Current Osteoporosis Reports

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 27–34 | Cite as

Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: How can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

  • Gim Gee Teng
  • Jeffrey R. Curtis
  • Kenneth G. Saag


A significant gap exists between evidence-based advances and real-world clinical practice in the diagnosis and prevention of osteoporosis. The goal of osteoporosis care is to prevent fractures and improve health-related quality of life, and ideally lower mortality. Despite recent advances in osteoporosis detection and treatment options, studies suggest underdiagnosis and undertreatment of osteoporosis, even among those who have already sustained fractures. The challenges in translating knowledge into practice are multifaceted, with efforts directed at the patient, provider, and health care system levels achieving variable success at the population level. Methods to improve quality of care in osteoporosis need to be multipronged, with emphasis on clinical process improvement and reliance on interdisciplinary teams. We review the growing literature on quality of care for osteoporosis.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA: An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004, 15:897–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA, Odén A, et al.: Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2004, 15:38–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, et al.: Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22:465–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curtis JR, Carbone L, Cheng H, et al.: Longitudinal trends in use of bone mass measurement among older Americans, 1999–2005. J Bone Miner Res 2008, 23:1061–1067.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andrade SE, Majumdar SR, Chan KA, et al.: Low frequency of treatment of osteoporosis among postmenopausal women following a fracture. Arch Intern Med 2003, 163:2052–2057.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch ER, Jamal SA, Beaton DE: Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 2004, 15:767–778.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Orwoll E, et al.: Bone mineral density measurement and treatment for osteoporosis in older individuals with fractures: a gap in evidence-based practice guideline implementation. Arch Intern Med 2003, 163:2165–2172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Majumdar SR, Rowe BH, Folk D, et al.: A controlled trial to increase detection and treatment of osteoporosis in older patients with a wrist fracture. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141:366–373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gass M, Dawson-Hughes B: Preventing osteoporosis-related fractures: an overview. Am J Med 2006, 119(4 Suppl 1):S3–S11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hooven F, Gehlbach SH, Pekow P, et al.: Follow-up treatment for osteoporosis after fracture. Osteoporos Int 2005, 16:296–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Cranney A, et al.: Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2006, 35:293–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanis JA, Adams J, Borgstrom F, et al.: The cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the management of osteoporosis. Bone 2008, 42:4–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Donabedian A: Evaluating the quality of health care. Milbank Q 1966, 4:166–206.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cadarette SM, Gignac MA, Jaglal SB, et al.: Access to osteoporosis treatment is critically linked to access to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry testing. Med Care 2007, 45:896–901.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kern LM, Powe NR, Levine MA, et al.: Association between screening for osteoporosis and the incidence of hip fracture. Ann Intern Med 2005, 142:173–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    National Committee for Quality Assurance: State of Health Care Quality Report 2008. Available at Accessed October 2008.
  17. 17.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: 2008 Physician Quality Reporting Index. Available at Accessed October 2008.
  18. 18.
    O’Kane ME: Performance-based measures: the early results are in. J Manag Care Pharm 2007, 13(2 Suppl B):S3–S6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mudano A, Allison J, Hill J, et al.: Variations in glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis prevention in a managed care cohort. J Rheumatol 2001, 28:1298–1305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Solomon DH, Brookhart MA, Gandhi TK, et al.: Adherence with osteoporosis practice guidelines: a multilevel analysis of patient, physician, and practice setting characteristics. Am J Med 2004, 117:919–924.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Solomon DH, Connelly MT, Rosen CJ, et al.: Factors related to the use of bone densitometry: survey responses of 494 primary care physicians in New England. Osteoporos Int 2003, 14:123–129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feldstein AC, Schneider J, Smith DH, et al.: Harnessing stakeholder perspectives to improve the care of osteoporosis after a fracture. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19:1527–1540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harrington JT, Deal CL: Successes and failures in improving osteoporosis care after fragility fracture: results of a multiple-site clinical improvement project. Arthritis Rheum 2006, 55:724–728.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Solomon DH, Polinski JM, Truppo C, et al.: Access to bone mineral density testing in patients at risk for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2006, 17:1749–1754.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Colón-Emeric C, Lyles KW, Levine DA, et al.: Prevalence and predictors of osteoporosis treatment in nursing home residents with known osteoporosis or recent fracture. Osteoporos Int 2007, 18:553–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Allison JJ, et al.: Longitudinal patterns in the prevention of osteoporosis in glucocorticoid-treated patients. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 52:2485–2494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mikuls TR, Saag KG, George V, et al.: Racial disparities in the receipt of osteoporosis related healthcare among community-dwelling older women with arthritis and previous fracture. J Rheumatol 2005, 32:870–875.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mudano AS, Casebeer L, Patino F, et al.: Racial disparities in osteoporosis prevention in a managed care population. South Med J 2003, 96:445–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hamrick I, Whetstone LM, Cummings DM: Racial disparity in treatment of osteoporosis after diagnosis. Osteoporos Int 2006, 17:1653–1658.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G, et al.: The osteoporosis care gap in men with fragility fractures: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19:581–587.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cramer JA, Gold DT, Silverman SL, Lewiecki EM: A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2007, 18:1023–1031.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ, et al.: Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 2006, 81:1013–1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    van den Boogaard CH, Breekveldt-Postma NS, Borggreve SE, et al.: Persistent bisphosphonate use and the risk of osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice: a database analysis study. Curr Med Res Opin 2006, 22:1757–1764.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shortell SM, Rundall TG, Hsu J: Improving patient care by linking evidence-based medicine and evidence-based management. JAMA 2007, 298:673–676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bliuc D, Eisman JA, Center JR: A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006, 17:1309–1317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Polinski JM, Patrick A, Truppo C, et al.: Interactive voice response telephone calls to enhance bone mineral density testing. Am J Manag Care 2006, 12:321–325.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Solomon DH, Katz JN, Finkelstein JS, et al.: Osteoporosis improvement: a large-scale randomized controlled trial of patient and primary care physician education. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22:1808–1815.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gardner MJ, Brophy RH, Demetrakopoulos D, et al.: Interventions to improve osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture. A prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:3–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Town R, Kane R, Johnson P, Butler M: Economic incentives and physicians’ delivery of preventive care: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2005, 28:234–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Feldstein AC, Vollmer WM, Smith DH, et al.: An outreach program improved osteoporosis management after a fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007, 55:1464–1469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB: Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995, 274:700–705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Curtis JR, Westfall AO, Allison J, et al.: Challenges in improving the quality of osteoporosis care for long-term glucocorticoid users: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2007, 167:591–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Colón-Emeric CS, Lyles KW, House P, et al.: Randomized trial to improve fracture prevention in nursing home residents. Am J Med 2007, 120:886–892.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, McAlister FA, et al.: Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 2008, 178:569–575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Solomon DH, Polinski JM, Stedman M, et al.: Improving care of patients at-risk for osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2007, 22:362–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    O’Brien MA, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G, et al.: Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 (4): CD000409.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ioannidis G, Thabane L, Gafni A, et al.: Optimizing care in osteoporosis: the Canadian quality circle project. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008, 9:130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Smith DH, et al.: Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006, 54:450–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Quintos-Macasa AM, Quinet R, Spady M, et al.: Implementation of a mandatory rheumatology osteoporosis consultation in patients with low-impact hip fracture. J Clin Rheumatol 2007, 13:70–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Streeten EA, Mohamed A, Gandhi A, et al.: The inpatient consultation approach to osteoporosis treatment in patients with a fracture. Is automatic consultation needed? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88:1968–1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Harrington JT, Lease J: Osteoporosis disease management for fragility fracture patients: new understandings based on three years’ experience with an osteoporosis care service. Arthritis Rheum 2007, 57:1502–1506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ayoub WT, Newman ED, Blosky MA, et al.: Improving detection and treatment of osteoporosis: redesigning care using the electronic medical record and shared medical appointments. Osteoporos Int 2009, 20:37–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dell R, Greene D, Schelkun SR, Williams K: Osteoporosis disease management: the role of the orthopaedic surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 4):188–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Newman ED, Matzko CK, Olenginski TP, et al.: Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis Program (GIOP): a novel, comprehensive, and highly successful care program with improved outcomes at 1 year. Osteoporos Int 2006, 17:1428–1434. (Published erratum appears in Osteoporos Int 2006, 17:1706.)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Majumdar SR, Beaupre LA, Harley CH, et al.: Use of a case manager to improve osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2007, 167:2110–2115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hawker G, Ridout R, Ricupero M, et al.: The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 2003, 14:171–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kuo I, Ong C, Simmons L, et al.: Successful direct intervention for osteoporosis in patients with minimal trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int 2007, 18:1633–1639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Harrington JT, Newman ED: Redesigning the care of rheumatic diseases at the practice and system levels. Part 1: practice level process improvement (Redesign 101). Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007, 25(6 Suppl 47):55–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Newman ED, Harrington JT: Redesigning the care of rheumatic diseases at the practice and system levels. Part 2: system level process improvement (Redesign 201). Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007, 25(6 Suppl 47):64–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Medicine Group, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gim Gee Teng
  • Jeffrey R. Curtis
  • Kenneth G. Saag
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics of Musculoskeletal DisordersUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  2. 2.Division of Clinical Immunology and RheumatologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations