Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A practical update on bulk semen analysis

  • Published:
Current Sexual Health Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bulk semen analysis is a highly valuable diagnostic tool used to evaluate the infertile male. Yet despite its importance, it often remains poorly understood. A basic understanding of the epidemiology of the infertile male is needed to best interpret bulk semen analysis. Its accurate interpretation allows the urologist to initiate a more efficient treatment plan. Using multiple semen parameters improves the urologist’s ability to more accurately discriminate between fertile and infertile men. We review the basic epidemiology of the infertile male and discuss the accurate interpretation of semen analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, et al.: Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three french regions (1988–1989). Hum Reprod 1991, 6:811–816.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. MacLeod J: The male factor in fertility and infertility; an analysis of ejaculate volume in 800 fertile men and in 600 men in infertile marriage. Fertil Steril 1950, 4:347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  3. MacLeod J, Gold RZ: The male factor in fertility and infertility. IV. Sperm morphology in fertile and infertile marriage. Fertil Steril 1951, 5:394–414.

    Google Scholar 

  4. MacLeod J, Gold RZ: The male factor in fertility and infertility. II. Spermatozoon counts in 1000 men of known fertility and in 1000 cases of infertile marriage. J Urol 1951, 66:436–449.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, et al.: Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:1388–1393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Niederberger CS: Understanding the epidemiology of fertility treatments. Urol Clin North Am 2002, 4:829–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Owen DH, Katz DF: A review of the physical and chemical properties of human semen and the formulation of a semen simulant. J Androl 2005, 4:459–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shetty Licht R, Handel L, Sigman M: Site of semen collection and its effect on semen analysis parameters. Fertil Steril 2007, In press.

  9. Appell RA, Evans PR: The effect of temperature on sperm motility and viability. Fertil Steril 1977, 12:1329–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Weiss N, et al.: Relationship between the duration of sexual abstinence and semen quality: analysis of 9489 semen samples. Fertil Steril 2005, 83:1680–1686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Jonge C, LaFromboise M, Bosmans E, et al.: Influence of the abstinence period on human sperm quality. Fertil Steril 2004, 82:57–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Keel BA, Stembridge TW, Pineda G, Serafy NT Sr: Lack of standardization in performance of the semen analysis among laboratories in the United States. Fertil Steril 2002, 78:603–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Menkveld R, Wong WY, Lombard CJ, et al.: Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds. Hum Reprod 2001, 6:1165–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldstein M, Schlossberg S: Men with congenital absence of the vas deferens often have seminal vesicles. J Urol 1988, 140:85–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Daudin M, Bieth E, Bujan L, et al.: Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens: clinical characteristics, biological parameters, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutations, and implications for genetic counseling. Fertil Steril 2000, 74:1164–1174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sigman M: Male infertility: absent of low-volume ejaculate. In Cambell-Walsh’s Urology. Edited by Wein AJ. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier Press; 2007:609–653.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kuligowska E, Baker CE, Oates RD: Male infertility: Role of transrectal US in diagnosis and management. Radiology 1992, 185:353–360.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Purohit RS, Wu DS, Shinohara K, Turek PJ: A prospective comparison of 3 diagnostic methods to evaluate ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol 2004, 171:232–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meacham RB, Hellerstein DK, Lipshultz LI: Evaluation and treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction in the infertile male. Fertil Steril 1993, 59:393–397.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schoor RA, Elhanbly S, Niederberger CS, Ross LS: The role of testicular biopsy in the modern management of male infertility. J Urol 2002, 167:197–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferlin A, Arredi B, Speltra E, et al.: Molecular and clinical characterization of Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men: a 10-year experience in Italy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007, 92:762–770.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jarow JP, Sharlip ID, Belker AM, et al.: Best practice policies for male infertility. J Urol 2002, 167:2138–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nabi G, Asterlings S, Greene DR, Marsh RL: Percutaneous embolization of varicoceles: outcomes and correlation of semen improvement with pregnancy. Urology 2004, 63:359–363.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Marmar JL, Agarwal A, Prabakaran S, et al.: Reassessing the value of varicocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2007, 88:639–648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Francavilla S, Pelliccione F, Cordeschi G, et al.: Ultrastructural analysis of asthenozoospermic ejaculates in the era of assisted procreation. Fertil Steril 2006, 85:940–946.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gubin DA, Dmochowski R, Kutteh WH: Multivariant analysis of men from infertile couples with and without antisperm antibodies. Am J Reprod Immunol 1998, 39:157–160.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vicari E: Effectiveness and limits of antimicrobial treatment on seminal leukocyte concentration and related reactive oxygen species production in patients with male accessory gland infection. Hum Reprod 2000, 15:2536–2544.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nallella KP, Sharma RK, Aziz N, Agarwal A: Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril 2006, 85:629–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bonde JP, Ernst E, Jensen TK, et al.: Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners. Lancet 1998, 352:1172–1177.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gunalp S, Onculoglu C, Gurgan T, et al.: A study of semen parameters with emphasis on sperm morphology in a fertile population: An attempt to develop clinical thresholds. Hum Reprod 2001, 16:110–114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Muller CH: Rationale, interpretation, validation, and uses of sperm function tests. J Androl 2000, 21:10–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jedrzejczak P, Taszarek-Hauke G, Hauke J, et al.: Prediction of spontaneous conception based on semen parameters. Int J Androl 2007, In press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Andrology, University of Illinois, 840 South Wood Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA

    Hector Pimentel

Authors
  1. Hector Pimentel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Craig Niederberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hector Pimentel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pimentel, H., Niederberger, C. A practical update on bulk semen analysis. Curr sex health rep 5, 36–40 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-008-0007-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-008-0007-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation