Skip to main content
Log in

Current studies in pharmacoeconomics

  • Clinical Trials Review
  • Published:
Current Hypertension Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

Although the management of hypertension has received prolonged pharmacoeconomic attention, the major questions beyond the advisability of active intervention, remain unresolved. It is still unclear whether the purported advantages of newer agents outweigh their greater treatment costs, particularly in the face of unproven effects on cardiovascular risks. The existing published analyses lack a broad perspective, either in terms of the interventions considered or of the aspects that are addressed. It is impossible, therefore, to reach any conclusion regarding the economic support for one choice of treatment over another. What little has been studied of the intensity of treatment suggest sthat more is better, but this is at present restricted to special populations or situations. Whether it will prove to be so in more general situations remains to be seen.

Studies that appropriately address realistic choices in the more difficult-to-study natural environment of actual practice are urgently needed. Until then, physicians an policy makers will be left with a puzzling, inconsistent, economic appraisal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stason WB, Weinstein MC: Allocation of resources to manage hypertension. N Engl J Med 1977, 296:732–739.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson F, Kartman B, Andersson OK, et al.: Costeffectiveness of felodipine-metoprolol (Logimax) and enalapril in the treatment of hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens 1998, 20:833–836.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Milne RJ, Vander Hoorn S, Jackson RT: A predictive model of the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of celiprolol and atenolol in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients. Pharmacoecon 1997, 2:384–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearce KA, Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Kirk J: Cost-minimization and the number needed to treat in uncomplicated hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1998, 11:618–629.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Johannesson M: The cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment in Sweden: an analysis of the criteria for intervention and the choice of drug treatment. J Hum Hypertens 1996, 10:S23-S26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aucott JN, Pelecanos E, Dombrowski R, et al.: Implementation of local guidelines for cost-effective management of hypertension: a trial of the firm system. J Gen Intern Med 1996, 11:139–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Edwards PR, Lunt DW, Fehrsen GS, et al.: Improving costeffectiveness of hypertension management at a community health centre. S Afr Med J 1998, 88:549–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes D, McGuire A: The direct costs to the NHS of discontinuing and switching prescriptions for hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 1998, 12:553–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caro, J.J. Current studies in pharmacoeconomics. Curr Hypertens Rep 1, 475–476 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-996-0018-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-996-0018-7

Keywords

Navigation