discharge (24 h after primary PCI) in low-risk STEMI patients on the other hand had a very good prognosis and resulted in significantly shorter hospital duration of stay. Such initiatives, and strategies to lower the reluctance of patients with ACS symptoms to seek medical help, are vital to improve prognosis in ACS patients in future pandemics.
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of V. The species severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5:536–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z.
Listings of WHO’s response to COVID-19. 2021. https://www.who.int/news/item/29-06-2020-covidtimeline. In.
Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, Barthelemy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL, Dendale P, Dorobantu M, Edvardsen T, Folliguet T, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:1289–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.
Bikdeli B, Madhavan MV, Jimenez D, Chuich T, Dreyfus I, Driggin E, Nigoghossian C, Ageno W, Madjid M, Guo Y, et al. COVID-19 and thrombotic or thromboembolic disease: implications for prevention, antithrombotic therapy, and follow-up: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:2950–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.031.This is a comprehensive overview of thrombotic disease and thromboembolic complications in patients with COVID-19.
Hamming I, Timens W, Bulthuis ML, Lely AT, Navis G, van Goor H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J Pathol. 2004;203:631–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1570.
Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si HR, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang CL, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7.
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.
Mackman N. The role of tissue factor and factor VIIa in hemostasis. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1447–52. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31819bceb1.
Panigada M, Bottino N, Tagliabue P, Grasselli G, Novembrino C, Chantarangkul V, Pesenti A, Peyvandi F, Tripodi A. Hypercoagulability of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: a report of thromboelastography findings and other parameters of hemostasis. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:1738–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14850.
Madjid M, Vela D, Khalili-Tabrizi H, Casscells SW, Litovsky S. Systemic infections cause exaggerated local inflammation in atherosclerotic coronary arteries: clues to the triggering effect of acute infections on acute coronary syndromes. Tex Heart Inst J. 2007;34:11–8.
Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:844–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14768.
Bangalore S, Sharma A, Slotwiner A, Yatskar L, Harari R, Shah B, Ibrahim H, Friedman GH, Thompson C, Alviar CL, et al. ST-segment elevation in patients with COVID-19 - a case series. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2478–80. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2009020.
• Choudry FA, Hamshere SM, Rathod KS, Akhtar MM, Archbold RA, Guttmann OP, Woldman S, Jain AK, Knight CJ, Baumbach A, et al. High thrombus burden in patients with COVID-19 presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:1168–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.022.This paper showed that patients with COVID-19 presenting with ACS have a high thrombus burden including multivessel thrombus and stent thrombosis.
Garcia S, Dehghani P, Grines C, Davidson L, Nayak KR, Saw J, Waksman R, Blair J, Akshay B, Garberich R, et al. Initial findings from the North American COVID-19 Myocardial Infarction Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:1994–2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.055.
Hamadeh A, Aldujeli A, Briedis K, Tecson KM, Sanz-Sanchez J, Al Dujeili M, Al-Obeidi A, Diez JL, Zaliunas R, Stoler RC, et al. Characteristics and outcomes in patients presenting with COVID-19 and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2020;131:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.063.
Kite TA, Ludman PF, Gale CP, Wu J, Caixeta A, Mansourati J, Sabate M, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Candilio L, Sadeghipour P, et al. International prospective registry of acute coronary syndromes in patients with COVID-19. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:2466–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.03.309.
Stefanini GG, Montorfano M, Trabattoni D, Andreini D, Ferrante G, Ancona M, Metra M, Curello S, Maffeo D, Pero G, et al. ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with COVID-19: clinical and angiographic outcomes. Circulation. 2020;141:2113–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047525.
Furnica C, Chistol RO, Chiran DA, Stan CI, Sargu GD, Girlescu N, Tinica G. The impact of the early COVID-19 pandemic on st-segment elevation myocardial infarction presentation and outcomes-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030588.
Gluckman TJ, Wilson MA, Chiu ST, Penny BW, Chepuri VB, Waggoner JW, Spinelli KJ. Case rates, treatment approaches, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:1419–24. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3629.
Mafham MM, Spata E, Goldacre R, Gair D, Curnow P, Bray M, Hollings S, Roebuck C, Gale CP, Mamas MA, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and admission rates for and management of acute coronary syndromes in England. Lancet. 2020;396:381–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31356-8.
Altobelli E, Angeletti PM, Marzi F, D’Ascenzo F, Petrocelli R, Patti G. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on emergency department presentation and prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092323.
Gitt AK, Karcher AK, Zahn R, Zeymer U. Collateral damage of COVID-19-lockdown in Germany: decline of NSTE-ACS admissions. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109:1585–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01705-x.
Mohamed MO, Kinnaird T, Curzen N, Ludman P, Wu J, Rashid M, Shoaib A, de Belder M, Deanfield J, Gale CP, et al. In-hospital and 30-day mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in England in the pre-COVID and COVID eras. J Invasive Cardiol. 2021;33:E206–19.
Noorali AAA, Thobani H, Hashmi S, Iqbal S, Merchant AA, Haroon MA, Chauhan SSB, Mallick S, Zahid N, Khan Y, et al. Comparative trends in ischemic heart disease admissions, presentation and outcomes due to the COVID-19 pandemic: first insights from a tertiary medical center in Pakistan. Cureus. 2021;13:e17558. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17558.
Wu J, Mamas M, Rashid M, Weston C, Hains J, Luescher T, de Belder MA, Deanfield JE, Gale CP. Patient response, treatments, and mortality for acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021;7:238–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa062.
Showkathali R, Yalamanchi R, Sankeerthana MP, Kumaran SN, Shree S, Nayak R, Oomman A, Mahilmaran A. Acute coronary syndrome admissions and outcome during COVID-19 pandemic-report from large tertiary centre in India. Indian Heart J. 2020;72:599–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2020.09.005.
Montone RA, Rinaldi R, Bonanni A, Severino A, Pedicino D, Crea F, Liuzzo G. Impact of air pollution on ischemic heart disease: evidence, mechanisms, clinical perspectives. Atherosclerosis. 2023;366:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.01.013.
Sielski J, Jozwiak MA, Kazirod-Wolski K, Siudak Z, Jozwiak M. Impact of air pollution and COVID-19 infection on periprocedural death in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416654.
Warren-Gash C, Hayward AC, Hemingway H, Denaxas S, Thomas SL, Timmis AD, Whitaker H, Smeeth L. Influenza infection and risk of acute myocardial infarction in England and Wales: a CALIBER self-controlled case series study. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:1652–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis597.
Kim K, Yu J. Fear of COVID-19 and social distancing on the health behavior of coronary heart disease patients. Appl Nurs Res. 2023;69:151664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151664.
• Baldi E, Sechi GM, Mare C, Canevari F, Brancaglione A, Primi R, Klersy C, Palo A, Contri E, Ronchi V, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:496–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2010418.This paper showed an increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, which could not all be attributed to COVID-19 infections, suggesting primary cardiac arrests in patients with ACS not seeking medical help.
Tam CF, Cheung KS, Lam S, Wong A, Yung A, Sze M, Fang J, Tse HF, Siu CW. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on outcome of myocardial infarction in Hong Kong, China. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:E194–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28943.
Toner L, Koshy AN, Hamilton GW, Clark D, Farouque O, Yudi MB. Acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the COVID-19 era: comparable case volumes but delayed symptom onset to hospital presentation. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020;6:225–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa038.
Popovic B, Varlot J, Metzdorf PA, Jeulin H, Goehringer F, Camenzind E. Changes in characteristics and management among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to COVID-19 infection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:E319–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29114.
Hammad TA, Parikh M, Tashtish N, Lowry CM, Gorbey D, Forouzandeh F, Filby SJ, Wolf WM, Costa MA, Simon DI, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a non-COVID-19 epicenter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:208–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28997.
Reinstadler SJ, Reindl M, Lechner I, Holzknecht M, Tiller C, Roithinger FX, Frick M, Hoppe UC, Jirak P, Berger R, et al. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on treatment delays in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Clin Med. 2020;9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072183.
Gao J, Lu PJ, Li CP, Wang H, Wang JX, Zhang N, Li XW, Zhao HW, Dou J, Bai MN, et al. Reconsidering treatment guidelines for acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022;22:194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02626-5.
Leng WX, Yang JG, Li XD, Jiang WY, Gao LJ, Wu Y, Yang YM, Yuan JQ, Yang WX, Qiao SB, et al. Impact of the shift to a fibrinolysis-first strategy on care and outcomes of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic-the experience from the largest cardiovascular-specific centre in China. Int J Cardiol. 2021;329:260–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.074.
Walters D, Mahmud E. Thrombolytic therapy for st-elevation myocardial infarction presenting to non-percutaneous coronary intervention centers during the COVID-19 crisis. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021;23:152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01576-2.
•• Bhatt AS, Moscone A, McElrath EE, Varshney AS, Claggett BL, Bhatt DL, Januzzi JL, Butler J, Adler DS, Solomon SD, et al. Fewer hospitalizations for acute cardiovascular conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:280–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.038. This is one of the early papers showing a decline in ACS admission rates during the pandemic.
Marbach JA, Alhassani S, Chong AY, MacPhee E, Le May M. A novel protocol for very early hospital discharge after STEMI. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36:1826–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2020.08.012.
Gong W, Li A, Ai H, Shi H, Wang X, Nie S. Safety of early discharge after primary angioplasty in low-risk patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25:807–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487318763823.
Bawamia B, Brown A, Spyridopoulos I, Bagnall A, Edwards R, Purcell I, Egred M, Zaman A, Alkhalil M. Very early discharge after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: mortality outcomes at six months. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023;46:12–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2022.08.022.
Rathod KS, Comer K, Casey-Gillman O, Moore L, Mills G, Ferguson G, Antoniou S, Patel R, Fhadil S, Damani T, et al. Early hospital discharge following PCI for patients with STEMI. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:2550–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.1379.
Shah JA, Saghir T, Ahmed B, Ul Haq SA, Kumar R, Mengal MN, Zehra M, Raza SS, Karim M, Qamar N. Safety and feasibility of same day discharge strategy for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Glob Heart. 2021;16:46. https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1035.
Yndigegn T, Gilje P, Dankiewicz J, Mokhtari A, Isma N, Holmqvist J, Schiopu A, Ravn-Fischer A, Hofmann R, Szummer K, et al. Safety of early hospital discharge following admission with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide cohort study. EuroIntervention. 2022;17:1091–9. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00501.
Bryndza MA, Litwinowicz R, Bartus S, Nosal M, Godlewski J, Orzechowska A, Wisniewski A, Korpak-Wysocka R, Rzeszutko L, Kocik P, et al. Incidence of mechanical complications following myocardial infarction during the first two months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Southern Poland region: a multicenter study. Kardiol Pol. 2021;79:66–8. https://doi.org/10.33963/KP.15653.
Fardman A, Zahger D, Orvin K, Oren D, Kofman N, Mohsen J, Tsafrir O, Asher E, Rubinshtein R, Jamal J, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in the Covid-19 era: incidence, clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes-A multicenter registry. PLoS One. 2021;16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253524.
Gadre A, Kotaru V, Mehta A, Kumar D, Rayasam V. Delayed presentation during COVID-19 pandemic leading to post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect. Cureus. 2021;13:e15945. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15945.
Rodriguez-Leor O, Cid-Alvarez B, Perez de Prado A, Rossello X, Ojeda S, Serrador A, Lopez-Palop R, Martin-Moreiras J, Rumoroso JR, Cequier A, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care. The Spanish experience. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2020;73:994–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2020.08.002.
El-Qushayri AE, Dahy A, Benmelouka AY, Kamel AMA. The effect of COVID-19 on the in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a large scale meta-analysis. Am J Med Open. 2023;9:100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100032.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Claessen has received consultancy fees from Philips, Sanofi, Amgen, and Boston Scientific and payments for lectures/speaker fees from Abiomed and Amgen. Dr. Grundeken has no conflict of interests to report.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Grundeken, M.J., Claessen, B.E.P.M. Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak on the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction Patients. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 25, 233–243 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-023-00988-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-023-00988-3