Skip to main content
Log in

Follow-up treatment for osteoporosis after fracture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of the management of osteoporosis in older women who have had hip or wrist fractures have found underdiagnosis and undertreatment of the disease. Few such studies have been conducted in the United States, however, and most studies have been confined to a subset of the treatments currently available to treat osteoporosis. Mail surveys were sent to 381 women between 50 and 84 years of age who had been treated for a hip or wrist fracture at a large northeast US teaching hospital between October 1, 1998, and September 30, 2000. These surveys included questions about osteoporosis risk factors and physician treatment both before and after the index fracture. Of 381 surveys mailed, 70 were returned because of an invalid address or by a relative because a patient was deceased. Of the remaining 311 surveys, 147 completed responses were received. Fifty-two percent of respondents reported having received either a prescription or a recommendation for a nonprescription medication used to treat osteoporosis before the fracture. After fracture, 60% of subjects were advised to take any osteoporosis medication, and 42% of were advised to take a prescription medication. Of women reporting no treatment advice before fracture, 33% reported treatment after. Twenty-four percent of patients reported a change in treatment after fracture versus before. No significant differences in treatment were found according to fracture history, maternal history of fracture, or maternal history of osteoporosis. Both prescription and nonprescription treatment prevalence after fracture were lower than expected, and there was only a small change in reported treatment prevalence after fracture versus before. There was also little difference in treatment prevalence based on risk factors for osteoporosis or osteoporotic fractures. A sizeable opportunity exists for intervention to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures for patients who have a history of fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anonymous (1998) Osteoporosis among estrogen-deficient women: United States, 1988–1994. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 47:969–973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper C (1997) The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on quality of life. Am J Med 103:12S-–19S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (1996) Incidence and costs to Medicare of fractures among Medicare beneficiaries aged > or = 65 years: United States, July 1991–June 1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 45:877–883

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cranney A, Tugwell P, Wells G, Guyatt G (2002) Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis, I: systematic reviews of randomized trials in osteoporosis: introduction and methodology. Endocr Rev 23:496–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanis JA, Delmas P, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D (1997) Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporos Int 7:390–406

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. NOF (2000) Physician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. National Osteoporosis Foundation, Washington, DC

  7. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC Jr (1988) Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin Invest 81:1804–1809

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC et al (1990) Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. JAMA 263:665–668

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanis JA (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int 4:368–381

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lydick E, Cook K, Turpin J, Melton M, Stine R, Byrnes C (1998) Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Am J Manag Care 4:37–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Kreiger N, McIsaac WJ, Darlington GA, Tu JV (2000) Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. CMAJ 162:1289–1294

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Melton LJ 3rd, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Wahner HW, Riggs BL (1993) Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 8:1227–1233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schroder HM, Petersen KK, Erlandsen M (1993) Occurrence and incidence of the second hip fracture. Clin Orthop 289:166–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Silman AJ (1995) The patient with fracture: the risk of subsequent fractures. Am J Med 98:12S–16S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA 3rd, Berger M (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD (1991) Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med 114:919–923

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS et al (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med 332:767–773

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burger H, de Laet CE, van Daele PL et al (1998) Risk factors for increased bone loss in an elderly population: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Epidemiol 147:871–879

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen TV, Center JR, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (2001) Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women. Am J Epidemiol 153:587–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang C, Ross PD, Wasnich RD (1998) Short-term and long-term fracture prediction by bone mass measurements: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 13:107–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Khan SA, de Geus C, Holroyd B, Russell AS (2001) Osteoporosis follow-up after wrist fractures following minor trauma. Arch Intern Med 161:1309–1312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Torgerson DJ, Dolan P (1999) Advice given to patients with fractures: drug treatments that reduce fracture rate are underused after vertebral fractures. BMJ 318:1698

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cumming RG, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR (1997) Epidemiology of hip fractures. Epidemiol Rev 19:244–257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pal B (1999) Questionnaire survey of advice given to patients with fractures. BMJ 318:500–501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cummings SR (1998) Prevention of hip fractures in older women: a population-based perspective. Osteoporos Int 8[Suppl 1]:S8–S12

    Google Scholar 

  27. Castel H, Bonneh DY, Sherf M, Liel Y (2001) Awareness of osteoporosis and compliance with management guidelines in patients with newly diagnosed low-impact fractures. Osteoporos Int 12:559–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kamel HK, Hussain MS, Tariq S, Perry HM, Morley JE (2000) Failure to diagnose and treat osteoporosis in elderly patients hospitalized with hip fracture. Am J Med 109:326–328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hajcsar EE, Hawker G, Bogoch ER (2000) Investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures. CMAJ 163:819–822

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bellantonio S, Fortinsky R, Prestwood K (2001) How well are community-living women treated for osteoporosis after hip fracture? J Am Geriatr Soc 49:1197–1204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Freedman KB, Kaplan FS, Bilker WB, Strom BL, Lowe RA (2000) Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity? J Bone Joint Surg Am 82A:1063–1070

    Google Scholar 

  32. Quam L, Ellis LB, Venus P, Clouse J, Taylor CG, Leatherman S (1993) Using claims data for epidemiologic research: the concordance of claims-based criteria with the medical record and patient survey for identifying a hypertensive population. Med Care 31:498–507

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Beers MH, Munekata M, Storrie M (1990) The accuracy of medication histories in the hospital medical records of elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 38:1183–1187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Romm FJ, Putnam SM (1981) The validity of the medical record. Med Care 19:310–315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Paganini-Hill A, Ross RK (1982) Reliability of recall of drug usage and other health-related information. Am J Epidemiol 116:114–122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gardner MJ, Flik KR, Mooar P, Lane JM (2002) Improvement in the undertreatment of osteoporosis following hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84A:1342–1348

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of the following persons in completing this study: Janet Kellogg, Ann DeRoode, Eleanor Vanetzian, and the Department of Healthcare Quality, Baystate Health Systems. Disclosure: Partial funding for this study was provided under a grant from Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick Hooven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hooven, F., Gehlbach, S.H., Pekow, P. et al. Follow-up treatment for osteoporosis after fracture. Osteoporos Int 16, 296–301 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1676-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1676-4

Keywords

Navigation