Abstract
Purpose of Review
The World Health Assembly called to eliminate viral hepatitis as a public health threat in 2016 and proposed elimination goals by 2030. This review examined current national and global progress with hepatitis B virus elimination, and the hurdles and solutions being undertaken to achieve elimination goals.
Recent Findings
Few countries are on target to achieve the elimination targets of a 95% reduction in new infections and a 65% reduction in mortality by 2030. Gaps towards elimination remain, such as low infant vaccine coverage in low-income countries and continued under-diagnosis and low rates of treatment globally.
Summary
HBV elimination is feasible but will require continued focus on infant and childhood vaccine coverage, improving blood and injection safety, increasing harm reduction measures among persons who use drugs, and providing broader access to low-cost diagnostics and antiviral treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Globally, hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major health problem, with an estimated 257.5 million people infected (3.23% of the population in 2022) and 820,000 deaths in 2019 [1•, 2]. Progress in global vaccine distribution and improved antiviral therapies have reduced the worldwide prevalence and incidence of HBV infection; however, gaps in HBV prevention and treatment remain.
The long-term sequelae of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection include cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which are the leading causes of mortality for HBV-infected individuals [3]. In 2019, HBV was the leading cause of liver cancer deaths (39.5%) and the third leading cause of cirrhosis-associated deaths (22.5%) worldwide, with age-standardized mortality rates of 1.2 and 4.03 per 100,000, respectively [4,5,6]. The burden of disease is highest in the Western Pacific, South-East Asia, and African regions, with 206,000 (37%), 169,000 (30%), and 71,000 (13%) of deaths, respectively in 2019 [6], and these regions have the highest prevalence of liver-related deaths due to cirrhosis and liver cancer [6].
In response to the substantial global health burden posed by viral hepatitis, the World Health Assembly announced in June 2016 the Global Health Sector Strategy (GHSS) to eliminate viral hepatitis as a public health treat by 2030 [7]. Their targets included the reduction of new HBV infections by 95% and deaths by 65% (or equating to ≤ 4 deaths per 100,000 people per year) by 2030 compared to baseline values in 2015 [8]. For hepatitis B, this would be achieved through increasing childhood vaccine coverage and preventing vertical transmission to reduce childhood HBsAg prevalence to ≤ 0.1% among those ≤ 5 years of age, as well as improving injection and blood safety and access to diagnosis and treatment. In May 2022, the 75th World Health Assembly released new integrated global health sector strategies on viral hepatitis for the years 2022–2030 to help meet these goals, which focused on raising awareness, increasing health equities, preventing transmission, and scaling up screening and treatment services [2].
Globally, there have been strides made in the elimination of HBV. In the United States (U.S.), the number of estimated new HBV infections in 2021 was 13,500, a 5% decrease from 2020 and a 36% decrease from 2019, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The number of deaths has remained relatively stable since 2017, with an age-adjusted death rate of 0.44 cases per 100,000 population in 2021 [8]. Globally, only four countries (Namibia, Montenegro, Ireland, and Dominica) have reached the World Health Assembly’s target of reducing deaths by 10% by 2020 with certainty, and no countries in the Western Pacific, South-East Asia, or Eastern Mediterranean regions have met the 2020 target of reducing new cases by 30% [6]. Here, we address the status of HBV elimination, barriers towards progress, and propose strategies to meet the 2030 GHHS targets.
Screening and Diagnosis
Diagnosis Rates
Hepatitis B infection is defined by the presence of HBsAg in blood [9,10,11], and the GHSS target in diagnosis is 90% by 2030. In 2019, it was estimated that 30.4 million people (10.3% of 257 million persons estimated to be living with hepatitis B) were aware of their infection, which was an increase from 2015 (22.0 million, 9%) [12••] (Table 1). Despite this, 89.7% of HBV infections remain undiagnosed.
In 2021, it was estimated that up to 2.4 million persons in the U.S. have CHB, and 50% were aware of their infection [13, 14•]. There are notable racial and ethnic differences in CHB prevalence rates, with Asians having the highest prevalence at 3.41%, compared to non-Hispanic blacks at 0.69% and non-Asian, non-Black individuals at < 0.2% [15]. Most persons with CHB in the U.S. are foreign-born, and an estimated 80% of these individuals acquired their infection from their country of birth, as demonstrated by foreign-born Asians having a higher prevalence of CHB at 3.85% compared to U.S.-born at 0.79% [14•, 15]. Of 1.47 million foreign-born individuals living with CHB in the U.S., the largest proportions emigrated from Asia (59%, 0.87 million), the Americas (19%, 0.27 million), and Africa (15%, 0.22 million) [14•].
Screening Guidelines
In the U.S., the CDC recommends HBV screening with a triple panel test (HBsAg, anti-HBc total, and anti-HBs) at least once in all adults aged 18 and older, during all pregnancies, in infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers, and anyone with ongoing risk for exposure [16••]. WHO recommends all adults be offered HBsAg testing in settings with a ≥ 2% or ≥ 5% HBsAg seroprevalence in the general population. However, this strategy of screening based on prevalence in country of origin or presence of risk factors may lead to under-screening (and missed opportunities for diagnosis) as it requires the provider to have knowledge of country prevalence rates and/or to ask a detailed risk history. To overcome this limitation and increase the rates of diagnosis, a universal one-time testing and then again if at risk may need to be considered in more countries.
Other Strategies to Improve Screening Rates
China has the highest prevalence of HBV worldwide and had a 19% diagnosis rate in 2016 [1•]. A recent study showed that implementing a five-test universal screen (serum HBsAg, HBsAb, HBeAg, HBeAb, and HBcAb) in people aged 18–70 years old was a cost-effective strategy in China, especially if implemented early, and would help China reach the WHO 2030 elimination targets [17]. In the U.S., the greatest burden of disease is among those born in endemic countries. Studies have shown that community-based and refugee clinic-based HBV testing initiatives can identify considerable numbers of persons with CHB, and resource allocation should be increased for screening and pathways to care in specific geographic areas [18, 19]. Lastly, point-of-care testing was found to be an effective option in remote or underserved areas, with > 90% sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value [20]. This may permit mass community screening events and the opportunity to both diagnose and identify vaccine-eligible individuals in the same day.
A major continued barrier to diagnosis is stigma. In a study from Australia, stigma was shown to be mostly driven by knowledge deficits about HBV and fear of infection and was demonstrated by social exclusion and limited employment opportunities [21]. Stigma can be combated through increased education and awareness on HBV infection, as demonstrated by the successful San Francisco Hep B Free Campaign which changed how HBV was perceived by Asian Americans [22]. Stigma may be reduced by including HBV testing as part of a more comprehensive health evaluation. The WHO recently emphasized the need to provide wide-ranging services for five groups at high risk for new infections: sex workers, people who inject drugs, men who have sex with men (MSM), trans and gender diverse people, and incarcerated persons [23].
Prevention of Transmission
HBV is transmitted through percutaneous or mucosal contact with contaminated blood or body fluids, such as saliva, menstrual, vaginal, and seminal fluids. The risk of chronic infection after exposure is inversely proportional to age. In adults, infection rarely results in chronic hepatitis (< 5%), but perinatal transmission is the main route of HBV transmission in areas where the virus is endemic with chronic infection developing in up to 90% [24]. Thus, global use of the hepatitis B vaccine in infants has considerably reduced the incidence of new chronic HBV infections. Taiwan launched a nationwide hepatitis B vaccination program in 1984, and after 20 years, HBsAg positivity declined by 78–87% in infants, with a 68% decline in mortality from fulminant hepatitis in infants and a 75% decrease in the incidence of HCC in children 6–9 years of age [25]. Similarly in China, HBsAg prevalence declined 52% by 2014 and 97% among children < 5 years of age after implementing a vaccine program in 1992 [26].
WHO recommends that all infants receive the hepatitis B vaccine as soon as possible after birth, preferably within 24 h, followed by 2 or 3 doses of the hepatitis B vaccine at least 4 weeks apart to complete the vaccination series. In the U.S., the CDC recommends the hepatitis B vaccine for all infants, all children or adolescents < 19 years of age who have not been vaccinated, all adults aged 19–59 years, and adults aged > 60 years with risk factors for hepatitis B infection. The new recommendation of one-time screening for all adults has been shown to be cost-effective, by increasing vaccination coverage and thereby preventing 138 cases of cirrhosis, 47 cases of decompensated cirrhosis, 90 cases of HCC, 33 liver transplants, and 163 HBV-related deaths, with a gain of 2185 quality-adjusted life years, per 100,000 adults screened [27, 28••].
Perinatal and Childhood Transmission
Perinatal and childhood transmission can be prevented through the universal immunization of infants and children. Countries that have adopted infant and childhood vaccination have seen a marked reduction in prevalent hepatitis B infections in children. In 2019, 85% of all infants had received the recommended three doses of the hepatitis B vaccine (Table 1), up from 30% in 2000, and the GHSS target of reducing HBsAg prevalence to < 1% among infants and children younger than 5 years by 2020 has been met [29]. However, there are still gaps in coverage in certain parts of the world, with the African region having the lowest percentage (32%) [6]. Challenges remain with the timely administration of the birth dose in rural countries or infants born at home, where there are no birth attendants able to give injections and difficulties with transport, cold chain capacity, and lack of adequately trained healthcare workers.
In addition to the vaccination series, infants born to mothers who are HBsAg-positive should be given hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), which can provide short-term protection to neonates after delivery. In a systematic review of the risk of vertical transmission of HBV in pregnant women with hepatitis B, the estimated transmission rates in the absence of vaccination, with vaccination alone, and with vaccination plus the HBIG birth dose were 75%, 21%, and 6% in women positive for HBeAg, respectively, and 10%, 3%, and 1% in women negative for HBeAg, respectively [30]. High maternal serum viral load is associated with prophylaxis failure in up to 10% despite provision of active and passive immunization [31]. Thus, WHO and AASLD recommend the use of antiviral therapy, specifically tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), in the third trimester for mothers with HBV viral load > 200,000 IU/mL [9, 32]. Earlier initiation of TDF therapy is recommended among women undergoing invasive procedures, such as amniocentesis [33].
The rate of perinatal transmission is reduced among those who received TDF therapy (5%) compared with those without antiviral therapy (18%) [34, 35••]. Maternal use of TDF is particularly important in scenarios where there may be delay in delivery of HBIG or HBV vaccine, especially in rural or resource-limited settings [36]. While some studies have reported adverse effects of TDF, including decreased bone mineral density and neutropenia in infants with fetal exposure to TDF [37, 38], overall the safety of TDF has been excellent. Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF), a newer prodrug of tenofovir, has been increasingly used in preventing vertical transmission and was recently endorsed as another safe treatment option for mothers and their infants [39,40,41,42].
Barriers to addressing mother-to-child transmission in the Africa region include timely administration of the hepatitis B vaccine in rural areas and availability of affordable testing. Screening may be improved with the integration of a triple rapid diagnostic test for HIV, syphilis, and hepatitis B which was shown to be both efficacious and cost-effective in Cambodia [43]. Administration of hepatitis B virus vaccination at the household level and transport outside the cold chain by trained community health workers can increase coverage, as demonstrated in rural China [44]. Additionally, studies have demonstrated that the HBV monovalent vaccine is relatively heat-stable for a limited time [45, 46], and rapid point-of-care testing can be feasible in a South African clinical setting [47]. These represent important strategies to enhancing infant vaccination rates and support countries in achieving the 2030 goal of global birth dose vaccine coverage to 90% and ≤ 0.1% HBsAg prevalence in children ≤ 5 years old.
Unsafe Injections
Approximately 16 billion injections are administered worldwide each year [48]. In response to the efforts of the Global Injection Safety Network and other injection safety campaigns, the prevalence of unsafe medical injections decreased from 39% in 2000 to 5% in 2010 [49]. However, between 2010 and 2017, 3.5% of all medical injections, or approximately 1 in 29, were potentially unsafe in low- and middle-income countries, with Pakistan, Comoros, and Afghanistan having the highest prevalences of 14.0%, 9.7%, and 9.1%, respectively [50]. In 2015, the WHO called for the worldwide use of safety-engineered syringes and to reduce the number of unnecessary syringes [48]. Multiple studies have shown that safety-engineered syringes are not only effective in reducing viral hepatitis burden, but are also cost-effective [51, 52]. Moreover, there should be further education to change patient and provider perceptions that injection medications are more effective [53] and reduce unnecessary injections by replacing commonly injected medicines with equally effective oral medications.
In many countries including the U.S., persons who use drugs (PWUD) represent an important target group for the prevention of the spread of HBV and other blood-borne pathogens. In the U.S., one in five adults aged 20–59 with a history of injection drug use (IDU) has serologic evidence of previous or ongoing HBV infection, over four times higher than the prevalence in the general population [54]. Globally, from 1990 to 2015, the mortality rate (age-adjusted per 100,000) of IDU-attributable liver cancer increased continually from 0.4 to 0.9, and from the mortality rate of IDU-attributable cirrhosis from 1.5 to 1.9 [55].
Numerous studies have demonstrated the significant impact of needle/syringe exchange programs (NSPs) and opioid agonist therapy as harm reduction strategies among PWUD, with the WHO goal to distribute 300 needles and syringes per PWUD per year by 2030 [23]. A randomized control trial emulation study in the Netherlands showed that complete participation in harm reduction programs led to a 72% decrease in the risk of HBV acquisition compared to no/partial participation [56]. NSPs can further decrease high-risk behaviors such as sharing of needles and injection drug paraphernalia after 6 months, with sustained behavior for over 2 years [57]. NSPs provide an opportunity to improve HBV vaccination rates [58, 59].
Lastly, PWUDs face many structural barriers for receiving HBV care which should be addressed, including decriminalizing drug use and possession for personal use, addressing stigma and discrimination, and increasing access to health services without making cessation of drug use a requirement for eligibility. Additionally, those engaging in chemsex or using stimulants may be at higher risk of other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and should thus have access to STIs testing, diagnosis, and treatment.
High-Risk Sexual Behaviors
HBV is efficiently transmitted via sexual contact. HBsAg or HBV DNA has been detected in body fluids and mucosal surfaces including semen, menstrual blood/vaginal discharge, saliva, feces, anal canal, rectal mucosa, and rectal mucosal lesions [60]. Sexual transmission continues to play a major role in incidental HBV in the U.S., accounting for 38.2% of acute HBV infections from 2013 to 2018 [61]. MSM and sex workers are at higher risk of HBV infection [62,63,64]. Female, transgender, and gender-diverse sex workers are more prone to transmitting HBV to clients as they are often in a poor position to negotiate safe sex because of social, economic, cultural, and legal factors.
The hepatitis B vaccination is recommended for MSM in many countries; however, gaps in vaccination remain. In a large European survey, only 56.4% reported HBV vaccination, with higher vaccination rates in countries that offer free vaccination [65]. In the Netherlands, a targeted vaccination program in outpatient or outreach locations, such as saunas and gay bars, was effective in reducing rates of acute hepatitis B [66]. With the rise of online dating platforms and mobile dating apps, there have been multiple clinical trials investigating the effectiveness of electronic health interventions at reducing HIV and STI transmission, with results showing short-term behavior change [67, 68].
Studies have shown that 54–63% of sex workers do not use condoms consistently and were approximately three times more likely to be infected with HBV, with < 5% vaccinated [62, 63, 69]. Outreach programs and awareness campaigns specifically designed for female sex workers could potentially increase condom use, HBV screening, and immunization uptake as shown in a study from India where community-led organizations of female sex workers increased consistent condom use [70]. In China, free female condoms and vaginal barrier protection appear promising in reducing unprotected sex and controlling STI transmission [71]. With more widespread use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV, tenofovir-based PrEP may further prevent incident HBV infections, as demonstrated in a study among HIV-negative MSM at a high risk, which found that those who received tenofovir-based PrEP had a decreased annual incidence of 0.77% (compared to 3.8%) and 87% reduced risk of acute HBV infection [72].
Incarceration
The prevalence of HBV infection among prisoners is higher than in the general population, reaching a prevalence of almost 25% of the prison populations in West and Central Africa, 10% in Eastern Europe Central Asia, but substantially lower in regions such as North American and Western Europe, where there is higher HBV vaccine coverage [73]. High-risk sexual behaviors, shared contaminated needles for drug injection, and tattooing are the principal routes of hepatitis transmission among prison inmates [74]. Prisons should be seen as opportunities to screen and diagnose HBV, since they bring together persons who more frequently present risk factors for viral hepatitis acquisition. In prisons, access to the health system can be offered to those who usually have little or no access to healthcare and include opportunities to promote prevention, screening, and treatment.
HBV spread can be prevented among the incarcerated by provision of HBV vaccination. Accelerated vaccination schedules, such as those that complete the three-part series within 3 weeks or 2 months, have shown promise for jail settings, particularly for inmates with short-term sentences [75,76,77]. Additionally, for the treatment of viremic persons who are at risk of transmission to others, directly observed therapy can be implemented and ensure compliance with treatment. Despite these measures, fear of stigma deters key populations from accessing prevention and treatment services in judicial settings [78]. Mathematical models have illustrated the positive epidemiological effects when these harm reduction strategies are implemented on a large scale in prisons [79].
Treatment Gaps and Potential Solutions
Substantial progress has been made in the treatment of CHB, yet achieving high coverage of treatment globally remains a formidable challenge. The WHO goal for 2030 was for 80% of eligible CHB patients to receive treatment, compared to the baseline of 8% in 2015 [3]. However, most countries are not on track to meet this target. Of the 257 million people infected with HBV worldwide in 2016, only 27 million (10.5%) were diagnosed and 4.5 million (16.7%) of those were receiving treatment [80]. In a separate study, it was estimated that the global prevalence of HBsAg in 2016 was 292 million, and of that number, only 4.8 million (5%) of the 94 million eligible for treatment were receiving antiviral therapy [81]. In China, approximately 16.1 million (19%) of those infected with CHB were diagnosed in 2019, with only 2.8 million (10%) of those receiving treatment [82].
The lack of information on the proportion of people with HBV infection who are eligible for treatment hinders the assessment of global treatment coverage. A systematic review found that while numerous studies have described people with CHB, most of them did not present data that could be used to assess eligibility in a consistent manner, as information of the presence of cirrhosis or elevated liver enzymes or level of viral replication are lacking [83]. This uncertainty regarding persons eligible for treatment makes it difficult to determine the true gaps towards reaching the global 2030 goal of 80% of eligible persons on treatment. Country-specific studies are needed to assess the number of people eligible for treatment, and subpopulations with the highest proportion should be targeted for testing and subsequent treatment if positive. In the U.S., about half of patients with CHB with private insurance did not have a complete laboratory evaluation to ascertain the need for treatment, and over one-third of treatment-eligible patients did not receive antiviral therapy [84]. Another study found that 37% in community primary care, 60% in gastroenterologist care, and 80% in hepatology care had a complete evaluation within the first 6 months of care, and about 40–60% of treatment-eligible patients were started on antiviral therapy [85•].
There are four commonly used drugs for the treatment of CHB globally: peg-interferon, entecavir (ETV), TDF, and TAF. Due to the intensive monitoring/frequent adverse events with peg-interferon, tenofovir (TDF and TAF) and ETV are recommended as the first-line treatment options for CHB by various international organizations, including WHO and AASLD [9, 86]. The current guideline recommendations on CHB treatment eligibility are shown in Table 2.
Historically, treatment rates and patient compliance were hindered by the high cost of antiviral medications; however, this barrier has been improved with recent patent expirations [87]. TDF and ETV have generic formulations and have been shown to be cost-effective in multiple countries [88,89,90]. The median price of generic tenofovir available on the international market fell by over 85%, from $208 per year of treatment in 2004 to $32 in 2016 [80]. Globally, in 2015, TDF cost $38/person-year and ETV was predicted to cost a minimum of $36/person-year [87]. However, a cost barrier related to HBV monitoring, especially for HBV DNA tests, remains and may result in missed opportunities to intervene with antiviral treatment in a timely manner. A recent study found that the currently recommended annual monitoring frequency was unlikely to be cost-effective in West Africa, and monitoring every 5 years among 15–45-year old would be more cost-effective, averting $404 per disability-adjusted life years while still substantially reducing HBV burden, averting an estimated 3258 HBV-related deaths and 89,000 disability-adjusted life years between 2020 and 2100 compared to the base-case scenario of no screening and treatment [91].
In high-income countries such as the U.S., cost is less of a barrier, but there are other challenges. First, the complexity of treatment algorithms may leave providers uncertain about whether a patient is eligible for treatment and potentially result in undertreatment. A more simplified treatment algorithm may help, and China adopted this approach in late 2022 [92]. Their new guideline recommends treatment for all HBsAg-positive patients with cirrhosis, detectable HBV DNA with elevated ALT levels, or detectable HBV DNA with age > 30 years [92]. WHO is similarly recommending expansion of treatment in any persons with CHB and clinical evidence of cirrhosis or adults with CHB who are age > 30 years with persistently abnormal ALT levels and HBV DNA > 20,000 IU/mL [86]. A U.S. expert consensus meeting designed a simplified treatment algorithm to treat all patients with cirrhosis (with detectable HBV DNA), all patients > 30 years of age and HBV DNA > 2000 IU/mL without cirrhosis, and refer to a specialist if decompensated cirrhosis is suspected or if HIV coinfection exists [93]. The AASLD guidelines are currently being updated. Application of a simplified guideline may increase the overall treatment of CHB with one U.S. study estimating an increase in treatment from 6.7 to 14.1–33.5% using simplified criteria [94]. The impact of broader treatment application on HBV-related morbidity and mortality needs to be studied. Simplified algorithms may result in the treatment of persons with CHB who will not benefit, but this risk is justifiable because current antivirals have an excellent safety record and the harms of missing the timely initiation of therapy are greater. A patient-centric approach is warranted, with consideration of potential clinical benefits (lower risks of transmission to others and lower risk of liver complications) as well as potential burdens (medication adherence) and financial burden (antivirals and monitoring).
Conclusions
Eliminating HBV infection is attainable globally. Major progress has been made, but gaps remain. Each country needs a national strategy to address its unique challenges in achieving the WHO’s HBV elimination targets to improve the HBV cascade of care (Fig. 1). In the U.S., recent changes include expanded indications for screening and vaccination, national efforts to increase awareness and reduce stigma, and consideration of expanded treatment opportunities. These provide a sense of optimism for achieving HBV elimination in the U.S. but much still needs to be accomplished in the next 7 years if we are to meet the WHO’s 2030 targets!
Abbreviations
- AASLD:
-
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
- Anti-HBs:
-
Hepatitis B surface antibody
- CDC:
-
Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- CHB:
-
Chronic hepatitis B
- ETV:
-
Entecavir
- GHSS:
-
Global Health Sector Strategy
- HBIG:
-
Hepatitis B immune globulin
- HBsAg:
-
Hepatitis B surface antigen
- HBV:
-
Hepatitis B virus
- HCC:
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- IDU:
-
Injection drug use
- MSM:
-
Men who have sex with men
- PrEP:
-
Pre-exposure prophylaxis
- PWUD:
-
Persons who use drugs
- STI:
-
Sexually transmitted infection
- TAF:
-
Tenofovir alafenamide
- TDF:
-
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
- WHO:
-
World Health Organization
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
• Razavi-Shearer D, Gamkrelidze I, Pan C, Jia J, Berg T, Gray R, et al. Global prevalence, cascade of care, and prophylaxis coverage of hepatitis B in 2022: a modelling study. Lancet GastroenterolHepatol [Internet]. 2023 Jul 27 [cited 2023 Aug 9]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468125323001978. This provides estimates of country, regional, and global prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection in 2022 and the effects of treatment and prevention on disease burden.
Global health sector strategies on, respectively, HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections for the period 2022–2030 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 7]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240053779
Global hepatitis report, 2017 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jun 22]. Available from: https://www-who-int.libproxy2.usc.edu/publications-detail-redirect/9789241565455
Lan Y, Wang H, Weng H, Xu X, Yu X, Tu H, et al. The burden of liver cirrhosis and underlying etiologies: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Hepatol Commun. 2023;7(2):e0026.
Choi S, Kim BK, Yon DK, Lee SW, Lee HG, Chang HH, et al. Global burden of primary liver cancer and its association with underlying aetiologies, sociodemographic status, and sex differences from 1990–2019: a DALY-based analysis of the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023;29(2):433–52.
Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;7(9):796–829.
Global health sector strategies on HIV, hepatitis and STIs 2016–2021 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 7]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-hiv-hepatitis-and-stis-programmes/strategies/global-health-sector-strategies-2016-2021
Interim guidance for country validation of viral hepatitis elimination [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 10]. Available from: https://www-who-int.libproxy2.usc.edu/publications-detail-redirect/9789240028395
Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology. 2018;67(4):1560–99.
Consolidated strategic information guidelines for viral hepatitis planning and tracking progress towards elimination: guidelines [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241515191
Interpretation of hepatitis B serologic test results | CDC [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/hbv/interpretationOfHepBSerologicResults.htm
•• Cui F, Blach S, Manzengo MC, Gonzalez MA, Sabry AA, Mozalevskis A, et al. Global reporting of progress towards elimination of hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;8(4):332–42. This details the global progress towards hepatitis elimination, gaps in data availability or quality, and suggests a new mechanism to monitor the progress of elimination.
Bixler D, Barker L, Lewis K, Peretz L, Teshale E. Prevalence and awareness of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: January 2017 - March 2020. Hepatol Commun. 2023;7(4):e0118.
• Wong RJ, Brosgart CL, Welch S, Block T, Chen M, Cohen C, et al. An updated assessment of chronic hepatitis B prevalence among foreign‐born persons living in the United States. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2021;74(2):607–26. This reference estimates the number of foreign-born persons with chronic hepatitis B in the United States.
Le MH, Yeo YH, Cheung R, Henry L, Lok AS, Nguyen MH. Chronic hepatitis B prevalence among foreign-born and U.S.-born adults in the United States, 1999–2016. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2020;71(2):431–43.
•• Schillie S. Prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices. MMWR Recomm Rep [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Aug 13];67. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/rr/rr6701a1.htm. These are recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and CDC regarding the prevention of HBV infection in the United States.
Su S, Wong WC, Zou Z, Cheng DD, Ong JJ, Chan P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of universal screening for chronic hepatitis B virus infection in China: an economic evaluation. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10(2):e278–87.
Beckett GA, Ramirez G, Vanderhoff A, Nichols K, Chute SM, Wyles DL, et al. Early identification and linkage to care of persons with chronic hepatitis B virus infection — three U.S. sites, 2012–2014. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(18):399–401.
Toy M, Wei B, Virdi TS, Le A, Trinh H, Li J, et al. Racial/ethnic- and county-specific prevalence of chronic hepatitis B and its burden in California. Hepatol Med Policy. 2018;5(3):6.
Sullivan RP, Davies J, Binks P, Dhurrkay RG, Gurruwiwi GG, Bukulatjpi SM, et al. Point of care and oral fluid hepatitis B testing in remote Indigenous communities of northern Australia. J Viral Hepat. 2020;27(4):407–14.
Jin D, Brener L, Treloar C. Hepatitis B-related stigma among Chinese immigrants living with hepatitis B virus in Australia: a qualitative study. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(6):e5602–11.
Yoo GJ, Fang T, Zola J, Dariotis WM. Destigmatizing hepatitis B in the Asian American community: lessons learned from the San Francisco Hep B Free Campaign. J Cancer Educ Off J Am Assoc Cancer Educ. 2012;27(1):138.
Consolidated guidelines on HIV, viral hepatitis and STI for key populations - 2022 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 14]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240052390
Lanini S, Ustianowski A, Pisapia R, Zumla A, Ippolito G. Viral hepatitis: etiology, epidemiology, transmission, diagnostics, treatment, and prevention. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2019;33(4):1045–62.
Chien YC, Jan CF, Kuo HS, Chen CJ. Nationwide hepatitis B vaccination program in Taiwan: effectiveness in the 20 years after it was launched. Epidemiol Rev. 2006;28(1):126–35.
Cui F, Shen L, Li L, Wang H, Wang F, Bi S, et al. Prevention of chronic hepatitis B after 3 decades of escalating vaccination policy, China - Volume 23, Number 5—May 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC. [cited 2023 Sep 10]; Available from: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/23/5/16-1477_article
Hutton DW, Toy M, Salomon JA, Conners EE, Nelson NP, Harris AM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis B testing and vaccination of adults seeking care for sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2022;49(7):517–25.
•• Weng MK, Doshani M, Khan MA, Frey S, Ault K, Moore KL, et al. Universal hepatitis B vaccination in adults aged 19–59 years: updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, 2022. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(13):477–83. This provides the updated Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations on hepatitis B vaccination, which expands the indicated age range for universal HepB vaccination to now include adults aged 19–59 years.
Global progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2021 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 7]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240027077
Funk AL, Lu Y, Yoshida K, Zhao T, Boucheron P, van Holten J, et al. Efficacy and safety of antiviral prophylaxis during pregnancy to prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):70–84.
Dionne-Odom J, Cozzi GD, Franco RA, Njei B, Tita ATN. Treatment and prevention of viral hepatitis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(3):335–46.
Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus: guidelines on antiviral prophylaxis in pregnancy [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2023 Aug 13]. (WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK561127/
Terrault NA, Levy MT, Cheung KW, Jourdain G. Viral hepatitis and pregnancy. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(2):117–30.
Jourdain G, Ngo-Giang-Huong N, Harrison L, Decker L, Khamduang W, Tierney C, et al. Tenofovir versus placebo to prevent perinatal transmission of hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(10):911–23.
•• Pan CQ, Duan Z, Dai E, Zhang S, Han G, Wang Y, et al. Tenofovir to prevent hepatitis B transmission in mothers with high viral load. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(24):2324–34. This landmark study evaluated the use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate during pregnancy for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV).
Bierhoff M, Rijken MJ, Yotyingaphiram W, Pimanpanarak M, van Vugt M, Angkurawaranon C, et al. Tenofovir for prevention of mother to child transmission of hepatitis B in migrant women in a resource-limited setting on the Thailand-Myanmar border: a commentary on challenges of implementation. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19(1):156.
Siberry GK, Jacobson DL, Kalkwarf HJ, Wu JW, DiMeglio LA, Yogev R, et al. Lower newborn bone mineral content associated with maternal use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate during pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2015;61(6):996–1003.
Seidel V, Weizsäcker K, Henrich W, Rancourt RC, Bührer C, Krüger R, et al. Safety of tenofovir during pregnancy: early growth outcomes and hematologic side effects in HIV-exposed uninfected infants. Eur J Pediatr. 2020;179(1):99–109.
Li B, Liu Z, Liu X, Liu D, Duan M, Gu Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate in preventing HBV vertical transmission of high maternal viral load. Hepatol Int. 2021;15(5):1103–8.
Zeng QL, Zhang HX, Zhang JY, Huang S, Li WZ, Li GM, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide for pregnant Chinese women with active chronic hepatitis B: a multicenter prospective study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2022;20(12):2826-2837.e9.
Chen R, Zou J, Long L, Huang H, Zhang M, Fan X, et al. Safety and efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate in early-middle pregnancy for mothers with chronic hepatitis B. Front Med. 2022;17(8):796901.
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org, Badell ML, Prabhu M, Dionne J, Tita ATN, Silverman NS, et al. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #69: Hepatitis B in pregnancy: updated guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;S0002–9378(23)02173–7.
Zhang L, Tao Y, Woodring J, Rattana K, Sovannarith S, Rathavy T, et al. Integrated approach for triple elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, hepatitis B and syphilis is highly effective and cost-effective: an economic evaluation. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(4):1327–39.
Wang L, Li J, Chen H, Li F, Armstrong GL, Nelson C, et al. Hepatitis B vaccination of newborn infants in rural China: evaluation of a village-based, out-of-cold-chain delivery strategy. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(9):688–94.
Kolwaite AR, Xeuatvongsa A, Ramirez-Gonzalez A, Wannemuehler K, Vongxay V, Vilayvone V, et al. Hepatitis B vaccine stored outside the cold chain setting: a pilot study in rural Lao PDR. Vaccine. 2016;34(28):3324–30.
Scott N, Palmer A, Morgan C, Lesi O, Spearman CW, Sonderup M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the controlled temperature chain for the hepatitis B virus birth dose vaccine in various global settings: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(6):e659–67.
Chotun N, Preiser W, van Rensburg CJ, Fernandez P, Theron GB, Glebe D, et al. Point-of-care screening for hepatitis B virus infection in pregnant women at an antenatal clinic: a South African experience. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0181267.
World Health Organization. WHO guideline on the use of safety-engineered syringes for intramuscular, intradermal and subcutaneous injections in health care settings [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2023 Aug 16]. 49 p. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/250144
Pépin J, Abou Chakra CN, Pépin E, Nault V, Valiquette L. Evolution of the global burden of viral infections from unsafe medical injections, 2000–2010. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e99677.
Adewuyi EO, Auta A. Medical injection and access to sterile injection equipment in low- and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys (2010–2017). Int Health. 2019;12(5):388–94.
Bahuguna P, Prinja S, Lahariya C, Dhiman RK, Kumar MP, Sharma V, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of therapeutic use of safety-engineered syringes in healthcare facilities in India. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020;18(3):393–411.
Mostafa A, El-Sayed MH, El Kassas M, Elhamamsy M, Elsisi GH. Safety-engineered syringes: an intervention to decrease hepatitis C burden in developing countries-a cost-effectiveness analysis from Egypt. Value Health Reg Issues. 2019;19:51–8.
Gore C, Lazarus JV, Peck RJJ, Sperle I, Safreed-Harmon K. Unnecessary injecting of medicines is still a major public health challenge globally. Trop Med Int Health TM IH. 2013;18(9):1157–9.
Shing JZ, Ly KN, Xing J, Teshale EH, Jiles RB. Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection among US adults aged 20–59 years with a history of injection drug use: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2016. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2020;70(12):2619–27.
Yang J, Zhang Y, Luo L, Meng R, Yu C. Global mortality burden of cirrhosis and liver cancer attributable to injection drug use, 1990–2016: an age-period-cohort and spatial autocorrelation analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(1):170.
van Santen DK, Boyd A, Matser A, Maher L, Hickman M, Lodi S, et al. The effect of needle and syringe program and opioid agonist therapy on the risk of HIV, hepatitis B and C virus infection for people who inject drugs in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: findings from an emulated target trial. Addict Abingdon Engl. 2021;116(11):3115–26.
Kåberg M, Karlsson N, Discacciati A, Widgren K, Weiland O, Ekström AM, et al. Significant decrease in injection risk behaviours among participants in a needle exchange programme. Infect Dis. 2020;52(5):336–46.
AlankoBlomé M, Björkman P, Flamholc L, Jacobsson H, Widell A. Vaccination against hepatitis B virus among people who inject drugs – a 20year experience from a Swedish needle exchange program. Vaccine. 2017;35(1):84–90.
Bowman S, Grau LE, Singer M, Scott G, Heimer R. Factors associated with hepatitis B vaccine series completion in a randomized trial for injection drug users reached through syringe exchange programs in three US cities. BMC Public Health. 2014;9(14):820.
Lloyd AR, Franco RA. Sexual transmission of viral hepatitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2023;37(2):335–49.
Roberts H, Jiles R, Harris AM, Gupta N, Teshale E. Incidence and prevalence of sexually transmitted hepatitis B, United States, 2013–2018. Sex Transm Dis. 2021;48(4):305–9.
Daka D, Hailemeskel G, Fenta DA. Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection and associated factors among female sex workers using respondent-driven sampling in Hawassa City, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Microbiol. 2022;31(22):37.
Bitty-Anderson AM, Ferré V, Gbeasor-Komlanvi FA, Tchankoni MK, Sadio A, Salou M, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis B and C among female sex workers in Togo, West Africa. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(12):e0259891.
Motta-Castro ARC, Kerr L, Kendall C, Mota RS, Guimarães MDC, Leal AF, et al. Hepatitis B prevalence among men who have sex with men in Brazil. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023;8(4):218.
Brandl M, Schmidt AJ, Marcus U, an der Heiden M, Dudareva S. Are men who have sex with men in Europe protected from hepatitis B? Epidemiol Infect. 2020;148: e27.
van Rijckevorsel G, Whelan J, Kretzschmar M, Siedenburg E, Sonder G, Geskus R, et al. Targeted vaccination programme successful in reducing acute hepatitis B in men having sex with men in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. J Hepatol. 2013;59(6):1177–83.
Nguyen LH, Tran BX, Rocha LEC, Nguyen HLT, Yang C, Latkin CA, et al. A systematic review of eHealth interventions addressing HIV/STI prevention among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(9):2253–72.
Nourimand F, Keramat A, Sayahi M, Bozorgian L, Hashempour Z. A systematic review of eHealth modes in preventing sexually transmitted infections. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS. 2022;43(2):117–27.
Hongjaisee S, Khamduang W, Sripan P, Choyrum S, Thepbundit V, Ngo-Giang-Huong N, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with hepatitis B and D virus infections among migrant sex workers in Chiangmai, Thailand: a cross-sectional study in 2019. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;1(100):247–54.
Mahapatra B, Walia M, Patel SK, Battala M, Mukherjee S, Patel P, et al. Sustaining consistent condom use among female sex workers by addressing their vulnerabilities and strengthening community-led organizations in India. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7):e0235094.
Zhang H, Hsieh E, Wang L, Liao S. HIV/AIDS Among Female Sex Workers in China: Epidemiology and Recent Prevention Strategies. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020;17(2):151–60.
Mizushima D, Takano M, Aoki T, Ando N, Uemura H, Yanagawa Y, et al. Effect of tenofovir-based HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis against HBV infection in men who have sex with men. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2023;77(6):2084–92.
Dolan K, Wirtz AL, Moazen B, Ndeffo-Mbah M, Galvani A, Kinner SA, et al. Global burden of HIV, viral hepatitis, and tuberculosis in prisoners and detainees. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016;388(10049):1089–102.
Pashangzadeh S, SeyedAlinaghi S, Dadras O, Pashaei Z, Soleymanzadeh M, Barzegary A, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis in prisoners: a systematic review of current evidence. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2022;22(8):61–72.
Christensen PB, Fisker N, Krarup HB, Liebert E, Jaroslavtsev N, Christensen K, et al. Hepatitis B vaccination in prison with a 3-week schedule is more efficient than the standard 6-month schedule. Vaccine. 2004;22(29–30):3897–901.
Stasi C, Monnini M, Cellesi V, Salvadori M, Marri D, Ameglio M, et al. Screening for hepatitis B virus and accelerated vaccination schedule in prison: a pilot multicenter study. Vaccine. 2019;37(11):1412–7.
Costumbrado J, Stirland A, Cox G, El-Amin AN, Miranda A, Carter A, et al. Implementation of a hepatitis A/B vaccination program using an accelerated schedule among high-risk inmates, Los Angeles County Jail, 2007–2010. Vaccine. 2012;30(48):6878–82.
Wirtz AL, Yeh PT, Flath NL, Beyrer C, Dolan K. HIV and viral hepatitis among imprisoned key populations. Epidemiol Rev. 2018;40(1):12–26.
Scott N, McBryde E, Kirwan A, Stoové M. Modelling the impact of condom distribution on the incidence and prevalence of sexually transmitted infections in an adult male prison system. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0144869.
Hutin Y, Nasrullah M, Easterbrook P, Nguimfack BD, Burrone E, Averhoff F, et al. Access to treatment for hepatitis B virus infection — worldwide, 2016. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(28):773–7.
Razavi-Shearer D, Gamkrelidze I, Nguyen MH, Chen DS, Van Damme P, Abbas Z, et al. Global prevalence, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in 2016: a modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(6):383–403.
Liu J, Liang W, Jing W, Liu M. Countdown to 2030: eliminating hepatitis B disease. China Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(3):230–8.
Tan M, Bhadoria AS, Cui F, Tan A, Van Holten J, Easterbrook P, et al. Estimating the proportion of people with chronic hepatitis B virus infection eligible for hepatitis B antiviral treatment worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;6(2):106–19.
Ye Q, Kam LY, Yeo YH, Dang N, Huang DQ, Cheung R, et al. Substantial gaps in evaluation and treatment of patients with hepatitis B in the US. J Hepatol. 2022;76(1):63–74.
• Nguyen VH, Le AK, Trinh HN, Chung M, Johnson T, Wong C, et al. Poor adherence to guidelines for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection at primary care and referral practices. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2019;17(5):957-967.e7. This reference assesses rates of treatment evaluation and initiation in patients with chronic HBV infection from different practice settings in the U.S.
Guidelines for the prevention, care and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B infection [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 22]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241549059
Hill A, Gotham D, Cooke G, Bhagani S, Andrieux-Meyer I, Cohn J, et al. Analysis of minimum target prices for production of entecavir to treat hepatitis B in high- and low-income countries. J Virus Erad. 2015;1(2):103–10.
Dakin H, Bentley A, Dusheiko G. Cost-utility analysis of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2010;13(8):922–33.
Dakin H, Sherman M, Fung S, Fidler C, Bentley A. Cost effectiveness of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B from a Canadian public payer perspective. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011;29(12):1075–91.
Ke W, Zhang C, Liu L, Gao Y, Yao Z, Ye X, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for treatment of chronic hepatitis B in China. Hepatol Int. 2016;10(6):924–36.
Schmit N, Nayagam S, Lemoine M, Ndow G, Shimakawa Y, Thursz MR, et al. Cost-effectiveness of different monitoring strategies in a screening and treatment programme for hepatitis B in the Gambia. J Glob Health. 2023;20(13):04004.
Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B (version 2022). Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi Zhonghua Ganzangbing Zazhi Chin J Hepatol. 2022;30(12):1309–31.
Dieterich D, Graham C, Wang S, Kwo P, Lim YS, Liu CJ, et al. It is time for a simplified approach to hepatitis B elimination. Gastro Hep Adv. 2023;2(2):209–18.
Wong RJ, Kaufman HW, Niles JK, Kapoor H, Gish RG. Simplifying treatment criteria in chronic hepatitis B: reducing barriers to elimination. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2023;76(3):e791-800.
Funding
Open access funding provided by SCELC, Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MX and NT wrote the main manuscript text and prepared all figures and tables. All authors have reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Terrault has received institutional grant support from Gilead Sciences, GSK, Eiger Pharmaceuticals.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, M., Terrault, N.A. Hepatitis B Virus Elimination Strategies. Curr Hepatology Rep 23, 268–277 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11901-024-00658-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11901-024-00658-3