Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Classical Psychodynamics to Evidence Synthesis: The Motif of Repression and a Contemporary Understanding of a Key Mediatory Mechanism in Psychosis

  • SCHIZOPHRENIA AND OTHER PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS (SJ SIEGEL, SECTION EDITOR)
  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stress vulnerability model has proven to be a politically important model for two reasons. It has provided the framework that defines a temporal and dynamic process whereby a person’s uniquely determined biopsychosocial vulnerability to schizophrenia symptoms interacts with his or her capacity to manage stress and the amount and type of stress experienced in such a way that the person experiences schizophrenia symptoms. Second, the development of this framework promoted the notion of inherited and acquired vulnerability. Implicit was that vulnerability was individually determined and that there was a role for psychosocial factors in the development/maintenance of schizophrenia symptoms. This proved to be a catalyst for the development of studies implicating psychosocial factors in the etiology of schizophrenia symptoms. Studies derived from cognitive-behavioral theories have proven the most successful in identifying thinking patterns, emotional disturbances, and neurocognitive and defensive vulnerability factors inherent in the development of schizophrenia symptoms. Historically, within the psychoanalytic school there has been debate regarding the role of repressive coping mechanisms in schizophrenia development. Psychoanalytic theories have always appeared incapable of providing etiologic explanations of schizophrenia symptoms, with the possible exception of Melanie Klein, than other more salient psychosocial schools. Mechanisms within the process of repressive coping are consistent with evidence and mechanisms supporting the stress vulnerability models and existing cognitive-behavioral theories regarding development of paranoid delusions. These mechanisms are less consistent with social cognitive explanations of schizophrenia symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Zubin J, Spring B. Vulnerability: a new view of psychosis. J Abnorm Psychol. 1977;86:260–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nuchterlien KH, Dawson ME. A heuristic vulnerability/stress model of schizophrenic episodes. Schizophr Bull. 1984;10:300–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholson I, Neufield W. A dynamic vulnerability perspective on stress and psychosis. Am J Orthopsychiat. 1992;62(1):117–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yank GR, Bentley KJ, Hargrove DS. The vulnerability-stress model of schizophrenia: advances in psychosocial treatment. Am J Orthopsychiat. 1993;63(1):55–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nuchterlien KH, Subotnick KL. The cognitive origins of schizophrenia and prospects for intervention. In: Wykes T, Tarrier N, Lewis S, editors. Outcome and innovation in psychological treatment of schizophrenia. Chichester: Wiley; 1998. p. 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nuchterlien KH, Dawson ME. Information processing and attentional functioning in the developmental course of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1984;10:160–203.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corcoran C, Walker E, Huot R, Mittal V, Tessner K, Kestler L, Malaspina D. The stress cascade and schizophrenia: etiology and onset. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29(4):671–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Winkel R, Stefanis NC, Myin-Germeys I. Psychosocial stress and psychosis. A review of neurobiological mechanisms and the evidence for gene–stress interactions. Schizophr Bull. 2008;34:1095–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Falloon IRH, Laporta L, Fadden G, Graham-Hole V. Coping with stress: the role of the family. In: Falloon IRH, Laporta L, Fadden G, Graham-Hole V, editors. Managing stress in families. London: Routledge; 1993. p. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Myin-Germeys I, Krabbendam L, Delespaul PA, et al. Do life events have their effect on psychosis by influencing the emotional reactivity to daily life stress? Psychol Med. 2003;33:327–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barrowclough C, Hooley JM. Attributions and expressed emotion: a review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2003;23:849–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Strauss JS. Hallucinations and delusions as points on continua function. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1969;21:581–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. van Os J, Linscott RJ, Myin-Germeys I, Delespaul P, Krabbendam L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness-persistence-impairment model of psychotic disorder. Psychol Med. 2008;39:179–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Verdoux H, van Os J. Psychotic symptoms in non-clinical populations and the continuum of psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2002;54:59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kingdon D, Turkington D. Cognitive therapy of schizophrenia. New York: The Guilford Press; 2005. p. 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davis E, Velleman R, Smith G, et al. Psychosocial developments: towards a model of recovery. In: Velleman R, Davis E, Smith G, et al., editors. Changing outcomes in psychosis: collaborative cases from practitioners, users and carers. BPS Blackwell, www.blackwellpsychology.com. 2007; pp. 1–21.

  17. Pilling S, Bebbington P, Kuipers E, et al. Psychological treatments in psychosis: 1. Meta-analysis of family intervention and cognitive behaviour therapy. Psychol Med. 2002;32:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  18. •• van Os J, Kenis G, Rutten BPF. The environment and schizophrenia. Nature. 2010;468:203–12. This excellent paper highlights and emphasizes in a precise and evidence-based manner the environmental contribution to schizophrenia. The paper thus promotes the salience of balance when considering the relative contributions of the environment and genetics to schizophrenia.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bentall RP. Madness explained: psychosis and human nature. London: Penguin; 2003. p. 41–66.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Freeman D, Pugh K, Antley A, et al. Virtual reality study of paranoid thinking in the general population. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192:258–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morrison AP, Wells A. Relationships between worry, psychotic experiences and emotional distress in patients with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses and comparisons with anxious and non-patient groups. Behav Res Ther. 2007;45(7):1593–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hawton K, Salkovskis PM, Kirk J, et al. The development and principles of cognitive-behavioural treatments. In: Hawton K, Salkovskis PM, Kirk J, et al., editors. Cognitive behaviour therapy for psychiatric problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989. p. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bentall RP, Kinderman P, Moutoussis M. The role of self esteem in paranoid delusions: the psychology, neurophysiology and the development of persecutory delusions. In: Freeman D, Bentall RP, Garety P, editors. Persecutory delusions: assessment, theory and treatment. Oxford University Press, www.oup.com. 2008, pp. 143–174.

  24. •• Moritz S, Burnette P, Sperber S, et al. Elucidating the black box from stress to paranoia. Schizophr Bull. 2011;37(6):1311–7. This excellent paper demonstrates convincingly within an experimental and controlled paradigm how stress interacts with cognitive vulnerability and biases to induce symptoms of paranoia. The paper thus establishes from the perspective of experimental rigor the key role of the cognitive process in the elucidation of symptoms that are associated with psychosis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tait L, Birchwood M, Trower P. Predicting engagement with services for psychosis: insight, symptoms and recovery style. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;182:123–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gumley A, Schwannauer M. Attachment theory, self-regulation and psychosis. In: Gumley A, Schwannauer M, editors. Staying well after psychosis. A cognitive interpersonal approach to recovery and relapse prevention. Wiley.com. 2006, pp. 34–46.

  27. Berry K, Barrowclough C, Wearden A. A review of the role of adult attachment style in psychosis: unexplored issues and questions for further research. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27:458–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Corcoran R, Rowse G, Moore R, et al. A transdiagnostic investigation of ‘theory of mind’ and ‘jumping to conclusions’ in patients with persecutory delusions. Psychol Med. 2008;38(11):1577–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Weinberger DA, Schwartz GE, Davidson RJ. Low-anxious, high-anxious, and repressive coping styles: psychometric patterns and behavioural and physiological responses to stress. J Abnorm Psychol. 1979;88(4):369–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Barnier AJ, Levin K, Maher A. Suppressing thoughts of past events: are repressive copers good suppressors? Cogn Emot. 2004;18(4):513–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Furnham A, Traynar J. Repression and effective coping styles. Eur J Personal. 1999;13:465–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Derakshan N, Eyesenck MW, Myers LB. Emotional information processing in repressors: the vigilance–avoidance theory. Cogn Emot. 2007;21(8):1585–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bentall RP. From cognitive studies of psychosis to cognitive-behavioural therapy for psychotic symptoms. In: Haddock G, Slade P, editors. Cognitive-behavioural interventions with psychotic disorders. London: Routledge; 1996. p. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mueser KT, Trumbetta SL, Rosenberg SD, et al. Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in severe mental illness. J Consult Clin Psych. 1998;66(3):493–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mueser KT, Rosenberg SD, Goodman LA, et al. Trauma, PTSD and the course of severe mental illness; an interactive model. Schizophr Res. 2001;53:123–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bebbington PE, Bhugra D, Brugha T, et al. Psychosis, victimisation and childhood disadvantage. Evidence from the second British National Survey of Psychiatric Morbidity. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;185:220–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Read J, Agar K, Argyle N, et al. Sexual and physical abuse during childhood and adulthood as predictors of hallucinations, delusions and thought disorder. Psychol Psychother. 2003;76:1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Health, Nursing, and Midwifery, University of the West of Scotland, University Campus Ayr, Beech Grove, Ayr, Scotland, KA8 0SR, UK

    Mick P. Fleming & Colin R. Martin

Authors
  1. Mick P. Fleming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Colin R. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin R. Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleming, M.P., Martin, C.R. From Classical Psychodynamics to Evidence Synthesis: The Motif of Repression and a Contemporary Understanding of a Key Mediatory Mechanism in Psychosis. Curr Psychiatry Rep 14, 252–258 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0260-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0260-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation